Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Conditions
Keywords
sitagliptin, albiglutide, renal impairment
Brief summary
This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.
Detailed description
This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 2 parallel-group, multicenter study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly subcutaneously injected dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.
Interventions
albiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection + sitagliptin matching placebo
albiglutide matching placebo + sitagliptin (25mg, 50mg or 100mg depending on level of renal impairment)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is experiencing inadequate glycemic control on their current regime of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, TZD, SU, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications * BMI \>/=20 kg/m2 and \</=45 kg/m2 * Fasting C-peptide \>/=0.8 ng/mL (\>/=0.26 nmol/L) * HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive.
Exclusion criteria
* History of cancer * History of treated diabetic gastroparesis * Current biliary disease or history of pancreatitis * History of significant gastrointestinal surgery * Recent clinically significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease * History of human immunodeficiency virus infection * Abnormal liver function or acute symptomatic infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C * Female subject is pregnant (confirmed by laboratory testing), lactating, or \<6 weeks postpartum * Known allergy to any GLP 1 analogue, sitagliptin, other study medications' excipients, excipients of albiglutide, or Baker's yeast * Receipt of any investigational drug or sitagliptin within the 30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, before Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months before randomization or receipt of albiglutide in previous studies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26 | Baseline; Week 26 | HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 26 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (\<65 years versus \>=65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and 52 | HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Observed Cases (OC) method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26 | Baseline; Week 26 | The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is define as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline FPG + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26 | The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, Week 52 | The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF | Week 26 | The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., the number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF | Week 26 | The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 26 were assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC | Week 52 | The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 | HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 2 to Week 52 | Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. |
| Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 2 to Week 52 | Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time is divided by 7 to express the result in weeks. |
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF | Baseline; Week 26 | Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline weight + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. |
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 26 | Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. |
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 26, Week 36, Week 48, and Week 52 | Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used observed weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. |
| Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16 | Week 8 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), Week 8 Post-dose (at least 2 days after a dose of medication), Week 16 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), and Week 16 Post-dose (at least 2 days after previous dose of albiglutide) | Sparse population pharmacokinetic (PK) data were collected for population PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses. Participants (par.) who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen. Beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic parameters. As such, albiglutide plasma conc. achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of par. who received either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations. The PK and PK/PD of albiglutide were characterized using a population modeling approach. Mean albiglutide plasma conc. observed at Weeks 8 and 16 are presented. Par. came to the clinic at Weeks 8 and 16 without taking albiglutide/matching placebo. The pre-dose PK sample was taken immediately prior to dosing. The Week 8 post-dose sample was taken between Weeks 8 and 10, \>=2 days after a dose of medication. The Week 16 post-dose PK sample was taken any time between Weeks 16 and 20, \>=2 days after the previous dose of albiglutide. |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC | Week 52 | The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 52 assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. |
Countries
Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Germany, India, Israel, Peru, Philippines, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Eligible participants entered into 2 weeks of Pre-screening and Screening; 4 weeks of Run-in/stabilization; 52-week Treatment Period for evaluation of efficacy and safety and 8 weeks of post treatment Follow-up. A total of 771 participants were screened, 507 were randomized and 495 received at least one dose of study treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg Participants received albiglutide 30 milligrams (mg) once weekly subcutaneously from Baseline until Week 52, with optional up-titration to 50 mg if additional glycemic control was required. Albiglutide was injected subcutaneously into the abdomen, on alternating right and left sides of the body. Participants also received sitagliptin matching placebo once daily orally. Participants who qualified for hyperglycemia rescue, on or after Week 2, continued in the study after rescue and continued to receive study treatment until study completion. | 249 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg Participants with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>89 milliliters per minute \[mL/min\]) received a sitagliptin 100 mg overcoated tablet once daily orally from Baseline until Week 52. The dose of sitagliptin was adjusted in a range of 25-100 mg based on the participant's severity of renal impairment using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. Participants also received albiglutide matching placebo once weekly subcutaneously from Baseline until Week 52. Albiglutide matching placebo was injected subcutaneously into the abdomen, on alternating right and left sides of the body. Participants who qualified for hyperglycemia rescue, on or after Week 2, continued in the study after rescue and continued to receive study treatment until study completion. | 246 |
| Total | 495 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 26 | 26 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Noncompliance | 3 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 5 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 12 | 26 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Albiglutide 30 mg | Sitagliptin 100 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.37 | 63.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02 | 63.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.69 |
| Gender Female | 113 Participants | 116 Participants | 229 Participants |
| Gender Male | 136 Participants | 130 Participants | 266 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American/African Heritage | 36 Participants | 42 Participants | 78 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaskan Native | 16 Participants | 16 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage | 45 Participants | 33 Participants | 78 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - East Asian Heritage | 26 Participants | 29 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - South East Asian Heritage | 13 Participants | 14 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - Arabic/North African Heritage | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage | 112 Participants | 111 Participants | 223 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 174 / 249 | 162 / 246 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 30 / 249 | 33 / 246 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 26 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (\<65 years versus \>=65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 26
Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and who had at least one post-Baseline assessment of the primary endpoint, HbA1c. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26 | -0.83 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Error 0.062 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26 | -0.52 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Error 0.063 |
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline weight + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 26
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF | -0.79 Kilograms | Standard Error 0.192 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF | -0.19 Kilograms | Standard Error 0.194 |
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 26
