Skip to content

Signature Personalised Patient Care System With the Vanguard Knee System Study

Study on the Signature Personalised Patient Care System With the Vanguard Knee System

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01092312
Enrollment
325
Registered
2010-03-24
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Keywords

knee, arthroplasty

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the percentage cases which have ideal mechanical axial alignment using the Vanguard total Knee implant with the Signature cutting blocks is higher than those without the use of Signature when measured immediately post-operatively.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the percentage cases which have ideal mechanical axial alignment using the Vanguard total Knee implant with the Signature cutting blocks is higher than those without the use of Signature when measured immediately post-operatively. Other outcomes will include knee assessments and patient questionnaires.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVanguard Knee System with Signature Knee Guide

Use of Signature Knee Guide

PROCEDUREVanguard Knee System with conventional Instruments

Vanguard Knee System with conventional Instruments

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis where one or more of the knee compartments are involved * correction of varus, valgus or posttraumatic deformity * correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy (wedge cut from bone to improve alignment), or arthrodesis (fusion) * need to obtain pain relief and improve function * ability and willingness to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level. * a good nutritional state * must have reached full skeletal maturity * able and willing to undergo an MRI scan

Exclusion criteria

* infection * sepsis * osteomyelitis * failure of a previous joint replacement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical Axial AlignmentPrior to Discharge: 0-2 weeksFemoral and tibial component alignment, femoral and tibial rotational alignment, tibial posterior slope

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Outcome6 months, 1 yearAmerican Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026