Radial Artery, Regional Blood Flow
Conditions
Keywords
radial artery, ulnar artery, catheterization, regional blood flow
Brief summary
The aim of this randomized study was to compare the impact of two different radial arterial catheters - 20G and 22G - on the changes of diameter, blood flow and velocity of radial artery and ulnar artery after induction of anesthesia and after cannulation.
Interventions
DEVICE22 gauge catheter
radial artery cannulation using 22 gauge catheter
DEVICE20 gauge catheter
radial artery cannulation using 20 gauge catheter
Sponsors
Severance Hospital
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* The patient who are scheduled for elective surgery and need arterial cannulation
Exclusion criteria
* Coronary occlusive disease * Known or suspected upper extremity peripheral arterial disease * Coagulopathy * DM with peripheral neuropathy * Infection at puncture site
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Radial artery diameter and blood flow before and after cannulation | 30 min |
| Ulnar artery diameter and blood flow before and after cannulation | 30 min |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The differences of radial artery diameter and blood flow after cannulation between catheter gauge(20- and 22-G) | 30 min |
| The differences of ulnar artery diameter and blood flow after cannulation between catheter gauge(20- and 22-G) | 30 min |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed