Skip to content

PF-00489791 For The Treatment Of Raynaud's

A Phase 2a Randomized Double-blinded, Placebo And Active Controlled Two Cohort Two Doses Cross-over Multi-center Clinical Study To Assess Efficacy Of A Once Daily Administration Of A Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor (Pf-00489791) For The Treatment Of Vasospasm In Primary And Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01090492
Enrollment
243
Registered
2010-03-22
Start date
2010-08-04
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2018-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Vascular Disease, Raynaud's Disease

Keywords

Raynaud's phenomenon, vasospasm, scleroderma, systemic sclerosis, CREST, phosphodiesterase inhibitor

Brief summary

The investigators propose that once daily administration of PF-00489791, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, will reduce vasospasm and improve symptoms and signs associated with Primary and Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon.

Interventions

Subjects with Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon will receive PF-00489791 4 mg once a day for the first 4 week cross over period and then placebo once a day for the second 4 week cross over period

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active Raynaud's Phenomenon * Stable disease and medication requirements over the previous two months * For Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon subjects, a diagnosis of scleroderma using the American College of Rheumatology criteria or by the presence of at least 3/5 features of CREST syndrome * both sexes

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, angina, or using oral nitrates * Smoking within 3 months or smoking cessation using nicotine products * Subjects currently taking sildenafil, tadalafil or vardenafil * Subjects with ulnar arterial occlusive disease as shown by a modified Allen test * Pregnant or breast feeding or considering pregnancy in next 4 months * Participation in trial for investigational drug within 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The Raynaud's Condition score (RCS) is participant's rating of difficulty considering number of attacks, duration, amount of pain, numbness, or other symptoms caused in the fingers (including painful sores) due to the Raynaud's phenomenon every day and impact of Raynaud's alone on use of hands every day. An 11 point Likert scale is used to rate the difficulty caused by the condition each day with 0 = no difficulty and 10 = extreme difficulty. Participants were asked to select the number that best describes their difficulty, with higher score indicating worse condition. Average daily score was considered for participants completing more than 1 Raynaud's pain score scale on a day. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 7 days prior to treatment start. Week 4 value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to Week 4.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Baseline, Week 4Mean duration of Raynaud's attacks for a time period was calculated as sum of recorded durations of attacks in the time period divided by total number of attacks in the time period where duration was recorded.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4Participants were asked to rate their worst Raynaud's pain in the past 24 hours using an 11 point Likert scale, with 0 = no Raynaud's pain and 10 = the worst possible pain. Highest (most severe) response was considered for participants responding at more than 1 point on the scale. Average daily score was considered for participants completing more than 1 Raynaud's pain score scale on a day. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 7 days prior to treatment start. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to the visit.
Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortBaseline, Day 14, 28Presence of ulcer was assessed at baseline. At post-baseline visits, each ulcer was measured and scored: 1= smaller or improved compared to previous visit, 2= same as previous visit, 3= bigger or worse than previous visit, and 4= new. If a new digital ulcer develops during the course of the study, the measurement and scoring were initiated on this additional ulcer. Healed ulcers were not counted into the number of ulcers. Participants with SRP in the per-protocol population with at least 1 digital ulcer present at any assessment were evaluable for this measure. Results are reported for participants with presence of ulcer at baseline and decrease from baseline in ulcers at post-baseline visits.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4Change from baseline in the number of Raynaud's attacks at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3 and Week 4 was calculated from the number of attacks reported over the 7-day period prior to each week from the patient diary, respectively.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesScreening up to 28 days after last study dose (up to 98 days)Criteria for laboratory tests abnormalities included: hemoglobin, hematocrit and red blood cells (less than \[\<\] 0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\]); leukocytes (\<0.6 LLN /greater than \[\>\] 1.5\*upper LN \[ULN\]; platelets (\<0.5\*LLN/\>1.75\*ULN); neutrophils, lymphocytes (\<0.8\* LLN/\>1.2\*ULN); eosinophils, basophils, monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN); bilirubin (\>1.5\*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Gamma GT, alkaline phosphatase (\>3\*ULN); BUN, creatinine (\>1.3\*ULN); glucose (\<0.6 LLN/\>1.5\*ULN); uric acid (\>1.2\*ULN); sodium (\<0.95\*LLN/\>1.05\*ULN); potassium, calcium, chloride, bicarbonate (\<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN); albumin, total protein (\<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN); creatine kinase (\>2.0\*ULN); Urine Specific Gravity, Urine pH, urine blood, urine glucose, urine protein, urine ketones, urine leukocytes esterase (\>=1 high-powered field). Total number of participants with any laboratory abnormalities was reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure MeasurementsScreening up to 28 days after last study dose (up to 98 days)Vital signs assessment included measurement of supine and standing pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Criteria for clinically significant vital signs and orthostatic blood pressure measurements were based on investigator's judgement.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesScreening up to 28 days after last study dose (up to 98 days)ECG assessment included measurement of PR, QRS, QT,corrected QT interval (QTc)values. Criteria for clinically significant ECG values were based on investigator's judgement.
Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 1, 15, 29 (Day 1, 15, 29 for first intervention period), 43, 57, 71 (Day 1, 15, 29 for second intervention period)Only participants receiving PF-00489791 were to be analyzed for this outcome. Data have been calculated by setting plasma concentration values below the lower limit of quantification to 0. The lower limit of quantification is 0.0100 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL). Data for plasma concentration of PF-00489791 metabolites was not analyzed, as it was not intended to be a secondary endpoint and was deemed optional.

