Skip to content

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Evaluation of Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Insulin Glargine

Evaluation of Insulin Glargine and Exenatide: A Randomized Clinical Trial With Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Ambulatory Glucose Profile Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01089569
Enrollment
60
Registered
2010-03-18
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2017-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, exenatide, insulin glargine

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effect on 24-hour blood glucose patterns, HbA1c, and weight management when adding insulin glargine, or exenatide, or a combination of insulin glargine and exenatide to metformin.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study was to characterize the diurnal glucose patterns produced by insulin glargine alone, exenatide (GLP-1 agonist) alone and the combination of insulin glargine and exenatide in subjects taking stable dose of metformin and to evaluate their efficacy in terms of improvement in glucose exposure, variability, stability, incidence of hypoglycemia and weight management. An ancillary study was approved as part of this study. The purpose of the ancillary study was to use CGM to characterize the glycemic response to a fixed breakfast meal consumed by study participants receiving different medications.

Interventions

DRUGExenatide

5 mcg BID (twice daily) for 1 month increasing to 10 mcg BID for the remainder of the study

DRUGInsulin Glargine

.1 unit per kg to start, titrated based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring results

Sponsors

International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet
CollaboratorOTHER
Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
HealthPartners Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Subjects were randomized and then told the medications they were randomized to. Since the medications were already on the market, there was no need for masking for any involved individuals.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects ≥18 and ≤75 years of age * Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes * Diabetes duration ≥ 1 year * HbA1c ≥7.0% * Currently treated with metformin (HbA1c ≤9%) or metformin/sulfonylurea (SU) (HbA1c ≤8%)or SU alone (HbA1c ≤8%)

Exclusion criteria

* Previously treated with insulin or incretin-based therapy * Treated with a thiazolidinedione within past 6 weeks * Taken oral or injected prednisone or cortisone medications in the previous 30 days * Any pancreatic disease or at high risk of pancreatitis (history of alcohol abuse, active gallbladder disease) * Serum creatinine \>1.4mg/dL (women) or \>1.5 mg/dL (men) * eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) \<30 ml/min (using MDRD/ Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation) * ALT(Alanine Transaminase) \> 2x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) * Presence of any severe medical or psychological condition or chronic conditions/infections that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise he subject's safety or successful participation in the study * Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period * Unable to follow the study protocol * Unable to speak, read and write in English * Uncontrolled hyperglycemia with HbA1c \> 9% on metformin or \>8% on SU or metformin/SU combination or ketonuria requiring immediate insulin therapy * At the investigator's discretion for other medical or psychological reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HbA1c Changebaseline to final visit (32 weeks)Measure the changes in HbA1C attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combination. Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)baseline to final visit (32 weeks)Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (degree) Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence percentage at baseline minus mean incidence percentage at final visit (32 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)baseline to final visit (32 weeks)Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves iii. Glucose stability (absolute hourly rate of change in median curve) Change from baseline was calculated as mean absolute hourly rate of change in median curve at baseline minus rate at final visit (32 weeks). Mean absolute hourly rate of change in the smoothed median curve is calculated as delta subscript MC = (\|p subscript 50 zero - p subscript 50 23\|+Sum superscript 23 subscript i = 1\| p subscript 50i - p subscript 50 i-1\| over T. i = hour of day p subscript 50i = smoothed 50th percentile value for ith hour of day T = total # of non-missing hourly smoothed percentiles
Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency)baseline to final visit (32 weeks)Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (frequency) Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence rate at baseline minus mean incidence rate at final visit (32 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)baseline - final visit (32 weeks)Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- i. Glucose exposure (area under the diurnal median curve) Change from baseline was calculated as area under the diurnal median curve at baseline minus AUC value at final visit (32 weeks). AUC is calculated using modified rectangle method AUC = sum of superscript 23, subscript i=0 P subscript 50i I = hour of day P subscript 50i = smoother 50th percentile value for ith hour of day
Change From Baseline in Weight Changesbaseline - final visit (32 weeks)Measure the changes in weight attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combinations. Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin. Change from baseline was calculated as weight in pounds at baseline minus weight in pounds at final visit (32 weeks).
Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variabilitybaseline to final visit (32 weeks)Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- ii. Glucose variability (inter-quartile range) IQR is the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles. Change from baseline was calculated as IQR at baseline minus IQR value at final visit (32 weeks).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exenatide
5 mcg BID for 1 month increasing to 10 mcg BID for the remainder of the study Exenatide: refer to Arm detail
16
Insulin Glargine
.1 unit per kg to start, titrated based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring results Insulin Glargine: refer to Arm detail
17
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine
Exenatide: 5 mcg BID (twice daily) for 1 month increasing to 10 mcg BID for the remainder of the study \+ Insulin Glargine: 0.1 unit per kg to start, titrated based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring results
16
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExenatideInsulin GlargineExenatide + Insulin GlargineTotal
Age, Continuous58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 Participants17 Participants16 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants10 Participants7 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants7 Participants9 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2010 / 2013 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

