Skip to content

Treatment With Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome

The TRANSLATE-ACS Study: Treatment With ADP Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01088503
Acronym
TRANSLATE-ACS
Enrollment
12227
Registered
2010-03-17
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2016-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Brief summary

The TReatment with ADP receptor iNhibitorS: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events after Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) study is a prospective, observational longitudinal study to evaluate the real world effectiveness and use of prasugrel and other ADP receptor inhibitor therapies among myocardial infarction (MI) participants treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization. Participant management and treatment decisions are at the discretion of the care team per routine clinical practice. Approximately 17,000 participants will be enrolled at approximately 350 sites in the United States. Follow-up will be conducted through 15 months in approximately 15,650 participants. TRANSLATE-ACS will complement the results of both randomized controlled clinical trials and current registries in addressing the real world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for MI participants managed with PCI and initiated on ADP receptor inhibitor therapy. In addition to determining the effectiveness of prasugrel in comparison to other ADP receptor inhibitors, the study will also determine factors associated with initial ADP receptor inhibitor selection and longitudinal patterns of use, evaluate the safety, and describe and compare resource use and medical costs associated with ADP receptor inhibitors. Additionally, this study will generate a continuum of information from the inpatient to outpatient settings to provide a comprehensive picture of participant treatment and outcomes not currently available for novel ADP receptor inhibitors.

Interventions

DRUGADP receptor inhibitors

Dosage regimen as determined by the treating physician.

Sponsors

Daiichi Sankyo
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* greater than or equal to 18 years of age * diagnosed with NSTEMI or STEMI treated with a PCI during the index hospitalization * initiated (or continued) on ADP receptor inhibitor therapy before discharge * fully informed and are able to provide written consent for longitudinal follow-up and data collection

Exclusion criteria

* simultaneously participating in a research study that directs choice of either an investigational or approved ADP receptor inhibitor within the first 12 months after MI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)Baseline through 12 monthsMACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or unplanned coronary revascularization. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with MACE, as well as the statistical analyses adjusted for baseline cohort differences, are presented. Percentage of participants = (number of participants with events in 12 months/ number of participants treated) \* 100.
Factors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentDay 0 (study enrollment)Factors are drug-eluting stent (DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) placement, other (no stent) vs. BMS, STEMI, other race, cardiogenic shock occurred within 24 hours, male, European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension Health State Score (EQ-5D) - United States (US) Index =1 vs. \<1, married, diabetes, and other vs. BMS placement. The EQ-5D US index is a participant-rated, health-related, quality-of-life instrument based on US population. Scores range from -0.11 to 1.0 with 1.0 = perfect health.
Factors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Pre-Procedure HemoglobinDay 0 (study enrollment)
Factors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Duke Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) IndexDay 0 (study enrollment)The Duke CAD Index is a validated composite measure of angiographic burden, which assigns prognostic weights 1 through 100. Higher scores indicate greater angiographic burden and are associated with poorer prognosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding EventsBaseline, 1, 6, 12 and 15 monthsBleeding events were collected utilizing the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) definition of bleeding. Non-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related GUSTO severe or life-threatening bleeding is any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) OR any bleeding event resulting in substantial hemodynamic compromise requiring treatment. Non-CABG-related GUSTO moderate bleeding is any bleeding event resulting in the need for transfusion that is not considered a GUSTO severe or life-threatening bleed. Additional bleeding events are fatal bleeding or ICH, or any non -fatal surgical-related bleeding events leading to ≥4 units of red cell transfusion. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with bleeding events, as well as the statistical analyses adjusted for baseline cohort differences, are presented. Percentage of participants = (number of participants with events / number of participants treated) \* 100.
Resource Use Patterns, Cumulative Total Medical Costs, and Cost Effectiveness15 months
Percentage of Participants With MACE and Who Had No Prior History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)/Stroke, Weigh ≥60 Kilograms (kg), and Are Age <75 YearsBaseline through 12 monthsMACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or unplanned coronary revascularization. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with MACE, as well as the statistical analyses adjusted for baseline cohort differences, are presented. Percentage of participant = (number of participants with events / number of participants treated) \* 100.
Percentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 MonthsBaseline through 1, 6 and 15 monthsMACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or unplanned coronary revascularization. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with MACE are presented. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the percentage of participants with a MACE event.
Percentage of Participants With Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis (ST) EventsBaseline through 15 monthsAcademic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria were used to define ST. Definite ST is angiographic or pathologic confirmation of partial or total thrombotic occlusion within the peri-stent region, and at least 1 of the following additional criteria: acute ischemic symptoms; ischemic electrocardiogram changes; elevated cardiac biomarkers. Probable ST is any unexplained death within 30 days of stent implantation; any MI, which is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of ST and in the absence of any other obvious cause. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with ST events are presented. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the percentage of participants with a definite or probable ST event.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Centralized follow-up visits were conducted for all participants. Participants who completed 15-month active follow-up were considered to have completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prasugrel
Participants who were admitted for NSTEMI or STEMI underwent PCI and were treated with prasugrel during the index hospitalization. Dosage regimen was determined by the treating physician.
3,123
Clopidogrel
Participants who were admitted for NSTEMI or STEMI underwent PCI and were treated with clopidogrel during the index hospitalization. Dosage regimen was determined by the treating physician.
8,846
Ticlopidine/Ticagrelor
Participants who were admitted for NSTEMI or STEMI underwent PCI and were treated with ticlopidine or ticagrelor during the index hospitalization. Dosage regimen was determined by the treating physician.
258
Total12,227

