Skip to content

Evaluation of the Treatment With Klacid®SR in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Evaluation of the Treatment With Klacid SR in Patients With Acute Tracheitis, Tracheobronchitis and Bronchitis, Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Bronchitis or Mild Community-acquired Bronchopneumonia in Common Clinical Practice in the Slovak Republic

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01108185
Enrollment
3181
Registered
2010-04-21
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2011-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchitis, Chronic Bronchitis, Community-acquired Pneumonia, Tracheitis, Tracheobronchitis

Keywords

treatment with Klacid®SR, tracheitis, tracheobronchitis, bronchitis, chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia

Brief summary

The aim of this post-marketing observational study (PMOS) is to describe the relief of symptoms, tolerability and compliance of treatment with Klacid®SR in a dose 1000 mg once daily in patients with lower respiratory tract infection or in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) or mild community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Detailed description

This PMOS will be conducted in a prospective, open-label, single-country, multicenter format. The investigational sites will be consulting rooms of GPs (general practitioner), pneumologists and centers with experience in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infection, AECB (acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis) and CAP (mild community-acquired pneumonia). Since this will be a PMOS, Klacid®SR will be prescribed in usual manner in accordance with the terms of the local market authorization with regards to dose, population and indication as well as local guidelines. The decision to prescribe or not prescribe Klacid®SR would be taken prior to entry of a subject in the study. Follow-up of patients should enable two patient visits during this period. Screening/Inclusion Visit will be performed when the decision to start the treatment with Klacid®SR is made. Inclusion of patient in the study will succeed at day 0 (S/I Visit). The Second Visit will follow 10 - 16 days after the Screening/Inclusion Visit.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Abbott
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men, women at least 18 years old * with acute tracheitis, * acute tracheobronchitis, * acute bronchitis, * mild community-acquired pneumonia or * acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known hypersensitivity to macrolide antibiotics * Patients with documented renal impairment (creatinine clearance under 30 ml/min). * Patients with documented liver parenchyma impairment (AST, ALT and GMT \> 3x higher level in comparison with the norm) * Concomitant therapy with the following drugs: astemizole, cisapride, colchicine, pimozide, terfenadine and ergotamine or dihydroergotamine * Pregnancy * Breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)Day 10 - 16Compliance was assessed by asking physicians if participants took their medication as directed and if not, the reason for noncompliance. The number of participants that completed their course of therapy or did not complete due to noncompliance is reported.
The Tolerability of Klacid SR Will be Assessed by Evaluation of Adverse EventsDay 0 through Days 10 - 16The number of participants experiencing adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to study discontinuation are summarized. See Reported Adverse Events for additional details.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body TemperatureDay 0Body temperature was measured at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). Increased body temperature was defined as body temperature greater than or equal to 37 degrees Celsius/98.6 Fahrenheit. The percentage of participants with increased or normal body temperature at Day 0 (Baseline) is summarized.
Cough and Its CharacterDay 0Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The presence of cough and the type of cough (productive or irritating) was determined by the treating physician based on clinical judgment. The number of participants with each type of cough or no cough at Baseline is presented.
DyspnoeaDay 0Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The treating physicians used their clinical judgment to determine the presence of dyspnoea (difficulty breathing) and whether it occurred while resting or after exertion. The number of participants with each type of dyspnoea or with no dyspnoea at Baseline is presented.
AuscultationDay 0Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The treating physician used their clinical judgment to determine the presence of abnormal breathing sounds such as wheezing or crackles using auscultation (listening for sounds within the body, usually with a stethoscope in the chest, neck or abdomen). The number of participants with each type of breath sound at Baseline is summarized.

Countries

Slovakia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acute Respiratory Infections
Slovak participants with lower respiratory tract infection or patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) or mild community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) prescribed Klacid SR 1000 mg once daily.
3,181
Total3,181

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyNon-compliance15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAcute Respiratory Infections
Age, Customized
20 to 29 years
411 participants
Age, Customized
30 to 39 years
873 participants
Age, Customized
40 to 49 years
787 participants
Age, Customized
50 to 59 years
538 participants
Age, Customized
60 to 69 years
331 participants
Age, Customized
70 to 79 years
130 participants
Age, Customized
80 years or older
50 participants
Age, Customized
Age not reported
11 participants
Age, Customized
Less than 20 years
50 participants
Diagnosis
Acute bronchitis
921 Participants
Diagnosis
Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis
281 Participants
Diagnosis
Acute tracheitis
870 Participants
Diagnosis
Acute tracheobronchitis
926 Participants
Diagnosis
Mild community-acquired bronchopneumonia
183 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
3181 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
NA Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
NA Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 3,181
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3,181

Outcome results

Primary

Compliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)

Compliance was assessed by asking physicians if participants took their medication as directed and if not, the reason for noncompliance. The number of participants that completed their course of therapy or did not complete due to noncompliance is reported.

