Skip to content

Nutritional Support in Pressure Ulcer Patients

Nutritional Support in Malnourished Pressure Ulcer Patients: the Oligoelement Sore Trial (OEST)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01107197
Acronym
OEST
Enrollment
200
Registered
2010-04-20
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2014-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pressure Ulcers

Keywords

Pressure ulcers, Healing, Malnutrition, Nutritional support, Micronutrients

Brief summary

Pressure ulcers are frequently associated with malnutrition. Previous studies have reported that nutritional support can improve the healing rate of pressure ulcers but no attention has been clearly given to the nutritional status of the patient treated. Moreover, other investigators have suggested the additional healing power of some nutrients. Unfortunately, previous results have been unpowered by small sample size, poor monitoring of compliance to treatments and the confounding effect of other nutrients. The investigators aimed to test the effect and additional benefits of several micronutrients delivered through oral nutritional support on the healing rate of pressure ulcers in malnourished patients.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTEnriched nutrition formula

oral formula enriched in arginine, zinc and antioxidant oligoelements

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTControl formula

Isonitrogenous isocaloric oral formula

Sponsors

Nutricia, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient or legal guardian or caregiver consent * stage II, III or IV pressure ulcers * malnutrition (as defined by low body mass index and/or unintentional weight loss and/or low serum albumin and/or reduced food intake \[\<60% of total daily estimated requirements\]) * patients who can drink supplements * home-care or long-term care

Exclusion criteria

* decompensated diabetes (HbA1C \>7%) * renal failure * hepatic failure (Child B and C) * current neoplastic disease * any organ-failure * immunosuppressive therapy * connective tissue disease * use of steroids * obesity * respiratory insufficiency (COPD) * anemia (haemoglobin \<10g/dL) * previous neoplastic disease (\<1 year since last treatment CT or RT) * infected wounds * cellulitis, sepsis or osteomyelitis * poor tolerance to sip feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Healing8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)healing is defined as reduction in ulcer area (the percentage of change)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Healing8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)reduction in ulcer area \>=40%
Incidence of Infections8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)defined as local (ulcer)
Cost-effectiveness8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the difference between total costs (active - control) by the difference in the mean reduction (%) of ulcer area. Costs are derived from oral nutritional supplements, dressings, antibiotics, PU swab sampling, nurse visits for wound dressing (according to their duration and cost per hour), medical consultations (unitary cost of the visit for prescription of antibiotic therapy).
Dressings8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)The number of dressings used throughout the intervention period
the Percentage of Change in Area4 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 4)the reduction in ulcer area (%) observed at 4 weeks

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants: patients (long-term care residents or subjects at home care services) with stage 2, 3 or 4 pressure ulcer. Estimated recruitment (sample size): 220 patients. Patients recruited and randomized to interventionas: 200 patients. The recruitment was stopped when at least 64 patients per treatment arm were available for analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enriched Nutrition Formula
Patients were given standard diet plus two brick of an hypercaloric oral formula enriched in arginine, zinc and antioxidant oligoelements Enriched nutrition formula : oral formula enriched in arginine, zinc and antioxidant oligoelements
78
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula
Patients were given standard diet plus 2 bricks of an hypercaloric oral formula isonitrogenous isocaloric to the experimental one Control formula : Isonitrogenous isocaloric oral formula
79
Total157

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath1210
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up58
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIsonitrogenous Isocaloric FormulaEnriched Nutrition FormulaTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
75 Participants73 Participants148 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Age, Continuous81.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
80.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
80.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Region of Enrollment
Italy
79 participants78 participants157 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants57 Participants109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants21 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1010 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1010 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Healing

healing is defined as reduction in ulcer area (the percentage of change)

Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enriched Nutrition FormulaRate of Healing62.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.1
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric FormulaRate of Healing43.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.5
Secondary

Cost-effectiveness

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the difference between total costs (active - control) by the difference in the mean reduction (%) of ulcer area. Costs are derived from oral nutritional supplements, dressings, antibiotics, PU swab sampling, nurse visits for wound dressing (according to their duration and cost per hour), medical consultations (unitary cost of the visit for prescription of antibiotic therapy).

Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enriched Nutrition FormulaCost-effectiveness639 EurosStandard Deviation 213
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric FormulaCost-effectiveness689 EurosStandard Deviation 247
Secondary

Dressings

The number of dressings used throughout the intervention period

Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enriched Nutrition FormulaDressings31 dressingsStandard Deviation 13
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric FormulaDressings35 dressingsStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

Incidence of Infections

defined as local (ulcer)

Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enriched Nutrition FormulaIncidence of Infections9 participants
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric FormulaIncidence of Infections14 participants
Secondary

Rate of Healing

complete healing

Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enriched Nutrition FormulaRate of Healing12 participants
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric FormulaRate of Healing6 participants
Secondary

Rate of Healing

reduction in ulcer area \>=40%

Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enriched Nutrition FormulaRate of Healing57 participants
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric FormulaRate of Healing41 participants
Secondary

the Percentage of Change in Area

the reduction in ulcer area (%) observed at 4 weeks

Time frame: 4 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 4)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enriched Nutrition Formulathe Percentage of Change in Area29.3 percent change
Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formulathe Percentage of Change in Area21.9 percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026