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath643587
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11832710

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPrasugrelClopidogrelTiclopidine/Ticagrelor
Age, Customized
<75 years
10765 participants3035 participants7505 participants225 participants
Age, Customized
≥75 years
1462 participants88 participants1341 participants33 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
413 Participants129 Participants271 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11755 Participants2986 Participants8525 Participants244 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
59 Participants8 Participants50 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
74 Participants35 Participants39 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
150 Participants55 Participants94 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1087 Participants237 Participants820 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
138 Participants34 Participants102 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10753 Participants2750 Participants7778 Participants225 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12227 participants3123 participants8846 participants258 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3434 Participants672 Participants2671 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8793 Participants2451 Participants6175 Participants167 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3,123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
865 / 3,123

Outcome results

Primary

Factors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment

Factors are drug-eluting stent (DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) placement, other (no stent) vs. BMS, STEMI, other race, cardiogenic shock occurred within 24 hours, male, European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension Health State Score (EQ-5D) - United States (US) Index =1 vs. \<1, married, diabetes, and other vs. BMS placement. The EQ-5D US index is a participant-rated, health-related, quality-of-life instrument based on US population. Scores range from -0.11 to 1.0 with 1.0 = perfect health.

Time frame: Day 0 (study enrollment)

Population: All enrolled participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentReceived DES2365 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentReceived only BMS672 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentSTEMI1831 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentOther Race (Non-Caucasian)365 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentCardiogenic Shock on Presentation79 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentMale Participants2451 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentEQ-5D US index = 1 vs. <11516 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentMarried Participants2044 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentParticipant has Diabetes767 participants
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentNo BMS or DES86 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentMarried Participants5601 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentReceived DES6282 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentMale Participants6342 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentReceived only BMS2491 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentNo BMS or DES331 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentSTEMI4508 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentEQ-5D US index = 1 vs. <13873 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentOther Race (Non-Caucasian)1049 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentParticipant has Diabetes2472 participants
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) Receptor Inhibitor Selection at EnrollmentCardiogenic Shock on Presentation176 participants
Primary

Factors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Duke Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Index

The Duke CAD Index is a validated composite measure of angiographic burden, which assigns prognostic weights 1 through 100. Higher scores indicate greater angiographic burden and are associated with poorer prognosis.

