Skip to content

Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Treatment (BMT CTN 0801)

A Phase II/III Randomized, Multicenter Trial Comparing Sirolimus Plus Prednisone and Sirolimus/Calcineurin Inhibitor Plus Prednisone for the Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (BMT CTN Protocol #0801)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01106833
Enrollment
151
Registered
2010-04-20
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2018-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic GVHD

Keywords

Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGVHD)

Brief summary

This study is designed as a combined Phase II/III, randomized, open label, multicenter, prospective comparative study of sirolimus plus prednisone versus sirolimus/calcineurin-inhibitor plus prednisone for the treatment of chronic GVHD. Patients will be stratified by transplant center and will be randomized to an experimental arm of one of the two pre-specified experimental arms (sirolimus + prednisone or the comparator arm of sirolimus + calcineurin inhibitor + prednisone) in a 1:1 ratio.

Detailed description

Background: Chronic GVHD is a medical condition that can become very serious. Chronic GVHD is a common development after allogeneic transplant that occurs when the donor cells attack and damage tissues. The primary purpose of this study is to compare treatment regimens that contain sirolimus without a calcineurin inhibitor to a comparator regimen of sirolimus with a calcineurin inhibitor and evaluate how well chronic GVHD responds to treatment. The combinations of medications in this study are: * Sirolimus + calcineurin inhibitor + prednisone * Sirolimus + prednisone The goal is to select a treatment regimen for further comparison in the Phase III trial. Design Narrative: The intent is to enroll subjects at the start of initial therapy for chronic GVHD, or before their chronic GVHD is refractory to glucocorticoid therapy, or is chronically dependent upon glucocorticoid therapy and multiple secondary systemic immunosuppressive agents. Patients will be stratified by transplant center and will be randomized to one of two arms.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus + calcineurin inhibitor + prednisone

The target serum level for sirolimus is 3-12 ng/mL. The target serum level for tacrolimus is 5-10 ng/mL. The target serum level for cyclosporine is 120-200 ng/mL. Prednisone is administered initially as a single early morning dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent). If prednisone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent) is contraindicated, patients may begin prednisone between 0.5-1 mg/kg/day.

