Skip to content

Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Versus Saline Solution

Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis. Platelet Rich Plasma vs. Steroid vs. Saline Solution

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01109446
Enrollment
60
Registered
2010-04-23
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2012-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylitis

Keywords

Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow, Epicondylitis Lateralis

Brief summary

We wish to address the efficacy and safety of Platelet Rich Plasma (blood platelets), a new treatment for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) and compare this new treatment to either injection with steroid or saline solution. All injections are guided by ultrasonography.

Detailed description

Plate Rich Plasma (PRP) is a new treatment for tendinopathy. A high concentration of blood platelets is made from the patients own blod, and then injected into the tendon. The idea is that the complex mixture of growth factors within the platelets can stimulate the healing process of the tendon. We want to address the efficacy and safety of this new treatment and compare it to either the best documented treatment, Steroid injection, or to a saline solution. We want to make a randomized controlled trial with 60 participants, 20 in each of the 3 groups, and a 12 months follow up. All injections are guided by ultrasonography.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPlatelet Rich Plasma

27ml of autologous whole blood added to 3ml of ACD-A (Citrate Anticoagulant). After separation of the platelets, a high concentration of platelets (3-4ml Platelet Rich Plasma) is injected into the tendon through 7 perforations of the tendon, guided by ultrasound.

PROCEDUREIsotonic Saline Solutions

3ml of Isotonic Saline Solution is injected into the tendon through 7 perforations of the tendon, guided by ultrasound.

DRUGTriamcinolonacetonid

Triamcinolonacetonid 40mg/ml. 40mg of Triamcinolonacetonid is mixed with 2ml of Lidocaine 10mg/ml. It is injected deep into the tendon, guided by ultrasound.

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Duration of tennis elbow \> 6 months * Doppler activity on ultrasonography * Lateral elbow pain that is maximal over the lateral epicondyle, and increases with pressure on the lateral epicondyle, and resisted dorsiflexion and/or middle finger.

Exclusion criteria

* Inflammatory disease. * Fibromyalgia. * Pain in hand or shoulder/neck in the same arm as being treated. * Anticoagulation treatment. * Wounds around the elbow. * Treatment with steroids within the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in pain as a continuous outcome measure. Using The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionaire.first day, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months.We use the PRTEE questionaire, which is validated for tennis elbow.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional DisabilityFirst day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsWe use the PRTEE questionaire, validated for tennis elbow.
Ultrasonographic changesfirst day, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsWe meassure ultrasonographic changes in: tendon thickness and doppler activity.
Adverse eventsthrough out the entire 12 monthsThe number of adverse events leading to withdrawal
Pain induced by the treatment1 months after treatmentA numeric scale 0-10 adressing if the treatment caused any aditional pain, and the duration: \<1 week, 1-2 week, 3-4 weeks, \> 4 weeks.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026