Skip to content

Study of Tecemotide (L-BLP25) in Subjects With Slowly Progressive Multiple Myeloma With no Symptoms and Who Have Had no Chemotherapy

A Randomized, Open-label, Phase II Study With Stimuvax® (L-BLP25 or BLP25 Liposome Vaccine) in Subjects With Either Chemotherapy-naïve, Slowly Progressive, Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma or With Stage II/III Multiple Myeloma in Stable Response/Plateau Phase Following Anti-tumor Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01094548
Enrollment
34
Registered
2010-03-29
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2016-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

L-BLP25 liposome, Multiple myeloma

Brief summary

Tecemotide (L-BLP25) is believed to induce a Mucinous glycoprotein 1 (MUC1)-specific T-cell response after vaccination. The primary purpose of this study is to ascertain whether vaccination with tecemotide (L-BLP25) induces a MUC1-specific T-cell response in slowly progressive or chemotherapy naive multiple myeloma subjects.

Interventions

After receiving single low dose of cyclophosphamide, subjects will receive 8 consecutive weekly subcutaneous vaccinations with 806 microgram (mcg) of tecemotide (L-BLP25) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 followed by maintenance vaccinations (806 mcg of tecemotide (L-BLP25) at 6-Week intervals, commencing at Week 14, until disease progression requiring anti-tumor therapy is documented.

An intravenous (IV) infusion of 300 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) (to a maximum 600 mg) of cyclophosphamide will be given 3 days before the first vaccine treatment.

DRUGMultiple low dose cyclophosphamide

An IV infusion of 300 mg/m\^2 (to a maximum 600 mg) of cyclophosphamide will be given 3 days before the first vaccine treatment plus an intravenous dose of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m\^2, to a maximum of 600 mg) 3 days prior to the tecemotide (LBLP25) administration at week 5 of the weekly treatment phase and 3 days prior to every tecemotide (L-BLP25) administration during the treatment phase with 6-Weekly administration of tecemotide (L-BLP25), commencing at Week 14 up to a maximum treatment period of 2 years.

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented previously untreated, Mucinous glycoprotein 1 (MUC1)-expressing, slowly progressive asymptomatic multiple myeloma with an increasing M-protein concentration displayed on two occasions separated by an interval of at least 4 weeks within the last 18 months, or * Documented MUC1-expressing stage II or III multiple myeloma with a treatment-free interval of at least 3 months following prior anti-tumor therapy, and fulfilling criteria for having a stable response/plateau phase * Signed written informed consent * MUC1-expressing myeloma cells in the bone marrow * Greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years of age * Life expectancy of at least 6 months * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of less than or equal to (\<=) 1 at study entry * Effective contraception for both male and female subjects, if the possibility of conception exists * A platelet count \>=100 x 10\^9/Liter, white blood cells \>=2.5 x 10\^9/Liter, and hemoglobin \>=90 gram per liter (g/L) * Total bilirubin \<= 1.5 x upper reference range * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<= 2.5 x upper reference range * Serum creatinine \<= 2 x upper reference

