Skip to content

Maintenance Chemotherapy or Observation Following Induction Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ependymoma

Phase III Randomized Trial of Post-Radiation Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ependymoma Ages 1 to 21 Years

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01096368
Enrollment
479
Registered
2010-03-31
Start date
2010-05-07
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2026-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaplastic Ependymoma, Brain Ependymoma, Cellular Ependymoma, Clear Cell Ependymoma, Ependymoma, Papillary Ependymoma

Brief summary

The primary aim of this randomized phase III trial was to study whether the addition of maintenance chemotherapy delivered after surgical resection and focal radiation would be better than surgery and focal radiation alone. The trial also studied if patients who received induction chemotherapy and then either achieved a complete response or went on to have a complete resection would also benefit from maintenance chemotherapy. Children ages 1-21 years with newly diagnosed intracranial ependymoma were included. There were 2 arms that were not randomized. One arm studied patients with Grade II tumors located in the supratentorial compartment that were completely resected. One arm studied patients with residual tumor and those patients all received maintenance chemotherapy after focal radiation. Chemotherapy drugs, such as vincristine sulfate, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. Giving chemotherapy in combination with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells and allow doctors to save the part of the body where the cancer started.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of children with completely resected ependymoma treated with post-operative conformal radiation therapy (cRT) and then randomized to receive or not receive four cycles of post radiation maintenance chemotherapy (vincristine, cisplatin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide \[VCEC\]). EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the EFS and OS of children with incompletely resected ependymoma who are unable to achieve a complete response (CR) by post-operative induction chemotherapy or by second surgery who will then be non-randomly assigned to cRT followed by four cycles of maintenance chemotherapy (VCEC). II. To further evaluate the EFS and OS of children with supratentorial classic ependymoma who achieve a complete resection at first or second resection OR children who achieve a CR to short course induction chemotherapy following first surgery. III. To evaluate whether the addition of maintenance chemotherapy post-radiation therapy contributes to neurobehavioral morbidity and reduced functional outcomes over time, compared to patients treated with radiation therapy followed by observation alone. IV. To examine differences in neurobehavioral outcomes and quality of life of children treated with proton beam radiation therapy compared to children treated with conventional radiation delivery techniques. V. To evaluate biologic prognostic factors in childhood ependymoma by studying molecular groups as defined by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation profiling and immunohistochemistry, copy number variants to identify 1q gain in posterior fossa ependymomas, CDKN2A loss (homozygous deletion) in supratentorial ependymomas and specific genetic alterations such as RELA fusions, YAP1 fusions and the H3 K27M mutation on initial tumor samples and correlating these data with clinical outcome. Va. To explore prognostic molecular signatures and genomic alterations in ependymomas by building upon the data derived from ACNS0121 to correlate biomarkers listed above with World Health Organization (WHO) grade, location, extent of resection, treatment, EFS and OS. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study partially randomized phase III study. Patients are randomized or non-randomly treated according to tumor location and extent of surgical resection or post-surgery induction chemotherapy response. Arm I: Patients with classic histology(WHO Grade II) supratentorial ependymoma who have undergone microscopic gross total resection (GTR1) or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are assigned to observation. For patients without GTR1, induction chemotherapy is comprised of vincristine intravenously (IV) over 1 minute on days 1 and 8 of cycles 1 and 2, carboplatin IV over 15-60 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2, and cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 1-2 of cycle 1 only. Patients also receive etoposide IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1-3 of cycle 2 only. Cycle 1 continues for 3 weeks and cycle 2 continues for 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma who have undergone gross or near total resection (GTR or NTR) or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy comprised of vincristine IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1-3 only, etoposide IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1-3, cisplatin IV over 1-8 hours on day 1, and cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 2-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients without GTR or NTR at enrollment require induction chemotherapy (see Arm I) and possibly second surgery before randomization. ARM III: Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or ST Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma (Grade II or III) who have undergone gross or near total resection or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks and then undergo observation. Patients without GTR or NTR at enrollment require induction chemotherapy (see Arm I) and possibly second surgery before randomization. ARM IV: Patients with subtotal resection after induction chemotherapy (see Arm I) and second surgery are non-randomly assigned to Arm II treatment. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up every 4 months for 5 years, and then annually thereafter.