HbA1c Change

Measure the changes in HbA1C attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combination. Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin.

Time frame: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideHbA1c ChangeBaseline6.4 %HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.3
ExenatideHbA1c ChangeFinal - Week 327.8 %HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.6
Insulin GlargineHbA1c ChangeBaseline6.4 %HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.5
Insulin GlargineHbA1c ChangeFinal - Week 327.6 %HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.5
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineHbA1c ChangeBaseline6.2 %HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.5
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineHbA1c ChangeFinal - Week 327.6 %HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability

Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- ii. Glucose variability (inter-quartile range) IQR is the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles. Change from baseline was calculated as IQR at baseline minus IQR value at final visit (32 weeks).

Time frame: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideChange From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability-9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.1
Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability-7.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.4
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability-12.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)

Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- i. Glucose exposure (area under the diurnal median curve) Change from baseline was calculated as area under the diurnal median curve at baseline minus AUC value at final visit (32 weeks). AUC is calculated using modified rectangle method AUC = sum of superscript 23, subscript i=0 P subscript 50i I = hour of day P subscript 50i = smoother 50th percentile value for ith hour of day

Time frame: baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideChange From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)-1207.1 mg/dL*24hrStandard Deviation 661.1
Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)-1476.2 mg/dL*24hrStandard Deviation 849.2
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)-1315 mg/dL*24hrStandard Deviation 953.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)

Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves iii. Glucose stability (absolute hourly rate of change in median curve) Change from baseline was calculated as mean absolute hourly rate of change in median curve at baseline minus rate at final visit (32 weeks). Mean absolute hourly rate of change in the smoothed median curve is calculated as delta subscript MC = (\|p subscript 50 zero - p subscript 50 23\|+Sum superscript 23 subscript i = 1\| p subscript 50i - p subscript 50 i-1\| over T. i = hour of day p subscript 50i = smoothed 50th percentile value for ith hour of day T = total # of non-missing hourly smoothed percentiles

Time frame: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideChange From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)-2 mg/dL/hrStandard Deviation 2.7
Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)-2.9 mg/dL/hrStandard Deviation 4.4
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)-2 mg/dL/hrStandard Deviation 3.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)

Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (degree) Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence percentage at baseline minus mean incidence percentage at final visit (32 weeks)

Time frame: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideChange From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)1.7 percentage of measures under 70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.7
Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)1.7 percentage of measures under 70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.8
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)1.3 percentage of measures under 70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency)

Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (frequency) Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence rate at baseline minus mean incidence rate at final visit (32 weeks)

Time frame: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideChange From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency).7 episodes/dayStandard Deviation 0.8
Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency).8 episodes/dayStandard Deviation 0.8
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency).6 episodes/dayStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weight Changes

Measure the changes in weight attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combinations. Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin. Change from baseline was calculated as weight in pounds at baseline minus weight in pounds at final visit (32 weeks).

Time frame: baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideChange From Baseline in Weight Changes-13.5 lbs (pounds)Standard Deviation 10.2
Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Weight Changes-0.5 lbs (pounds)Standard Deviation 7.7
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineChange From Baseline in Weight Changes-10.3 lbs (pounds)Standard Deviation 10.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026