Time frame: Day 10 - 16

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCompliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)>Participant felt better2 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCompliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)Completed course of therapy3154 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCompliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)Did not complete (lost to follow-up)12 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCompliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)Did not complete (noncompliance)15 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCompliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)>Diarrhea1 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCompliance (Was the Dosage Followed - Yes, no)>Reason not reported12 Participants
Primary

The Tolerability of Klacid SR Will be Assessed by Evaluation of Adverse Events

The number of participants experiencing adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to study discontinuation are summarized. See Reported Adverse Events for additional details.

Time frame: Day 0 through Days 10 - 16

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsThe Tolerability of Klacid SR Will be Assessed by Evaluation of Adverse EventsNon-serious adverse events (AEs)7 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsThe Tolerability of Klacid SR Will be Assessed by Evaluation of Adverse EventsSerious AEs0 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsThe Tolerability of Klacid SR Will be Assessed by Evaluation of Adverse EventsDiscontinued due to AEs0 Participants
Secondary

Auscultation

Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The treating physician used their clinical judgment to determine the presence of abnormal breathing sounds such as wheezing or crackles using auscultation (listening for sounds within the body, usually with a stethoscope in the chest, neck or abdomen). The number of participants with each type of breath sound at Visit 2 is summarized.

Time frame: Day 10 - 16

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationNormal breath sounds3115 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationWheezing36 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationCrackles15 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationBreath sounds not reported15 Participants
Secondary

Auscultation

Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The treating physician used their clinical judgment to determine the presence of abnormal breathing sounds such as wheezing or crackles using auscultation (listening for sounds within the body, usually with a stethoscope in the chest, neck or abdomen). The number of participants with each type of breath sound at Baseline is summarized.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationNormal breath sounds917 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationWheezing1223 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationCrackles1030 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsAuscultationBreath sounds not reported11 Participants
Secondary

Body Temperature

Body temperature was measured at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). Increased body temperature was defined as body temperature greater than or equal to 37 degrees Celsius/98.6 Fahrenheit. The percentage of participants with increased or normal body temperature at Day 0 (Baseline) is summarized.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsBody TemperatureBody temperature not reported at Day 01 Percentage
Acute Respiratory InfectionsBody TemperatureBody temperature greater than 37 ºC at Day 084 Percentage
Acute Respiratory InfectionsBody TemperatureBody temperature less than 37 ºC at Day 015 Percentage
Secondary

Body Temperature

Body temperature was measured at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). Increased body temperature was defined as body temperature greater than or equal to 37 degrees Celsius/98.6 Fahrenheit. The percentage of participants with increased or normal body temperature at Visit 2 is summarized.

Time frame: Day 10 - 16

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsBody TemperatureBody temperature greater than 37 ºC at Visit 21 Percentage
Acute Respiratory InfectionsBody TemperatureBody temperature less than 37 ºC at Visit 298 Percentage
Acute Respiratory InfectionsBody TemperatureBody temperature not reported at Visit 21 Percentage
Secondary

Cough and Its Character

Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The presence of cough and the type of cough (productive or irritating) was determined by the treating physician based on clinical judgment. The number of participants with each type of cough or no cough at Baseline is presented.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterHad irritating cough1920 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterHad productive cough1152 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterDid not have cough101 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterPresence or absence of cough not reported8 Participants
Secondary

Cough and Its Character

Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The presence of cough and the type of cough (productive or irritating) was determined by the treating physician based on clinical judgment. The number of participants with each type of cough or no cough at Visit 2 is presented.

Time frame: Day 10 - 16

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterHad irritating cough164 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterHad productive cough178 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterDid not have cough2828 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsCough and Its CharacterPresence or absence of cough not reported11 Participants
Secondary

Dyspnoea

Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The treating physicians used their clinical judgment to determine the presence of dyspnoea (difficulty breathing) and whether it occurred while resting or after exertion. The number of participants with each type of dyspnoea or with no dyspnoea at Baseline is presented.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: The per-protocol population was analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaHad resting dyspnoea141 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaHad exertional dyspnoea634 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaDid not have dyspnoea2398 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaPresence or absence of dyspnoea not reported8 Participants
Secondary

Dyspnoea

Participants were evaluated at Day 0 (Baseline) and 10 to 16 days later (Visit 2). The treating physicians used their clinical judgment to determine the presence of dyspnoea (difficulty breathing) and whether it occurred while resting or after exertion. The number of participants with each type of dyspnoea or with no dyspnoea at Visit 2 is presented.

Time frame: Day 10 - 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaHad resting dyspnoea12 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaHad exertional dyspnoea27 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaDid not have dyspnoea3128 Participants
Acute Respiratory InfectionsDyspnoeaPresence or absence of dyspnoea not reported14 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026