DRUGSirolimus + prednisone

The target serum level for sirolimus is 3-12 ng/mL. Prednisone is administered initially as a single early morning dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent). If prednisone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent) is contraindicated, patients may begin prednisone between 0.5-1 mg/kg/day.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Marrow Donor Program
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Suitable candidates are patients with classic chronic GVHD or overlap syndrome (classic chronic plus acute GVHD)that is: a)Previously untreated (newly diagnosed) as defined by having received \< 14 days of prednisone (or equivalent) before enrollment/randomization to study therapy; b)Previously treated but inadequately responding after ≤ 16 weeks of initial therapy with prednisone and/or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) ± additional non-sirolimus agent (started at the time of chronic GVHD diagnosis). * Patient or guardian willing and able to provide informed consent. * Stated willingness to use contraception in women of childbearing potential. * Stated willingness of patient to comply with study procedures and reporting requirements.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with late persistent acute GVHD or recurrent acute GVHD only. * Inability to begin prednisone therapy at a dose of greater than 0.5 mg/kg/day. * Receiving sirolimus for treatment of chronic GVHD (sirolimus for prophylaxis or treatment of acute GVHD is acceptable). * Already receiving sirolimus (for prophylaxis or treatment of acute GVHD) with prednisone at ≥ 0.25 mg/kg/day (or equivalent) ± additional agents. * Receiving therapy for chronic GVHD for more than 16 weeks. * Invasive fungal or viral infection not responding to appropriate antifungal or antiviral therapies. * Inadequate renal function defined as measured creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula (adults) or Schwartz formula (age less than or equal to 12 years). Adults: estimated creatinine clearance rate (eCCr) (mL/min/) = (140 - age) x mass (kg) x (0.85 if female)/72 x serum creatinine (mg/dL; Creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.73m\^2) = eCCr x 1.73/Body Surface Area (BSA) (m\^2); Children: eCCr (mL/min/1.73 m\^2) = k x height (cm) / serum creatinine (mg/dL) k = 0.33 (pre-term), 0.45 (full term to 1 year old), 0.55 (age 1-12 years). * Inability to tolerate oral medications. * Absolute neutrophil count less than 1500 per microliter. * Requirement for platelet transfusions. * Pregnancy (positive serum β-HCG) or breastfeeding. * Receiving any treatment for persistent, progressive or recurrent malignancy. * Progressive or recurrent malignancy defined other than by quantitative molecular assays. * Known hypersensitivity to sirolimus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With Treatment Success6 months and 24 months post-randomizationTreatment success was evaluated at 6 months in Phase II and is defined as a complete or partial response without secondary systemic immunosuppressive therapy and no recurrent malignancy or death. In Phase III, treatment success was evaluated at 24 months and is defined as a complete response without secondary systemic immunosuppressive therapy and no recurrent malignancy or death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival6 months and 24 months post-randomizationProgression-free Survival is defined as survival without malignancy relapse. Relapse and death are considered failures for this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants With Failure-free Survival6 months and 24 months post-randomizationFailure-free Survival is defined as survival without malignancy progression or initiation of secondary therapy for chronic GVHD. Progression, initiation of secondary therapy for chronic GVHD, and death are considered failures for this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse6 months and 24 months post-randomizationRelapse is defined as recurrence of the primary malignancy. Death is considered a competing risk for this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Immunosuppressive Therapy Initiated6 months and 24 months post-randomizationThe percentage of participants initiating secondary immunosuppressive therapy for chronic GVHD is described. Death is considered a competing risk for this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy at Two Years2 years post-randomizationThe percentage of participants discontinuing all systemic immunosuppressive therapy by two years post-randomization is described. Death is considered a competing risk for this endpoint.
Prednisone DoseBaseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomizationDaily dose of prednisone is described by treatment arm at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomization.
Change in Prednisone Dose From Baseline6 months and 1 year post-randomizationChange in the daily dose of prednisone from baseline, the time of randomization, is described by treatment arm at 6 months and 1 year post-randomization.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival6 months and 24 months post-randomizationOverall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.
Change in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline6 months and 1 year post-randomizationChange in creatinine level from baseline, the time of randomization, is described by treatment arm at 6 months and 1 year post-randomization.
Patient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomizationEach patient's perception of the severity of the chronic GVHD was collected at baseline and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization. Severity is categorized as none, mild, moderate, and severe.
Provider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomizationEach patient's care provider's perception of the severity of the chronic GVHD was collected at baseline and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization. Severity is categorized as none, mild, moderate, and severe.
NIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomizationChronic GVHD severity was determined at baseline and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization per the 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005). Severity is categorized as none, mild, moderate, and severe.
SF-36 Physical Component SummaryBaseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomizationThe Medical Outcome Study SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) is a subscale of the SF-36 intended to measure physical well-being. It is scored on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being.
SF-36 Mental Component SummaryBaseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomizationThe Medical Outcome Study SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) is a subscale of the SF-36 intended to measure mental well-being. It is scored on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being.
FACT-BMT ScoreBaseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomizationThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant scale (FACT-BMT) is a quality of life instrument that assesses the effects of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on a patient's physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being while taking into consideration BMT-specific concerns. The assessment has 37 questions, each scored on a Likert scale from 0-4. The overall score is computed by adding scores of the questions and falls in the range 0-148, with higher scores indicating higher levels of overall well-being.
Serum Creatinine LevelBaseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomizationCreatinine level is described by treatment arm at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomization.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone
Sirolimus + calcineurin inhibitor + prednisone Sirolimus + calcineurin inhibitor + prednisone: The target serum level for sirolimus is 3-12 ng/mL. The target serum level for tacrolimus is 5-10 ng/mL. The target serum level for cyclosporine is 120-200 ng/mL. Prednisone is administered initially as a single early morning dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent). If prednisone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent) is contraindicated, patients may begin prednisone between 0.5-1 mg/kg/day.
66
Sirolimus and Prednisone
Sirolimus + prednisone Sirolimus + prednisone: The target serum level for sirolimus is 3-12 ng/mL. Prednisone is administered initially as a single early morning dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent). If prednisone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or equivalent) is contraindicated, patients may begin prednisone between 0.5-1 mg/kg/day.
72
Total138

