Skip to content

Depression Attention for Women Now (The DAWN Study)

Reducing Disparities and Improving Care for Depression in OB-GYN Clinics: Depression Attention for Women Now (The DAWN Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01096316
Acronym
DAWN
Enrollment
205
Registered
2010-03-31
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2016-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder

Keywords

mood disorders, depressive disorder, women, depression

Brief summary

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common disabling illness that disproportionately affects women, with prevalence rates two times those of men. In addition to suffering, MDD has been shown to have a marked effect on social and vocational functioning, with increased disability, lost productivity, and excess mortality. Women with MDD have an increased prevalence of comorbid anxiety disorders and medical conditions. Our model of care utilizes a social worker as a depression care manager (DCM) to support both patients and physicians in optimizing care in the OB-GYN clinical setting. This intervention will be compared to usual care for depression.

Detailed description

A large number of women receive their routine care in OB-GYN clinics, including a disproportionate percentage of low-income and minority women. For many of these women, OG-GYNs are the only provider they see on a regular basis. OB-GYNs take care of women across their lifespan, addressing gynecologic, health care maintenance, pregnancy and primary care concerns in their everyday practices. There are multiple aspects of OG-GYN care that are uniquely suited for detection and treatment of depression, but there are also significant barriers to such care that must be addressed. In this randomized controlled trial, we are testing this depression care management program for women attending two OB-GYN clinics in the University of Washington health care system. Our research aims to test the hypothesis that a depression care management intervention, integrated into the OB-GYN clinic setting, will improve treatment outcomes for depression, functional outcomes, and satisfaction with depression care. The results of our research will greatly impact clinical care by satisfying an unmet need for effective depression services for women seen in OB-GYN clinical settings. The study compares a depression care management intervention, delivered by a depression care manager, to usual care for depression in the clinics. The primary aims of the study are to evaluate, compared to usual care, a depression intervention consisting of enhanced education, engagement, and depression care management (with a choice of antidepressant medication monitoring and/or provision of brief psychotherapy).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDepression Care Management

The intervention is conducted by a social worker who has the role of a Depression Care Manager (DCM). First, a unique engagement session develops rapport with the DCM, providing education and identifying health concerns. DCM meets in-person and/or by phone every 1-2 weeks for 12 weeks, then monthly for the rest of the 12-month intervention. Patients choose either medication or Problem-Solving Treatment-Primary Care therapy. Depressive symptoms are assessed at each visit with the PHQ-9, as well as response to medications or to PST, with a total of 8 PST-PC sessions. Patients with inadequate response after 8 weeks to the first choice will switch or combine treatments. Providers are given extensive feedback about the patient's health care concerns.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* PHQ-9 score ≥10 for Major Depressive Disorder (with 1 cardinal symptom) and/or ≥10 for Dysthymia (with 1 cardinal symptom) * MINI confirmation of PHQ-9 diagnoses * Access to a telephone * English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* High suicide risk (PHQ-9 response) * ≥2 prior suicide attempts * Lifetime history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (MINI response) * Substance abuse/dependence within the previous 3 months (CAGE-AID) * Current severe intimate partner violence * Currently seeing a psychiatrist

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression Treatment Outcome12 monthsImpact of the intervention on depression treatment outcomes, including change in depressive symptoms and treatment response. In particular, the depression scale from the Hopkins Symptom Checklist 20 (SCL-20) was used to assess depression severity at the assessments. The SCL-20 ranges from 0 (no depression) to 4 (severe depression),
Functional Outcome12 monthsImpact of the intervention on functional outcomes of patients. Functional impairment was measured using the Sheehan Disability Scale. The Sheehan disability scale is the average of 3 items assessing impairment in social, work and family responsibilities. Each item is rated 0 (no impairment) to 10 (totally impaired) and the 3 ratings are averaged for the Sheehan disability scale reported below.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Depression Care Indicators12 monthsIntervention impact on quality of depression care indicators and satisfaction with depression care. Number of participants receiving 4 or more mental health visits are reported. Receiving 4 or more mental health visits has previously been used in depression randomized control trials as a measure of the quality of depression treatment received by a patient
Potential Facilitators and Barriers to Sustainability18 monthsProviders' and administrators' perceived barriers and facilitators to continue providing the intervention after study end.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
The intervention will integrate care between a depression care manager, consulting study team (psychiatry, psychology, OB-GYN researchers) and OB-GYN clinic providers. The 3-part intervention includes: * enhanced education of patients and providers * engagement of patients * depression care management with patient choice of initial antidepressant medication or Problem-Solving Treatment-Primary Care and behavioral activation. Depression Care Management: The intervention is conducted by a social worker who has the role of a Depression Care Manager (DCM). First, a unique engagement session develops rapport with the DCM, providing education and identifying health concerns. DCM meets in-person and/or by phone every 1-2 weeks for 12 weeks, then monthly for the rest of the 12-month intervention. Patients choose either medication or Problem-Solving Treatment-Primary Care therapy. Depressive symptoms are assessed at each visit with the PHQ-9, as well as response to medications or to PST,
102
Usual Care
Patients randomized to Usual Care Arm will be informed of their diagnosis and encouraged to inform her OB-GYN provider about her depression diagnosis. Patients will be encouraged to proceed with care using any primary care or specialty services normally available to them inside/outside their OB-GYN clinic. All treatment decision for Usual Care Arm patients are left to the OB-GN provider.
103
Total205

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up159

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionUsual CareTotal
Age, Continuous39.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.11
38.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
39.02 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.09
Sex: Female, Male
Female
102 Participants103 Participants205 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1020 / 103
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1021 / 103

Outcome results

Primary

Depression Treatment Outcome

Impact of the intervention on depression treatment outcomes, including change in depressive symptoms and treatment response. In particular, the depression scale from the Hopkins Symptom Checklist 20 (SCL-20) was used to assess depression severity at the assessments. The SCL-20 ranges from 0 (no depression) to 4 (severe depression),

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionDepression Treatment Outcome0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Usual CareDepression Treatment Outcome1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Primary

Functional Outcome

Impact of the intervention on functional outcomes of patients. Functional impairment was measured using the Sheehan Disability Scale. The Sheehan disability scale is the average of 3 items assessing impairment in social, work and family responsibilities. Each item is rated 0 (no impairment) to 10 (totally impaired) and the 3 ratings are averaged for the Sheehan disability scale reported below.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionFunctional Outcome3.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Usual CareFunctional Outcome4.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Potential Facilitators and Barriers to Sustainability

Providers' and administrators' perceived barriers and facilitators to continue providing the intervention after study end.

Time frame: 18 months

Secondary

Quality of Depression Care Indicators

Intervention impact on quality of depression care indicators and satisfaction with depression care. Number of participants receiving 4 or more mental health visits are reported. Receiving 4 or more mental health visits has previously been used in depression randomized control trials as a measure of the quality of depression treatment received by a patient

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionQuality of Depression Care Indicators67 participants
Usual CareQuality of Depression Care Indicators28 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026