Skip to content

Gustin Gene Polymorphism and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste

Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Association With Gustin (CA6) Gene Polymorphism, Salivary Zinc and BMI in Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01097915
Acronym
gustinprop
Enrollment
170
Registered
2010-04-02
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2018-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysgeusia

Keywords

PROP taste sensitivity, Gustin (CAVI) polymorphism, Salivary zinc, BMI, Electrophysiological recording from the tongue

Brief summary

The investigators evaluate the possible association of PROP taste with gustin gene polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G), salivary zinc ion concentration and BMI. In addition, it has also been evaluated PROP taste sensitivity by recording monophasic potentials from the tongue.

Detailed description

The investigators evaluate the possible association of PROP taste with gustin gene polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G), salivary zinc ion concentration and BMI. Furthermore, we apply direct measures of the gustatory system activation following stimulation with PROP, obtained by electrophysiological recordings from the tongue of subjects classified for taster status, genotyped for the specific receptor gene (TAS2R38), and in which papilla density was determined.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Cagliari
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* no variation of body weight \> 5 kg over the last 3 mo BMI within 20-25 Age between 20-30

Exclusion criteria

* gustatory impairment following a prescribed diet or using medications that might interfere with taste perception food allergies smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity7 monthsWe examine associations between PROP status and the polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G) of the gene that codify for the salivary protein, gustin/CA6, Which has been suggested as a trophic factor that promotes growth and development of taste buds by acting on taste bud stem cells. The intensity of taste perception evoked by PROP and NaCl solutions was estimated to evaluate PROP taster status and molecular analysis of the gustin gene polymorphism was performed in individuals classified by PROP status using PCR techniques.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Saliva Zinc Ion Concentration7 monthsSince the enzymatic function of gustin (CA6) depends upon the presence of Zn at its active site we measured the salivary zinc ion concentration in subjects classified as super-taster, medium taster and non-taster.The salivary Zn2+ concentration was measured with a QuantiChromTM zinc Assay kit (Gentaur, Brussels, Belgium) where the color intensity is directly proportional to the Zn2+ concentration in the sample.
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and BMI7 monthsSince individual ability to taste PROP may be correlated with BMI, we determined BMI (kg/m\^2) in subjects classified as super-taster, medium taster and non-taster.Weight (kg) and height (m) were recorded for each subject.
Electrophysiological Recordings From the Tongue for the Objective Evaluation of Individual Variations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Sensitivity1 yearelectrophysiological recordings from the tongue of 43 subjects classified for their taste sensitivity to 6-n- propyltiouracil (PROP) and genotyped for the specific receptor gene, TAS2R38. Density of fungiform papillae was also determined in each subject. The biopotentials were recorded by means of differential electrophysiological derivations between two silver electrodes, one in contact with the ventral surface of the tongue and one in perfect adhesion with the dorsal surface.
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Fungiform Papilla Density6 months43 subjects were classified for their taste sensitivity to 6-n- propyltiouracil (PROP) and density of fungiform papillae was determined in each subject.
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.8 monthsTaste perception was assessed by testing the ability to recognize, and the responsiveness to, representative solutions of the five taste qualities, also when supplemented with L-Arg, in subjects classified as PROP-tasters.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Super Tasters
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
50
Medium Tasters
Subjects sensitive to PROP
70
Non Tasters
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
50
Total170

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSuper TastersMedium TastersNon TastersTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
50 Participants70 Participants50 Participants170 Participants
Age, Continuous25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
healthy volunteers50 participants70 participants50 participants170 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
50 Participants70 Participants50 Participants170 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
50 participants70 participants50 participants170 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants40 Participants34 Participants109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants30 Participants16 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 270 / 280 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 280 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity

We examine associations between PROP status and the polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G) of the gene that codify for the salivary protein, gustin/CA6, Which has been suggested as a trophic factor that promotes growth and development of taste buds by acting on taste bud stem cells. The intensity of taste perception evoked by PROP and NaCl solutions was estimated to evaluate PROP taster status and molecular analysis of the gustin gene polymorphism was performed in individuals classified by PROP status using PCR techniques.

Time frame: 7 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Super TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityAllele A92.59 percentage of participants
Super TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype GG0 percentage of participants
Super TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype AA85.19 percentage of participants
Super TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype AG14.81 percentage of participants
Super TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityAllele G7.40 percentage of participants
Medium TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype GG14.29 percentage of participants
Medium TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype AA50.99 percentage of participants
Medium TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype AG35.71 percentage of participants
Medium TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityAllele A67.86 percentage of participants
Medium TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityAllele G32.14 percentage of participants
Non TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityAllele G65 percentage of participants
Non TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityAllele A35 percentage of participants
Non TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype AA25.00 percentage of participants
Non TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype GG55 percentage of participants
Non TastersAssociation Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP SensitivityGenotype AG20 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.01Fisher Exact
Secondary

Association Between PROP Sensitivity and BMI

Since individual ability to taste PROP may be correlated with BMI, we determined BMI (kg/m\^2) in subjects classified as super-taster, medium taster and non-taster.Weight (kg) and height (m) were recorded for each subject.

