Skip to content

Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Adult Onset Active and Progressive Psoriatic Arthritis

Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Adult-Onset Active and Progressive Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01087788
Enrollment
409
Registered
2010-03-16
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2018-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Psoriatic

Keywords

Certolizumab Pegol, Cimzia

Brief summary

Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in subjects with adult onset active and progressive Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCZP 200 mg Q2W

200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).

BIOLOGICALCZP 400 mg Q4W

400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).

OTHERPlacebo

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Sponsors

UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of adult-onset Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) of at least 6 months' duration as defined by the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR criteria) * Active Psoriatic Skin Lesions or a documented history of Psoriasis * Active Arthritis with ≥ 3 tender joints at Screening and Baseline, ≥ 3 swollen joints at Screening and Baseline and fulfilling at least 1 of the following 2 criteria during the Screening Period: 1. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (Westergren) ≥ 28 mm/hour 2. C-reactive protein (CRP) \> Upper Limit Normal (ULN) * Failure to 1 or more treatment with Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of any other inflammatory Arthritis or known diagnosis of Fibromyalgia * Exposure to more than 1 Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNFα) antagonist or to more than 2 previous biological response modifiers for PsA or Psoriasis * Any non-biological systemic treatment of Psoriasis; phototherapy; topical agents * History of chronic or recurrent infections * High risk of infection * Live vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to Baseline * Concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy * Class III or IV congestive Heart Failure - New York Heart Association (NYHA) * Demyelinating disease of the central nervous system * Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 12Week 12ACR20 responders are those subjects with at least 20 % improvement from Baseline (BL) for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS).
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24From Baseline to Week 24Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively, with higher scores representing greater damage. mTSS (bone erosions) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 320 (worst possible outcome); mTSS (joint space narrowing) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 208 (worst possible outcome); and total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 528 (worst possible outcome). For the pre-defined analysis of this outcome measure, 0 was used for Baseline and the maximum observed mTSS value was used for Week 24 for those subjects which had less than 2 radiographs. The re-analysis is restricted to those subjects in the Randomized Set who have at least 2 x-ray values at scheduled visits, which are at least 8 weeks apart.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24Week 24ACR20 responders are those subjects with at least 20 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS).
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24From Baseline to Week 24The HAQ-DI is a measure of function in Arthritis. There are 20 items in eight categories that represent a comprehensive set of functional activities on a scale from 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to perform without assistance). The category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI from 0 to 3. Scores of 0 to 1 generally represent mild to moderate difficulty, 1 to 2 represent moderate to severe disability, and 2 to 3 indicate severe to very severe disability. A negative value in HAQ-DI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value, the higher the improvement.
Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) Response at Week 24 in the Subgroup of Subjects With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3 % Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineWeek 24The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75 % improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. The PASI score is a measure of the average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale), weighted by the area of involvement.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48From Baseline to Week 48Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively, with higher scores representing greater damage. mTSS (bone erosions) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 320 (worst possible outcome); mTSS (joint space narrowing) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 208 (worst possible outcome); and total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 528 (worst possible outcome). For the analysis of this outcome measure, the change from Baseline to Week 48 was imputed using the median change from Baseline among all subjects for those subjects, which had less than 2 radiographs. The post-hoc analysis presented here is based on the subgroup of subjects which had a Baseline mTSS value greater than 6.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study started to enroll patients in March 2010 and concluded in August 2015.

Pre-assignment details

The study included a 24-week Double-Blind, a 24-week Dose-Blind, and an Open-Label Treatment Period. 409 subjects are included in Randomized Set (RS) shown in the Participant Flow, which is an Intention- to- Treat (ITT) dataset.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matching Placebo to Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) injections from Week 0 to Week 24. Placebo subjects who did not achieve certain predefined response criteria at both Weeks 14 and 16 left the Placebo group and were re-randomized to either CZP 200 mg Q2W or CZP 400 mg Q4W arm on Week 16. After 24 weeks, all subjects were re-randomized to active treatment with CZP 200 mg every two weeks (Q2W) or CZP 400 mg every four weeks (Q4W).
136
CZP 200 mg Q2W
Subjects received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneous (sc) on Weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP sc every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 6 onwards. At every visit, subjects received one injection of 200 mg CZP and one injection of Placebo to maintain the study blind.
138
CZP 400 mg Q4W
Subjects received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneous (sc) on Weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by 400 mg CZP sc every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 8 onwards. Subjects received 2 injections of Placebo every 4 weeks in between the 2 injections of 200 mg CZP to maintain the study blind.
135
Total Title409
Total818

