Skip to content

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes With Renal Impairment.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide as Compared With Sitagliptin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Renal Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01098539
Enrollment
507
Registered
2010-04-02
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2017-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

sitagliptin, albiglutide, renal impairment

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.

Detailed description

This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 2 parallel-group, multicenter study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly subcutaneously injected dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALalbiglutide

albiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection + sitagliptin matching placebo

DRUGsitagliptin

albiglutide matching placebo + sitagliptin (25mg, 50mg or 100mg depending on level of renal impairment)

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is experiencing inadequate glycemic control on their current regime of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, TZD, SU, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications * BMI \>/=20 kg/m2 and \</=45 kg/m2 * Fasting C-peptide \>/=0.8 ng/mL (\>/=0.26 nmol/L) * HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive.

Exclusion criteria

* History of cancer * History of treated diabetic gastroparesis * Current biliary disease or history of pancreatitis * History of significant gastrointestinal surgery * Recent clinically significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease * History of human immunodeficiency virus infection * Abnormal liver function or acute symptomatic infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C * Female subject is pregnant (confirmed by laboratory testing), lactating, or \<6 weeks postpartum * Known allergy to any GLP 1 analogue, sitagliptin, other study medications' excipients, excipients of albiglutide, or Baker's yeast * Receipt of any investigational drug or sitagliptin within the 30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, before Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months before randomization or receipt of albiglutide in previous studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26Baseline; Week 26HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 26 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (\<65 years versus \>=65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and 52HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Observed Cases (OC) method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26Baseline; Week 26The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is define as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline FPG + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.
Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCBaseline; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, Week 52The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCFWeek 26The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., the number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCFWeek 26The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 26 were assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OCWeek 52The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 2 to Week 52Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue.
Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 2 to Week 52Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time is divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCFBaseline; Week 26Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline weight + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFBaseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 26Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCBaseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 26, Week 36, Week 48, and Week 52Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used observed weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.
Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16Week 8 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), Week 8 Post-dose (at least 2 days after a dose of medication), Week 16 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), and Week 16 Post-dose (at least 2 days after previous dose of albiglutide)Sparse population pharmacokinetic (PK) data were collected for population PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses. Participants (par.) who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen. Beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic parameters. As such, albiglutide plasma conc. achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of par. who received either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations. The PK and PK/PD of albiglutide were characterized using a population modeling approach. Mean albiglutide plasma conc. observed at Weeks 8 and 16 are presented. Par. came to the clinic at Weeks 8 and 16 without taking albiglutide/matching placebo. The pre-dose PK sample was taken immediately prior to dosing. The Week 8 post-dose sample was taken between Weeks 8 and 10, \>=2 days after a dose of medication. The Week 16 post-dose PK sample was taken any time between Weeks 16 and 20, \>=2 days after the previous dose of albiglutide.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OCWeek 52The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 52 assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.

Countries

Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Germany, India, Israel, Peru, Philippines, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants entered into 2 weeks of Pre-screening and Screening; 4 weeks of Run-in/stabilization; 52-week Treatment Period for evaluation of efficacy and safety and 8 weeks of post treatment Follow-up. A total of 771 participants were screened, 507 were randomized and 495 received at least one dose of study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Albiglutide 30 mg
Participants received albiglutide 30 milligrams (mg) once weekly subcutaneously from Baseline until Week 52, with optional up-titration to 50 mg if additional glycemic control was required. Albiglutide was injected subcutaneously into the abdomen, on alternating right and left sides of the body. Participants also received sitagliptin matching placebo once daily orally. Participants who qualified for hyperglycemia rescue, on or after Week 2, continued in the study after rescue and continued to receive study treatment until study completion.
249
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Participants with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>89 milliliters per minute \[mL/min\]) received a sitagliptin 100 mg overcoated tablet once daily orally from Baseline until Week 52. The dose of sitagliptin was adjusted in a range of 25-100 mg based on the participant's severity of renal impairment using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. Participants also received albiglutide matching placebo once weekly subcutaneously from Baseline until Week 52. Albiglutide matching placebo was injected subcutaneously into the abdomen, on alternating right and left sides of the body. Participants who qualified for hyperglycemia rescue, on or after Week 2, continued in the study after rescue and continued to receive study treatment until study completion.
246
Total495

