Skip to content

Clinical Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of the TOPAS System to Treat Fecal Incontinence

An Investigation of the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence Using the TOPAS Sling System For Women (TRANSFORM)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01090739
Acronym
TRANSFORM
Enrollment
207
Registered
2010-03-22
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

Fecal incontinence, Accidental bowel leakage, Failure conservative therapy, Women, Class III medical device, Surgical mesh

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the TOPAS System effectively treats fecal incontinence in women as measured by a 50% reduction in the number of FI episodes in a 14 day bowel diary at 12 months.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, open-label, two- stage, adaptive study conducted to obtain data to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the TOPAS system for the treatment of FI in women who have failed conservative therapy. It was approved by the FDA for up to 152 implanted subjects at up to 15 investigational sites in the US. Eight study centers are led by a Colorectal Surgeon and seven centers are led by an Urogynecologist. This study is being conducted in compliance with Title 21 CFR Parts 11, 50, 54, 56, and 812; the principles of GCP as set forth in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2008); and the ISO standard 14155:2011 (Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Good clinical practice).

Interventions

DEVICETOPAS Treatment for Fecal Incontinence

The TOPAS Treatment for Fecal Incontinence is implanted using a minimally invasive trans-obturator approach; two needle passers deliver the sling assembly. Two small posterior incisions facilitate the post-anal placement of the mesh.

Sponsors

ASTORA Women's Health
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subject is/has: 1. An adult (\>/= 18 years) female. 2. FI symptoms for a minimum of 6 months. 3. Failed two modalities of conservative therapies such as Dietary Modification, Pharmacologic Intervention, or Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. 4. \<50 years old OR if \>/= 50 years old, has had a negative cancer screening examination of the colon according screening guidelines (colonoscopy or barium enema + flexible sigmoidoscopy) within the past 3 years prior to informed consent date. (Note: if not done, the investigating physician must provide written justification for not having this exam and must be following the American Cancer Society Guidelines). 5. FI episodes ≥ 4 in 14 day period.