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodAE, non-serious non-fatal211
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodAE, serious fatal010
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodAE, serious non-fatal212
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodLack of Efficacy021
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodLost to Follow-up101
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodPatient moved001
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodSponsor decision following missed visits100
24-weeks Dose-blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject100
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodAE, non-serious non-fatal212
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodAE, serious fatal011
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodAE, serious non-fatal023
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodAE, unknown type001
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodExclusion criteria were not met010
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodLack of Efficacy201
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodLost to Follow-up411
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodPatient (P) does not want to attend100
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodP cannot comply with scheduled visits001
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodProtocol Violation010
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodProtocol violation (decision of monitor)010
24-weeks Double-blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject725
Open-Label Period (OL-P)AE, non-serious non-fatal644
Open-Label Period (OL-P)AE, non-serious unknown100
Open-Label Period (OL-P)AE, serious fatal201
Open-Label Period (OL-P)AE, serious non-fatal134
Open-Label Period (OL-P)Lack of Efficacy423
Open-Label Period (OL-P)Lost to Follow-up042
Open-Label Period (OL-P)No participation in study extension001
Open-Label Period (OL-P)Personal reasons001
Open-Label Period (OL-P)Principal investigator decision012
Open-Label Period (OL-P)Protocol Violation210
Open-Label Period (OL-P)SAE, non-fatal+AE, non-serious non-fatal010
Open-Label Period (OL-P)Sponsor request100
Open-Label Period (OL-P)Withdrawal by Subject13810

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboCZP 200 mg Q2WCZP 400 mg Q4WTotal Title
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants12 Participants7 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
129 Participants126 Participants128 Participants383 Participants
Age, Continuous47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants74 Participants73 Participants226 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants64 Participants62 Participants183 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
158 / 198153 / 195311 / 393
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 19851 / 195100 / 393

Outcome results

Primary

American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 12

ACR20 responders are those subjects with at least 20 % improvement from Baseline (BL) for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Intention-to-treat dataset was the Randomized Set (RS). RS with non-responder imputation: subjects who withdrew for any reason or placebo subjects who used escape medication are considered as nonresponders from drop out timepoint or when escape therapy was initiated. Subjects with missing data at a visit are non-responders for that visit, too.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Randomized Set)American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 1224.3 percentage of participants
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 1258.0 percentage of participants
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 1251.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [22.8, 44.6]Wald-test, 2-sided
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [16.5, 38.7]Wald-test, 2-sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24

Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively, with higher scores representing greater damage. mTSS (bone erosions) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 320 (worst possible outcome); mTSS (joint space narrowing) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 208 (worst possible outcome); and total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 528 (worst possible outcome). For the pre-defined analysis of this outcome measure, 0 was used for Baseline and the maximum observed mTSS value was used for Week 24 for those subjects which had less than 2 radiographs. The re-analysis is restricted to those subjects in the Randomized Set who have at least 2 x-ray values at scheduled visits, which are at least 8 weeks apart.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat dataset was the Randomized Set (RS). RS with imputation: for subjects who withdrew for any reason, or subjects with missing Week 24 measurements, or placebo subjects who used escape medication, scores are linearly extrapolated from the last two radiographs prior to early withdrawal or Week 24 or before receiving CZP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Placebo (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Pre-defined results28.92 units on a scale
Placebo (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Re-analysis results ( n = 123, 130, 123, 253)0.18 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Re-analysis results ( n = 123, 130, 123, 253)-0.02 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Pre-defined results11.52 units on a scale
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Pre-defined results25.05 units on a scale
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Re-analysis results ( n = 123, 130, 123, 253)0.09 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Pre-defined results18.28 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) in Modification for Psoriatic Arthritis at Week 24Re-analysis results ( n = 123, 130, 123, 253)0.03 units on a scale
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected. This is the pre-defined primary analysis.p-value: =0.20395% CI: [-27.05, 5.77]ANCOVA
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints.Conditional on the 1st test being significant, the 2nd hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5%. Stat. testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected Re-analysis approach, restricted to subjects in the RS who have at least 2 x-ray values at scheduled visits (at least 8 wks apart)p-value: =0.01795% CI: [-0.38, -0.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints.Conditional on the 1st test being significant, the 2nd hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5%. Stat. testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected Re-analysis approach, restricted to subjects in the RS who have at least 2 x-ray values at scheduled visits (at least 8 wks apart)p-value: =0.26195% CI: [-0.27, 0.07]ANCOVA
Secondary

