Skip to content

Evaluation of the Single Use Flexible Optical Scope Versus Multiple Use Flexible Optical Scopes for Intubation

Evaluation and Comparison of the New Single Use Ambu aScope With Olympus BF 160 Multiple Use Scope for Securing the Airway of the Anaesthetised/Awake Patients' Normal or Difficult Airway

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01100957
Enrollment
60
Registered
2010-04-09
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2011-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Airway, Tracheal Intubation

Brief summary

The study is in two parts Part one of the study describes the use of the new single-use flexible video-scope for intubation of patients with predicted normal airways. Part two compares the performance of the single-use flexible video-scope with that of a conventional flexible video-scope for awake intubation of patients with predicted difficult airways. The hypothesis is that the new single-use flexible video-scope for intubation performs as well as the traditional scope.

Interventions

PROCEDUREtracheal intubation with a single use flexible videoscope

tracheal intubation with a single use flexible videoscope

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Study part 1: * Patients scheduled for tracheal intubation and predicted to have a normal airway * ASA class I, II or III * \>18 years 2. Study part 2: * Adult patients scheduled for tracheal intubation and predicted to have a difficult airway * ASA class I, II or III * \>18 years

Exclusion criteria

1. Study part 1: * Massive bleeding from the mouth * Previously abandoned flexible optical intubation 2. Study part 2: * Massive bleeding from the mouth * Previously abandoned flexible optical intubation * Patients with audible stridor * Patients with dyspnea

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time for completion of intubationSeptember 2010This, the time for intubation, is measured immediately during the intubation, on the day that the specific patient participates in the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of intubation attemptsseptember 2010measured during the intubation
success rate of endotracheal intubationseptember 2010measured during the intubation
total time for the intubation-procedure inclusive the time for distributing local analgesicsseptember 2010measured during the intubation
time for preparing and cleaning the endoscopesseptember 2010this is measured in the hour before and after the intubation
Evaluation of the insertion cord of the flexible scopeseptember 2010measured during the intubation
Evaluation of the working-/-injection-channelseptember 2010measured during the intubation
Quality of the image from the videoscopeseptember 2010Observed immediately before, and during, the intubation

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026