Exclusion criteria

Pre-Therapies: * Previous exposure to MUC1 targeting therapy * Radiotherapy or any investigational drug in the 30 days before the start of treatment in this study * Receipt of immunotherapy (Example: interferons, tumor necrosis factor \[TNF\], interleukins, or biological response modifiers \[granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor {GM-CSF}, granulocyte colony stimulating factor {G-CSF}, macrophage-colony stimulating factor {M-CSF}\], monoclonal antibodies) within 4 weeks (28 days) prior to randomization * Any preexisting medical condition requiring chronic oral or intravenous steroid or immunosuppressive therapy except for maintenance doses of prednisone of \<=10 milligram per day (mg/day) Medical Conditions: * Autoimmune disease that in the opinion of the investigator could compromise the safety of the subject in this study * Hereditary or congenital immunodeficiencies * Known hypersensitivity reaction to any of the components of study treatments * Clinically significant cardiac disease, Example: New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III-IV; unstable angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia or uncontrolled hypertension, myocardial infarction in the previous 6 months * Other previous malignancies within 5 years, with exception of a history of a previous basal cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of uterine cervix, gastrointestinal intramucosal carcinoma * Known Hepatitis B and/or C * Splenectomy Standard Safety: * Known alcohol or drug abuse * Medical or psychological conditions that would not permit the subject to complete the study or sign informed consent * Significant disease which, in the investigator's opinion, would exclude the subject from the study * Pregnant or breast-feeding women, women of childbearing potential, unless using effective contraception as determined by the investigator. Subjects whom the investigator considers may be at risk of pregnancy will have a pregnancy test performed per institutional standard * Participation in another clinical study within the past 30 days * Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity * Concurrent treatment with a non-permitted drug * Any other reason that, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes the subject from participating in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Overall Induced Mucinous Glycoprotein-1 (MUC-1)-Specific Immune ResponseFrom the date of randomization up to Week 104The overall immune response was achieved at least for 2 timepoints; that is at least 1 parameter in at least 1 assay (Lymphoproliferation assay, enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) for interferon \[IFN\] gamma, and intracellular IFN gamma cytokine assay in peripheral blood mononuclear cell \[PBMC\]) with ratio to background \>=2, and ratio of background-corrected value to baseline \>=2;Specific immune response at a given timepoint 't' was considered as differences of log-scale values under stimulation (X vax,t ) to those of the respective unstimulated controls (Xneg,t, background values)were computed after certain assay-specific pre-processing steps: Yt = Xvax,t - Xneg,t; A participant was considered to show positive stimulation-induced immune response at timepoint 't' (POS\[t\]=1), upon fulfilling the following criteria: Yt =\>1 (That is at least a 2-fold higher value under stimulation than without stimulation). AVvax,t-1SEM vax,t \> AVneg,t+1SEMneg,t (ELISPOT and proliferation assay only).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeFrom the date of randomization up to Week 104Relationship between immune response with HLA subtypes was determined by analyzing the number of participants with overall induced immune response grouped by the presence versus absence of the given HLA type.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]From the date of randomization up to Month 48OCR (CR, or PR, or MR or NC or PD or NE) was defined per Blade Criteria. OCR rate (CR, or PR, or MR) was defined as the number of participants having experienced at least once a CR, PR, or MR, divided by the number of all participants. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein), disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas (STP), \<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow (BM); PR: \>=50% reduction in serum M-protein, plasma cells in BM, size of STP; \>=90% reduction of urinary M-protein in 24 hours, no increase in size/number of the lytic bone lesions (LBL). MR: 25%-49% reduction in serum M-protein, plasma cells in BM aspirate in non-secretory myeloma participants, size of STP; 50%-89% reduction in 24 h urinary light chain reaction (LCR), and no increase in size/number of LBL. PD: \>25% increase in the serum M-protein level, 24 hour urinary LCR. Increase in size of existing BL or STP, development of new BL or STP, or development of hypercalcemia
Number of Participants With Baseline Immune Response and Initial Increase of MUC1 Specific Immune ResponseBaseline and Week 9Baseline immune response towards MUC1 was defined as an immune response towards BP25, MUC-A2 or MUC-A11 peptide stimulation which was present in at least one of the two baseline assessments; the specific immune responses at baseline were based on the averaged baseline values across the two baseline visits. Initial increase of MUC1-specific immune response was defined as an increase of MUC1-specific immune response during the primary treatment period (up to Week 9).
Time to Anti-tumor TherapyFrom the date of randomization up to Month 48Time from date of randomization to the date of first anti-tumor therapy since end of study treatment. In case a concomitant or concurrent procedure was identified as anti-tumor therapy during the medical review process, the start date of that anti-tumor therapy was used instead. Participants in the survival follow-up phase without subsequent anti-tumor therapy at the time of the analysis were censored at the latest available follow-up date. Participants without anti-tumor therapy and still on treatment at the time of analysis were censored at the data cut-off date if any trial treatment administration was recorded after the data cut-off date. In case no such record exists, the subject was censored at the last available administration date prior or equal to the data cut-off date. Participants dying before start of subsequent anti-tumor therapy were treated as censored observations at time of death.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)From the first dose of study drug administration up to 42 days after the last dose of study drug administration or clinical data cut-off date (07 March 2012)TEAEs occurred between the first dose of study drug administration and up to 42 days after the last dose of study drug administration that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A Serious TEAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.Grade 3 and 4 TEAES as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 3 (NCI-CTCAE v3.0) were presented. Grade 3 refers to severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care and Activity of daily living (ADL).Grade 4 refers to Life-threatening consequences; where urgent intervention indicated. Injection site reactions, term used per NCI-CTCAE, were also presented.
Time to Progression (TTP)From the date of randomization up to Month 48Progression was defined as follows per Blade criteria: The disease was considered to be progressive if it met 1 or more of the following: \>25% increase in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein);\>25% increase in the 24 h urinary light chain excretion; \>25% increase in plasma cells in the bone marrow- definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissues plasmacytomas (STP); Development of new bone lesions or STP, or development of hypercalcemia. TTP was defined as time from randomization to disease progression. Participants without events were censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Participants without PD at time of treatment discontinuation were censored at the date of discontinuation. Participants without PD at the time of the analysis but still on treatment were censored at the date of the latest available multiple myeloma status assessment. Participants dying from causes other than PD were treated as censored observations at time of death.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First/last participant (informed consent): 21 January 2008/11 January 2010. Last participant completed: 07 March 2012; Clinical data cut-off date: 07 March 2012.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 36 participants were screened for eligibility; 2 were excluded (mainly non-fulfillment of inclusion or exclusion) and 34 participants were enrolled and randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose Cyclophosphamide
Tecemotide (L-BLP25): After receiving single low dose cyclophosphamide, participants received 8 consecutive weekly subcutaneous vaccinations with 806 mcg of tecemotide (L-BLP25) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 followed by maintenance vaccinations (806 mcg of tecemotide \[L-BLP25\]) at 6-Week intervals, commencing at Week 14, until disease progression requiring anti-tumor therapy was documented. Single low dose cyclophosphamide: An intravenous (IV) infusion of 300 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) (to a maximum 600 mg) of cyclophosphamide was given 3 days before the first vaccine treatment.
17
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose Cyclophosphamide
Tecemotide (L-BLP25): After receiving multiple low dose cyclophosphamide, participants received 8 consecutive weekly subcutaneous vaccinations with 806 mcg of tecemotide (L-BLP25) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 followed by maintenance vaccinations (806 mcg of tecemotide \[L-BLP25\]) at 6-Week intervals, commencing at Week 14, until disease progression requiring anti-tumor therapy was documented. Multiple low dose cyclophosphamide: An IV infusion of 300 mg/m\^2 (to a maximum 600 mg) of cyclophosphamide was given 3 days before the first vaccine treatment plus an IV dose of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m\^2, to a maximum of 600 mg) 3 days prior to the tecemotide(LBLP25) administration at week 5 of the weekly treatment phase and 3 days prior to every tecemotide (L-BLP25) administration during the treatment phase with 6-Weekly administration of tecemotide (L-BLP25), commencing at Week-14 up to a maximum treatment period of 2 years.
17
Total34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideTecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideTotal
Age, Continuous62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.26
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.36
63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 1717 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 175 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Overall Induced Mucinous Glycoprotein-1 (MUC-1)-Specific Immune Response