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSirolimus and PrednisoneTotal
Age, Continuous50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Age, Customized
20 - 40
12 Participants18 Participants30 Participants
Age, Customized
41 - 60
36 Participants30 Participants66 Participants
Age, Customized
Less Than 20
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Age, Customized
Over 60
16 Participants19 Participants35 Participants
Conditioning Regimen Intensity
Myeloablative
29 Participants47 Participants76 Participants
Conditioning Regimen Intensity
Non-myeloablative or Reduced Intensity
37 Participants25 Participants62 Participants
Donor Age44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Donor Gender
Female
26 Participants35 Participants61 Participants
Donor Gender
Male
38 Participants37 Participants75 Participants
Donor Gender
Unknown
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Donor/Recipient Gender Matching
Female Donor, Female Recipient
10 Participants14 Participants24 Participants
Donor/Recipient Gender Matching
Female Donor, Male Recipient
16 Participants21 Participants37 Participants
Donor/Recipient Gender Matching
Male Donor, Female Recipient
21 Participants10 Participants31 Participants
Donor/Recipient Gender Matching
Male Donor, Male Recipient
17 Participants27 Participants44 Participants
Donor/Recipient Gender Matching
Unknown Donor Gender
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Donor Type
Related
38 Participants29 Participants67 Participants
Donor Type
Unrelated
27 Participants40 Participants67 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
59 Participants63 Participants122 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants1 Participants8 Participants
Graft Type
Bone Marrow
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Graft Type
Double Cord Blood
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Graft Type
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
60 Participants64 Participants124 Participants
Graft Type
Single Cord Blood
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Primary Disease
Acute Leukemia
25 Participants47 Participants72 Participants
Primary Disease
Chronic Leukemia
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Primary Disease
Lymphoma
17 Participants5 Participants22 Participants
Primary Disease
MDS / MPS
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Primary Disease
Other
7 Participants1 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-white
9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown / Not Answered
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
57 Participants54 Participants111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants24 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants48 Participants81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
16 / 6613 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 660 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 6612 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants With Treatment Success

Treatment success was evaluated at 6 months in Phase II and is defined as a complete or partial response without secondary systemic immunosuppressive therapy and no recurrent malignancy or death. In Phase III, treatment success was evaluated at 24 months and is defined as a complete response without secondary systemic immunosuppressive therapy and no recurrent malignancy or death.

Time frame: 6 months and 24 months post-randomization

Population: Twelve participants withdrew study consent between 6 and 24 months post-randomization, so are excluded from the analysis of treatment success at 24 months.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase II: 6 MonthsYes33 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase II: 6 MonthsNo33 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase III: 24 MonthsYes9 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase III: 24 MonthsNo49 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase III: 24 MonthsNo58 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase II: 6 MonthsYes35 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase III: 24 MonthsYes10 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Treatment SuccessPhase II: 6 MonthsNo37 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportion of participants with treatment success at 6 months is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.63Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportion of participants with treatment success at 24 months is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.44Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change in Prednisone Dose From Baseline

Change in the daily dose of prednisone from baseline, the time of randomization, is described by treatment arm at 6 months and 1 year post-randomization.