Exclusion criteria

Subject is/has 1. Unable or unwilling to sign Informed Consent Form or comply with study requirements. 2. Currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent drug and/or device study that may confound the results of this study as determined by AMS. 3. Allergic to polypropylene. 4. Pregnant or planning a future pregnancy. 5. Less than 12 months (365 days) postpartum. 6. Pelvic prolapse \>/=1 cm beyond the hymen (Stage III & IV) 7. Had stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or anterior repair within 3 months (90 days) prior to TOPAS Sling System implantation. 8. Had a hysterectomy, Sphincteroplasty, or Posterior surgery within 6 months (180 days) prior to TOPAS Sling System implantation. 9. Had rectal surgery (such as rectopexy) within 12 months (365 days) of TOPAS Sling System implantation. 10. Planning pelvic surgery within 12 months (365 days) post implant 11. Current Grade III or IV hemorrhoids. 12. Neurological or psychological condition as cause of FI such as MS, dementia, brain tumor. 13. Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease (for example, ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease). 14. Chronic, watery diarrhea, unmanageable by drugs or diet, as primary cause of fecal incontinence. 15. Severe chronic constipation, including obstructive defecatory disorder. 16. External full thickness rectal prolapse. 17. A history of laxative abuse within the past 5 years. 18. Had previous rectal resection. 19. Active pelvic infection, perianal or recto-vaginal fistula. 20. Congenital anorectal malformations or chronic 4th degree lacerations and cloacae. 21. History of therapeutic radiation for cancers of the pelvis. 22. Currently implanted with a sacral nerve stimulator. 23. Contraindicated for surgery or having any condition that would compromise wound healing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Responders12 MonthsThe primary endpoint for efficacy is the 14 day bowel diary documenting liquid or solid fecal incontinence episodes. A 50% reduction in the number of FI episodes is considered a treatment responder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Wexner Symptom Severity Score36 Month Follow-up VisitWexner Symptom Severity Score for fecal incontinence (also known as the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score) as described by Jorge and Wexner, 1993 (Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97). Measured on a 0-20 scale with lower scores equal to less fecal incontinence.
Change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) Scores36 Month Follow-up VisitShort-form version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) as described by Barber et al., 2005 (Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13). The short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory has a total of 20 questions and 3 scales (Urinary Distress Inventory, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory). Total PFDI score measured on a 0-300 scale with higher scores equal to greater pelvic floor distress. As with the Total PFDI Score, higher subscale scores equal greater pelvic floor distress, on a 0-100 scale.
Change in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) Scores36 Month Follow-up VisitShort-form version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) as described by Barber et al., 2005 (Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13). The short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire has a total of 7 questions and 3 scales (Urinary Impact, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact, and Colorectal-Anal Impact). Total PFIQ score measured on a 0-300 scale with higher scores equal to greater pelvic floor impact. Subscales scored on 0-100 scale and the higher the score the greater pelvic floor impact, exactly like the Total PFIQ score.
Change in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)36 Month Follow-up VisitPelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12) as described by Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Aug;14(3):164-8; discussion 168. Measured on a 0-48 scale with higher scores equal to better sexual function.
Change in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)12 Month Follow-up VisitNumeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS) adapted from McCafferty M, Pasero C. Pain: Clinical Manual. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Inc.; 1999. Chapter 3, Assessment Tools; p. 58-75. The NPPS is scored on a 0-10 scale with higher scores indicating more severe pain. Since the NPPS was introduced later in the study, earlier implanted subjects did not have the baseline NPPS score and a change from baseline could not be calculated.
Change in Fecal Incontinence Episodes36 Month Follow-up VisitNumber of fecal incontinence episodes in a 14 day period
Change in Fecal Incontinence Days36 Month Follow-up VisitNumber of fecal incontinence days in a 14 day period
Change in Urge Fecal Incontinence Episodes36 Month Follow-up VisitNumber of urge fecal incontinence episodes in a 14 day period
Change in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score36 Month Follow-up VisitFecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score as described by Rockwood et al., 2000 (Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7). Four domains of lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment. Measured on a 0-4 scale with higher scores equal to better quality of life.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI36 Month Follow-up VisitChange in health resource usage using sponsor-created questionnaire
Change in Health Resource Usage: # Physician Visits Due to FI36 Month Follow-up VisitChange in health resource usage using sponsor-created questionnaire
Change in Health Resource Usage: # Pads Per Day Subject Took for FI36 Month Follow-up VisitChange in health resource usage using sponsor-created questionnaire: # days in hospital due to FI
Change in the Haff Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8)36 Month Follow-up VisitThe SSQ-8 is an 8 item questionnaire to assess subject surgical satisfaction as described by Murphy M, Sternschuss G, Haff R, van Raalte H, Saltz S, Lucente V. Quality of life and surgical satisfaction after vaginal reconstructive vs. obliterative surgery for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):573.e1-7. The SSQ-8 was collected as an optional one-time assessment from implanted subjects between the 3 and 36 month visits. Scale is scored on 0-100 with higher scores are better

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subject recruitment occurred from July 2010 - December 2012.

Pre-assignment details

Following enrollment (i.e., signing informed consent form), subjects underwent two screening visits to evaluate and confirm eligibility for the TOPAS implant procedures.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TOPAS
TOPAS Treatment for Fecal Incontinence: The TOPAS Treatment for Fecal Incontinence is implanted using a minimally invasive trans-obturator approach; two needle passers deliver the sling assembly. Two small posterior incisions facilitate the post-anal placement of the mesh.
152
Total152

