Skip to content

Quality Of Life Assessment In Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Patients Receiving Aricept Tablets

Quality Of Life Assessment In AD Patients Receiving Aricept Tablets (Donepezil Hydrochloride)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01089582
Acronym
QUEST
Enrollment
628
Registered
2010-03-18
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2011-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

non-interventional, mild to moderate Alzheimer's, ARICEPT.

Brief summary

This study assessed the Hr QoL (Health related Quality of life) of subjects with mild to moderate AD, who received ARICEPT under usual clinical practice.

Detailed description

This non-interventional study enrolled patients with mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer's type, who have been prescribed treatment with ARICEPT under usual clinical practice.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12.CGI-I is a 7-point physician rated scale ranging from very much improved to very much worse.
Number of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12Baseline, Week 12.The caregiver's assessment improvement was a 5-point rated scale ranging from much improved to much worse to the question 'compared to the severity of your relative's condition at baseline, how much do you feel it has changed?'.
Change From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Baseline, Week 12.QoL-AD was comprised of 13 individual items, each measured on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 \[poor\] to 4 \[excellent\]). Overall QoL-AD score was the sum of the scores for the 13 individual items and ranged from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating a higher health related quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Baseline, Week 12.QoL-AD was comprised of 13 individual items, each measured on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 \[poor\] to 4 \[excellent\]). Overall QoL-AD score was the sum of the scores for the 13 individual items and ranged from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating a higher health related quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants at Each Final Dose of ARICEPTWeek 12.
Number of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12Baseline to Week 12.The physician rated tolerance to ARICEPT as very good, good, adequate, unsatisfactory, or unevaluable.
Change in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose EscalationBaseline to Week 12.The starting dose of ARICPET was 5 mg once daily (QD), which could be increased to 10 mg QD during the study.

Countries

Greece

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ARICEPT
ARICEPT (donepezil hydrochloride) 5 milligram (mg) or 10 mg once daily (QD) orally. 5 mg QD was maintained for at least 4 weeks. The recommended maximum dose was 10 mg QD.
603
Total603

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event15
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8
Overall StudyOther4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicARICEPT
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
6 participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
44 participants
Age, Customized
65 years or older
543 participants
Age, Customized
Unspecified
10 participants
Medical History
Abnormal behaviour
2 participants
Medical History
Anaemia
4 participants
Medical History
Anxiety disorder
3 participants
Medical History
Aortic valve incompetence
1 participants
Medical History
Arrhythmia
1 participants
Medical History
Arterial disorder
1 participants
Medical History
Arthritis
2 participants
Medical History
Arthropathy
1 participants
Medical History
Asthma
4 participants
Medical History
Atrial fibrillation
7 participants
Medical History
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
9 participants
Medical History
Bipolar disorder
1 participants
Medical History
Cardiac failure
1 participants
Medical History
Cardiac operation
1 participants
Medical History
Cardiac pacemaker insertion
1 participants
Medical History
Carotid artery disease
1 participants
Medical History
Cataract
4 participants
Medical History
Cerebral ischaemia
51 participants
Medical History
Cerebrovascular accident
16 participants
Medical History
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
13 participants
Medical History
Colitis
1 participants
Medical History
Coronary artery disease
64 participants
Medical History
Dementia
2 participants
Medical History
Depression
116 participants
Medical History
Diabetes mellitus
89 participants
Medical History
Diabetic neuropathy
1 participants
Medical History
Diverticulum
1 participants
Medical History
Diverticulum intestinal
1 participants
Medical History
Dyslipidaemia
1 participants
Medical History
Dystonia
1 participants
Medical History
Epilepsy
7 participants
Medical History
Erysipelas
1 participants
Medical History
Extrapyramidal disorder
3 participants
Medical History
Eye disorder
1 participants
Medical History
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
3 participants
Medical History
Glaucoma
1 participants
Medical History
Glomerulonephritis
1 participants
Medical History
Goitre
3 participants
Medical History
Haemangioma
1 participants
Medical History
Headache
1 participants
Medical History
Hypercholesterolaemia
2 participants
Medical History
Hyperlipidaemia
129 participants
Medical History
Hypertension
273 participants
Medical History
Hyperthyroidism
7 participants
Medical History
Hyperuricaemia
3 participants
Medical History
Hypothyroidism
16 participants
Medical History
Incontinence
1 participants
Medical History
Iron deficiency anaemia
3 participants
Medical History
Lichen sclerosus
1 participants
Medical History
Migraine
2 participants
Medical History
Motor neurone disease
1 participants
Medical History
Multiple sclerosis
2 participants
Medical History
Musculoskeletal pain
1 participants
Medical History
Myasthenia gravis
1 participants
Medical History
Necrosis
1 participants
Medical History
Neurosis
2 participants
Medical History
Oesophageal operation
1 participants
Medical History
Osteoarthritis
4 participants
Medical History
Osteoporosis
33 participants
Medical History
Pancreatitis chronic
1 participants
Medical History
Panencephalitis
1 participants
Medical History
Parkinson's disease
16 participants
Medical History
Personality change due to a general medical condit
1 participants
Medical History
Phobia
1 participants
Medical History
Polyneuropathy
2 participants
Medical History
Prostate cancer
3 participants
Medical History
Prostatic disorder
1 participants
Medical History
Prostatomegaly
9 participants
Medical History
Psychotic disorder
3 participants
Medical History
Psychotic disorder due to a general medical condit
2 participants
Medical History
Renal failure
1 participants
Medical History
Renal failure chronic
2 participants
Medical History
Rheumatoid arthritis
3 participants
Medical History
Sarcoidosis
1 participants
Medical History
Schizophrenia
11 participants
Medical History
Schizophrenia, paranoid type
1 participants
Medical History
Sciatica
2 participants
Medical History
Sleep disorder
3 participants
Medical History
Stress
2 participants
Medical History
Temporal arteritis
1 participants
Medical History
Thalassaemia trait
1 participants
Medical History
Traumatic brain injury
1 participants
Medical History
Tremor
1 participants
Medical History
Urinary incontinence
2 participants
Medical History
Urinary retention
1 participants
Medical History
Varicose vein
1 participants
Medical History
Venous insufficiency
1 participants
Medical History
Vertigo
4 participants
Medical History
Vitamin B12 decreased
1 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
364 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
238 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unspecified
1 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 603
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 603