Interventions

RADIATION3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy

Patients undergo conformal radiotherapy

DRUGCarboplatin

Given IV

DRUGCisplatin

Given IV

OTHERClinical Observation

Patients undergo observation

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Given IV

DRUGEtoposide

Given IV

BIOLOGICALFilgrastim

Given SC or IV

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Optional correlative studies

DRUGMesna

Given IV

DRUGVincristine

Given IV

Sponsors

Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Months to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must be newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed intracranial ependymoma; patients with classic ependymoma (WHO II) or anaplastic ependymoma (WHO III) are eligible, as are various subtypes described as clear cell, papillary, cellular or a combination of the above * There is no minimum performance level; children with ependymoma may suffer neurologic sequelae as a result of their tumor or surgical measures taken to establish a diagnosis and resect the tumor; in the majority of cases, there is neurologic recovery; neurologic recovery is not likely to be impeded by protocol therapy * REGULATORY: All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed consent * REGULATORY: All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute (NCI) requirements for human studies must be met

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with evidence of metastatic disease will be excluded; any evidence of non-contiguous spread beyond the primary site as determined by pre or post-operative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of brain, pre or post-operative MR imaging of the spine, and post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology obtained from the lumbar CSF space (the requirement for lumbar CSF examination may be waived if deemed to be medically contraindicated); CSF cytology from a ventriculostomy or permanent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt that reveals the presence of tumor cells is indicative of metastatic disease * Patients with a diagnosis of spinal cord ependymoma, myxopapillary ependymoma, subependymoma, ependymoblastoma, or mixed glioma are NOT eligible * No prior treatment other than surgical intervention and corticosteroids; patients are allowed to have had more than one attempt at resection prior to enrollment * Pregnant female patients are not eligible for this study * Post-menarchal females may not participate unless a pregnancy test with a negative result has been obtained * Males and females of reproductive potential may not participate unless they have agreed to use an effective contraceptive method * Lactating females may not participate unless they have agreed not to breastfeed a child while on this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-free Survival (EFS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation OnlyUp to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of EFS are presentedKaplan-Meier estimates of EFS are calculated from randomization date to first occurrence of disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 90.46% stagewise adjusted Wald confidence interval.
Overall Survival (OS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation OnlyUp to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS are calculated from randomization date to death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 90.46% stagewise adjusted Wald confidence interval.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmy A Smith

Children's Oncology Group

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I: Observation
Patients with classic histology (WHO Grade II) supratentorial ependymoma who have undergone microscopic gross total resection (GTR1) or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are assigned to observation. For patients without GTR1, induction chemotherapy is comprised of vincristine intravenously (IV) over 1 minute on days 1 and 8 of cycles 1 and 2, carboplatin IV over 15-60 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2, and cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 1-2 of cycle 1 only. Patients also receive etoposide IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1-3 of cycle 2 only. Cycle 1 continues for 3 weeks and cycle 2 continues for 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
37
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance Chemotherapy
Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma who have undergone gross or near total resection (GTR or NTR) or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy comprised of vincristine IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1-3 only, etoposide IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1-3, cisplatin IV over 1-8 hours on day 1, and cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 2-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients without GTR or NTR at enrollment require induction chemotherapy (see Arm I) and possibly second surgery before randomization.
167
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation Only
Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or ST Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma (Grade II or III) who have undergone gross or near total resection or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks and then undergo observation.
163
Arm IV: Nonrandomly Assigned to Arm II Treatment
Patients with subtotal resection after induction chemotherapy (see Arm I) and second surgery are nonrandomly assigned to Arm II treatment.
63
Not Ependymoma or Withdrew Before Radiation
Patients with tumor other than ependymoma or withdrew before protocol-specified radiotherapy administered
49
Total479

