Skip to content

A Longitudinal 2-year Bone Marrow Study of Eltrombopag in Previously Treated Adults, With Chronic Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)

A Longitudinal 2-year Bone Marrow Study of Eltrombopag Olamine (SB-497115-GR) in Previously Treated Adults, With Chronic Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01098487
Enrollment
167
Registered
2010-04-02
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2015-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic

Keywords

Immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), bone marrow fibers, eltrombopag olamine, thrombopoietin receptor agonist

Brief summary

A open-label, multi-center 2-year safety study to ascertain the baseline levels of bone marrow fibers in previously treated adults with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and to evaluate the long-term effect of eltrombopag on bone marrow fibers. The study will also describe the long-term safety and tolerability of oral eltrombopag treatment in subjects with chronic ITP.

Detailed description

This is a phase IV, open-label safety study, designed to determine baseline levels of bone marrow fibers in previously treated adults with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)and to evaluate the long-term effect of eltrombopag on bone marrow reticulin and/or collagen fibers. The duration of the screening period is up to 8 weeks. Eltrombopag will be administered for at least 2-years followed by a 4-week follow-up period. Bone marrow biopsies will be performed at screening, after 1-year and 2-years of eltrombopag treatment, and at early withdrawal of treatment. The screening bone marrow biopsy should be performed within 8 weeks of planned start of study medication and the bone marrow biopsy block must be available for central laboratory processing.

Interventions

Thrombopoietin receptor agonist

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have signed and dated a written informed consent and be able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions. * Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with chronic ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Hematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines \[George, 1996; BCSH, 2003; Provan, 2009\]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other disease causative of thrombocytopenia (e.g., pseudo thrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease, which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP. * Subjects must be physically eligible for serial bone marrow biopsies and must have a bone marrow biopsy performed during screening, and be willing to remain on the study for at least 2 years with annual bone marrow biopsies. * Subjects, who previously received eltrombopag or romiplostim, must have completed treatment with these therapies at least 6 months prior to the screening bone marrow biopsy. * Subjects must have the following clinical chemistry values: * ALT and AST \< 2xULN; * Bilirubin \<1.5xULN (except for Gilbert's Syndrome); * Subjects are practicing an acceptable method of contraception as specified in the protocol. * In France, subjects will be eligible for inclusion in this study, only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another primary diagnosis (e.g., thrombocytopenia is secondary to another disease). * Subjects with any concurrent malignant disease and/or a recent history of cancer treatment with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Exception: Subjects with a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated in situ carcinoma are eligible. * Subjects with any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND ≥ two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any family history of arterial or venous thrombosis. * Subjects with screening bone marrow fibers of either MF Grade 3 using European Consensus scale or Grade 4 using Bauermeister scale. * Subjects with a QTc \>450 msec or \> 480 msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block. * Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening. * Subjects treated with an investigational drug (other than a thrombopopoetin-receptor (TPO-R) agonist) within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of eltrombopag in the study. (For romiplostim or eltrombopag, see inclusion criterion #4). * Subjects treated with any TPO-R agonist other than romiplostim or eltrombopag. * Subjects with recent history of alcohol/drug abuse as determined by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 Year2 yearsThe change from Baseline to on-treatment assessments of collagen level was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period.
Number of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearBaseline and 1 yearThe change from baseline to on-treatment assessments of European Consensus (EC) scale was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period. MF-0 is scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal BM; MF-1 is loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; MF-2 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF-3 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.
Number of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsBaseline and 2 yearsThe change from baseline to on-treatment assessments of European Consensus (EC) scale was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period. MF-0 is scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal BM; MF-1 is loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; MF-2 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF-3 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.
Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 Year1 yearThe change from Baseline to on-treatment assessments of collagen level was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period.
Number of Participants With Bone Marrow (BM) Fibers of MF Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 on the European Consensus (EC) Scale at BaselineBaselineThe evaluation of fibrosis was performed using BM biopsies in which the amount of fibrosis was assessed by the EC Grading Scale. This method distinguishes four degrees of fibrosis (myelofibrosis \[MF\]-0 to MF-3). MF Grade (G) 0 is scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal BM; MF Grade 1 is loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; MF Grade 2 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF Grade 3 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.
Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at BaselineBaselineThe number of participants with a positive or negative collagen level was analyzed. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyFrom Week 1 up to Week 104 and up to 6 months follow-up (4 weeks for most participants) (up to approximately 2.5 years)Hematology parameters were summarized according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.0: G0, none; G1, mild; G2, moderate; G3, severe; G4, life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin (increased), hemoglobin (anemia), lymphocyte count (increased), lymphocyte count (decreased), total absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count and white blood cell (WBC) count. Baseline values were obtained at Day 1. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). The maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade includes any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment during.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post TherapyFrom Week 1 up to Week 104 and up to 6 months follow-up (4 weeks for most participants) (up to approximately 2.5 years)On-therapy + 1 day is defined as AEs started between the first dose of eltrombopag and up to the day after the last dose of eltrombopag; \>1 to 30 days post therapy is defined as AEs that started more than 1 day and up to 30 days after the last dose of eltrombopag; \>30 days post therapy is defined as AEs started that started more than 30 days after the last dose of eltrombopag. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyFrom Week 1 up to Week 104 and up to 6 months follow-up (4 weeks for most participants) (up to approximately 2.5 years)Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.0: G0, none; G1, mild; G2, moderate; G3, severe; G4, life-threatening or disabling. Clinical chemistry parameters included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium (hypercalcemia), calcium (hypocalcemia), potassium (hyperkalemia), potassium (hypokalemia), sodium (hypernatremia), sodium (hyponatremia), inorganic phosphorus and creatinine. Baseline values were obtained at Day 1. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). The maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade includes any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment during.