Time frame: 7 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Super TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and BMI20.3 Kg/m^2Standard Error 0.48
Medium TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and BMI20.76 Kg/m^2Standard Error 0.58
Non TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and BMI22.58 Kg/m^2Standard Error 0.84
p-value: <0.048ANCOVA
Secondary

Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Fungiform Papilla Density

43 subjects were classified for their taste sensitivity to 6-n- propyltiouracil (PROP) and density of fungiform papillae was determined in each subject.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Relationship between density of fungiform papillae and PROP taster status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Super TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and Fungiform Papilla Density51.66 No./cm2Standard Error 5.25
Medium TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and Fungiform Papilla Density33.49 No./cm2Standard Error 5.26
Non TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and Fungiform Papilla Density18.53 No./cm2Standard Error 7.023
p-value: <0.00001ANOVA
Secondary

Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Saliva Zinc Ion Concentration

Since the enzymatic function of gustin (CA6) depends upon the presence of Zn at its active site we measured the salivary zinc ion concentration in subjects classified as super-taster, medium taster and non-taster.The salivary Zn2+ concentration was measured with a QuantiChromTM zinc Assay kit (Gentaur, Brussels, Belgium) where the color intensity is directly proportional to the Zn2+ concentration in the sample.

Time frame: 7 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Super TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and Saliva Zinc Ion Concentration57.3 microg/dlStandard Error 13
Medium TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and Saliva Zinc Ion Concentration89.5 microg/dlStandard Error 17.2
Non TastersAssociation Between PROP Sensitivity and Saliva Zinc Ion Concentration149.64 microg/dlStandard Error 26.4
p-value: <0.004ANOVA
Secondary

Electrophysiological Recordings From the Tongue for the Objective Evaluation of Individual Variations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Sensitivity

electrophysiological recordings from the tongue of 43 subjects classified for their taste sensitivity to 6-n- propyltiouracil (PROP) and genotyped for the specific receptor gene, TAS2R38. Density of fungiform papillae was also determined in each subject. The biopotentials were recorded by means of differential electrophysiological derivations between two silver electrodes, one in contact with the ventral surface of the tongue and one in perfect adhesion with the dorsal surface.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Relationship between depolarization amplitude of signals and PROP taster status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Super TastersElectrophysiological Recordings From the Tongue for the Objective Evaluation of Individual Variations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Sensitivity97,08867 mV
Medium TastersElectrophysiological Recordings From the Tongue for the Objective Evaluation of Individual Variations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Sensitivity75,42000 mV
Non TastersElectrophysiological Recordings From the Tongue for the Objective Evaluation of Individual Variations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Sensitivity48,48231 mV
p-value: <0.00001ANOVA
Secondary

Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.

Taste perception was assessed by testing the ability to recognize, and the responsiveness to, representative solutions of the five taste qualities, also when supplemented with L-Arg, in subjects classified as PROP-tasters.

Time frame: 8 months

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.NaClCorrect identification52 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.Citric AcidIncorrect teste response10 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.sucroseIncorrect teste response6 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.caffeineUndet Threshold6 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.NaClIncorrect teste response11 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.caffeineCorrect identification56 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.sucroseCorrect identification40 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.caffeineIncorrect teste response2 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.Citric AcidUndet Threshold5 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.MSGUndet Threshold7 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.sucroseUndet Threshold18 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.MSGCorrect identification26 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.Citric AcidCorrect identification49 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.MSGIncorrect teste response31 Participants
Super TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.NaClUndet Threshold1 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.MSGIncorrect teste response31 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.sucroseUndet Threshold2 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.sucroseCorrect identification20 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.sucroseIncorrect teste response42 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.NaClUndet Threshold1 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.NaClCorrect identification41 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.NaClIncorrect teste response22 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.Citric AcidUndet Threshold4 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.Citric AcidCorrect identification47 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.Citric AcidIncorrect teste response13 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.caffeineUndet Threshold6 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.caffeineCorrect identification56 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.caffeineIncorrect teste response2 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.MSGUndet Threshold0 Participants
Medium TastersTaste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.MSGCorrect identification33 Participants
p-value: <0.00001Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026