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
12 Month Follow-upDeath1
12 Month Follow-upLost to Follow-up1
12 Month Follow-upPhysician Decision1
12 Month Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject2
24 Month Follow-upDeath1
24 Month Follow-upLost to Follow-up1
24 Month Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject7
36 Month Follow-upVisit still pending17
36 Month Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject6
EnrollmentAdverse Event1
EnrollmentLost to Follow-up5
EnrollmentPhysician Decision5
EnrollmentProtocol Violation14
EnrollmentSponsor termination of site4
EnrollmentStudy implant limit reached2
EnrollmentWithdrawal by Subject24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTOPAS
Age, Continuous59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Anal Resting Tone
Absent
11 participants
Anal Resting Tone
Present
141 participants
Anorectal Manometry - Pressures
Mean Maximum Resting Pressure
31.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.9
Anorectal Manometry - Pressures
Mean Maximum Squeeze Pressure
60.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.6
Anorectal Manometry - Volumes
First sensation volume
43.1 cc
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.9
Anorectal Manometry - Volumes
Maximum tolerated volume
124.8 cc
STANDARD_DEVIATION 61.9
Baseline Fecal Incontinence Medication
Anti-cholinergic agents
6 participants
Baseline Fecal Incontinence Medication
Bile acid sequestrants
3 participants
Baseline Fecal Incontinence Medication
Bulking agents
22 participants
Baseline Fecal Incontinence Medication
Opioid-receptor agents
30 participants
Baseline Fecal Incontinence Medication
Osmotic laxatives
8 participants
Baseline Fecal Incontinence Medication
Other meds
5 participants
Baseline Medical History
Depressive disorder
56 participants
Baseline Medical History
Diabetes
19 participants
Baseline Medical History
Diverticulitis
41 participants
Baseline Medical History
Gallstones
2 participants
Baseline Medical History
Gastrointestional reflux disease
65 participants
Baseline Medical History
Headaches
29 participants
Baseline Medical History
Hemorrhoids
36 participants
Baseline Medical History
Hyperlipidemia
53 participants
Baseline Medical History
Hypertension
60 participants
Baseline Medical History
Hypothroid
38 participants
Baseline Medical History
Irritable bowel syndrome
31 participants
Baseline Medical History
Pelvic area pain
52 participants
Baseline Medical History
Previous anal sphincter repair
31 participants
Baseline Medical History
Previous cholecystectomy
38 participants
Baseline Medical History
Previous hysterectomy / oophorectomy
74 participants
Baseline Medical History
Previous prolapse / UI repair
70 participants
Baseline Medical History
Rectal prolapse
6 participants
Baseline Medical History
Systemic pain
55 participants
Baseline Medical History
Urinary incontinence
39 participants
Baseline Medical History
Vaginal atrophy
23 participants
Baseline Medical History
Vaginal prolapse
8 participants
Concomitant Use
# Caffeine use on a regular basis
102 participants
Concomitant Use
# Rgular laxative use within past 5 years
18 participants
Concomitant Use
# Smoked within past 6 months
8 participants
Duration of Fecal Incontinence110.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 113.5
Etiology of Fecal Incontinence
Anorectal trauma
6 participants
Etiology of Fecal Incontinence
Idiopathic/unknown
62 participants
Etiology of Fecal Incontinence
Obstetric trauma
87 participants
Etiology of Fecal Incontinence
Other
4 participants
External Anal Sphincter Defect Extent95.3 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45
External Anal Sphincter Defects
Absent
73 participants
External Anal Sphincter Defects
Present
79 participants
Failed Fecal Incontinence Conservative Therapy
Diet, medication and pelvic floor training
61 participants
Failed Fecal Incontinence Conservative Therapy
Diet modification and medication
22 participants
Failed Fecal Incontinence Conservative Therapy
Diet modification and pelvic floor muscle training
49 participants
Failed Fecal Incontinence Conservative Therapy
Medication and pelvic floor muscle training
20 participants
Hemorrhoids
Absent
118 participants
Hemorrhoids
Present
34 participants
Internal Anal Sphincter Defect Extent110.0 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.7
Internal Anal Sphincter Defects
Absent
110 participants
Internal Anal Sphincter Defects
Present
42 participants
Menopausal Status
Peri-menopausal
6 participants
Menopausal Status
Post-menopausal
126 participants
Menopausal Status
Pre-menopausal
20 participants
Obstetric History - Gravidity3.0 number
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Obstetric History - # of Caesarean deliveries0.1 number
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Obstetric History - # of Vaginal Deliveries2.4 number
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Obstetric History - Parity2.6 number
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latina
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
137 participants
Rectal soft tissue scarring
Absent
126 participants
Rectal soft tissue scarring
Present
26 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
152 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Women
152 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 152
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 152

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Responders

The primary endpoint for efficacy is the 14 day bowel diary documenting liquid or solid fecal incontinence episodes. A 50% reduction in the number of FI episodes is considered a treatment responder.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TOPASPercentage of Responders69.1 percentage of treatment responders
Secondary

Change in Fecal Incontinence Days

Number of fecal incontinence days in a 14 day period

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence DaysBaseline10 fecal incontinent days/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Days3 Months4 fecal incontinent days/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Days6 Months4 fecal incontinent days/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Days12 Months4 fecal incontinent days/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Days24 Months4 fecal incontinent days/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Days36 Months4 fecal incontinent days/14 days
Secondary

Change in Fecal Incontinence Episodes

Number of fecal incontinence episodes in a 14 day period

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence EpisodesBaseline18 fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Episodes3 Months5 fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Episodes6 Months5 fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Episodes12 Months5 fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Episodes24 Months5 fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Episodes36 Months5 fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
Secondary

Change in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score

Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score as described by Rockwood et al., 2000 (Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7). Four domains of lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment. Measured on a 0-4 scale with higher scores equal to better quality of life.

