Skip to content

A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety of a New Influenza Vaccine

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety of a New 6:2 Influenza Virus Reassortant

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01104493
Enrollment
300
Registered
2010-04-15
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2011-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

To assess the safety of a new influenza virus vaccine containing a new virus strain in healthy patients prior to the release of the vaccine.

Detailed description

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled release study will enroll approximately 300 healthy adults 18-49 years of age. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned in a 4:1 fashion to receive a single dose of monovalent vaccine or placebo by intranasal spray. This study will be conducted at multiple sites in the United States. Randomization will be stratified by site. Each subject will receive one dose of investigational product on Study Day 1. The duration of study participation for each subject is the time from receipt of investigational product through 180 days after receipt of investigational product. To summarize the primary safety phase data (Study Days 1-8), the study will be unblinded to the analysis team at MedImmune after all data through at least Study Day 8 are locked.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALMonovalent Frozen FluMist®

Single dose of monovalent vaccine (240 subjects) by intranasal spray on Study Day 1.

OTHERPlacebo

Single dose of placebo (60 subjects) by intranasal spray on Study Day 1

Sponsors

MedImmune LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 18 through 49 years of age (not yet reached their 50th birthday) at the time of investigational product administration * Healthy by medical history and physical examination * Written informed consent and any locally required authorization (eg, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in the United States of America, European Union \[EU\] Data Privacy Directive in the EU) obtained from the subject/legal representative prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations * Female subjects of child-bearing potential, (ie, unless at least 2 years postmenopausal, surgically sterile \[eg, bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy\], has sterile male partner, or practices abstinence) must use an effective method of avoiding pregnancy (including oral, transdermal, or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine device, female condom with spermicide, diaphragm with spermicide, cervical cap, or use of a condom with spermicide by the sexual partner) for 30 days prior to administration of investigational product, and must agree to continue using such precautions for 60 days after investigational product administration. In addition, the subject must also have a negative urine or blood pregnancy test at screening and, if screening and Day 1 do not occur on the same day, on the day of vaccination prior to randomization. * Males, unless surgically sterile must use an effective method of birth control with a female partner and must agree to continue using such contraceptive precautions for at least 30 days after dosing with investigational product (from Study Day 1 through Study Day 31) * Subject available by telephone * Ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the protocol, as judged by the investigator * Ability to complete follow-up period of 180 days after dosing as required by the protocol

Exclusion criteria

* History of hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine, including egg or egg protein or serious, life threatening, or severe reactions to previous influenza vaccinations * History of hypersensitivity to gentamicin * Any condition for which the inactivated influenza vaccine is indicated, including chronic disorders of the pulmonary or cardiovascular systems (eg, asthma), chronic metabolic diseases (eg, diabetes mellitus), renal dysfunction, or hemoglobinopathies that required regular medical follow-up or hospitalization during the preceding year Note: A history of asthma that requires regular medical follow-up or hospitalization during the preceding 2 years is exclusionary. Investigator judgment is required to determine whether or not a subject has a history of asthma; however, for adult subjects, a remote history of wheezing or a remote diagnosis of asthma that the investigator does not consider to be relevant to current health does not need to be considered to be a history of asthma. For example, childhood asthma that has not required treatment in adulthood is not necessarily exclusionary * Acute febrile (\> 100.0°F oral or equivalent) and/or clinically significant respiratory illness (eg, cough or sore throat) within 14 days prior to randomization * Any known immunosuppressive condition or immune deficiency disease, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or ongoing immunosuppressive therapy * History of Guillain-Barré syndrome * A household contact who is severely immunocompromised (eg, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient, during those periods in which the immunocompromised individual requires care in a protective environment); additionally, subject should avoid close contact with severely immunocompromised individuals for at least 21 days after receipt of investigational product * Receipt of any investigational agent within 30 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 30 days after the dose of investigational product * Receipt of any non-study vaccine within 30 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 30 days after receipt of investigational product * Expected receipt of antipyretic or analgesic medication on a daily or every other day basis from randomization through 14 days after receipt of investigational product Note: A daily dose of up to 81 mg of aspirin for prophylactic use is not considered a contraindication to enrollment. * Administration of intranasal medications within 14 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 14 days after administration of investigational product * Receipt of influenza antiviral therapy or antiviral agents within 48 hours prior to investigational product administration or expected receipt of influenza antiviral therapy or antiviral agents through 14 days after receipt of each dose of investigational product * Known or suspected mitochondrial encephalomyopathy * Nursing mother * Any condition (eg, chronic cough) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with evaluation of the investigational product or interpretation of subject safety or study results * Employees of the clinical study site, any other individuals involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of such individuals

