Skip to content

Phase II Confirmatory Study in Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP)

A Phase II, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study to Confirm the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Bioresorbable Afamelanotide Implants in Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01097044
Enrollment
77
Registered
2010-04-01
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2019-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erythropoietic Protoporphyria

Keywords

Erythropoietic Protoporphyria, EPP, Afamelanotide

Brief summary

This is a randomized placebo-controlled study to be conducted in two parallel study arms for a six month period (three doses). Approximately 10 eligible patients per center will be enrolled and will receive afamelanotide (16 mg implants) or placebo according to the following dosing regimen: * Group A will be administered afamelanotide implants on Days 0, 60 and 120 * Group B will be administered placebo implants on Days 0, 60 and 120 To determine eligibility for study inclusion, patients will undergo a screening evaluation 7 to 14 days prior to the administration of the first dose. The number and severity of phototoxic reactions will be determined Days 60, 120, and 180. Quality of life will be measured using the EPP specific questionnaire (EPP-QoL) every 60 days and the DLQI questionnaire every 7 days, beginning at Day 0 until Day 180. Participants will visit the clinic on Days 60, 120 and 180 for assessments of adverse events.

Detailed description

Afamelanotide is a man-made drug being studied for use as a preventative medication for EPP sufferers. It is a synthetically produced analogue of human alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) and is not yet available on the market. The purpose of this study is to look at whether afamelanotide can reduce the number and severity of EPP symptoms when patients are exposed to light between 10:00 and 20:00 hours. This study will also look at how the drug is tolerated when taken by people with EPP. The study will involve the use of an implant, which comes in the form of a small rod to be administered under the skin. The implant may contain the study drug afamelanotide or a placebo (inactive medication). Over 450 subjects have been treated with afamelanotide to date with no serious safety concerns identified. For this study, afamelanotide has been formulated as a controlled release depot injection (implant). This means that the afamelanotide will be released slowly into the body over a few days. Once inserted, the implant will remain in the body after afamelanotide has been released and will slowly dissolve. This study will help to provide more information about afamelanotide. This information will be used to determine the safety and efficacy (the ability of the drug to produce an effect) of this drug in EPP sufferers.

Interventions

One 16mg subcutaneous implant every 2 months for 6 months. (3 implants in total)

DRUGPlacebo

One placebo subcutaneous implant every 2 months for 6 months. (3 implants in total)

Sponsors

Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects with characteristic photosensitivity of EPP symptoms and positive diagnosis of EPP confirmed by laboratory result of elevated total protoporphyrin IX. * Aged 18 years old and above (inclusive). * Able to understand and sign the written Informed Consent Form. * Willing to take precautions to prevent pregnancy until completion of the study (Day 180).

