Coronary Artery Disease, Angina Pectoris, Unstable Angina, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
randomized controlled trial, controlled clinical trial, comparative effectiveness research, chest pain, angina pectoris, non-invasive cardiac imaging, nuclear stress testing, coronary CT angiography, coronary catheterization, coronary revascularization
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether coronary artery CT scanning or nuclear stress testing is better at diagnosing chest pain patients with known coronary artery disease to select appropriate candidates for coronary catheterization and re-vascularization.
Interventions
EKG-gated, computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries during heart rate control
Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patient admitted for chest pain / pressure or other suggestive symptoms * patient has known coronary artery disease (with or without prior revascularization) * patient has clinical need for non-invasive cardiac evaluation
Exclusion criteria
* evidence of ongoing myocardial infarction or hemodynamic instability * ischemia on EKG (greater than 1mm ST segment deviation) * contraindications to CT scanning with iodinated intravenous contrast (including allergies, asthma and renal dysfunction) * heart rhythm precluding EKG gating * pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Number of participants that undergo subsequent cardiac catheterization but do not have consequent coronary angioplasty, stenting or bypass | 3 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Length of hospital stay (time to discharge) | 1 month |
| Number of participants that have a subsequent non-fatal myocardial infarction | 1 year |
| Number of participants that die due to any cause | 1 year |
| Number of participants that experience a procedural complication due to non-invasive imaging, cardiac catheterization or coronary revascularization | 3 months |
Countries
United States