Skip to content

A Comprehensive Care Programme for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A Comprehensive Care Programme for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01108835
Enrollment
180
Registered
2010-04-22
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2017-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

COPD, Comprehensive care

Brief summary

Objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease with significant morbidity and incurs heavy utilization of healthcare resources. The direct cost of hospital admissions related to COPD is the single largest source of expenditure in the public hospital system. This study aims to assess whether a comprehensive care programme can decrease the rate of hospital admissions for COPD patients.

Detailed description

Design: A randomised controlled trial of patients discharged from hospital after an episode of acute exacerbation of COPD. Patients will be randomised to the intervention arm or usual care group. Setting: Tertiary University affiliated Hospital. Interventions: The Intervention group will receive a comprehensive programme which involves inputs from doctors, respiratory nurses and physiotherapists, providing an individualized care plan for each subject. The components in the programme will include optimization of medications, specialist physician follow up, nursing support in education, and physiotherapist support for pulmonary rehabilitation. Patients in the intervention group will also receive monthly telephone calls by a respiratory nurse for a period of 1 year to assess their conditions and answer their queries. Patients will also be followed up in the respiratory clinic by respiratory specialist once every 3 months for 1 year. The control group will be managed as the usual care. The discharging physician will determine the patients' medication and follow up as in normal practice. All patients will be asked to return for assessments (spirometry, 6 minute walk test, questionnaires on the severity of dyspnoea and quality of life) at baseline and 12 months Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint is the hospital readmission rate and the secondary endpoints are the quality of life, mortality, lung function and exercise capacity of the patients.

Interventions

OTHERComprehensive care programme

Intervention group: * Patients will be interviewed by a respiratory nurse and given education in 1-2 sessions * Physiotherapist assessment and training (individualized physical training programme to perform at home or a short course out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation) * Respiratory physician assessment and optimization of treatment * Patients will also be taught about a personalized action plan by the physician and respiratory nurse. * Subsequent intervention: Patients will receive monthly telephone calls by a respiratory nurse for a period of 1 year to assess their conditions and also answer their queries.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are admitted to the Prince of Wales Hospital with AECOPD will be screened for this study. * Patients with age over 40 years

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with asthma * Patients unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Readmission12 monthsTo investigate the effectiveness of a comprehensive care programme in reducing hospital admission in COPD patients who have been discharged from hospital for an episode of AECOPD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life12 monthsMeasured by change in St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score from baseline to 12 month. SGRQ total score ranged from 0-100. The change was calculated by the 12 month SGRQ total score minus the baseline value. Negative values indicated improvement in quality of life.
Mortality12 monthsFrom contacting the patient/their family and hospital record retrieval.
Lung Function12 monthsMeasurement of change of spirometry (FEV1 % predicted) from baseline to 12 month. The range is from 0% to 100%. The change was calculated by 12 month value minus the baseline value. Positive value indicated improvement in lung function.
Exercise Capacity12 monthExercise capacity was measured by change in 6 minutes walk test distance from baseline to 12 month. 6 minute walk test is the distance that the patient can walk over 6 minutes and it can range to 0 meters to few hundred meters. This was calculated by the 12 month 6 minutes walk test distance minus that of the baseline. Positive values indicated improvement in exercise capacity.

Countries

Hong Kong

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Comprehensive Care
Comprehensive care Comprehensive care programme: Intervention group: * Patients will be interviewed by a respiratory nurse and given education in 1-2 sessions * Physiotherapist assessment and training (individualized physical training programme to perform at home or a short course out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation) * Respiratory physician assessment and optimization of treatment * Patients will also be taught about a personalized action plan by the physician and respiratory nurse. * Subsequent intervention: Patients will receive monthly telephone calls by a respiratory nurse for a period of 1 year to assess their conditions and also answer their queries.
90
Control Group
Control arm with usual care
90
Total180

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicComprehensive CareControl GroupTotal
Age, Customized
Age (years)
74.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
74.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
74.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
90 Participants90 Participants180 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
90 participants90 participants180 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants87 Participants172 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 900 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 900 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Hospital Readmission

To investigate the effectiveness of a comprehensive care programme in reducing hospital admission in COPD patients who have been discharged from hospital for an episode of AECOPD.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comprehensive CareHospital Readmission1.12 hospital readmissionsStandard Deviation 1.69
Control GroupHospital Readmission1.7 hospital readmissionsStandard Deviation 1.65
Secondary

Exercise Capacity

Exercise capacity was measured by change in 6 minutes walk test distance from baseline to 12 month. 6 minute walk test is the distance that the patient can walk over 6 minutes and it can range to 0 meters to few hundred meters. This was calculated by the 12 month 6 minutes walk test distance minus that of the baseline. Positive values indicated improvement in exercise capacity.

Time frame: 12 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comprehensive CareExercise Capacity-10.0 metersStandard Deviation 61.2
Control GroupExercise Capacity-22.5 metersStandard Deviation 71.4
Secondary

Lung Function

Measurement of change of spirometry (FEV1 % predicted) from baseline to 12 month. The range is from 0% to 100%. The change was calculated by 12 month value minus the baseline value. Positive value indicated improvement in lung function.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Percentage of predicted FEV1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comprehensive CareLung Function0.8 Percentage of Predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.8
Control GroupLung Function-0.5 Percentage of Predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.5
Secondary

Mortality

From contacting the patient/their family and hospital record retrieval.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Comprehensive CareMortality10 participants
Control GroupMortality12 participants
Secondary

Quality of Life

Measured by change in St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score from baseline to 12 month. SGRQ total score ranged from 0-100. The change was calculated by the 12 month SGRQ total score minus the baseline value. Negative values indicated improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comprehensive CareQuality of Life-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Control GroupQuality of Life-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026