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreLifestyle - Baseline2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreLifestyle - 3 Months3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreLifestyle - 6 Months3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreLifestyle - 12 Months3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreLifestyle - 24 Months3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreLifestyle - 36 Months3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreCoping - Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreCoping - 3 Months2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreCoping - 6 Months2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreCoping - 12 Months2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreCoping - 24 Months2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreCoping - 36 Months2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreDepression - Baseline2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreDepression - 3 Months3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreDepression - 6 Months3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreDepression - 12 Months3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreDepression - 24 Months3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreDepression - 36 Months3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreEmbarrassment - Baseline1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreEmbarrassment - 3 Months2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreEmbarrassment - 6 Months2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreEmbarrassment - 12 Months2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreEmbarrassment - 24 Months2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
TOPASChange in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ScoreEmbarrassment - 36 Months2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Change in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)

Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS) adapted from McCafferty M, Pasero C. Pain: Clinical Manual. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Inc.; 1999. Chapter 3, Assessment Tools; p. 58-75. The NPPS is scored on a 0-10 scale with higher scores indicating more severe pain. Since the NPPS was introduced later in the study, earlier implanted subjects did not have the baseline NPPS score and a change from baseline could not be calculated.

Time frame: 12 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted at the time the NPPS was implemented in the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)Baseline0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
TOPASChange in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)Procedure3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
TOPASChange in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)Acute Follow-up1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
TOPASChange in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)3 Months0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
TOPASChange in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)6 Months0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
TOPASChange in Numeric Pelvic Pain Scale (NPPS)12 Months0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) Scores

Short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) as described by Barber et al., 2005 (Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13). The short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory has a total of 20 questions and 3 scales (Urinary Distress Inventory, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory). Total PFDI score measured on a 0-300 scale with higher scores equal to greater pelvic floor distress. As with the Total PFDI Score, higher subscale scores equal greater pelvic floor distress, on a 0-100 scale.

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 3 Months33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresPOP Subscale - 12 Months12.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresTotal PFDI Score - Baseline104.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.4
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresTotal PFDI Score - 3 Months69.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresTotal PFDI Score - 6 Months68.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresTotal PFDI Score - 12 Months66.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.4
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresTotal PFDI Score - 24 Months65.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresTotal PFDI Score - 36 Months70.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.2
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - Baseline54.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 6 Months33.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 12 Months32.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 24 Months31.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 36 Months33.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresUrinary Subscale - Baseline27.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 3 Months21.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 6 Months21.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 12 Months21.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 24 Months22.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresPOP Subscale - 36 Months13.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 36 Months22.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresPOP Subscale - Baseline21.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresPOP Subscale - 3 Months14.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresPOP Subscale - 6 Months14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) ScoresPOP Subscale - 24 Months12.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Secondary

Change in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) Scores

Short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) as described by Barber et al., 2005 (Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13). The short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire has a total of 7 questions and 3 scales (Urinary Impact, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact, and Colorectal-Anal Impact). Total PFIQ score measured on a 0-300 scale with higher scores equal to greater pelvic floor impact. Subscales scored on 0-100 scale and the higher the score the greater pelvic floor impact, exactly like the Total PFIQ score.

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresTotal PDFI Score - Baseline79.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.3
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresTotal PDFI Score - 3 Months41.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresTotal PDFI Score - 6 Months39.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.4
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresTotal PDFI Score - 12 Months37.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresTotal PDFI Score - 24 Months35.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresTotal PDFI Score - 36 Months38.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - Baseline51.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 3 Months23.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 6 Months23.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 12 Months21.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 24 Months20.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresColorectal-Anal Subscale - 36 Months20.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresUrinary Subscale - Baseline18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 3 Months12.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 6 Months10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 12 Months11.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 24 Months10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresUrinary Subscale - 36 Months11.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresPOP Subscale - Baseline9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresPOP Subscale - 3 Months5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresPOP Subscale - 6 Months5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresPOP Subscale - 12 Months4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresPOP Subscale - 24 Months4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) ScoresPOP Subscale - 36 Months5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Secondary

Change in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12) as described by Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Aug;14(3):164-8; discussion 168. Measured on a 0-48 scale with higher scores equal to better sexual function.