The overall immune response was achieved at least for 2 timepoints; that is at least 1 parameter in at least 1 assay (Lymphoproliferation assay, enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) for interferon \[IFN\] gamma, and intracellular IFN gamma cytokine assay in peripheral blood mononuclear cell \[PBMC\]) with ratio to background \>=2, and ratio of background-corrected value to baseline \>=2;Specific immune response at a given timepoint 't' was considered as differences of log-scale values under stimulation (X vax,t ) to those of the respective unstimulated controls (Xneg,t, background values)were computed after certain assay-specific pre-processing steps: Yt = Xvax,t - Xneg,t; A participant was considered to show positive stimulation-induced immune response at timepoint 't' (POS\[t\]=1), upon fulfilling the following criteria: Yt =\>1 (That is at least a 2-fold higher value under stimulation than without stimulation). AVvax,t-1SEM vax,t \> AVneg,t+1SEMneg,t (ELISPOT and proliferation assay only).

Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Week 104

Population: Immunological diagnostic analysis set was defined as the subset of safety analysis set consisting of all the participants with at least one complete set of baseline (baseline/cyclophosphamide infusion visit or both), Week 5, and Week 9 data of either ELISPOT, proliferation assay or cytokine assay.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Mucinous Glycoprotein-1 (MUC-1)-Specific Immune Response8 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Mucinous Glycoprotein-1 (MUC-1)-Specific Immune Response7 participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Baseline Immune Response and Initial Increase of MUC1 Specific Immune Response

Baseline immune response towards MUC1 was defined as an immune response towards BP25, MUC-A2 or MUC-A11 peptide stimulation which was present in at least one of the two baseline assessments; the specific immune responses at baseline were based on the averaged baseline values across the two baseline visits. Initial increase of MUC1-specific immune response was defined as an increase of MUC1-specific immune response during the primary treatment period (up to Week 9).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 9

Population: Immunological diagnostic analysis set was defined as the subset of safety analysis set consisting of all the participants with at least one complete set of baseline (baseline/cyclophosphamide infusion visit or both), Week 5, and Week 9 data of either ELISPOT, proliferation assay or cytokine assay.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Baseline Immune Response and Initial Increase of MUC1 Specific Immune ResponseBaseline immune response10 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Baseline Immune Response and Initial Increase of MUC1 Specific Immune ResponseMUC1 specific immune response at Week 98 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Baseline Immune Response and Initial Increase of MUC1 Specific Immune ResponseBaseline immune response7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Baseline Immune Response and Initial Increase of MUC1 Specific Immune ResponseMUC1 specific immune response at Week 97 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) Type

Relationship between immune response with HLA subtypes was determined by analyzing the number of participants with overall induced immune response grouped by the presence versus absence of the given HLA type.

Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Week 104

Population: Immunological diagnostic analysis set was defined as the subset of safety analysis set consisting of all the participants with at least 1 complete set of baseline, Week 5, and Week 9 data of either ELISPOT, proliferation assay or cytokine assay. n signifies number of participants evaluable for the particular HLA type, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C02 not present (n=14, 14)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B08 present (n=3, 6)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C03 present (n=9, 2)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A02 present (n=10, 10)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C03 not present (n=8, 13)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B08 not present (n=14, 9)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C04 present (n=1, 3)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A24 present (n=7, 1)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C04 not present (n=16, 12)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B15 present (n=4, 1)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C07 present (n=12, 10)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB01 not present (n=14, 14)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C07 not present (n=5, 5)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B15 not present (n=13, 14)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB02 present (n=2, 6)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A24 not present (n=10, 14)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB02 not present (n=15, 9)8 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B27 present (n=3, 2)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB03 present (n=11, 9)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A02 not present (n=7, 5)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB03 not present (n=6, 6)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A68 present (n=2, 3)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB05 present (n=6, 2)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B35 present (n=2, 4)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB05 not present (n=11, 13)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A01 not present (n=14, 8)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB06 present (n=7, 5)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B35 not present (n=15, 11)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB06 not present (n=10, 10)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A68 not present (n=15, 12)8 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB01 present (n=3, 1)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B44 present (n=4, 2)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB03 present (n=2, 6)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A03 present (n=4, 3)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB03 not present (n=15, 9)8 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B44 not present (n=13, 13)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB04 present (n=11, 6)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B07 present (n=6, 5)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB04 not present (n=6, 9)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C01 present (n=1, 4)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB11 present (n=2, 5)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A01 (n=3, 7)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB11 not present (n=15, 10)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C01 not present (n=16, 11)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB13 present (n=5, 2)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B07 not present (n=11, 10)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB13 not present (n=12, 13)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C02 present (n=3, 1)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB15 present (n=5, 3)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A03 not present (n=13, 12)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB15 not present (n=12, 12)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B27 not present (n=14, 13)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB15 not present (n=12, 12)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB01 present (n=3, 1)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A01 (n=3, 7)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A01 not present (n=14, 8)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A02 present (n=10, 10)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A02 not present (n=7, 5)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A03 present (n=4, 3)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A03 not present (n=13, 12)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A24 present (n=7, 1)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A24 not present (n=10, 14)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A68 present (n=2, 3)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA A68 not present (n=15, 12)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B07 present (n=6, 5)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B07 not present (n=11, 10)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B08 present (n=3, 6)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B08 not present (n=14, 9)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B15 present (n=4, 1)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B15 not present (n=13, 14)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B27 present (n=3, 2)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B27 not present (n=14, 13)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B35 present (n=2, 4)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B35 not present (n=15, 11)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B44 present (n=4, 2)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA B44 not present (n=13, 13)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C01 present (n=1, 4)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C01 not present (n=16, 11)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C02 present (n=3, 1)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C02 not present (n=14, 14)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C03 present (n=9, 2)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C03 not present (n=8, 13)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C04 present (n=1, 3)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C04 not present (n=16, 12)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C07 present (n=12, 10)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA C07 not present (n=5, 5)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB02 present (n=2, 6)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB02 not present (n=15, 9)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB03 present (n=11, 9)5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB03 not present (n=6, 6)2 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB05 present (n=6, 2)0 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB05 not present (n=11, 13)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB06 present (n=7, 5)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DQB06 not present (n=10, 10)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB01 not present (n=14, 14)7 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB03 present (n=2, 6)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB03 not present (n=15, 9)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB04 present (n=11, 6)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB04 not present (n=6, 9)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB11 present (n=2, 5)3 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB11 not present (n=15, 10)4 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB13 present (n=5, 2)1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB13 not present (n=12, 13)6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Overall Induced Immune Response by Human Leukocyte-associated Antigen (HLA) TypeHLA DRB15 present (n=5, 3)2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)

TEAEs occurred between the first dose of study drug administration and up to 42 days after the last dose of study drug administration that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A Serious TEAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.Grade 3 and 4 TEAES as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 3 (NCI-CTCAE v3.0) were presented. Grade 3 refers to severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care and Activity of daily living (ADL).Grade 4 refers to Life-threatening consequences; where urgent intervention indicated. Injection site reactions, term used per NCI-CTCAE, were also presented.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to 42 days after the last dose of study drug administration or clinical data cut-off date (07 March 2012)