Countries

Canada, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 243 participants were stratified into 2 cohorts (Primary Raynaud's phenomenon\[PRP\] and secondary RP\[SRP\]), who entered a 2-week placebo run-in period (to establish baseline), followed by a cross-over period (first 4 week treatment period,then a 2 week placebo washout,then 4 week treatment period) and then a 2-week placebo run-out period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 4 mg
Two placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention period and then PF-00489791 tablets 4 milligram (mg) (2 tablets of PF-00489791 2 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in second intervention period to participants with PRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
27
PRP Cohort: PF-00489791 4mg First, Then Placebo
PF-00489791 tablets 4 mg (2 tablets of PF-00489791 2 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention DB period and 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in second DB intervention period to participants with PRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
29
PRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 20 mg
Two placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention period and then PF-00489791 tablets 20 mg (2 tablets of PF-00489791 10 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in second DB intervention period to participants with PRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
29
PRP Cohort: PF-00489791 20 mg First, Then Placebo
PF-00489791 tablets 20 mg (2 tablets of PF-00489791 10 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention period and then 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in second intervention period to participants with PRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
28
SRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 4 mg
Two placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention period and then PF-00489791 tablets 4 milligram (mg) (2 tablets of PF-00489791 2 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in second intervention period to participants with SRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
33
SRP Cohort: PF-00489791 4 mg First, Then Placebo
PF-00489791 tablets 4 mg (2 tablets of PF-00489791 2 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention period and then 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in second intervention period to participants with SRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
32
SRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 20 mg
Two placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention period and then PF-00489791 tablets 20 mg (2 tablets of PF-00489791 10 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in second intervention period to participants with SRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
32
SRP Cohort: PF-00489791 20 mg First, Then Placebo
PF-00489791 tablets 20 mg (2 tablets of PF-00489791 10 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks in first intervention period and then 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 orally once daily for 4 weeks in second intervention period to participants with SRP. A washout period of 2 weeks was maintained between each intervention period during which 2 placebo tablets matched to PF-00489791 were given orally once daily.
33
Total243