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I: ObservationArm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyArm III: Randomized to Radiation OnlyArm IV: Nonrandomly Assigned to Arm II TreatmentNot Ependymoma or Withdrew Before RadiationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
36 Participants164 Participants159 Participants62 Participants48 Participants469 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Age, Continuous8.8 years4.4 years4.5 years4.2 years7.5 years5.2 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants37 Participants30 Participants11 Participants11 Participants94 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants119 Participants129 Participants47 Participants35 Participants359 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants11 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants4 Participants0 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants21 Participants10 Participants6 Participants7 Participants50 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants22 Participants21 Participants9 Participants9 Participants66 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants113 Participants119 Participants43 Participants30 Participants329 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
0 participants7 participants14 participants8 participants4 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
5 participants17 participants15 participants10 participants3 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
1 participants1 participants2 participants1 participants0 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants142 participants132 participants44 participants42 participants391 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants78 Participants68 Participants23 Participants27 Participants214 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants89 Participants95 Participants40 Participants22 Participants265 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3720 / 16427 / 16122 / 634 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3722 / 16410 / 16115 / 634 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 375 / 1640 / 1611 / 630 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Event-free Survival (EFS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only

Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS are calculated from randomization date to first occurrence of disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 90.46% stagewise adjusted Wald confidence interval.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of EFS are presented

Population: Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyEvent-free Survival (EFS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only69.2 percentage of participants
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation OnlyEvent-free Survival (EFS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only63.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: The study was designed to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by EFS using the hazard ratio via a 1-sided log-rank test. The planned sample size was 160 subjects per arm. 85 EFS events were needed, which were expected after 8 years of accrual and 2 years of follow-up. At 5% type 1 error, the study had 93% power to detect an increase in 2-year EFS from 75% (RT alone) to 87% (RT+maintenance). The design also incorporated interim analyses for futility and efficacy.p-value: 0.22990.46% CI: [0.627, 1.197]Log Rank
Primary

Overall Survival (OS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only

Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS are calculated from randomization date to death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 90.46% stagewise adjusted Wald confidence interval.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.

Population: Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyOverall Survival (OS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only88.3 percentage of participants
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation OnlyOverall Survival (OS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only86.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: It was planned to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by OS using the hazard ratio via a 1-sided log-rank test using the planned sample size of 160 subjects per arm which was optimized for the EFS outcome. A one-sided significance threshold of 5% was planned for this comparison as well.p-value: 0.17290.46% CI: [0.463, 1.238]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

EFS in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma at Initial Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only

Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS are calculated from randomization date to first occurrence of disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) for this stratum is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 95% Wald confidence interval.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of EFS are presented.

Population: Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat) in stratum 1 (completely resected ependymom at initial surgery)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyEFS in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma at Initial Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only72.7 percentage of participants
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation OnlyEFS in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma at Initial Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only62.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: In stratum 1, it was also planned to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by EFS using the hazard ratio via a 2-sided log-rank test. A two-sided significance threshold of 5% was planned for this comparison.p-value: 0.09695% CI: [0.461, 1.068]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

EFS of Children With Incompletely Resected Ependymoma Who Are Unable to Achieve a Complete Response (CR) by Post-operative Induction Chemotherapy or by Second Surgery and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Receive Maintenance Chemotherapy

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of EFS is calculated from enrollment date to first occurrence of disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of EFS are presented.

Population: Eligible participants in Arm IV (intent-to-treat)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyEFS of Children With Incompletely Resected Ependymoma Who Are Unable to Achieve a Complete Response (CR) by Post-operative Induction Chemotherapy or by Second Surgery and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Receive Maintenance Chemotherapy33.6 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

EFS of Children With Supratentorial Classic Ependymoma Who Achieve Complete Resection at First or Second Surgery or Children Who Achieve Complete Response (CR) After Induction Chemo and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Observation

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of EFS is calculated from enrollment date to first occurrence of disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of EFS are presented.