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of trial treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)Serious TEAEs6 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment1 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)NCI-CTC Grade 3 and 4 TEAEs5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)ISRs8 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)TEAEs17 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)ISRs11 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)TEAEs17 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)Serious TEAEs5 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)NCI-CTC Grade 3 and 4 TEAEs8 participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs),Serious TEAEs, TEAEs of Grade 3 or 4 According to NCI-CTCAE v3.0, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment2 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]

OCR (CR, or PR, or MR or NC or PD or NE) was defined per Blade Criteria. OCR rate (CR, or PR, or MR) was defined as the number of participants having experienced at least once a CR, PR, or MR, divided by the number of all participants. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein), disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas (STP), \<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow (BM); PR: \>=50% reduction in serum M-protein, plasma cells in BM, size of STP; \>=90% reduction of urinary M-protein in 24 hours, no increase in size/number of the lytic bone lesions (LBL). MR: 25%-49% reduction in serum M-protein, plasma cells in BM aspirate in non-secretory myeloma participants, size of STP; 50%-89% reduction in 24 h urinary light chain reaction (LCR), and no increase in size/number of LBL. PD: \>25% increase in the serum M-protein level, 24 hour urinary LCR. Increase in size of existing BL or STP, development of new BL or STP, or development of hypercalcemia

Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Month 48

Population: Immunological diagnostic analysis set was defined as the subset of safety analysis set consisting of all the participants with at least one complete set of baseline (baseline/cyclophosphamide infusion visit or both), Week 5, and Week 9 data of either ELISPOT, proliferation assay or cytokine assay.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]MR0.0 Percentage of participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]PR0.0 Percentage of participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]CR+PR+MR0.0 Percentage of participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]CR0.0 Percentage of participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]CR+PR+MR0.0 Percentage of participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]PR0.0 Percentage of participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]MR0.0 Percentage of participants
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamidePercentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response (Complete Response [CR], or Partial Response [PR], or Minimal Response [MR]CR0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Anti-tumor Therapy

Time from date of randomization to the date of first anti-tumor therapy since end of study treatment. In case a concomitant or concurrent procedure was identified as anti-tumor therapy during the medical review process, the start date of that anti-tumor therapy was used instead. Participants in the survival follow-up phase without subsequent anti-tumor therapy at the time of the analysis were censored at the latest available follow-up date. Participants without anti-tumor therapy and still on treatment at the time of analysis were censored at the data cut-off date if any trial treatment administration was recorded after the data cut-off date. In case no such record exists, the subject was censored at the last available administration date prior or equal to the data cut-off date. Participants dying before start of subsequent anti-tumor therapy were treated as censored observations at time of death.

Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Month 48

Population: Immunological diagnostic analysis set was defined as the subset of safety analysis set consisting of all the participants with at least one complete set of baseline (baseline/cyclophosphamide infusion visit or both), Week 5, and Week 9 data of either ELISPOT, proliferation assay or cytokine assay.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideTime to Anti-tumor Therapy24.7 months
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideTime to Anti-tumor Therapy36.7 months
p-value: 0.391995% CI: [0.261, 1.698]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

Progression was defined as follows per Blade criteria: The disease was considered to be progressive if it met 1 or more of the following: \>25% increase in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein);\>25% increase in the 24 h urinary light chain excretion; \>25% increase in plasma cells in the bone marrow- definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissues plasmacytomas (STP); Development of new bone lesions or STP, or development of hypercalcemia. TTP was defined as time from randomization to disease progression. Participants without events were censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Participants without PD at time of treatment discontinuation were censored at the date of discontinuation. Participants without PD at the time of the analysis but still on treatment were censored at the date of the latest available multiple myeloma status assessment. Participants dying from causes other than PD were treated as censored observations at time of death.

Time frame: From the date of randomization up to Month 48

Population: Immunological diagnostic analysis set was defined as the subset of safety analysis set consisting of all the participants with at least one complete set of baseline (baseline/cyclophosphamide infusion visit or both), Week 5, and Week 9 data of either ELISPOT, proliferation assay or cytokine assay.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Single Low Dose CyclophosphamideTime to Progression (TTP)15.2 months
Tecemotide (L-BLP25) Plus Multiple Low Dose CyclophosphamideTime to Progression (TTP)38.9 months
p-value: 0.09495% CI: [0.157, 1.185]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026