Skip to content

Assessment of 3M Oedema Reduction System in the Treatment of Lymphoedema Compared to Commercial Short-stretch Bandage

Preliminary Study to Assess the Effectiveness of 3M Oedema Reduction System in the Treatment of Lymphoedema Treatment Compared to Comprilan Short-stretch Bandage Compression Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01096589
Enrollment
82
Registered
2010-03-31
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2024-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphedema

Keywords

lymphoedema, lymphedema

Brief summary

Objectives. The primary objective of the study is to assess volume reduction in the treatment of lymphoedematous legs and arms with compression bandaging. Secondary objectives: * Assessment of safety * Quality of life * Health economic parameters * Slippage * Subbandage pressure

Interventions

DEVICE3M Coban 2 (Compression System)

Nonwoven cohesive backing and foam.

DEVICEComprilan

Commercial short-stretch bandage (Comprilan; BSN Medical Ltd, Hull, U.K).

Sponsors

3M
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Solventum US LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(Arm): * Mobile males or females, age 18 years or older * Unilateral arm lymphoedema of secondary origin * Pitting arm lymphoedema diagnosed as stage II or late stage II according to the International Society of Lymphology staging * Patients who require intense bandaging therapy (approx. \>= 15% increase in arm volume over the opposite healthy arm) * Completion of all primary and adjuvant cancer treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) at least 6 months prior to randomisation * Willing to give written informed consent and willing to comply with the study protocol Inclusion Criteria (Leg): * Mobile males or females, age 18 years or older * Unilateral or bilateral leg lymphoedema of primary or secondary origin * Pitting leg lymphoedema diagnosed as stage II or late stage II according to the International Society of Lymphology staging * Patients who require intense bandaging therapy * Completion of all primary and adjuvant cancer treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) at least 6 months prior to randomisation * Willing to give written informed consent and willing to comply with the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

(Arm): * Known pregnancy * Evidence of active cancer, either local or metastatic * A period of intense daily bandaging within the last month * Decompensated heart failure or clinically relevant kidney or liver disease * Known relevant arterial disease of the arms * Deep vein thrombosis or phlebitis in the last 3 months * Paralysis of the arms * Clinical infection of the arms (e.g. erysipelas) * Wounds located at the study arm that require dressing change more than once a week * History of allergic reactions to study material * Participation in any prospective clinical study that can potentially interfere with this study * Participants who are, in the opinion of the clinical investigator, unsuitable for enrolment in this study, for reasons not specified in the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Volume Change of Affected Limb at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline.baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of Safety by Incidence of Adverse Events.3 weeks

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were randomly allocated to the 4 application frequencies for 19 days. The randomisation was stratified according to limb location. Enroled participants were randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups. Patients were treated in private lymphoedema clinics or in NHS centres (UK). US patients were treated in hospitals.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1 - 3M Oedema Reduction System
3M Oedema Reduction System - 2 apps/wk 3M Oedema Reduction System (Compression Bandage) : Nonwoven cohesive backing and foam.
22
Arm 2 - 3M Oedema Reduction System
3M Oedema Reduction System - 3 apps/wk 3M Oedema Reduction System (Compression Bandage) : Nonwoven cohesive backing and foam.
20
Arm 3 - 3M Oedema Reduction System
3M Oedema Reduction System - 5 apps/wk 3M Oedema Reduction System (Compression Bandage) : Nonwoven cohesive backing and foam.
22
Arm 4 - Commercial Compression System 5 Apps/wk
Commercial Compression System 5 apps/wk Short-stretch Bandage (Comprilan; BSN Medical Ltd,). : Commercial short-stretch bandage (Comprilan; BSN Medical Ltd, Hull, U.K).
18
Total82

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event2121
Overall StudyCompliance with protocol0010
Overall Studyfound treatment exhausting0001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemArm 2 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemArm 3 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemArm 4 - Commercial Compression System 5 Apps/wkTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants11 Participants11 Participants4 Participants33 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants9 Participants11 Participants14 Participants49 Participants
Age, Continuous59.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.29
61.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.49
62.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.25
56.22 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.78
60.16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.85
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
17 participants17 participants20 participants16 participants70 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants3 participants2 participants2 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants20 Participants20 Participants17 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 2211 / 2014 / 2210 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 200 / 220 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Volume Change of Affected Limb at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline.

Time frame: baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Population: Patients must have completed the first week.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemPercent Volume Change of Affected Limb at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline.-14.56 % volume change measured in mL.Standard Deviation 12.22
Arm 2 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemPercent Volume Change of Affected Limb at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline.-7.09 % volume change measured in mL.Standard Deviation 7.3
Arm 3 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemPercent Volume Change of Affected Limb at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline.-10.24 % volume change measured in mL.Standard Deviation 8.65
Arm 4 - Commercial Compression System 5 Apps/wkPercent Volume Change of Affected Limb at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline.-9.84 % volume change measured in mL.Standard Deviation 4.34
Secondary

Assessment of Safety by Incidence of Adverse Events.

Time frame: 3 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemAssessment of Safety by Incidence of Adverse Events.13 No. of treatment-emergent adverse events
Arm 2 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemAssessment of Safety by Incidence of Adverse Events.11 No. of treatment-emergent adverse events
Arm 3 - 3M Oedema Reduction SystemAssessment of Safety by Incidence of Adverse Events.14 No. of treatment-emergent adverse events
Arm 4 - Commercial Compression System 5 Apps/wkAssessment of Safety by Incidence of Adverse Events.10 No. of treatment-emergent adverse events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026