Skip to content

Effects of cKit Inhibition by Imatinib in Patients With Severe Refractory Asthma (KIA)

A 28 Week, Treatment Randomized, Double -Blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Effects of cKit Inhibition by Imatinib in Patients With Severe Refractory Asthma (KIA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01097694
Acronym
KIA
Enrollment
176
Registered
2010-04-02
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2017-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

cKIT inhibition in Asthma, Efficacy of Imatinib in severe resistent asthma.

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see whether a new investigational drug (Imatinib) may help improve asthma in people whose symptoms are not well controlled with high dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

Detailed description

Severe asthmatics remain poorly controlled despite high doses of standard asthma therapy or even daily doses of systemic corticosteroids or their equivalent. They account for a large proportion of the morbidity and mortality associated with asthma. Features that seem to characterize many patients with this disorder include persistent inflammation, symptoms, and airway hyperresponsiveness in the face of corticosteroid therapy. Mast cells are powerful, long-lived tissue dwelling effector cells that are resistant to corticosteroid effects and have been implicated in the pathobiology of asthma. Mast cells in the airway smooth muscle have been found to be the major distinguishing difference between asthmatic and non-asthmatic eosinophil airway disease; and putative circulating mast cell progenitors are increased 5 fold in asthma. Stem cell factor (SCF) is critical to mast cell homeostasis and upregulation and has pleiotropic effects on mast cells and eosinophils . SCF levels are elevated in relation to asthma severity and SCF antibodies block hyperresponsiveness and inflammation and remodeling in murine asthma models. Imatinib, a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibits cKit (Kit), the receptor for SCF on mast cells. Imatinib at doses equivalent to, or below, doses safely used in humans, also mimics or exceeds anti-SCF effects in the murine asthma model. Therefore we would like to know Does imatinib, an inhibitor of Kit, ameliorate severe asthma, in association with effects on lung mast cell phenotype and/or function? Specific Aims of the study are: Specific Aim 1: To investigate whether, in patients with persistent airway responsiveness and poor asthma control despite intensive asthma therapy, 24 weeks of imatinib therapy results in a reduction in airway responsiveness and in secondary indicators of asthma control, airway inflammation, and structural changes in the airways. Patients will be treated with imatinib in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Assessments will include methacholine and AMP reactivity, airway function, symptoms, airway wall thickness by CT scan, analysis of induced sputum, non-invasive markers of airway inflammation, and bronchoscopy including endobronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage - all before and at the end of therapy. Specific Aim 2: To investigate whether, in patients with persistent airway responsiveness and poor asthma control despite intensive asthma therapy, 24 weeks of imatinib therapy results in changes in airway mast cell population and/or phenotype.

Interventions

DRUGImatinib mesylate

Imatinib will be initiated at an oral dose of 200 mg (two 100 mg film-coated tables) per day during the first two weeks of treatment. If the treatment is well tolerated, an up-titration to 400 mg daily (four 100 mg film-coated tables) will occur.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Baim Institute for Clinical Research
CollaboratorOTHER
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients 18-65 years of age, diagnosed with asthma for at least 1 year; 2. Refractory asthma, defined as reporting that their asthma has not been completely controlled in the past 3 months despite continuous treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and an additional controller medication, with or without continuous oral corticosteroids (OCS)