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
First Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Adverse Event02031205
First Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Did not meet inclusion criteria02000001
First Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up00100000
First Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Other00112000
First Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Pregnancy00001000
First Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Protocol Violation11120010
Second Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Adverse Event00101171
Second Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up00000010
Second Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Non-compliance01000000
Second Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Other01100000
Second Intervention Period (4 Weeks)Protocol Violation10001011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 4 mgPRP Cohort: PF-00489791 4mg First, Then PlaceboPRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 20 mgPRP Cohort: PF-00489791 20 mg First, Then PlaceboSRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 4 mgSRP Cohort: PF-00489791 4 mg First, Then PlaceboSRP Cohort: Placebo First, Then PF-00489791 20 mgSRP Cohort: PF-00489791 20 mg First, Then PlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
Between 18 to 44 years
14 Participants12 Participants14 Participants14 Participants10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants9 Participants95 Participants
Age, Customized
Between 45 to 64 years
13 Participants16 Participants15 Participants14 Participants22 Participants26 Participants16 Participants24 Participants146 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than or equal to (>=) 65 years
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants25 Participants25 Participants26 Participants30 Participants30 Participants31 Participants28 Participants220 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 550 / 540 / 1020 / 610 / 641 / 122
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 5534 / 5443 / 10234 / 6151 / 6460 / 122
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 550 / 540 / 1020 / 610 / 641 / 122

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4

The Raynaud's Condition score (RCS) is participant's rating of difficulty considering number of attacks, duration, amount of pain, numbness, or other symptoms caused in the fingers (including painful sores) due to the Raynaud's phenomenon every day and impact of Raynaud's alone on use of hands every day. An 11 point Likert scale is used to rate the difficulty caused by the condition each day with 0 = no difficulty and 10 = extreme difficulty. Participants were asked to select the number that best describes their difficulty, with higher score indicating worse condition. Average daily score was considered for participants completing more than 1 Raynaud's pain score scale on a day. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 7 days prior to treatment start. Week 4 value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to Week 4.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Per-protocol analysis set (PPAS) included all randomized participants compliant with diary completion and were not amongst serious protocol violators, receiving study medication till the study completion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Baseline3.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.899
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Change at Week 4-0.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.901
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Baseline2.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Change at Week 4-1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.771
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Baseline2.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.958
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Change at Week 4-0.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.404
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Baseline3.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.431
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Change at Week 4-0.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.624
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Baseline2.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.833
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Change at Week 4-0.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Baseline2.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.492
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) at Week 4Change at Week 4-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.437
Comparison: PRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.651380% CI: [-0.21, 0.44]ANCOVA
Comparison: PRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.005780% CI: [-0.99, -0.38]ANCOVA
Comparison: SRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.115780% CI: [-0.8, -0.08]ANCOVA
Comparison: SRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.628680% CI: [-0.56, 0.25]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4

Mean duration of Raynaud's attacks for a time period was calculated as sum of recorded durations of attacks in the time period divided by total number of attacks in the time period where duration was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: PPAS included all randomized participants compliant with diary completion and were not amongst serious protocol violators, receiving study medication till the study completion. Here, number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Baseline17.69 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 13.184
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Change at Week 4-2.89 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 7.48
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Baseline22.23 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 36.562
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Change at Week 4-5.63 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 43.067
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Baseline19.61 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 40.603
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Change at Week 4-1.41 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 12.348
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Baseline19.37 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 18.929
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Change at Week 4-3.92 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 11.336
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Baseline19.07 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 18.196
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Change at Week 4-2.61 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 9.593
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Baseline19.91 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 19.886
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 4Change at Week 4-1.65 minutes per attackStandard Deviation 10.609
Comparison: PRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.7980% CI: [-4.61, 7.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: PRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.146380% CI: [-11.61, -0.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: SRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.144680% CI: [-4.44, -0.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: SRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.549780% CI: [-3.45, 1.26]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4

Participants were asked to rate their worst Raynaud's pain in the past 24 hours using an 11 point Likert scale, with 0 = no Raynaud's pain and 10 = the worst possible pain. Highest (most severe) response was considered for participants responding at more than 1 point on the scale. Average daily score was considered for participants completing more than 1 Raynaud's pain score scale on a day. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 7 days prior to treatment start. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to the visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