Countries

Czechia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Italy, Pakistan, Russia, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 167 participants were enrolled and received at least one dose of study medication. The 5 enrolled participants from center 082877 were excluded from the analysis due to the following: serious good clinical practice (GCP) findings related to informed consent, source documents and investigator study oversight.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eltrombopag
Participants received an Open-label treatment of eltrombopag administered as a tablet for up to 2 years (104 weeks), followed by a follow-up period of up to 6 months (only 4 weeks for most participants). The starting dose of eltrombopag was 50 milligrams (mg), once daily (QD). East Asian participants started at a dose of 25 mg QD. The maximum dose allowed was 75 mg daily. Dose modifications were allowed based upon each participant's individual platelet count response.
162
Total162

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event22
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEltrombopag
Age, Continuous43.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.31
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
47 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
104 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
114 / 162
serious
Total, serious adverse events
42 / 162

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 Year

The change from Baseline to on-treatment assessments of collagen level was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ATS Population. Participants with bone marrow biopsy data available in the relevant time period were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 YearNegative to Negative120 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 YearNegative to Positive5 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 YearPositive to Negative0 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 YearPositive to Positive0 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 YearMissing to Negative2 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 1 YearMissing to Positive0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 Year

The change from Baseline to on-treatment assessments of collagen level was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ATS Population. Participants with bone marrow biopsy data available in the relevant time period were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 YearNegative to Negative90 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 YearNegative to Positive1 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 YearPositive to Negative0 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 YearPositive to Positive0 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 YearMissing to Negative2 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at 2 YearMissing to Positive0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at Baseline

The number of participants with a positive or negative collagen level was analyzed. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: ATS Population. Participants with bone marrow biopsy data available in the relevant time period were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at BaselineNegative159 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Positive or Negative Collagen Level at BaselinePositive0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Bone Marrow (BM) Fibers of MF Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 on the European Consensus (EC) Scale at Baseline