Exclusion criteria

1. Current smoking or smoking history of greater than 10 pack-years 2. Any other significant respiratory or cardiac disease, or the presence of clinically important comorbidities, including uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled coronary artery disease 3. If subject cannot undergo bronchoscopy procedure due to safety reasons 4. Previous treatment with Imatinib 5. A history of acute heart failure or chronic left sided heart failure 6. Uncontrolled systemic arterial hypertension 7. History of major bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage 8. History of immunodeficiency diseases, including HIV 9. Use of other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer 10. History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases. 11. Diagnosis of Hepatitis B or C. 12. History of alcohol abuse within 6 months of screening. 13. History of illicit drug abuse within 6 months of screening. 14. Regular use of anticoagulants (eg: Warfarin Sodium, Coumadin), amiodarone, carbamazepine, Cyclosporine, Rifampicin, or reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus BaselineOver 6 months from beginning of treatmentOur primary outcome was change in airway hyperresponsiveness, as assessed by PC20, from baseline to 3 and/or 6 months of therapy in imatinib treated participants as compared with controls. Change in PC20 was assessed using log2-transformed ratios of PC20 at month 3 and /or month 6 vs PC20 at baseline. Our null hypothesis was that the mean of this ratio will be 0 after log2-transformed. We used a linear mixed-effects model for a repeated-measures analysis to compare the primary outcome between the two groups. PC20 is determined by the provocation concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Airway Wall Thickness6 months after start of treatmentChange in airway wall thickness as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)
Serum Total Tryptase6 months after start of treatmentChange in serum total tryptase after 24 weeks of imatinib vs placebo treatment
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level6 months after start of treatmentChange in BAL fluid tryptase levels after 24 weeks of imatinib vs. placebo
Change in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %6 months after start of treatment
Number of Asthma ExacerbationsUp to 24 weeksNumber of asthma exacerbations experienced from randomization to study completion.
FEV1 in Liters6 months after start of treatmentChange in FEV1 in treatment group compared to placebo group
FEV1%6 months after start of treatmentChange in FEV1% of predicted
Morning Peak Flow Measurement6 months after start of treatmentChange in patient-reported morning peak flow measurement (L/s)
Evening Peak Flow6 months after start of treatmentChange in patient-reported evening peak flow measurement (L/s)
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)6 months after start of treatmentChange in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurement (ppb)
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)6 months after start of treatmentChange in patient-reported ACQ score The six-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) is a scale from 0 to 6 with a lower value denoting an improvement in asthma control. The minimal important difference is 0.5.
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)6 months after start of treatmentChange in patient-reported Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score The asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item scale with a range from 1-7 with a higher value denoting improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.5.
Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)6 months after start of treatmentChange in patient reported ASUI score The asthma symptom utility index (ASUI) is a 10-item weighted scale with a range from 0.2 to 1 with a higher value indicating improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.09.
Blood Eosinophils6 months after start of treatmentChange in blood eosinophil count
BAL Eosinophil %6 months after start of treatmentChange in BAL eosinophil percentage
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD26 months after start of treatmentChange in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) PGD2 levels from baseline at 6 months
Endobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells6 months after start of treatmentChange in endobronchial biopsy total tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months
Endobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells6 months after start of treatmentChange in the biopsy smooth muscle tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months
Airway Wall Area6 months after start of treatmentChange in airway wall area as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine6 months after start of treatmentChange in bronchoalveolar lavage histamine levels from baseline
Urinary Prostaglandin D26 months after start of treatmentChange in urinary Prostaglandin D2 levels from baseline
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes6 months after start of treatmentChange in bronchoalveolar lavage cysteinyl leukotrienes levels from baseline
Urinary Leukotriene E46 months after start of treatmentChange in urinary leukotriene E4 levels from baseline
Change in Sputum Supernatant Differential, Supernatant Tryptase and IL-13baseline to 24 weeksChange in sputum eosinophil and neutrophil percentage. Change in sputum supernatant tryptase as measured by ELISA. Change in sputum IL-13 level as measured by ELISA.
Change in Inflammatory Mediators in Exhaled Breath Condensatebaseline to week 24Assessment of change in eicosanoids in the exhaled breath condensate
Change in Number of Self-Reported Asthma Symptom Free Daysbaseline to week 24
BAL Neutrophil %6 months after start of treatmentChange in BAL neutrophil percentage from baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from November 2010 until December 2014 in seven academic medical centers.