Population: PPAS included all randomized participants compliant with diary completion and were not amongst serious protocol violators, receiving study medication till the study completion. Here, number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-0.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-0.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.525
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline2.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.074
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.842
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.745
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-0.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.266
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.664
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline2.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.348
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-0.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.524
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.205
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.262
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.423
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-0.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.337
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline2.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.064
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-0.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.614
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-0.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.836
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-0.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.922
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.081
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline2.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.895
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-0.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.115
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-0.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.276
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.321
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline3.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.753
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.269
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-0.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.272
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-0.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.466
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Mean Raynaud's Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.306
Comparison: Week 4 (PRP): Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.590980% CI: [-0.21, 0.52]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 4 (PRP): Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.005380% CI: [-1.12, -0.43]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 4 (SRP): Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.346280% CI: [-0.67, 0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 4 (SRP): Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.19480% CI: [-0.88, -0.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4

Change from baseline in the number of Raynaud's attacks at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3 and Week 4 was calculated from the number of attacks reported over the 7-day period prior to each week from the patient diary, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4

Population: PPAS included all randomized participants compliant with diary completion and were not amongst serious protocol violators, receiving study medication till the study completion. Here, number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-4.66 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 10.559
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-3.75 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 7.494
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline22.06 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 20.587
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-4.85 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 13.008
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-5.30 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 9.487
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-2.47 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 6.477
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-4.86 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 5.681
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline16.31 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 10.885
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-3.07 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 7.118
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-2.36 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 8.371
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-1.41 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 7.934
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-4.03 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 10.396
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-3.65 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 10.46
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-2.45 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 11.107
Placebo (PRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline20.19 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 17.802
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-3.76 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 9.028
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline22.80 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 16.27
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-3.17 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 7.994
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-4.25 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 11.408
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-3.89 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 8.326
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-3.75 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 8.601
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline23.70 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 20.909
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-2.68 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 10.002
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-4.49 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 14.692
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-4.43 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 17.312
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline23.08 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 20.698
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 3-1.93 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 9.487
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 1-2.36 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 11.85
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 4-2.25 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 10.624
Placebo (SRP)Change From Baseline in the Number of Raynaud's Attacks at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4Change at Week 2-1.87 Raynaud's attacksStandard Deviation 11.051
Comparison: At Week 4 - PRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.950480% CI: [-2.43, 2.68]ANCOVA
Comparison: At Week 4 - PRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.465180% CI: [-3.74, 1.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: At Week 4 - SRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.742380% CI: [-2.92, 1.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: At Week 4 - SRP: Adjusted mean difference analysis was based on ANCOVA model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect, utilizing the baseline scores as covariate.p-value: 0.352480% CI: [-4.55, 0.73]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

ECG assessment included measurement of PR, QRS, QT,corrected QT interval (QTc)values. Criteria for clinically significant ECG values were based on investigator's judgement.

Time frame: Screening up to 28 days after last study dose (up to 98 days)

Population: Safety analysis set consisted of all participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 participants
Placebo (PRP)Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 participants
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 participants
Placebo (SRP)Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Measurements

Vital signs assessment included measurement of supine and standing pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Criteria for clinically significant vital signs and orthostatic blood pressure measurements were based on investigator's judgement.

Time frame: Screening up to 28 days after last study dose (up to 98 days)

Population: Safety analysis set consisted of all participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Measurements0 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Measurements0 participants
Placebo (PRP)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Measurements0 participants
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Measurements0 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Measurements0 participants
Placebo (SRP)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Measurements0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon Cohort

Presence of ulcer was assessed at baseline. At post-baseline visits, each ulcer was measured and scored: 1= smaller or improved compared to previous visit, 2= same as previous visit, 3= bigger or worse than previous visit, and 4= new. If a new digital ulcer develops during the course of the study, the measurement and scoring were initiated on this additional ulcer. Healed ulcers were not counted into the number of ulcers. Participants with SRP in the per-protocol population with at least 1 digital ulcer present at any assessment were evaluable for this measure. Results are reported for participants with presence of ulcer at baseline and decrease from baseline in ulcers at post-baseline visits.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 14, 28

