Skip to content

A Randomized Comparison of Intraoperative Warming With the LMA PerfecTemp and Forced-air

A Randomized Comparison of Intraoperative Warming With the LMA PerfecTemp and Forced-air

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01094119
Enrollment
70
Registered
2010-03-26
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2017-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Warming Systems During Surgery

Keywords

heated blanket, heated pad

Brief summary

Recently, a novel posterior heating system has been developed that provides enhanced pressure relief: the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) PerfecTemp. Anactodal experience with this FDA-approved system suggests that the PerfecTemp warmer is effective, even in open abdominal surgery. The investigators therefore propose to test the hypothesis that intraoperative distal esophageal (core) temperatures with PerfecTemp warming are non-inferior to upper-body forced-air warming in patients undergoing open major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Secondary hypotheses include that: 1. intraoperative core temperatures are superior with PerfecTemp than upper-body forced-air warming 2. final intraoperative core temperature is non-inferior with PerfecTemp than upper-body forced-air warming 3. final intraoperative core temperature is superior with PerfecTemp than upper-body forced-air warming.

Interventions

DEVICEheated blanket

heated blanket

DEVICEheated pad

patients will be warmed with a heated pad during surgery.

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Body-mass index 20-36 kg/m2 * Age 18-75 yrs * ASA Physical Status 1-3 * Supine position (with or without lithotomy)

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-operative fever * Serious skin lesions * And contraindication to either PerfecTemp or forced-air warming

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Weighted Average Core Temperaturefrom tracheal intubation to 3 hours after or tracheal extubationTime weighted average core temperature (esophogeal temperature) from tracheal intubation to 3 hours after or tracheal extubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With Temperatures Above 36 Degreeat the end of surgeryProportion of patients with esophogeal temperatures above 36 degree at the end of surgery

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bair Hugger Heated Blanket
Patients will be warmed during surgery with the Bair Hugger heated blanket. heated blanket: heated blanket
34
LMA PerfecTemp System
Patients will be warmed during surgery with the PerfecTemp heated pad . heated pad: patients will be warmed with a heated pad during surgery.
36
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBair Hugger Heated BlanketLMA PerfecTemp SystemTotal
Age, Continuous51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
preoperative oral temperature36.2 degrees C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
36.8 degrees C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
36.2 degrees C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
34 participants34 participants68 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Caucasian
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
11 participants13 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants23 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants24 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 340 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Time Weighted Average Core Temperature

Time weighted average core temperature (esophogeal temperature) from tracheal intubation to 3 hours after or tracheal extubation

Time frame: from tracheal intubation to 3 hours after or tracheal extubation

Population: Randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bair Hugger Heated BlanketTime Weighted Average Core Temperature36.11 Degrees CStandard Deviation 0.5
LMA PerfecTemp SystemTime Weighted Average Core Temperature36.02 Degrees CStandard Deviation 0.55
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Temperatures Above 36 Degree

Proportion of patients with esophogeal temperatures above 36 degree at the end of surgery

Time frame: at the end of surgery

Population: Enrolled patients

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bair Hugger Heated BlanketProportion of Patients With Temperatures Above 36 Degree30 Participants
LMA PerfecTemp SystemProportion of Patients With Temperatures Above 36 Degree21 Participants
p-value: 0.0069Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026