Pre-assignment details

Following enrollment, 176 subjects entered a run-in period in which several inclusion criteria had to be met prior to randomization, including ACQ requirements and methacholine sensitivity, as well as safety and compliance requirements. 114 subjects who did not meet these inclusion criteria were not randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Imatinib Mesylate
Group on active imatinib treatment Imatinib mesylate: Imatinib will be initiated at an oral dose of 200 mg (two 100 mg film-coated tables) per day during the first two weeks of treatment. If the treatment is well tolerated, an up-titration to 400 mg daily (four 100 mg film-coated tables) will occur.
32
Placebo
Group on Placebo treatment Placebo: Placebo
30
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event50
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImatinib MesylatePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants30 Participants62 Participants
Age, Continuous40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants25 Participants52 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants13 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants15 Participants35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 participants30 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants18 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 3223 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 325 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline

Our primary outcome was change in airway hyperresponsiveness, as assessed by PC20, from baseline to 3 and/or 6 months of therapy in imatinib treated participants as compared with controls. Change in PC20 was assessed using log2-transformed ratios of PC20 at month 3 and /or month 6 vs PC20 at baseline. Our null hypothesis was that the mean of this ratio will be 0 after log2-transformed. We used a linear mixed-effects model for a repeated-measures analysis to compare the primary outcome between the two groups. PC20 is determined by the provocation concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).

Time frame: Over 6 months from beginning of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateChange in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline1.73 Log2 RatioStandard Deviation 0.52
PlaceboChange in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline1.07 Log2 RatioStandard Deviation 0.6
Comparison: Our null hypothesis was that the mean of this ratio will be 0 after log2-transformed.~The target enrollment was 60 assuming 10% drop-out for 54 completions which gave us 80% power to detect a doubling-dose change in PC20.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Airway Wall Area

Change in airway wall area as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateAirway Wall Area0.0002 % of areaStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboAirway Wall Area0.0002 % of areaStandard Deviation 0.02
p-value: 0.25Regression, Linear
Secondary

Airway Wall Thickness

Change in airway wall thickness as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateAirway Wall Thickness-0.0040 % of airwayStandard Deviation 0.03
PlaceboAirway Wall Thickness-0.0027 % of airwayStandard Deviation 0.02
p-value: 0.13Regression, Linear
Secondary

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

Change in patient-reported ACQ score The six-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) is a scale from 0 to 6 with a lower value denoting an improvement in asthma control. The minimal important difference is 0.5.

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-0.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
p-value: 0.31Regression, Linear
Secondary

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

Change in patient-reported Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score The asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item scale with a range from 1-7 with a higher value denoting improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.5.

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
p-value: 0.11Regression, Linear
Secondary

Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)

Change in patient reported ASUI score The asthma symptom utility index (ASUI) is a 10-item weighted scale with a range from 0.2 to 1 with a higher value indicating improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.09.

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
p-value: 0.62Regression, Linear
Secondary

BAL Eosinophil %

Change in BAL eosinophil percentage

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateBAL Eosinophil %2.55 % eosinophilsStandard Deviation 8.8
PlaceboBAL Eosinophil %-2.63 % eosinophilsStandard Deviation 10.4
p-value: 0.15Regression, Linear
Secondary

BAL Neutrophil %

Change in BAL neutrophil percentage from baseline

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateBAL Neutrophil %-0.8 % neutrophilsStandard Deviation 5.6
PlaceboBAL Neutrophil %-0.4 % neutrophilsStandard Deviation 7
p-value: 0.57Regression, Linear
Secondary

Blood Eosinophils

Change in blood eosinophil count

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateBlood Eosinophils-10.2 eosinophils per microliterStandard Deviation 50.6
PlaceboBlood Eosinophils-2.6 eosinophils per microliterStandard Deviation 25.6
p-value: 0.94Regression, Linear
Secondary

Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level

Change in BAL fluid tryptase levels after 24 weeks of imatinib vs. placebo

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateBronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level-0.74 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.35
PlaceboBronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level0.43 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.19
p-value: 0.12Regression, Linear
Secondary

Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD2

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) PGD2 levels from baseline at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateBronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD212.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 57.2
PlaceboBronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD2-4.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 54.4
p-value: 0.33Regression, Linear
Secondary

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage cysteinyl leukotrienes levels from baseline

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateBronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes3.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 37.3
PlaceboBronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes6.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 32.9
p-value: 0.56Regression, Linear
Secondary

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage histamine levels from baseline

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateBronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine2.1 nMStandard Deviation 6.3
PlaceboBronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine-1.1 nMStandard Deviation 13.4
p-value: 0.54Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Inflammatory Mediators in Exhaled Breath Condensate

Assessment of change in eicosanoids in the exhaled breath condensate

Time frame: baseline to week 24

Population: The exhaled breath condensate was not processed for inflammatory mediators.