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12

QoL-AD was comprised of 13 individual items, each measured on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 \[poor\] to 4 \[excellent\]). Overall QoL-AD score was the sum of the scores for the 13 individual items and ranged from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating a higher health related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12.

Population: FAS; (n)=number of participants evaluable at baseline and Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Physical health0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Energy0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Mood0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Living situation0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Memory0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Family0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Marriage0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Friends0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Self as a whole0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Ability to do chores around the house0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Ability to do things for fun0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Money0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Life as a whole0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Caregiver's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Overall score2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.58
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors on response: primary diagnosis severity.p-value: 0.0137Regression, Linear
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors on response: baseline QoL-AD score as assessed by caregiver.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Linear
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors on response: center number.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Linear
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12

QoL-AD was comprised of 13 individual items, each measured on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 \[poor\] to 4 \[excellent\]). Overall QoL-AD score was the sum of the scores for the 13 individual items and ranged from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating a higher health related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12.

Population: FAS; (n)=number of participants evaluable at baseline and Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Physical health0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Energy0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Mood0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Living situation0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Memory0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Family0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Marriage0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Friends0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Self as a whole0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Ability to do chores around the house0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Ability to do things for fun0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Money0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Life as a whole0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
ARICEPTChange From Baseline in the Participant's Assessment for Quality of Life for Alzheimer's Dementia (QoL-AD) Overall and Subscale Scores at Week 12Overall score2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.33
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors on response: primary diagnosis severity.p-value: 0.1805Regression, Linear
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors on response: baseline QoL-AD score as assessed by participant.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Linear
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors on response: center number.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Linear
Primary

Number of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12

CGI-I is a 7-point physician rated scale ranging from very much improved to very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose (including partial doses) of ARICEPT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Missing26 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Not assessed5 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very much improved27 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much improved103 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Minimally improved277 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12No change142 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Minimally worse20 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much worse3 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very much worse0 participants
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors response on response rate: primary diagnosis severity. Participants were classified as responders if they were very much improved or much improved from baseline.p-value: 0.0023Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12

The caregiver's assessment improvement was a 5-point rated scale ranging from much improved to much worse to the question 'compared to the severity of your relative's condition at baseline, how much do you feel it has changed?'.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12.

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12Missing39 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12Much improved54 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12Improved343 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12No change140 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12Worse27 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for Change From Baseline for the Caregiver's Assessment of Improvement at Week 12Much worse0 participants
Comparison: The effect of possible prognostic factors on response: significant medical history. Participants were classified as responders if they were much improved or improved from baseline.p-value: 0.0382Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants at Each Final Dose of ARICEPT

Time frame: Week 12.

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants at Each Final Dose of ARICEPTMissing8 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants at Each Final Dose of ARICEPT5 mg193 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants at Each Final Dose of ARICEPT10 mg400 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants at Each Final Dose of ARICEPTgreater than 10 mg2 participants
Secondary

Change in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose Escalation

The starting dose of ARICPET was 5 mg once daily (QD), which could be increased to 10 mg QD during the study.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12.

Population: FAS. Starting dose of ARICEPT was not summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose EscalationMissing198 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose Escalation0 weeks up to less than 4 weeks77 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose Escalation4 weeks up to less than 6 weeks267 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose Escalation6 weeks up to less than 8 weeks19 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose Escalation8 weeks up to less than 10 weeks13 participants
ARICEPTChange in ARICEPT Dosing: Number of Participants for Time to First ARICEPT Dose Escalation10 weeks or later29 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12

The physician rated tolerance to ARICEPT as very good, good, adequate, unsatisfactory, or unevaluable.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12.

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12Unevaluable8 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12Missing9 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12Very good386 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12Good161 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12Adequate26 participants
ARICEPTNumber of Participants for the Physician's Assessment of Tolerance to ARICEPT at Week 12Unstatisfactory13 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026