Skip to content

Floseal Treatment for Posterior Epistaxis Study

Floseal Posterior Epistaxis Pilot Study (PEPIS)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01098578
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-04-02
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2015-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epistaxis

Keywords

Posterior Epistaxis

Brief summary

Effectiveness of Floseal for the treatment of posterior epistaxis.

Detailed description

Floseal, a hemostatic agent, is an effective treatment for anterior epistaxis as well as numerous other acute bleeding conditions throughout the body. The investigators hypothesize that Floseal is an effective treatment for posterior epistaxis. If so, then this will also lead to significant cost savings in comparison to any other method of treatment of posterior epistaxis. The investigators have planned a prospective, nonblinded, nonrandomised study with a total of 40 subjects with posterior epistaxis to be included in this study.

Interventions

Received 1 syringe of Floseal as treatment for posterior epistaxis.

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age greater than 18 years of age * posterior epistaxis

Exclusion criteria

* patients with anterior epistaxis * known sensitivity to any of the materials of Floseal or the topical medications administered as part of the evaluation and treatment of epistaxis (lidocaine, xylometazoline hydrochloride) * pregnant or breast feeding woman

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness of Floseal for the Treatment of Posterior Epistaxis.Immediate effect with 1 hour observation and follow-up at 5 and 30 days following treatment.Successful treatment using the gelatin-thrombin matrix protocol (Floseal) was any case of posterior epistaxis that stopped following the immediate application of either one or two syringes of Floseal® and the epistaxis did not resume within fourteen days of the treatment date.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost Savings of Floseal Treatment in Comparison to Posterior Packing, Surgical, and Embolisation Treatments for Posterior Epistaxis.30 daysThe institutional cost for the treatment of posterior epistaxis patients with posterior packing, endoscopic surgery, and endovascular embolization, at TOH were calculated and compared with the institutional cost of a patient visit for posterior epistaxis successfully treated with the study protocol using Floseal. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars (CAD), they were converted to US dollars (USD) using the current monetary exchange rate (total CAD x 1.03= total USD). For all of the patients treated in this study, the total institution cost was $24487.53 (USD). The minimal institutional cost of successfully treating all of the study patients with endoscopic surgery, would have been $53933.89 (USD) or 2.2 times the actual expense. (Total cost 20 participants Floseal/expected total cost 20 endoscopic surgery\*100)This represents savings of $29446.39 (USD) or 45.40%

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Institutional Cost SavingsEnd of study. Cost calculated after 20 patients were treated with FlosealDifference between the total institutional cost of successfully treating 20 study patients with Floseal compared to the total institutional cost of treating the same number of patient with endoscopic surgery

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients who presented to the emergency department with posterior epistaxis or who were already admitted to hospital for another diagnosis and had posterior epistaxis were offered enrollment. Recruitment period April 2010- April 2012

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Floseal
Received Floseal treatment for posterior epistaxis. Floseal : Received Floseal as treatment for posterior epistaxis.
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFloseal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.06
Region of Enrollment
Canada
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Effectiveness of Floseal for the Treatment of Posterior Epistaxis.

Successful treatment using the gelatin-thrombin matrix protocol (Floseal) was any case of posterior epistaxis that stopped following the immediate application of either one or two syringes of Floseal® and the epistaxis did not resume within fourteen days of the treatment date.

Time frame: Immediate effect with 1 hour observation and follow-up at 5 and 30 days following treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FlosealEffectiveness of Floseal for the Treatment of Posterior Epistaxis.20 participants
Secondary

Cost Savings of Floseal Treatment in Comparison to Posterior Packing, Surgical, and Embolisation Treatments for Posterior Epistaxis.

The institutional cost for the treatment of posterior epistaxis patients with posterior packing, endoscopic surgery, and endovascular embolization, at TOH were calculated and compared with the institutional cost of a patient visit for posterior epistaxis successfully treated with the study protocol using Floseal. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars (CAD), they were converted to US dollars (USD) using the current monetary exchange rate (total CAD x 1.03= total USD). For all of the patients treated in this study, the total institution cost was $24487.53 (USD). The minimal institutional cost of successfully treating all of the study patients with endoscopic surgery, would have been $53933.89 (USD) or 2.2 times the actual expense. (Total cost 20 participants Floseal/expected total cost 20 endoscopic surgery\*100)This represents savings of $29446.39 (USD) or 45.40%

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FlosealCost Savings of Floseal Treatment in Comparison to Posterior Packing, Surgical, and Embolisation Treatments for Posterior Epistaxis.45.40 percentage of expected cost
Other Pre-specified

Total Institutional Cost Savings

Difference between the total institutional cost of successfully treating 20 study patients with Floseal compared to the total institutional cost of treating the same number of patient with endoscopic surgery

Time frame: End of study. Cost calculated after 20 patients were treated with Floseal

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FlosealTotal Institutional Cost Savings24487.53 US Dollars
Endoscopic SurgeryTotal Institutional Cost Savings53933.89 US Dollars

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026