Skip to content

Static Implant Versus Dynamic Implant in the Surgical Treatment on Ankle Syndesmosis Rupture

Prospective Randomized Multicentric Trial Comparing a Static Implant and a Dynamic Implant in the Surgical Treatment of Ankle Syndesmosis Rupture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01109303
Enrollment
70
Registered
2010-04-23
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Syndesmosis Rupture

Keywords

ankle fracture with syndesmotic ligament rupture, ankle syndesmosis rupture

Brief summary

Ankle fracture is frequent and its number is increasing. In Canada, surgical treatment of these lesions is advised and the options currently used all have in common a rigid fixation of the syndesmosis which results in residual stiffness and a high level of secondary surgery, mostly to remove the implant. The purpose of the study is to compare the treatment of ankle syndesmotic rupture by a dynamic fixation to a static fixation suggesting that the dynamic fixation method will improve the Olerud-Molander functional score of more than 15 points at the 3 months follow-up.

Interventions

PROCEDURETightRope System- Arthrex® / Dynamic Implant

Patients are operated on using a dynamic implant, the TightRope System by Arthrex®. The ankle is immobilized in a plaster boot for 6 weeks.

PROCEDUREScrew fixation - Synthes® / Static Implant

Patients are operated on using a static implant, the rigid four-cortices 3,5 mm screw fixation by Synthes®. The ankle is immobilized in a plaster boot for 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Arthrex, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hopital de l'Enfant-Jesus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* men or women ≥ 18 years-old; * ankle fracture type 44-C (AO classification) with an AP, lateral and mortise X-ray views of the ankle and an AP and lateral X-ray views of the leg; * open fractures (Gustilo I-IIIb) or closed; * trauma-surgery delay of less than 7 days; * consent form signed.

Exclusion criteria

* ankle fractures without syndesmotic lesion; * fracture associated with neuro-vascular lesions (Gustillo IIIc); * pathologic fracture; * fracture in a polytraumatized patient; * fracture of a bone in the ipsilateral leg; * men or women \> 65 years-old; * chronic cardiac insufficiency (ejection fraction \< 30%); * lower leg chronic venous insufficiency; * neuro-arthropathic foot (Charcot, diabetes, etc…); * body mass index ≥ 40; * past medical history of fracture of the same ankle; * medical conditions too serious for a surgery; * men or women unfit to consent; * any other conditions that make the examinator thinks that the follow up would be problematic.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Olerud-Molander score3 months after surgeryThe Olerud-Molander scoring scale was chosen because it adequately represents the ankle performance following surgery (trauma or elective basis). It comprises nine functional parameters which are concerned with primary complaints, the ability to perform simple tasks and the everyday life activities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological loss of reduction2 weeks after surgeryAdequate reduction of the syndesmosis is evaluated on a simple X-ray in the anteroposterior (AP) and mortise views; the clear space is the distance between the medial side of fibula and the incisural surface of tibia (1 cm above tibial pilon) and cannot be more than 6 mm. Rate of loss of reduction and the range of this loss over 6 mm will be calculated in each group.
Implant failureone year after surgeryRate of implant failure (with or without a second surgery for removal) will be measured in each group.
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score of hindfoot12 weeks after surgeryAn evaluation of the function (7 criteria), alignment (1 criteria) and pain (1 criteria), for a maximum of 100 points on the AOFAS scale.
AOFAS score of hindfoot6 months after surgeryAn evaluation of the function (7 criteria), alignment (1 criteria) and pain (1 criteria), for a maximum of 100 points on the AOFAS scale.
Return to professional activities3 months after surgeryThis measure will be determined in days after surgery, for rate of 50% and 100% of the usual work load.
Rate of secondary surgerywithin one year following surgeryTo measure the rate of secondary surgery due to infection or implant removal. Every secondary surgery during the following year counts, even for the same patient.
Pain on VAS12 weeks after surgeryPain is described with the VAS, which ranges from 1 to 10.
Range of motion12 weeks after surgeryWith a goniometer, a measure of the dorsal flexion (normal value 20°) and plantar flexion (40°) will be taken. Inversion and eversion will be measured according to this scale: + = weak ; ++ = middle ; +++ = complete.
Muscular trophicity measure of the leg12 weeks after surgeryThis measure is taken with a metric band 15 cm under the inferior patellar pole and must be compared to normal side. It is defined in cm with a precision of 0.5 cm. A ratio injured side/normal side will be calculated.
Ankle circumference measure12 weeks after surgeryThis measure is taken with a metric band at the bimalleolar level and must be compared to normal side. It is defined in cm with a precision of 0.5 cm. A ratio injured side/normal side will be calculated.
Pain on visual analog scale (VAS)12 weeks after surgeryPain is described with the VAS, which ranges from 1 to 10.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026