Skip to content

Durability of Combination Therapy With Exenatide/Pioglitazone/Metformin vs. Conventional Therapy in New Onset T2DM

Durability of Early Initial Combination Therapy With Exenatide/Pioglitazone/Metformin vs Conventional Therapy in New Onset Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01107717
Enrollment
318
Registered
2010-04-21
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2023-02-03
Last updated
2024-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Keywords

type 2 diabetes, new onset, combination therapy, new onset type 2 diabetes

Brief summary

Type 2 diabetes is a systemic metabolic disease with significant morbidity and mortality due to damaging blood vessels. Increased blood sugar level is a hallmark of diabetes and is an contributes to the development of many of its complications. Multiple defects, e.g. impaired insulin secretion and impaired insulin action, contribute to the development of the disease. The aim of this study is to test the efficacy and durability of combination of drugs which correct the defects that lead to the development of diabetes on achieving adequate and durable control of blood sugar levels. Achieving adequate and durable control of blood sugar will prevent many of diabetes complications.

Detailed description

Subjects will be randomized (using a table of random numbers) to receive, in open label fashion, one of the following treatment regimens: (i) Group I will be started on pioglitazone (15 mg/day) plus metformin (1000 mg/day) with the supper meal and exenatide (5 mcg s.c. bid 30 min before breakfast and supper) and up-titrated to 45 pioglitazone plus 2000 metformin and 10 mcg s.c. bid exenatide to achieve HbA1c \<6.0%; (II) Group II will be started on metformin, 1000 mg with breakfast and 1000 mg with supper, glyburide and basal insulin will be added and up titrated to achieve HbA1c \<6.0% The study team will compare the efficacy of two therapeutic regimens: (i) triple therapy (pioglitazone, metformin, exenatide) at the time of diagnosis of T2DM versus (ii) stepwise therapy starting with metformin and subsequent addition of sulfonylurea and basal insulin (i.e., the standard approach) in achieving this goal. The first intervention is based on the novel concept of initiating therapy at the time of diagnosis with combination therapy using agents that correct specific pathophysiologic defects that are characteristic of T2DM (insulin resistance and beta cell failure). The second intervention is based upon stepwise addition of antidiabetic agents to reduce the HbA1C according to the current ADA therapeutic recommendation.

Interventions

DRUGmetformin\pioglitazone\exenatide

metformin (1000 mg), pioglitazone (15 mg) and exenatide (5 microgram bid) are started and dose is up titrated to achieve HbA1c \< 6.5%

DRUGmetformin, glyburide and glargine

subjects are started on metformin 500 mg bid and dose is up titrated and glyburide (up to 5 mg) and glargine are sequentially added to maintain HbA1c \< 6.5%

Sponsors

American Diabetes Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* subjects with type 2 diabetes diagnosed during the past 2 years, * above 18 years of age, * drug naive, or have been on metformin less than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* subjects with type 1 diabetes or GAD positive subjects or subjects with long standing diabetes (\>2 years) or subjects who are not drug naive or have been on metformin more than 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HbA1c Levelat the end of the study (3 years)subjects will be followed for 3 years and the HbA1c measured at this time to provide the values for each arm as defined for the primary outcome of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Failure3 yearsNumber of participants with HbA1c\>6.5% at 3 years
Percentage of Patients With Reported Hypoglycemic Eventsduring the entire study (3 years)asymptomatic hypoglycemic events with documented PGC \< 60 mg/dl and sympotomatic hypoglycemia

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Newly diagnosed T2DM participants

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Triple Therapy
initiation a combination of metformin (1000 mg), pioglitazone (15 mg) and exenatide (5 microgram bid) at the time diabetes is diagnosed metformin\\pioglitazone\\exenatide: metformin (1000 mg), pioglitazone (15 mg) and exenatide (5 microgram bid) are started and dose is up titrated to achieve HbA1c \< 6.5%
103
Conventional Therapy
sequential addition of metformin, glyburide and basal insulin metformin, glyburide and glargine: subjects are started on metformin 500 mg bid and dose is up titrated and glyburide (up to 5 mg) and glargine are sequentially added to maintain HbA1c \< 6.5%
114
Total217

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTriple TherapyConventional TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Baseline HbA1c9.0 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
8.8 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
8.9 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Body Mass Index (BMI)36.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
36.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
36.25 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
Diabetes Duration at start4.8 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
5.2 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
5 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Fasting Plasma Glucose203 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
200 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
201.5 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mexican Americans
73 participants75 participants148 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
15 participants24 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
103 participants114 participants217 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants72 Participants124 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants42 Participants93 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1032 / 114
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 10353 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1030 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

HbA1c Level

subjects will be followed for 3 years and the HbA1c measured at this time to provide the values for each arm as defined for the primary outcome of the study

Time frame: at the end of the study (3 years)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Triple TherapyHbA1c Level6.9 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.1
Conventional TherapyHbA1c Level6.4 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Reported Hypoglycemic Events

asymptomatic hypoglycemic events with documented PGC \< 60 mg/dl and sympotomatic hypoglycemia

Time frame: during the entire study (3 years)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Triple TherapyPercentage of Patients With Reported Hypoglycemic Events14 Participants
Conventional TherapyPercentage of Patients With Reported Hypoglycemic Events52 Participants
Secondary

Treatment Failure

Number of participants with HbA1c\>6.5% at 3 years

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Triple TherapyTreatment Failure33 number of participants
Conventional TherapyTreatment Failure59 number of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026