The evaluation of fibrosis was performed using BM biopsies in which the amount of fibrosis was assessed by the EC Grading Scale. This method distinguishes four degrees of fibrosis (myelofibrosis \[MF\]-0 to MF-3). MF Grade (G) 0 is scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal BM; MF Grade 1 is loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; MF Grade 2 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF Grade 3 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: All Treated Subjects (ATS) Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study medication excluding the 5 participants from Center 082877. Participants with bone marrow biopsy data available in the relevant time period were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Bone Marrow (BM) Fibers of MF Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 on the European Consensus (EC) Scale at BaselineMF-0150 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Bone Marrow (BM) Fibers of MF Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 on the European Consensus (EC) Scale at BaselineMF-19 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Bone Marrow (BM) Fibers of MF Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 on the European Consensus (EC) Scale at BaselineMF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Bone Marrow (BM) Fibers of MF Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 on the European Consensus (EC) Scale at BaselineMF-30 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 Years

The change from baseline to on-treatment assessments of European Consensus (EC) scale was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period. MF-0 is scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal BM; MF-1 is loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; MF-2 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF-3 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: ATS Population. Participants with bone marrow biopsy data available in the relevant time period were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-0 to MF-079 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-0 to MF-19 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-0 to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-0 to MF-30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-1 to MF-02 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-1 to MF-11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-1 to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-1 to MF-30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-2 to MF-00 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-2 to MF-10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-2 to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-2 to MF-30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-3 to MF-00 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-3 to MF-10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-3 to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMF-3 to MF-30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMissing to MF-02 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMissing to MF-10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMissing to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 2 YearsMissing to MF-30 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 Year

The change from baseline to on-treatment assessments of European Consensus (EC) scale was analyzed. On-treatment is defined as during the treatment period (including dose interruptions) and up to 14 days after the end of the treatment period. MF-0 is scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal BM; MF-1 is loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; MF-2 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF-3 is diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis. Baseline is defined as the most recent centrally-reviewed BM biopsy prior to first dose of eltrombopag in the study.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: ATS Population. Participants with bone marrow biopsy data available in the relevant time period were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-0 to MF-082 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-0 to MF-133 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-0 to MF-22 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-0 to MF-32 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-1 to MF-03 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-1 to MF-12 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-1 to MF-21 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-1 to MF-30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-2 to MF-00 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-2 to MF-10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-2 to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-2 to MF-30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-3 to MF-00 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-3 to MF-10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-3 to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMF-3 to MF-30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMissing to MF-02 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMissing to MF-10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMissing to MF-20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Indicated Grade Change From Baseline in the EC Grading Scale at 1 YearMissing to MF-30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post Therapy

On-therapy + 1 day is defined as AEs started between the first dose of eltrombopag and up to the day after the last dose of eltrombopag; \>1 to 30 days post therapy is defined as AEs that started more than 1 day and up to 30 days after the last dose of eltrombopag; \>30 days post therapy is defined as AEs started that started more than 30 days after the last dose of eltrombopag. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations.

Time frame: From Week 1 up to Week 104 and up to 6 months follow-up (4 weeks for most participants) (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post TherapyAny AE, on-therapy + 1 day141 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post TherapyAny SAE, on-therapy + 1 day41 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post TherapyAny AE, >1 to 30 days post therapy12 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post TherapyAny SAE, >1 to 30 days post therapy5 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post TherapyAny AE, >30 days post therapy9 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Started On-therapy + 1 Day, >1 to 30 Days Post Therapy and >30 Days Post TherapyAny SAE, >30 days post therapy1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the Study

Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.0: G0, none; G1, mild; G2, moderate; G3, severe; G4, life-threatening or disabling. Clinical chemistry parameters included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium (hypercalcemia), calcium (hypocalcemia), potassium (hyperkalemia), potassium (hypokalemia), sodium (hypernatremia), sodium (hyponatremia), inorganic phosphorus and creatinine. Baseline values were obtained at Day 1. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). The maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade includes any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment during.