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Reporting Fever, Defined as Oral Temperature ≥ 101°FStudy Days 1-8A comparison of the rate of fever (oral temperature ≥ 101°F) reported during the 7 days post administration of investigational product between the monovalent vaccine and placebo groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomStudy Days 1-8Solicited symptoms were events that were considered likely to occur post dosing. Solicited symptoms for this study are listed below.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event.Study Days 1-8An adverse event (AE) was defined as: Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Study Days 1-15Solicited symptoms were events that were considered likely to occur post dosing. Solicited symptoms for this study are listed below.
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-29Study Days 1-29SAEs were those that resulted in death; were life-threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant; or were a medical event that may have jeopardized the subject and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition of a chronic, ongoing nature and assessed by the investigator as medically significant.
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-181Study Days 1-181SAEs were those that resulted in death; were life-threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant; or were a medical event that may have jeopardized the subject and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition of a chronic, ongoing nature and assessed by the investigator as medically significant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Three investigators at 3 clinical research units in the United States of America (USA) enrolled 300 subjects in May, 2010.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Monovalent Influenza Virus Vaccine
Frozen monovalent vaccine containing the new strain was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing a total volume of 0.2 mL of sucrose phosphate/concentrated gelatin-arginine-glutamate buffer, egg allantoic fluid, and approximately 10\^7 fluorescent focus units of influenza virus type A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2) virus. A single dose of investigational product was administered on Day 1.
240
Placebo
Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing 0.2 mL of sucrose phosphate/concentrated gelatin-arginine-glutamate buffer. A single dose of investigational product was administered on Day 1.
60
Total300

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMonovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePlaceboTotal
Age Continuous32.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
32.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
127 Participants29 Participants156 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
113 Participants31 Participants144 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 2402 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2400 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Fever, Defined as Oral Temperature ≥ 101°F

A comparison of the rate of fever (oral temperature ≥ 101°F) reported during the 7 days post administration of investigational product between the monovalent vaccine and placebo groups.

Time frame: Study Days 1-8

Population: All subjects who received a single dose of investigational product (monovalent vaccine = 240; placebo = 60)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Fever, Defined as Oral Temperature ≥ 101°F0.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Fever, Defined as Oral Temperature ≥ 101°F0.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Comparison of the rate of fever between the 2 treatment groups was based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals (CIs) for the rate increase (Monovalent vaccine minus Placebo) evaluated against the prespecified equivalence criterion of 5 percentage points.95% CI: [-5.2, 2.6]score statistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event.

An adverse event (AE) was defined as: Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

Time frame: Study Days 1-15

Population: All subjects who received a single dose of investigational product (monovalent vaccine = 240; placebo = 60)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event.4.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event.3.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event.

An adverse event (AE) was defined as: Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

Time frame: Study Days 1-8

Population: All subjects who received a single dose of investigational product (monovalent vaccine = 240; placebo = 60)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event.3.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event.3.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom

Solicited symptoms were events that were considered likely to occur post dosing. Solicited symptoms for this study are listed below.

Time frame: Study Days 1-8

Population: All subjects who received a single dose of investigational product (monovalent vaccine = 240; placebo = 60)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomFever > 100F0.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomCough7.5 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomFever > 103F0.0 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomVomiting0.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomAny symptom33.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomMuscle aches5.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomRunny nose13.3 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomChills2.5 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomDecreased activity (tiredness)8.3 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomFever > 102F0.0 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomHeadache16.7 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomSore throat8.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomHeadache16.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomAny symptom40.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomFever > 100F0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomFever > 102F0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomFever > 103F0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomRunny nose18.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomSore throat5.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomCough6.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomVomiting0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomMuscle aches3.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomDecreased activity (tiredness)6.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited SymptomChills1.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.

Solicited symptoms were events that were considered likely to occur post dosing. Solicited symptoms for this study are listed below.

Time frame: Study Days 1-15

Population: All subjects who received a single dose of investigational product (monovalent vaccine = 240; placebo = 60)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Sore throat10.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever > 102F0.0 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Cough8.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Any Symptom38.3 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Vomiting1.3 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever > 103F0.0 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Muscle aches7.5 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Chills3.3 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever ≥ 101F0.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Decreased activity (tiredness)8.8 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Runny nose17.1 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Headache19.2 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever > 100F1.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Headache25.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Any Symptom50.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever > 100F1.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever ≥ 101F1.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever > 102F0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Fever > 103F0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Runny nose21.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Sore throat8.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Cough6.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Vomiting0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Chills1.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Decreased activity (tiredness)8.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom.Muscle aches6.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-181

SAEs were those that resulted in death; were life-threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant; or were a medical event that may have jeopardized the subject and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition of a chronic, ongoing nature and assessed by the investigator as medically significant.

Time frame: Study Days 1-181

Population: All subjects who received a single dose of investigational product (monovalent vaccine = 240; placebo = 60)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-181Total participants reporting ≥ one SAE1.3 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-181Total participants reporting ≥ one NOCD0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-181Total participants reporting ≥ one SAE0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-181Total participants reporting ≥ one NOCD0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-29

SAEs were those that resulted in death; were life-threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant; or were a medical event that may have jeopardized the subject and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition of a chronic, ongoing nature and assessed by the investigator as medically significant.

Time frame: Study Days 1-29

Population: All subjects who received a single dose of investigational product (monovalent vaccine = 240; placebo = 60)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-29Total participants reporting ≥ one SAE0.0 Percentage of participants
Monovalent Influenza Virus VaccinePercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-29Total participants reporting ≥ one NOCD0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-29Total participants reporting ≥ one SAE0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD), Study Days 1-29Total participants reporting ≥ one NOCD0.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026