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2626
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up44
Overall StudyNoncompliance35
Overall StudyPhysician Decision53
Overall StudyProtocol Violation14
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1226

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlbiglutide 30 mgSitagliptin 100 mgTotal
Age, Continuous63.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.37
63.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
63.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.69
Gender
Female
113 Participants116 Participants229 Participants
Gender
Male
136 Participants130 Participants266 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
36 Participants42 Participants78 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
45 Participants33 Participants78 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
26 Participants29 Participants55 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
112 Participants111 Participants223 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
174 / 249162 / 246
serious
Total, serious adverse events
30 / 24933 / 246

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 26 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (\<65 years versus \>=65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and who had at least one post-Baseline assessment of the primary endpoint, HbA1c. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26-0.83 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Error 0.062
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26-0.52 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Error 0.063
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.49, -0.15]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline weight + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF-0.79 KilogramsStandard Error 0.192
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF-0.19 KilogramsStandard Error 0.194
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 1, n=225, 225-0.17 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.215
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 2, n=241, 238-0.21 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.317
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 3, n=244, 240-0.25 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.392
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 4, n=244, 240-0.33 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.456
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 8, n=244, 240-0.58 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.768
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 12, n=244, 240-0.47 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.055
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 16, n=244, 240-0.63 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.197
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 20, n=244, 240-0.69 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.556
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 20, n=244, 240-0.07 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.878
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 1, n=225, 2250.12 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.237
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 8, n=244, 2400.02 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.952
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 2, n=241, 238-0.02 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.423
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 16, n=244, 240-0.08 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.564
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 3, n=244, 2400.01 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.53
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 12, n=244, 2400.03 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.254
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCFWeek 4, n=244, 2400.09 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.806
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used observed weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 26, Week 36, Week 48, and Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 3, n=236, 224-0.24 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.404
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 16, n=223, 210-0.68 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.226
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 52, n=157, 119-0.82 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.931
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 20, n=211, 198-0.76 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.619
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 4, n=235, 230-0.31 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.466
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 26, n=202, 178-0.87 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.856
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 2, n=232, 227-0.21 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.339
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 36, n=190, 155-0.92 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.551
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 8, n=226, 214-0.61 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.8
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 48, n=172, 140-0.93 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.829
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 1, n=225, 225-0.17 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.215
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 12, n=228, 219-0.45 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.091
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 52, n=157, 1190.31 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.685
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 1, n=225, 2250.12 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.237
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 2, n=232, 227-0.01 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.438
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 3, n=236, 2240.03 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.544
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 4, n=235, 2300.10 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.827
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 8, n=226, 2140.05 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.012
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 12, n=228, 2190.16 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.193
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 16, n=223, 2100.07 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.589
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 20, n=211, 1980.09 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.976
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 26, n=202, 178-0.04 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.465
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 36, n=190, 1550.01 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.975
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OCWeek 48, n=172, 1400.07 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.349
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is define as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline FPG + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26-1.42 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.183
Sitagliptin 100 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26-0.22 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.184
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 1, n=219, 217-0.82 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.572
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 2, n=226, 223-1.28 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.569
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 3, n=230, 219-1.25 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.168
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 4, n=231, 226-1.55 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.859
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 8, n=221, 210-1.24 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.896
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 12, n=224, 216-1.46 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.623
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 16, n=214, 204-1.41 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.796
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 20, n=207, 191-1.51 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.859
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 26, n=200, 177-1.54 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.507
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 36, n=186, 149-1.42 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.788
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 48, n=165, 140-1.08 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.72
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 52, n=149, 114-1.06 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.85
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 48, n=165, 140-0.58 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.725
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 1, n=219, 217-0.93 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.207
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 16, n=214, 204-0.55 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.023
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 2, n=226, 223-0.66 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.319
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 36, n=186, 149-0.92 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.628
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 3, n=230, 219-0.88 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.136
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 20, n=207, 191-1.00 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.474
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 4, n=231, 226-0.76 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.569
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 52, n=149, 114-0.96 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.281
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 8, n=221, 210-0.74 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.877
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 26, n=200, 177-0.58 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.673
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OCWeek 12, n=224, 216-0.88 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.723
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 8, n=244, 240-1.19 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.115
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 16, n=244, 240-1.34 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.07
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 12, n=244, 240-1.35 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.93
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 20, n=244, 240-1.37 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.198
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 4, n=244, 240-1.47 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.054
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 20, n=244, 240-0.62 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.257
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 4, n=244, 240-0.84 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.67
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 8, n=244, 240-0.82 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.169
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 12, n=244, 240-0.81 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.214
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCFWeek 16, n=244, 240-0.49 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.44
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Observed Cases (OC) method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and 52

