Pressure Ulcers
Conditions
Keywords
Pressure ulcers, Healing, Malnutrition, Nutritional support, Micronutrients
Brief summary
Pressure ulcers are frequently associated with malnutrition. Previous studies have reported that nutritional support can improve the healing rate of pressure ulcers but no attention has been clearly given to the nutritional status of the patient treated. Moreover, other investigators have suggested the additional healing power of some nutrients. Unfortunately, previous results have been unpowered by small sample size, poor monitoring of compliance to treatments and the confounding effect of other nutrients. The investigators aimed to test the effect and additional benefits of several micronutrients delivered through oral nutritional support on the healing rate of pressure ulcers in malnourished patients.
Interventions
oral formula enriched in arginine, zinc and antioxidant oligoelements
Isonitrogenous isocaloric oral formula
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patient or legal guardian or caregiver consent * stage II, III or IV pressure ulcers * malnutrition (as defined by low body mass index and/or unintentional weight loss and/or low serum albumin and/or reduced food intake \[\<60% of total daily estimated requirements\]) * patients who can drink supplements * home-care or long-term care
Exclusion criteria
* decompensated diabetes (HbA1C \>7%) * renal failure * hepatic failure (Child B and C) * current neoplastic disease * any organ-failure * immunosuppressive therapy * connective tissue disease * use of steroids * obesity * respiratory insufficiency (COPD) * anemia (haemoglobin \<10g/dL) * previous neoplastic disease (\<1 year since last treatment CT or RT) * infected wounds * cellulitis, sepsis or osteomyelitis * poor tolerance to sip feeding
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Healing | 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8) | healing is defined as reduction in ulcer area (the percentage of change) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Healing | 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8) | reduction in ulcer area \>=40% |
| Incidence of Infections | 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8) | defined as local (ulcer) |
| Cost-effectiveness | 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8) | Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the difference between total costs (active - control) by the difference in the mean reduction (%) of ulcer area. Costs are derived from oral nutritional supplements, dressings, antibiotics, PU swab sampling, nurse visits for wound dressing (according to their duration and cost per hour), medical consultations (unitary cost of the visit for prescription of antibiotic therapy). |
| Dressings | 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8) | The number of dressings used throughout the intervention period |
| the Percentage of Change in Area | 4 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 4) | the reduction in ulcer area (%) observed at 4 weeks |
Countries
Italy
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants: patients (long-term care residents or subjects at home care services) with stage 2, 3 or 4 pressure ulcer. Estimated recruitment (sample size): 220 patients. Patients recruited and randomized to interventionas: 200 patients. The recruitment was stopped when at least 64 patients per treatment arm were available for analyses.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula Patients were given standard diet plus two brick of an hypercaloric oral formula enriched in arginine, zinc and antioxidant oligoelements
Enriched nutrition formula : oral formula enriched in arginine, zinc and antioxidant oligoelements | 78 |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula Patients were given standard diet plus 2 bricks of an hypercaloric oral formula isonitrogenous isocaloric to the experimental one
Control formula : Isonitrogenous isocaloric oral formula | 79 |
| Total | 157 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 12 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | Enriched Nutrition Formula | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 75 Participants | 73 Participants | 148 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 81.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 | 80.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 | 80.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 79 participants | 78 participants | 157 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 52 Participants | 57 Participants | 109 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 27 Participants | 21 Participants | 48 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 101 | 0 / 99 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 101 | 0 / 99 |
Outcome results
Rate of Healing
healing is defined as reduction in ulcer area (the percentage of change)
Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula | Rate of Healing | 62.9 percent change | Standard Deviation 29.1 |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | Rate of Healing | 43.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 33.5 |
Cost-effectiveness
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the difference between total costs (active - control) by the difference in the mean reduction (%) of ulcer area. Costs are derived from oral nutritional supplements, dressings, antibiotics, PU swab sampling, nurse visits for wound dressing (according to their duration and cost per hour), medical consultations (unitary cost of the visit for prescription of antibiotic therapy).
Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula | Cost-effectiveness | 639 Euros | Standard Deviation 213 |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | Cost-effectiveness | 689 Euros | Standard Deviation 247 |
Dressings
The number of dressings used throughout the intervention period
Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula | Dressings | 31 dressings | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | Dressings | 35 dressings | Standard Deviation 13 |
Incidence of Infections
defined as local (ulcer)
Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula | Incidence of Infections | 9 participants |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | Incidence of Infections | 14 participants |
Rate of Healing
complete healing
Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula | Rate of Healing | 12 participants |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | Rate of Healing | 6 participants |
Rate of Healing
reduction in ulcer area \>=40%
Time frame: 8 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula | Rate of Healing | 57 participants |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | Rate of Healing | 41 participants |
the Percentage of Change in Area
the reduction in ulcer area (%) observed at 4 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks of nutritional support (baseline and week 4)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enriched Nutrition Formula | the Percentage of Change in Area | 29.3 percent change |
| Isonitrogenous Isocaloric Formula | the Percentage of Change in Area | 21.9 percent change |