Skip to content

Effects of Ground Level Gait Training With Body Weight Support (BWS) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)

Ground-level Gait Training Combining Body Weight Support and Functional Electrical Stimulation in People Following Chronic Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01106755
Enrollment
12
Registered
2010-04-20
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2010-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparesis, Stroke

Keywords

kinematic, hemiparesis, gait, Body weight support, Functional electrical stimulation

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of gait training on ground level, combining BWS and FES in people following chronic stroke.

Detailed description

The body weight support system (BWS) associated to a treadmill as well as to a functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the common peroneal nerve, has been proposed as a strategy for gait training in people following stroke. Moreover, it has also considered that the ground level is the most common locomotion surface, and that there is little information about the effects of gait training, on this kind of surface, in people with hemiparesis.

Interventions

DEVICEgait training on ground level using BWS

An A1-B-A2 system was applied in which A1 and A2 corresponded to gait training on ground level using Body Weight Support (BWS). Each training phase was performed during 45 minutes, three times a week, for six weeks.

DEVICEgait training on ground level using BWS associated to FES

An A1-B-A2 system was applied in which B corresponded to the training associated to Functional Electrical Stimulation. Each training phase was performed during 45 minutes, three times a week, for six weeks.

Sponsors

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elapsed time since stroke longer than 6 months * Spasticity classified under level 3 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale * The ability to walk classified at levels 2, 3 or 4 according to the Functional Ambulation Category

Exclusion criteria

* Heart failure, angina pectoris, arrhythmias and other cardiovascular diseases * Severe lung disease * Orthopedic disorders * Cognitive deficits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
kinematic evaluation4 monthsParticipants were assessed walking freely at a comfortable self-selected speed before and after each training phase. The analyzed variables were: mean walking speed of locomotion; step length; stride length, speed and duration; initial and final double support duration; single-limb support duration; swing period; range of motion (ROM), maximum and minimum angles of foot, leg, thigh, and trunk segments of both paretic and nonparetic limbs.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026