Population: PPAS included all randomized participants compliant with diary completion and were not amongst serious protocol violators, receiving study medication till the study completion. Here, number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortWith Decrease at Day 147 participants
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortBaseline10 participants
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortWith Decrease at Day 289 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortWith Decrease at Day 141 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortBaseline7 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortWith Decrease at Day 285 participants
Placebo (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortBaseline16 participants
Placebo (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortWith Decrease at Day 287 participants
Placebo (PRP)Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Digital Ulcers at Day 14 and 28: Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon CohortWith Decrease at Day 146 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities

Criteria for laboratory tests abnormalities included: hemoglobin, hematocrit and red blood cells (less than \[\<\] 0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\]); leukocytes (\<0.6 LLN /greater than \[\>\] 1.5\*upper LN \[ULN\]; platelets (\<0.5\*LLN/\>1.75\*ULN); neutrophils, lymphocytes (\<0.8\* LLN/\>1.2\*ULN); eosinophils, basophils, monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN); bilirubin (\>1.5\*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Gamma GT, alkaline phosphatase (\>3\*ULN); BUN, creatinine (\>1.3\*ULN); glucose (\<0.6 LLN/\>1.5\*ULN); uric acid (\>1.2\*ULN); sodium (\<0.95\*LLN/\>1.05\*ULN); potassium, calcium, chloride, bicarbonate (\<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN); albumin, total protein (\<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN); creatine kinase (\>2.0\*ULN); Urine Specific Gravity, Urine pH, urine blood, urine glucose, urine protein, urine ketones, urine leukocytes esterase (\>=1 high-powered field). Total number of participants with any laboratory abnormalities was reported.

Time frame: Screening up to 28 days after last study dose (up to 98 days)

Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication along with at least 1 on-treatment laboratory test result.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities2 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities4 participants
Placebo (PRP)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities14 participants
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities5 participants
PF-00489791 20 mg (SRP)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities13 participants
Placebo (SRP)Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities10 participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its Metabolites

Only participants receiving PF-00489791 were to be analyzed for this outcome. Data have been calculated by setting plasma concentration values below the lower limit of quantification to 0. The lower limit of quantification is 0.0100 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL). Data for plasma concentration of PF-00489791 metabolites was not analyzed, as it was not intended to be a secondary endpoint and was deemed optional.

Time frame: Day 1, 15, 29 (Day 1, 15, 29 for first intervention period), 43, 57, 71 (Day 1, 15, 29 for second intervention period)

Population: Analysis population included participants who received 1 dose of study drug and were analyzed for pharmacokinetic parameters. Here, Overall number of participants signifies participants evaluable for either first or second intervention period and number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 10.0058 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.0314
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 150.1523 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.0855
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 290.1489 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.0854
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 43NA mcg/mL
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 570.1088 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.0629
PF-00489791 4 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 710.1178 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.0614
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 710.6337 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.3745
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 43NA mcg/mL
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 1NA mcg/mL
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 290.6525 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.3822
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 150.5907 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.3736
PF-00489791 20 mg (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 570.6890 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.4318
Placebo (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 150.1756 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.09038
Placebo (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 290.1776 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.08508
Placebo (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 43NA mcg/mL
Placebo (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 710.1224 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.0638
Placebo (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 570.1167 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.05644
Placebo (PRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 1NA mcg/mL
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 570.7565 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.6224
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 710.6639 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.5834
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 150.7718 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.4991
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 43NA mcg/mL
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 1NA mcg/mL
PF-00489791 4 mg (SRP)Plasma Concentration of PF-00489791 and Its MetabolitesDay 290.7577 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.4137

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026