Time frame: 6 months and 1 year post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneChange in Prednisone Dose From Baseline6 Months-0.6 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneChange in Prednisone Dose From Baseline1 Year-0.6 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus and PrednisoneChange in Prednisone Dose From Baseline6 Months-0.6 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus and PrednisoneChange in Prednisone Dose From Baseline1 Year-0.7 mg/kg/day
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median change in prednisone dose from baseline to 6 months post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.586Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median change in prednisone dose from baseline to 1 year post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.14Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Change in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline

Change in creatinine level from baseline, the time of randomization, is described by treatment arm at 6 months and 1 year post-randomization.

Time frame: 6 months and 1 year post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline6 Months0.1 mg/dL
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline1 Year0.0 mg/dL
Sirolimus and PrednisoneChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline6 Months0.1 mg/dL
Sirolimus and PrednisoneChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Baseline1 Year0.0 mg/dL
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median change in serum creatinine level from baseline to 6 months post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.147Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median change in serum creatinine level from baseline to 1 year post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.863Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

FACT-BMT Score

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant scale (FACT-BMT) is a quality of life instrument that assesses the effects of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on a patient's physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being while taking into consideration BMT-specific concerns. The assessment has 37 questions, each scored on a Likert scale from 0-4. The overall score is computed by adding scores of the questions and falls in the range 0-148, with higher scores indicating higher levels of overall well-being.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score2 Months105 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score1 Year114 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score6 Months109 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score2 Years119 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.8
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneFACT-BMT ScoreBaseline103 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Sirolimus and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score2 Years113 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
Sirolimus and PrednisoneFACT-BMT ScoreBaseline104 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
Sirolimus and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score2 Months110 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Sirolimus and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score6 Months109 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Sirolimus and PrednisoneFACT-BMT Score1 Year110 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.6
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean FACT-BMT scores at baseline are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.763t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean FACT-BMT scores at 2 months are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.133t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean FACT-BMT scores at 6 months are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.953t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean FACT-BMT scores at 1 year are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.398t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean FACT-BMT scores at 2 years are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.309t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

NIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity

Chronic GVHD severity was determined at baseline and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization per the 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005). Severity is categorized as none, mild, moderate, and severe.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and whose clinical assessments were completed.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearNone2 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineRelapsed0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearMild2 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsMild3 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearModerate16 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineMild1 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearSevere9 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsModerate25 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearRelapsed5 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineInitiated Secondary Therapy0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearInitiated Secondary Therapy15 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsSevere12 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearDead7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineSevere33 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsNone9 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsRelapsed3 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsMild6 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineDead0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsModerate8 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsInitiated Secondary Therapy7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsSevere2 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineModerate29 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsRelapsed8 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsDead6 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsInitiated Secondary Therapy18 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsNone3 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsDead7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineNone0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineNone1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineMild1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineModerate23 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineSevere46 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineRelapsed0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineInitiated Secondary Therapy0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineDead0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsNone1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsMild3 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsModerate27 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsSevere17 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsRelapsed1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsInitiated Secondary Therapy14 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearNone3 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearMild5 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearModerate16 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearSevere10 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearRelapsed3 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearInitiated Secondary Therapy21 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsNone9 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsMild12 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsModerate8 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsSevere2 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsRelapsed5 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneNIH Consensus Criteria Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsInitiated Secondary Therapy28 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the NIH Consensus Criteria severity and vital status categories considered at baseline are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.238Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the NIH Consensus Criteria severity and vital status categories considered at 6 months post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.546Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the NIH Consensus Criteria severity and vital status categories considered at 1 year post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.756Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the NIH Consensus Criteria severity and vital status categories considered at 2 years post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.554Fisher Exact
Secondary