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 1, n=225, 225 | -0.17 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.215 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 2, n=241, 238 | -0.21 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.317 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 3, n=244, 240 | -0.25 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.392 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 4, n=244, 240 | -0.33 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.456 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 8, n=244, 240 | -0.58 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.768 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 12, n=244, 240 | -0.47 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.055 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 16, n=244, 240 | -0.63 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.197 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 20, n=244, 240 | -0.69 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.556 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 20, n=244, 240 | -0.07 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.878 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 1, n=225, 225 | 0.12 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.237 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 8, n=244, 240 | 0.02 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.952 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 2, n=241, 238 | -0.02 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.423 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 16, n=244, 240 | -0.08 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.564 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 3, n=244, 240 | 0.01 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 12, n=244, 240 | 0.03 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.254 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF | Week 4, n=244, 240 | 0.09 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.806 |
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used observed weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 26, Week 36, Week 48, and Week 52
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 3, n=236, 224 | -0.24 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.404 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 16, n=223, 210 | -0.68 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.226 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 52, n=157, 119 | -0.82 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 3.931 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 20, n=211, 198 | -0.76 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.619 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 4, n=235, 230 | -0.31 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.466 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 26, n=202, 178 | -0.87 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.856 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 2, n=232, 227 | -0.21 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.339 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 36, n=190, 155 | -0.92 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 3.551 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 8, n=226, 214 | -0.61 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 48, n=172, 140 | -0.93 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 3.829 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 1, n=225, 225 | -0.17 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.215 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 12, n=228, 219 | -0.45 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.091 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 52, n=157, 119 | 0.31 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 3.685 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 1, n=225, 225 | 0.12 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.237 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 2, n=232, 227 | -0.01 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.438 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 3, n=236, 224 | 0.03 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.544 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 4, n=235, 230 | 0.10 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 1.827 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 8, n=226, 214 | 0.05 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.012 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 12, n=228, 219 | 0.16 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.193 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 16, n=223, 210 | 0.07 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.589 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 20, n=211, 198 | 0.09 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.976 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 26, n=202, 178 | -0.04 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 3.465 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 36, n=190, 155 | 0.01 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 2.975 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC | Week 48, n=172, 140 | 0.07 Kilograms | Standard Deviation 3.349 |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is define as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline FPG + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 26
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26 | -1.42 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Error 0.183 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26 | -0.22 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Error 0.184 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, Week 52
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 1, n=219, 217 | -0.82 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.572 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 2, n=226, 223 | -1.28 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.569 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 3, n=230, 219 | -1.25 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.168 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 4, n=231, 226 | -1.55 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.859 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 8, n=221, 210 | -1.24 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.896 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 12, n=224, 216 | -1.46 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.623 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 16, n=214, 204 | -1.41 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.796 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 20, n=207, 191 | -1.51 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.859 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 26, n=200, 177 | -1.54 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.507 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 36, n=186, 149 | -1.42 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.788 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 48, n=165, 140 | -1.08 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 52, n=149, 114 | -1.06 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.85 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 48, n=165, 140 | -0.58 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.725 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 1, n=219, 217 | -0.93 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.207 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 16, n=214, 204 | -0.55 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.023 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 2, n=226, 223 | -0.66 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.319 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 36, n=186, 149 | -0.92 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.628 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 3, n=230, 219 | -0.88 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.136 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 20, n=207, 191 | -1.00 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.474 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 4, n=231, 226 | -0.76 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.569 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 52, n=149, 114 | -0.96 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.281 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 8, n=221, 210 | -0.74 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.877 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 26, n=200, 177 | -0.58 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.673 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC | Week 12, n=224, 216 | -0.88 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.723 |
Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 8, n=244, 240 | -1.19 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.115 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 16, n=244, 240 | -1.34 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 12, n=244, 240 | -1.35 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 20, n=244, 240 | -1.37 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.198 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 4, n=244, 240 | -1.47 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.054 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 20, n=244, 240 | -0.62 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.257 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 4, n=244, 240 | -0.84 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.67 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 8, n=244, 240 | -0.82 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.169 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 12, n=244, 240 | -0.81 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.214 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF | Week 16, n=244, 240 | -0.49 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.44 |