Time frame: Day 0 (study enrollment)

Population: All enrolled participants who had Duke CAD Index completed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Duke Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Index40.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.43
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Duke Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Index41.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.01
Primary

Factors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Pre-Procedure Hemoglobin

Time frame: Day 0 (study enrollment)

Population: All enrolled participants who had pre-procedure hemoglobin evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrasugrelFactors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Pre-Procedure Hemoglobin14.59 grams/deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.702
ClopidogrelFactors Associated With Initial ADP Receptor Inhibitor Selection at Enrollment: Pre-Procedure Hemoglobin14 grams/deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.909
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

MACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or unplanned coronary revascularization. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with MACE, as well as the statistical analyses adjusted for baseline cohort differences, are presented. Percentage of participants = (number of participants with events in 12 months/ number of participants treated) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through 12 months

Population: Participants who were treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel. Participants with MACE events dated prior to index PCI were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)13.14 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)17.12 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.710895% CI: [0.88, 1.22]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events

Bleeding events were collected utilizing the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) definition of bleeding. Non-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related GUSTO severe or life-threatening bleeding is any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) OR any bleeding event resulting in substantial hemodynamic compromise requiring treatment. Non-CABG-related GUSTO moderate bleeding is any bleeding event resulting in the need for transfusion that is not considered a GUSTO severe or life-threatening bleed. Additional bleeding events are fatal bleeding or ICH, or any non -fatal surgical-related bleeding events leading to ≥4 units of red cell transfusion. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with bleeding events, as well as the statistical analyses adjusted for baseline cohort differences, are presented. Percentage of participants = (number of participants with events / number of participants treated) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, 12 and 15 months

Population: Participants who were treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel. Participants with bleeding events dated prior to index PCI were excluded from the analysis. The analysis was based on the initial treatment assignment, regardless of whether or not the participants switched or discontinued that treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events1 month1.22 percentage of participants
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events12 months2.72 percentage of participants
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events6 months1.93 percentage of participants
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events15 months3.10 percentage of participants
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding EventsBaseline0.54 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events15 months4.21 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding EventsBaseline0.45 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events1 month1.62 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events6 months2.77 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Severe or Moderate Bleeding Events12 months3.86 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.188295% CI: [0.88, 1.93]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis (ST) Events

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria were used to define ST. Definite ST is angiographic or pathologic confirmation of partial or total thrombotic occlusion within the peri-stent region, and at least 1 of the following additional criteria: acute ischemic symptoms; ischemic electrocardiogram changes; elevated cardiac biomarkers. Probable ST is any unexplained death within 30 days of stent implantation; any MI, which is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of ST and in the absence of any other obvious cause. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with ST events are presented. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the percentage of participants with a definite or probable ST event.

Time frame: Baseline through 15 months

Population: Participants who were treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis (ST) Events1.35 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis (ST) Events1.79 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With MACE and Who Had No Prior History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)/Stroke, Weigh ≥60 Kilograms (kg), and Are Age <75 Years

MACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or unplanned coronary revascularization. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with MACE, as well as the statistical analyses adjusted for baseline cohort differences, are presented. Percentage of participant = (number of participants with events / number of participants treated) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through 12 months

Population: Participants who were treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel. Participants with MACE events dated prior to index PCI were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With MACE and Who Had No Prior History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)/Stroke, Weigh ≥60 Kilograms (kg), and Are Age <75 Years12.67 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With MACE and Who Had No Prior History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)/Stroke, Weigh ≥60 Kilograms (kg), and Are Age <75 Years15.89 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.849, 1.103]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 Months

MACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or unplanned coronary revascularization. Events that occurred more than 7 days after medication was switched or discontinued were excluded from the analysis. Observed (unadjusted) percentages of participants with MACE are presented. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the percentage of participants with a MACE event.

Time frame: Baseline through 1, 6 and 15 months

Population: Participants who were treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel. Participants with MACE events dated prior to index PCI were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 Months1 month4.63 percentage of participants
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 Months6 months9.64 percentage of participants
PrasugrelPercentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 Months15 months14.26 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 Months1 month5.40 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 Months6 months12.04 percentage of participants
ClopidogrelPercentage of Participants With MACE Over 1, 6 and 15 Months15 months19.13 percentage of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Patterns, Cumulative Total Medical Costs, and Cost Effectiveness

Time frame: 15 months

Population: Zero participants were analyzed. Exploratory analysis of resource use patterns, cumulative total medical costs, and cost effectiveness was dependent on effectiveness in the primary outcome. As there was no effectiveness on the primary outcome demonstrated, no analysis of these outcome measure was conducted.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026