Patient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity

Each patient's perception of the severity of the chronic GVHD was collected at baseline and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization. Severity is categorized as none, mild, moderate, and severe.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearNone9 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineRelapsed0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearMild13 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsMild13 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearModerate4 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineMild21 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearSevere0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsModerate15 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearRelapsed5 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineInitiated Secondary Therapy0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearInitiated Secondary Therapy15 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsSevere2 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearDead7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineSevere10 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsNone2 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsRelapsed3 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsMild10 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineDead0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsModerate2 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsInitiated Secondary Therapy7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsSevere0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineModerate23 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsRelapsed8 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsDead6 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsInitiated Secondary Therapy18 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsNone4 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsDead7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineNone0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineNone0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineMild20 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineModerate32 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineSevere10 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineRelapsed0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineInitiated Secondary Therapy0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineDead0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsNone6 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsMild25 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsModerate10 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsSevere3 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsRelapsed1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsInitiated Secondary Therapy14 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearNone2 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearMild23 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearModerate3 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearSevere4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearRelapsed3 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearInitiated Secondary Therapy21 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsNone6 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsMild13 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsModerate1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsSevere0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsRelapsed5 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePatient-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsInitiated Secondary Therapy28 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the patient-reported severity and vital status categories considered at baseline are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.62Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the patient-reported severity and vital status categories considered at 6 months post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.258Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the patient-reported severity and vital status categories considered at 1 year post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.036Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the patient-reported severity and vital status categories considered at 2 years post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.369Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy at Two Years

The percentage of participants discontinuing all systemic immunosuppressive therapy by two years post-randomization is described. Death is considered a competing risk for this endpoint.

Time frame: 2 years post-randomization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy at Two Years20 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy at Two Years23.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the rate of discontinuation of systemic immunosuppressive therapy during the first two years post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.706Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Failure-free Survival

Failure-free Survival is defined as survival without malignancy progression or initiation of secondary therapy for chronic GVHD. Progression, initiation of secondary therapy for chronic GVHD, and death are considered failures for this endpoint.

Time frame: 6 months and 24 months post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Failure-free Survival6 Months74.7 percentage of participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Failure-free Survival24 Months46.2 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Failure-free Survival6 Months73.6 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Failure-free Survival24 Months48.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the rate of failure-free survival during the first two years post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.775Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.

Time frame: 6 months and 24 months post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Overall Survival6 Months85.5 percentage of participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Overall Survival24 Months74.0 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Overall Survival6 Months91.7 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Overall Survival24 Months81.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the rate of overall survival during the first two years post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.205Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival

Progression-free Survival is defined as survival without malignancy relapse. Relapse and death are considered failures for this endpoint.

Time frame: 6 months and 24 months post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival6 Months84.0 percentage of participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival24 Months67.3 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival6 Months90.3 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival24 Months78.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the rate of progression-free survival during the first two years post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.141Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse is defined as recurrence of the primary malignancy. Death is considered a competing risk for this endpoint.

Time frame: 6 months and 24 months post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Relapse6 Months4.8 percentage of participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Relapse24 Months14.9 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Relapse6 Months1.4 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Relapse24 Months10.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the rate of relapse during the first two years post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.396Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Immunosuppressive Therapy Initiated

The percentage of participants initiating secondary immunosuppressive therapy for chronic GVHD is described. Death is considered a competing risk for this endpoint.

Time frame: 6 months and 24 months post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Secondary Immunosuppressive Therapy Initiated6 Months12.9 percentage of participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Secondary Immunosuppressive Therapy Initiated24 months29.4 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Secondary Immunosuppressive Therapy Initiated6 Months13.9 percentage of participants
Sirolimus and PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Secondary Immunosuppressive Therapy Initiated24 months38.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the rate of initiation of secondary immunosuppressive therapy for chronic GVHD during the first two years post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.219Gray's test
Secondary

Prednisone Dose

Daily dose of prednisone is described by treatment arm at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomization.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePrednisone DoseBaseline0.9 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePrednisone Dose6 Months0.2 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisonePrednisone Dose1 Year0.2 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus and PrednisonePrednisone DoseBaseline0.9 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus and PrednisonePrednisone Dose6 Months0.2 mg/kg/day
Sirolimus and PrednisonePrednisone Dose1 Year0.1 mg/kg/day
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median prednisone dose at baseline is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.127Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median prednisone dose at 6 months post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.562Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median prednisone dose at 1 year post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.129Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Provider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity

Each patient's care provider's perception of the severity of the chronic GVHD was collected at baseline and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization. Severity is categorized as none, mild, moderate, and severe.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and whose providers completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearNone8 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineRelapsed0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearMild15 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsMild27 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearModerate5 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineMild13 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearSevere1 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsModerate10 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearRelapsed5 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineInitiated Secondary Therapy0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearInitiated Secondary Therapy15 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsSevere0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearDead7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineSevere3 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsNone7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsRelapsed3 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsMild10 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineDead0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsModerate1 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsInitiated Secondary Therapy7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsSevere0 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineModerate46 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsRelapsed8 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsDead6 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsInitiated Secondary Therapy18 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsNone6 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsDead7 Participants
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineNone1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineNone0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineMild17 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineModerate48 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineSevere7 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineRelapsed0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineInitiated Secondary Therapy0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD SeverityBaselineDead0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsNone2 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsMild33 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsModerate13 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsSevere0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsRelapsed1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsInitiated Secondary Therapy14 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity6 MonthsDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearNone7 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearMild19 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearModerate9 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearSevere1 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearRelapsed3 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearInitiated Secondary Therapy21 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity1 YearDead4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsNone7 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsMild11 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsModerate4 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsSevere0 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsRelapsed5 Participants
Sirolimus and PrednisoneProvider-reported Chronic GVHD Severity2 YearsInitiated Secondary Therapy28 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the provider-reported severity and vital status categories considered at baseline are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.45Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the provider-reported severity and vital status categories considered at 6 months post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.301Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the provider-reported severity and vital status categories considered at 1 year post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.75Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the proportions of patients in the provider-reported severity and vital status categories considered at 2 years post-randomization are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.444Fisher Exact
Secondary

Serum Creatinine Level

Creatinine level is described by treatment arm at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomization.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSerum Creatinine LevelBaseline0.9 mg/dL
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSerum Creatinine Level6 Months1.0 mg/dL
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSerum Creatinine Level1 Year0.9 mg/dL
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSerum Creatinine LevelBaseline0.9 mg/dL
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSerum Creatinine Level6 Months1.0 mg/dL
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSerum Creatinine Level1 Year0.9 mg/dL
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median serum creatinine level at baseline is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.582Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median serum creatinine level at 6 months post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.208Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median serum creatinine level at 1 year post-randomization is equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.431Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

SF-36 Mental Component Summary

The Medical Outcome Study SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) is a subscale of the SF-36 intended to measure mental well-being. It is scored on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component SummaryBaseline47 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary1 Year50 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary2 Months49 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary2 Years52 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary6 Months50 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary2 Years50 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component SummaryBaseline48 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary6 Months48 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary1 Year46 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Mental Component Summary2 Months50 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean MCS scores at baseline are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.631t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean MCS scores at 2 months are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.759t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean MCS scores at 6 months are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.391t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean MCS scores at 1 year are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.222t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean MCS scores at 2 years are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.527t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

SF-36 Physical Component Summary

The Medical Outcome Study SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) is a subscale of the SF-36 intended to measure physical well-being. It is scored on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-randomization

Population: Outcomes are analyzed in participants that were alive and completed assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary2 Months39 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary1 Year40 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary6 Months38 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary2 Years44 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component SummaryBaseline38 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary2 Years43 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component SummaryBaseline38 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary2 Months42 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary6 Months43 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Sirolimus and PrednisoneSF-36 Physical Component Summary1 Year43 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean PCS scores at baseline are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.685t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean PCS scores at 2 months are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.105t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean PCS scores at 6 months are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.039t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean PCS scores at 1 year are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.278t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean PCS scores at 2 years are equal for those receiving either Sirolimus, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Prednisone or Sirolimus and Prednisone for treatment of chronic GVHD.p-value: 0.804t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026