Exclusion criteria

* Any allergy to afamelanotide or the polymer contained in the implant or to lidocaine or other local anesthetic to be used during the administration of the study medication * EPP patients with significant hepatic involvement * Personal history of melanoma or dysplastic nevus syndrome. * Current Bowen's disease, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or other malignant or premalignant skin lesions. * Any other photodermatosis such as PLE, DLE or solar urticaria. * Any evidence of clinically significant organ dysfunction or any clinically significant deviation from normal in the clinical or laboratory determinations. * Acute history of drug or alcohol abuse (in the last 6 months). * Patient assessed as not suitable for the study in the opinion of the Investigator (e.g. noncompliance history, allergic to local anesthetics, faints when given injections or giving blood). * Participation in a clinical trial for an investigational agent within 30 days prior to the screening visit. * Prior and concomitant therapy with medications which may interfere with the objectives of the study, including drugs that cause photosensitivity or skin pigmentation within 60 days prior to the screening visit. * Female who is pregnant (confirmed by positive serum β-HCG pregnancy test prior to baseline) or lactating. * Females of child-bearing potential (pre-menopausal, not surgically sterile) not using adequate contraceptive measures (i.e. oral contraceptives, diaphragm plus spermicide, intrauterine device).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time in Direct Sunlight Between 10:00-15:00 on Pain-free DaysDaily for 6 monthsThe amount of direct sunlight exposure between 10:00 and 15:00 hours on days when no pain was experienced (e.g. 11-point Likert pain score of 0). Time was recorded in a patient dairy using 15 minute time blocks. The pain score is measured by the 11-point Likert Pain scale with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. Likert Pain scale of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 0, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180Erythropoietic Protoporphyria Quality of Life Measure (EPP-QoL) is used to measure the quality of life of participants. The total EPP-QoL score ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 as the worst quality of life and score of 100 as the best quality of life.
Change of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in ParticipantsBaseline, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180This was an exploratory assessment only to analyze whether afamelanotide-induced change in sun exposure would result in a reduction of protoporphyrin IX. The changes of the Total Protoporphyrin IX Level (μg/dL) from Screening Visit (ITT Population) were measured between the two groups. The Protoporphyrin IX level is a laboratory parameter that is measured in specialist labs.
Maximum Severity of Phototoxic Reaction Experienced by ParticipantsDaily for 6 monthsThe days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The maximum severity of a phototoxic reaction was determined by the highest daily 11-point Likert scale score that occurred during that phototoxic reaction.
Number of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by ParticipantsDaily for 6 monthsThe days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The number of phototoxic reactions was determined by counting the number of episodes on which participants report a 11-point Likert scale score of 4 or more for one or more consecutive days.
Total Severity of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by Participants Over the Entire StudyDaily for 6 months.The days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert Pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The total severity of phototoxic reactions was determined by the sum of daily 11-point Likert scale scores that occurred during phototoxic reactions. The overall sum of the severity per participant over the entire study was analyzed. The theoretical minimum score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 1800.
Number of Participants With Phototoxic Reactions With Likert Severity Scores ≥ 4 and ≥ 7Daily for 6 monthsThe number of participants who experienced phototoxic reactions with Likert severity scores ≥ 4 and severity scores ≥7 were recorded. A derived endpoint was used. The number of participants who reported at least one phototoxic reaction with a Likert severity score of ≥ 4 was recorded. For severity scores ≥ 7, the number of patients who reported at least one phototoxic reaction with a Likert severity score of ≥ 7 was recorded. The 11-point Likert pain scale ranges from minimum of 0 to maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study Recruitment period: April2010 - July2010 Study site location: Mt. Sinai, New York Carolinas Medical Center, North Carolina University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama University of Utah, Utah University of Texas Medical Branch, Texas University of California, San Francisco, California

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Afamelanotide
Afamelanotide: One 16mg subcutaneous implant every 2 months for 6 months. (3 implants in total)
39
Placebo
Placebo: One placebo subcutaneous implant every 2 months for 6 months. (3 implants in total)
38
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Sponsor01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAfamelanotidePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
35 Participants36 Participants71 Participants
Age, Continuous38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 participants38 participants77 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants18 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants20 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 3929 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 392 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Time in Direct Sunlight Between 10:00-15:00 on Pain-free Days

The amount of direct sunlight exposure between 10:00 and 15:00 hours on days when no pain was experienced (e.g. 11-point Likert pain score of 0). Time was recorded in a patient dairy using 15 minute time blocks. The pain score is measured by the 11-point Likert Pain scale with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. Likert Pain scale of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain.

Time frame: Daily for 6 months

Population: One active participant and one placebo participant withdrew after Baseline assessment and no data was provided for the analysis of this endpoint.~The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the total number of study participants because the data was either incomplete and/or missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AfamelanotideTime in Direct Sunlight Between 10:00-15:00 on Pain-free Days8.25 Hours
PlaceboTime in Direct Sunlight Between 10:00-15:00 on Pain-free Days0.75 Hours
Secondary

Change of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in Participants

This was an exploratory assessment only to analyze whether afamelanotide-induced change in sun exposure would result in a reduction of protoporphyrin IX. The changes of the Total Protoporphyrin IX Level (μg/dL) from Screening Visit (ITT Population) were measured between the two groups. The Protoporphyrin IX level is a laboratory parameter that is measured in specialist labs.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180

Population: One active participant and one placebo participant withdrew after Baseline assessment and no data was provided for the analysis of this endpoint.~The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the total number of study participants because the data was either incomplete and/or missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AfamelanotideChange of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in ParticipantsDay 60-471.3 mcg/dLStandard Deviation 505.4
AfamelanotideChange of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in ParticipantsDay 120-511.8 mcg/dLStandard Deviation 595.3
AfamelanotideChange of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in ParticipantsDay 180-92.7 mcg/dLStandard Deviation 549.1
PlaceboChange of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in ParticipantsDay 60-628.5 mcg/dLStandard Deviation 837.5
PlaceboChange of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in ParticipantsDay 120-619.9 mcg/dLStandard Deviation 1022.3
PlaceboChange of Total Protoporphyrin IX Level in ParticipantsDay 180-369.2 mcg/dLStandard Deviation 1265.6
Secondary

Maximum Severity of Phototoxic Reaction Experienced by Participants

The days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The maximum severity of a phototoxic reaction was determined by the highest daily 11-point Likert scale score that occurred during that phototoxic reaction.