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 8, n=222, 213-0.63 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.677
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 26, n=202, 178-0.93 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.806
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 16, n=218, 209-0.75 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.885
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 36, n=192, 155-1.01 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.808
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 12, n=224, 216-0.71 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.832
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 48, n=172, 139-1.01 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.884
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 20, n=207, 196-0.86 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.852
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 52, n=157, 118-1.04 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.796
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 4, n=233, 228-0.43 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.463
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 52, n=157, 118-1.03 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.883
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 4, n=233, 228-0.37 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.512
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 8, n=222, 213-0.56 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.794
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 12, n=224, 216-0.62 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.94
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 16, n=218, 209-0.63 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 1.085
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 20, n=207, 196-0.71 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.931
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 26, n=202, 178-0.80 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.887
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 36, n=192, 155-0.82 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 1.014
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed CasesWeek 48, n=172, 139-0.89 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.977
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 8, n=242, 236-0.60 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.663
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 16, n=242, 236-0.75 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.886
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 12, n=242, 236-0.69 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.84
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 20, n=242, 236-0.79 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.89
Albiglutide 30 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 4, n=237, 234-0.43 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.46
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 20, n=242, 236-0.54 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 1.083
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 4, n=237, 234-0.37 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.512
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 8, n=242, 236-0.52 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.785
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 12, n=242, 236-0.56 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 0.989
Sitagliptin 100 mgMean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCFWeek 16, n=242, 236-0.56 Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodStandard Deviation 1.103
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c <7.0%98 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c <6.5%44 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c <6.5%27 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c <7.0%61 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF

The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 26 were assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c >=1.0%102 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c >=1.5%49 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c >=2.0%26 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c >=1.0%77 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c >=1.5%38 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c >=2.0%17 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC

The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 52 assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c >=1.0%79 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c >=1.5%43 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c >=2.0%20 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c >=1.0%65 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c >=1.5%30 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OCHbA1c >=2.0%15 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., the number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c <6.5%37 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c <7.0%103 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c <6.5%29 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCFHbA1c <7.0%72 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52

Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue.

Time frame: Week 2 to Week 52

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 209 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 122 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 2615 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 40 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 3625 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 81 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 4833 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 165 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 5244 Participants
Albiglutide 30 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 20 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 5268 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 83 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 22 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 125 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 166 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 2014 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 2629 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 3647 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 4853 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52Week 42 Participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16

Sparse population pharmacokinetic (PK) data were collected for population PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses. Participants (par.) who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen. Beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic parameters. As such, albiglutide plasma conc. achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of par. who received either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations. The PK and PK/PD of albiglutide were characterized using a population modeling approach. Mean albiglutide plasma conc. observed at Weeks 8 and 16 are presented. Par. came to the clinic at Weeks 8 and 16 without taking albiglutide/matching placebo. The pre-dose PK sample was taken immediately prior to dosing. The Week 8 post-dose sample was taken between Weeks 8 and 10, \>=2 days after a dose of medication. The Week 16 post-dose PK sample was taken any time between Weeks 16 and 20, \>=2 days after the previous dose of albiglutide.

Time frame: Week 8 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), Week 8 Post-dose (at least 2 days after a dose of medication), Week 16 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), and Week 16 Post-dose (at least 2 days after previous dose of albiglutide)

Population: ITT population. Only participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Albiglutide 30 mgPlasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16Week 8, Pre-dose, n=2233005.80 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1788.544
Albiglutide 30 mgPlasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16Week 8, Post-dose, n=2203452.62 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1912.329
Albiglutide 30 mgPlasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16Week 16, Pre-dose, n=2152994.15 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1759.161
Albiglutide 30 mgPlasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16Week 16, Post-dose, n=2053583.06 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2239.026
Secondary

Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52

Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time is divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.

Time frame: Week 2 to Week 52

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Albiglutide 30 mgTime to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52NA Weeks
Sitagliptin 100 mgTime to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52NA Weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026