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Observed Cases (OC) method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and 52
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 8, n=222, 213 | -0.63 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.677 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 26, n=202, 178 | -0.93 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.806 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 16, n=218, 209 | -0.75 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.885 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 36, n=192, 155 | -1.01 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.808 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 12, n=224, 216 | -0.71 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.832 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 48, n=172, 139 | -1.01 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.884 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 20, n=207, 196 | -0.86 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.852 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 52, n=157, 118 | -1.04 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.796 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 4, n=233, 228 | -0.43 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.463 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 52, n=157, 118 | -1.03 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.883 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 4, n=233, 228 | -0.37 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.512 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 8, n=222, 213 | -0.56 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.794 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 12, n=224, 216 | -0.62 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 16, n=218, 209 | -0.63 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 1.085 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 20, n=207, 196 | -0.71 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.931 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 26, n=202, 178 | -0.80 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.887 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 36, n=192, 155 | -0.82 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 1.014 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases | Week 48, n=172, 139 | -0.89 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.977 |
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 8, n=242, 236 | -0.60 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.663 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 16, n=242, 236 | -0.75 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.886 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 12, n=242, 236 | -0.69 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 20, n=242, 236 | -0.79 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 4, n=237, 234 | -0.43 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 20, n=242, 236 | -0.54 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 1.083 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 4, n=237, 234 | -0.37 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.512 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 8, n=242, 236 | -0.52 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.785 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 12, n=242, 236 | -0.56 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 0.989 |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF | Week 16, n=242, 236 | -0.56 Percentage of HbA1c in the blood | Standard Deviation 1.103 |
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c <7.0% | 98 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c <6.5% | 44 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c <6.5% | 27 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c <7.0% | 61 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF
The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 26 were assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c >=1.0% | 102 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c >=1.5% | 49 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c >=2.0% | 26 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c >=1.0% | 77 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c >=1.5% | 38 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c >=2.0% | 17 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC
The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of \>=1.0%, \>=1.5%, and \>=2.0% at Week 52 assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c >=1.0% | 79 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c >=1.5% | 43 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c >=2.0% | 20 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c >=1.0% | 65 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c >=1.5% | 30 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC | HbA1c >=2.0% | 15 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., the number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and \<6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time point were assessed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c <6.5% | 37 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c <7.0% | 103 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c <6.5% | 29 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF | HbA1c <7.0% | 72 Participants |
Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52
Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue.
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 52
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 20 | 9 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 12 | 2 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 26 | 15 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 4 | 0 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 36 | 25 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 8 | 1 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 48 | 33 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 16 | 5 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 52 | 44 Participants |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 2 | 0 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 52 | 68 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 8 | 3 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 2 | 2 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 12 | 5 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 16 | 6 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 20 | 14 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 26 | 29 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 36 | 47 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 48 | 53 Participants |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | Week 4 | 2 Participants |
Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16
Sparse population pharmacokinetic (PK) data were collected for population PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses. Participants (par.) who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen. Beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic parameters. As such, albiglutide plasma conc. achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of par. who received either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations. The PK and PK/PD of albiglutide were characterized using a population modeling approach. Mean albiglutide plasma conc. observed at Weeks 8 and 16 are presented. Par. came to the clinic at Weeks 8 and 16 without taking albiglutide/matching placebo. The pre-dose PK sample was taken immediately prior to dosing. The Week 8 post-dose sample was taken between Weeks 8 and 10, \>=2 days after a dose of medication. The Week 16 post-dose PK sample was taken any time between Weeks 16 and 20, \>=2 days after the previous dose of albiglutide.
Time frame: Week 8 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), Week 8 Post-dose (at least 2 days after a dose of medication), Week 16 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), and Week 16 Post-dose (at least 2 days after previous dose of albiglutide)
Population: ITT population. Only participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16 | Week 8, Pre-dose, n=223 | 3005.80 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1788.544 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16 | Week 8, Post-dose, n=220 | 3452.62 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1912.329 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16 | Week 16, Pre-dose, n=215 | 2994.15 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1759.161 |
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16 | Week 16, Post-dose, n=205 | 3583.06 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 2239.026 |
Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52
Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value \>=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the \>Week 4 and \<Week 12 visits, a single FPG value \>=250 mg/dL and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 12 and \<Week 26 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 26 and \<Week 48 visits, HbA1c \>=8.5% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks; for the \>=Week 48 and \<Week 52 visits, HbA1c \>=8.0% and previous titration for \>=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time is divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 52
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Albiglutide 30 mg | Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | NA Weeks |
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52 | NA Weeks |