Skip to content

Comparison of Parker Flex-Tip Endotracheal Tube to Standard Endotracheal Tube

Comparison of Parker Flex-Tip Endotracheal Tube to Standard Endotracheal Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01095861
Enrollment
200
Registered
2010-03-30
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2011-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endotracheal Intubation

Keywords

endotracheal tube

Brief summary

Patients presenting for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation will be randomized to one of two different endotracheal tubes (ETT).

Detailed description

The post-operative complication of a sore throat after endotracheal intubation is unfortunately common, with estimates ranging from 15-50%. Most estimates are in the order of 35-45%.(McHardy 1999, Higgins 2002) There is evidence that many patients do not report sore throat and/or vocal changes unless directly asked because surgical pain is more prominent and many patients may be unaware that intubation completed as part of the general anesthetic. (Harding 1987) The Parker FlexTip® endotracheal tube (ETT) is formulated with a softer plastic at the distal tip as well as a laterally curved profile to reduce trauma during ETT advancement. (Makino 2003) This ETT has been shown to be faster during fibreoptic intubation, but complication of sore throat was not examined. (Kristensen 2003) Our previous study (Jones 2007) demonstrated that modification of anesthetic techniques could reduce the incidence of post-operative sore throat in patients undergoing naso-tracheal intubation. We will now study the Parker Flex-Tip ETT to see if its use can also reduce the incidence of sore throat in patients undergoing oro-tracheal intubation.

Interventions

DEVICEFlexTip ETT (Parker FlexTip/GlideScope FlexTip)

FlexTip ETT used for endotracheal intubation

DEVICEControl - standard flexible ETT (Mallinckrodt)

Control - standard flexible ETT Mallinckrodt Hi-Lo cuffed tracheal tube, Catalog # 86114, Mallinckrodt, ST. Louis, MO, 63134

Sponsors

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any adult patient scheduled for elective surgery. * ETT is indicated for the procedure in the opinion of the attending anesthesiologist.

Exclusion criteria

* Any patients with known or probable difficult airways. * Any patient requiring rapid sequence induction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sore throat48-72 hoursPatients fill in a questionaire 48-72 hours after Surgery by a blinded data assessor. They are asked if they had a sore throat after their surgery. If so, they are asked to grade the sore throat as mild, moderate, or severe, when it was at its worst. Note: There is only one questionaire for both outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vocal changes48-72 hoursPatients fill in a questionaire 48-72 hours after Surgery by a blinded data assessor. They are asked if they had vocal changes after their surgery. If so, they are asked to grade the vocal changes as mild, moderate, or severe, when the changes were at its worst. Patients are asked for one word to best characterise the vocal changes. Note: There is only one questionaire for both outcomes.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026