Skip to content

Intubation With Storz Videolaryngoscope® Versus Airtraq® - in an Infant Population

Intubation With Storz Videolaryngoscope® Versus Airtraq® - in an Infant Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01090726
Enrollment
10
Registered
2010-03-22
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2010-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Videolaryngoscopy, Infant

Brief summary

The purpose of the pilot study is to compare new laryngoscopes for infants by assessing the equipment best suited to assist the intubation, with the best overview, shortest time to intubation and use these numbers to make a sample size calculation for the full protocol. The investigators hypothesis is that the Storz videolaryngoscope® has a better success rate than infants (\<2 years). The patients will be optimally anaesthetized with neuromuscular blockade for the intubation. All patient will be evaluated with af Macintosh blade laryngoscope, with an Airtraq® or a Storz videolaryngoscope®, and finally intubated with the other one of the later, which the patient was randomized to.

Interventions

Storz videolaryngoscope being used for the actual intubation

DEVICEAirtraq

Airtraq being used for the actual intubation

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 2 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective surgical patients ASA-class 1-2 below the age of 2 years, with indication for intubation. * Informed consent from parent. * The parents must have legal custody of the child. * The parents must be able to read and understand Danish.

Exclusion criteria

* Expected difficult airway.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate5 minutesSucces is defined by intubation being executed in the first try.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to intubation5 minutes
Number of intubation attempts5 Minutes
Time to Cormack evaluation5 minutes
Prevalence of post intubation stridor12 hours
Intubation conditions5 Minutes
Quality of laryngeal overview before intubation5 MinutesEvaluated by Cormack score

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026