Time frame: Daily for 6 months

Population: One active participant and one placebo participant withdrew after Baseline assessment and no data was provided for the analysis of this endpoint.~The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the total number of study participants because the data was either incomplete and/or missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AfamelanotideMaximum Severity of Phototoxic Reaction Experienced by Participants5.0 score on a scale
PlaceboMaximum Severity of Phototoxic Reaction Experienced by Participants5.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With Phototoxic Reactions With Likert Severity Scores ≥ 4 and ≥ 7

The number of participants who experienced phototoxic reactions with Likert severity scores ≥ 4 and severity scores ≥7 were recorded. A derived endpoint was used. The number of participants who reported at least one phototoxic reaction with a Likert severity score of ≥ 4 was recorded. For severity scores ≥ 7, the number of patients who reported at least one phototoxic reaction with a Likert severity score of ≥ 7 was recorded. The 11-point Likert pain scale ranges from minimum of 0 to maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain.

Time frame: Daily for 6 months

Population: One active participant and one placebo participant withdrew after Baseline assessment and no data was provided for the analysis of this endpoint.~The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the total number of study participants because the data was either incomplete and/or missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AfamelanotideNumber of Participants With Phototoxic Reactions With Likert Severity Scores ≥ 4 and ≥ 7Severity Likert score of ≥ 426 Count of Participants
AfamelanotideNumber of Participants With Phototoxic Reactions With Likert Severity Scores ≥ 4 and ≥ 7Severity Likert score of ≥ 77 Count of Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Phototoxic Reactions With Likert Severity Scores ≥ 4 and ≥ 7Severity Likert score of ≥ 424 Count of Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Phototoxic Reactions With Likert Severity Scores ≥ 4 and ≥ 7Severity Likert score of ≥ 714 Count of Participants
Secondary

Number of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by Participants

The days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The number of phototoxic reactions was determined by counting the number of episodes on which participants report a 11-point Likert scale score of 4 or more for one or more consecutive days.

Time frame: Daily for 6 months

Population: One active participant and one placebo participant withdrew after Baseline assessment and no data was provided for the analysis of this endpoint.~The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the total number of study participants because the data was either incomplete and/or missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AfamelanotideNumber of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by Participants2.0 Episodes
PlaceboNumber of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by Participants1.0 Episodes
Secondary

Quality of Life Measured by Participant Completed Questionnaire

Erythropoietic Protoporphyria Quality of Life Measure (EPP-QoL) is used to measure the quality of life of participants. The total EPP-QoL score ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 as the worst quality of life and score of 100 as the best quality of life.

Time frame: Day 0, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180

Population: One active participant and one placebo participant withdrew after Baseline assessment and no data was provided for the analysis of this endpoint.~The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the total number of study participants because the data was either incomplete and/or missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AfamelanotideQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 6073.6 units on a scale
AfamelanotideQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 034.7 units on a scale
AfamelanotideQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 12084.7 units on a scale
AfamelanotideQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 18088.9 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 18063.9 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 12055.6 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 022.2 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Measured by Participant Completed QuestionnaireDay 6044.4 units on a scale
Secondary

Total Severity of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by Participants Over the Entire Study

The days on which the participant experienced pain as a result of phototoxic reactions (caused by exposure to natural light) was recorded in a study diary. On each day such a reaction occurred, the participant scored the level of pain using an 11-point Likert pain scale, with minimum of 0 and maximum of 10. The 11-point Likert Pain scale with a value of 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. The total severity of phototoxic reactions was determined by the sum of daily 11-point Likert scale scores that occurred during phototoxic reactions. The overall sum of the severity per participant over the entire study was analyzed. The theoretical minimum score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 1800.

Time frame: Daily for 6 months.

Population: One active participant and one placebo participant withdrew after Baseline assessment and no data was provided for the analysis of this endpoint.~The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the total number of study participants because the data was either incomplete and/or missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AfamelanotideTotal Severity of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by Participants Over the Entire Study27.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.1
PlaceboTotal Severity of Phototoxic Reactions Experienced by Participants Over the Entire Study37.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 102.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026