Secondary

Change in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateChange in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %0.01 % of predictedStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %-0.08 % of predictedStandard Deviation 0.26
p-value: 0.1Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Number of Self-Reported Asthma Symptom Free Days

Time frame: baseline to week 24

Population: Self-reported asthma symptom free days were not entered into the study database.

Secondary

Change in Sputum Supernatant Differential, Supernatant Tryptase and IL-13

Change in sputum eosinophil and neutrophil percentage. Change in sputum supernatant tryptase as measured by ELISA. Change in sputum IL-13 level as measured by ELISA.

Time frame: baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Sputum sample slide preparation quality was poor and samples meeting quality control were insufficient for analysis of sputum differential.~Insufficient study funds prevented assessment of sputum tryptase. IL-13 was below the detection limit of assay in sputum supernatant.

Secondary

Endobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

Change in the biopsy smooth muscle tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateEndobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells-102.7 mast cells per mm2Standard Deviation 167.9
PlaceboEndobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells-79.2 mast cells per mm2Standard Deviation 157.3
p-value: 0.07Regression, Linear
Secondary

Endobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

Change in endobronchial biopsy total tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateEndobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells-54.2 mast cells per mm2Standard Deviation 96.5
PlaceboEndobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells-32.3 mast cells per mm2Standard Deviation 79.8
p-value: 0.11Regression, Linear
Secondary

Evening Peak Flow

Change in patient-reported evening peak flow measurement (L/s)

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateEvening Peak Flow8.3 L/secondStandard Deviation 53.6
PlaceboEvening Peak Flow-8.2 L/secondStandard Deviation 37.2
p-value: 0.31Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

FEV1%

Change in FEV1% of predicted

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateFEV1%2.3 % of predictedStandard Deviation 8.86
PlaceboFEV1%0.78 % of predictedStandard Deviation 13.1
Comparison: For FEV1% we used a linear mixed-effects model to assess the between-group difference in the change from baseline over weeks 8-24.p-value: 0.06Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

FEV1 in Liters

Change in FEV1 in treatment group compared to placebo group

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Imatinib MesylateFEV1 in Liters0.046 L
PlaceboFEV1 in Liters0 L
Comparison: For FEV1 we used a linear mixed-effects model to assess the between-group difference in the change from baseline over weeks 8-24.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)

Change in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurement (ppb)

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateFractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)7.89 parts per billionStandard Deviation 33
PlaceboFractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)-5.92 parts per billionStandard Deviation 33.2
p-value: 0.11Regression, Linear
Secondary

Morning Peak Flow Measurement

Change in patient-reported morning peak flow measurement (L/s)

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateMorning Peak Flow Measurement7.3 L/secondStandard Deviation 46.1
PlaceboMorning Peak Flow Measurement-6.4 L/secondStandard Deviation 39.3
p-value: 0.38Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Asthma Exacerbations

Number of asthma exacerbations experienced from randomization to study completion.

Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib MesylateNumber of Asthma Exacerbations16 events
PlaceboNumber of Asthma Exacerbations20 events
p-value: 0.36Poisson regression model
Secondary

Serum Total Tryptase

Change in serum total tryptase after 24 weeks of imatinib vs placebo treatment

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateSerum Total Tryptase-2.02 ng/mlStandard Deviation 2.32
PlaceboSerum Total Tryptase-0.56 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1.39
p-value: <0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Urinary Leukotriene E4

Change in urinary leukotriene E4 levels from baseline

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateUrinary Leukotriene E40.07 ng/mg CreatinineStandard Deviation 0.65
PlaceboUrinary Leukotriene E40.01 ng/mg CreatinineStandard Deviation 0.18
p-value: 0.47Regression, Linear
Secondary

Urinary Prostaglandin D2

Change in urinary Prostaglandin D2 levels from baseline

Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imatinib MesylateUrinary Prostaglandin D2-0.30 ng/mg CreatinineStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboUrinary Prostaglandin D20.39 ng/mg CreatinineStandard Deviation 1.73
p-value: 0.18Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026