Population: Eligible participants in Arm I

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyEFS of Children With Supratentorial Classic Ependymoma Who Achieve Complete Resection at First or Second Surgery or Children Who Achieve Complete Response (CR) After Induction Chemo and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Observation66.9 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

EFS With Incomplete Resection After Initial Surgery, Then Achieved CR After Induction Chemotherapy or GTR/NTR After Second Surgery and Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only

Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS are calculated from randomization date to first occurrence of disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, or death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) for this stratum is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 95% Wald confidence interval.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of EFS are presented.

Population: Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat) in stratum 2 (completely resected ependymom at initial surgery)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyEFS With Incomplete Resection After Initial Surgery, Then Achieved CR After Induction Chemotherapy or GTR/NTR After Second Surgery and Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only41.7 percentage of participants
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation OnlyEFS With Incomplete Resection After Initial Surgery, Then Achieved CR After Induction Chemotherapy or GTR/NTR After Second Surgery and Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only67.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: In stratum 2, it was also planned to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by EFS using the hazard ratio via a 2-sided log-rank test. A two-sided significance threshold of 5% was planned for this comparison.p-value: 0.04195% CI: [1.004, 7.175]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

OS in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma at Initial Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only.

Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS are calculated from randomization date to death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) for this stratum is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 95% Wald confidence interval.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.

Population: Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat) in stratum 1 (completely resected ependymom at initial surgery)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyOS in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma at Initial Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only.90.7 percentage of participants
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation OnlyOS in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma at Initial Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only.86.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: In stratum 1, it was also planned to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by OS using the hazard ratio via a 2-sided log-rank test. A two-sided significance threshold of 5% was planned for this comparison.p-value: 0.06795% CI: [0.284, 1.053]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

OS in Children With Incomplete Resection After Initial Surgery Who Then Achieved CR After Induction Chemotherapy or GTR/NTR After Second Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only

Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS are calculated from randomization date to death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) for this stratum is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 95% Wald confidence interval.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.

Population: Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat) in stratum 2 (induction chemotherapy or second surgery required)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyOS in Children With Incomplete Resection After Initial Surgery Who Then Achieved CR After Induction Chemotherapy or GTR/NTR After Second Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only69.2 percentage of participants
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation OnlyOS in Children With Incomplete Resection After Initial Surgery Who Then Achieved CR After Induction Chemotherapy or GTR/NTR After Second Surgery and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only89.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: In stratum 2, it was also planned to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by OS using the hazard ratio via a 2-sided log-rank test. A two-sided significance threshold of 5% was planned for this comparison.p-value: 0.09495% CI: [0.724, 17.902]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

OS of Children With Incompletely Resected Ependymoma Who Are Unable to Achieve a Complete Response (CR) by Post-operative Induction Chemotherapy or by Second Surgery and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Receive Maintenance Chemotherapy

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS is calculated from enrollment date to death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.

Population: Eligible participants in Arm IV (intent-to-treat)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyOS of Children With Incompletely Resected Ependymoma Who Are Unable to Achieve a Complete Response (CR) by Post-operative Induction Chemotherapy or by Second Surgery and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Receive Maintenance Chemotherapy74.0 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

OS of Children With Supratentorial Classic Ependymoma Who Achieve Complete Resection at First or Second Surgery or Children Who Achieve Complete Response (CR) After Induction Chemo and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Observation

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS is calculated from enrollment date to death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.

Population: Eligible participants in Arm I

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance ChemotherapyOS of Children With Supratentorial Classic Ependymoma Who Achieve Complete Resection at First or Second Surgery or Children Who Achieve Complete Response (CR) After Induction Chemo and Who Are Non-randomly Assigned to Observation100 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026