Time frame: From Week 1 up to Week 104 and up to 6 months follow-up (4 weeks for most participants) (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAlbumin, G0, n=162151 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAlbumin, G1, n=1625 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAlbumin, G2, n=1626 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAlbumin, G3, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAlbumin, G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALP, G0, n=162125 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALP, G1, n=16235 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALP, G2, n=1622 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALP, G3, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALP, G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALT, G0, n=162109 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALT, G1, n=16237 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALT, G2, n=1628 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALT, G3, n=1627 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyALT, G4, n=1621 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAST, G0, n=16299 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAST, G1, n=16248 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAST, G2, n=1628 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAST, G3, n=1625 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyAST, G4, n=1622 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal bilirubin, G0, n=162103 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal bilirubin, G1, n=16240 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal bilirubin, G2, n=16217 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal bilirubin, G3, n=1622 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal bilirubin, G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypercalcemia), G0, n=162159 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypercalcemia), G1, n=1622 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypercalcemia), G2, n=1621 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypercalcemia), G3, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypercalcemia), G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypocalcemia), G0, n=16292 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypocalcemia), G1, n=16257 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypocalcemia), G2, n=16212 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypocalcemia), G3, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCalcium (hypocalcemia), G4, n=1621 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hyperkalemia), G0, n=162138 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hyperkalemia), G1, n=16214 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hyperkalemia), G2, n=1625 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hyperkalemia), G3, n=1625 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hyperkalemia), G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hypokalemia), G0, n=162123 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hypokalemia), G1, n=16235 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hypokalemia), G2, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hypokalemia), G3, n=1624 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPotassium (hypokalemia), G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hypernatremia), G0, n=162138 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hypernatremia), G1, n=16220 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hypernatremia), G2, n=1622 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hypernatremia), G3, n=1622 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hypernatremia), G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hyponatremia), G0, n=162137 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hyponatremia), G1, n=16221 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hyponatremia), G2, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hyponatremia), G3, n=1623 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudySodium (hyponatremia), G4, n=1621 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyInorganic phosphorus, G0, n=162100 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyInorganic phosphorus, G1, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyInorganic phosphorus, G2, n=16252 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyInorganic phosphorus, G3, n=16210 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyInorganic phosphorus, G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCreatinine, G0, n=162149 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCreatinine, G1, n=1628 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCreatinine, G2, n=1623 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCreatinine, G3, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyCreatinine, G4, n=1622 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the Study

Hematology parameters were summarized according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.0: G0, none; G1, mild; G2, moderate; G3, severe; G4, life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin (increased), hemoglobin (anemia), lymphocyte count (increased), lymphocyte count (decreased), total absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count and white blood cell (WBC) count. Baseline values were obtained at Day 1. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). The maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade includes any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment during.

Time frame: From Week 1 up to Week 104 and up to 6 months follow-up (4 weeks for most participants) (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (increased), G0, n=162143 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (increased), G1, n=16217 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (increased), G2, n=1621 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (increased), G3, n=1621 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (increased), G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (anemia), G0, n=16255 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (anemia), G1, n=16263 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (anemia), G2, n=16231 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (anemia), G3, n=16213 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyHemoglobin (anemia), G4, n=1620 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (increased), G0, n=161122 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (increased), G1, n=1610 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (increased), G2, n=16139 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (increased), G3, n=1610 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (increased), G4, n=1610 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (decreased), G0, n=16186 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (decreased), G1, n=16136 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (decreased), G2, n=16126 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (decreased), G3, n=16113 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyLymphocyte count (decreased), G4, n=1610 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal ANC, G0, n=161140 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal ANC, G1, n=16112 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal ANC, G2, n=1613 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal ANC, G3, n=1613 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyTotal ANC, G4, n=1613 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPlatelet count, G0, n=1622 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPlatelet count, G1, n=1628 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPlatelet count, G2, n=1623 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPlatelet count, G3, n=16226 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyPlatelet count, G4, n=162123 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyWBC, G0, n=162135 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyWBC, G1, n=16221 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyWBC, G2, n=1623 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyWBC, G3, n=1623 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline During the StudyWBC, G4, n=1620 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026