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)Baseline32.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
TOPASChange in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)3 Months35.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)6 Months35.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)12 Months34.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
TOPASChange in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)24 Months33.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
TOPASChange in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)36 Months35.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Secondary

Change in Urge Fecal Incontinence Episodes

Number of urge fecal incontinence episodes in a 14 day period

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TOPASChange in Urge Fecal Incontinence EpisodesBaseline4 urge fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Urge Fecal Incontinence Episodes3 Months0 urge fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Urge Fecal Incontinence Episodes6 Months0 urge fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Urge Fecal Incontinence Episodes12 Months0 urge fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Urge Fecal Incontinence Episodes24 Months0 urge fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
TOPASChange in Urge Fecal Incontinence Episodes36 Months0 urge fecal incontinent episodes/14 days
Secondary

Change in Wexner Symptom Severity Score

Wexner Symptom Severity Score for fecal incontinence (also known as the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score) as described by Jorge and Wexner, 1993 (Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97). Measured on a 0-20 scale with lower scores equal to less fecal incontinence.

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All subjects implanted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Wexner Symptom Severity ScoreBaseline13.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
TOPASChange in Wexner Symptom Severity Score3 Months9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
TOPASChange in Wexner Symptom Severity Score6 Months9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
TOPASChange in Wexner Symptom Severity Score12 Months9.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
TOPASChange in Wexner Symptom Severity Score24 Months9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
TOPASChange in Wexner Symptom Severity Score36 Months9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Other Pre-specified

Change in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI

Change in health resource usage using sponsor-created questionnaire

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All implanted subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days in hospital due to FI - Baseline0.1 daysStandard Deviation 0.6
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days in hospital due to FI - 12 Months0.1 daysStandard Deviation 0.5
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days in hospital due to FI - 24 Months0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0.1
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days in hospital due to FI - 36 Months0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days took off work due to FI - Baseline6.4 daysStandard Deviation 34
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days took off work due to FI - 12 Months1.3 daysStandard Deviation 9.9
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days took off work due to FI - 24 Months4.5 daysStandard Deviation 35.4
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days took off work due to FI - 36 Months0.9 daysStandard Deviation 9.5
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days others took off work - Baseline0.2 daysStandard Deviation 1.3
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days others took off work - 12 Months0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days others took off work - 24 Months0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0.3
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Days in Hospital, Took Off Work, or Others Took Off Work Due to FI# days others took off work - 36 Months0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

Change in Health Resource Usage: # Pads Per Day Subject Took for FI

Change in health resource usage using sponsor-created questionnaire: # days in hospital due to FI

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All implanted subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Pads Per Day Subject Took for FI# pads per day subject took for FI - Baseline2.4 pads per dayStandard Deviation 2.1
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Pads Per Day Subject Took for FI# per day subject took for FI - 12 Months1.4 pads per dayStandard Deviation 1.8
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Pads Per Day Subject Took for FI# pads per day subject took for FI - 24 Months1.1 pads per dayStandard Deviation 1.5
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Pads Per Day Subject Took for FI# pads per day subject took for FI - 36 Months1.2 pads per dayStandard Deviation 1.6
Other Pre-specified

Change in Health Resource Usage: # Physician Visits Due to FI

Change in health resource usage using sponsor-created questionnaire

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All implanted subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Physician Visits Due to FI# physician visits due to FI - Baseline5.0 physician visitsStandard Deviation 7.6
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Physician Visits Due to FI# physician visits due to FI - 12 Months0.4 physician visitsStandard Deviation 1.4
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Physician Visits Due to FI# physician visits due to FI - 24 Months0.5 physician visitsStandard Deviation 1.8
TOPASChange in Health Resource Usage: # Physician Visits Due to FI# physician visits due to FI - 36 Months0.3 physician visitsStandard Deviation 1.1
Other Pre-specified

Change in the Haff Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8)

The SSQ-8 is an 8 item questionnaire to assess subject surgical satisfaction as described by Murphy M, Sternschuss G, Haff R, van Raalte H, Saltz S, Lucente V. Quality of life and surgical satisfaction after vaginal reconstructive vs. obliterative surgery for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):573.e1-7. The SSQ-8 was collected as an optional one-time assessment from implanted subjects between the 3 and 36 month visits. Scale is scored on 0-100 with higher scores are better

Time frame: 36 Month Follow-up Visit

Population: All implanted subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TOPASChange in the Haff Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8)79.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026