American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24

ACR20 responders are those subjects with at least 20 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat dataset was the Randomized Set (RS). RS with non-responder imputation: subjects who withdrew for any reason or placebo subjects who used escape medication are considered as nonresponders from drop out timepoint or when escape therapy was initiated. Subjects with missing data at a visit are non-responders for that visit, too.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Randomized Set)American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 2423.5 percentage of participants
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 2463.8 percentage of participants
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 2456.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [29.5, 51]Wald-test, 2-sided
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [21.8, 43.8]Wald-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24

The HAQ-DI is a measure of function in Arthritis. There are 20 items in eight categories that represent a comprehensive set of functional activities on a scale from 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to perform without assistance). The category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI from 0 to 3. Scores of 0 to 1 generally represent mild to moderate difficulty, 1 to 2 represent moderate to severe disability, and 2 to 3 indicate severe to very severe disability. A negative value in HAQ-DI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value, the higher the improvement.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat dataset was the Randomized Set (RS). RS with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF): for subjects who withdrew for any reason, or subjects with missing Week 24 measurements, or placebo subjects who used escape medication, last observation prior to early withdrawal or Week 24 or before receiving CZP is carried forward to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Placebo (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24-0.19 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24-0.54 units on a scale
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24-0.46 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24-0.50 units on a scale
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.42, -0.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48

Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively, with higher scores representing greater damage. mTSS (bone erosions) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 320 (worst possible outcome); mTSS (joint space narrowing) ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 208 (worst possible outcome); and total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 528 (worst possible outcome). For the analysis of this outcome measure, the change from Baseline to Week 48 was imputed using the median change from Baseline among all subjects for those subjects, which had less than 2 radiographs. The post-hoc analysis presented here is based on the subgroup of subjects which had a Baseline mTSS value greater than 6.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 48

Population: Randomized Set (RS) with imputation: for subjects who withdrew for any reason, or subjects with missing Week 48 measurements, and for all placebo subjects after the switch to CZP, Week 48 scores are linearly extrapolated from the last two available radiographs prior to early withdrawal or Week 24 or before receiving CZP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Placebo (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Predefined results: Overall0.32 units on a scale
Placebo (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Post-hoc results: Basel. mTSS > 6 (n=61,65,65,130)0.78 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Predefined results: Overall0.15 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Post-hoc results: Basel. mTSS > 6 (n=61,65,65,130)0.31 units on a scale
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Post-hoc results: Basel. mTSS > 6 (n=61,65,65,130)0.22 units on a scale
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Predefined results: Overall0.11 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Predefined results: Overall0.13 units on a scale
CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48Post-hoc results: Basel. mTSS > 6 (n=61,65,65,130)0.26 units on a scale
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected. This is the predefined analysis.p-value: =0.12795% CI: [-0.43, 0.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected. This is the post-hoc analysis for the subgroup 'Baseline mTSS \> 6'.p-value: =0.04895% CI: [-1.04, -0.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) Response at Week 24 in the Subgroup of Subjects With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3 % Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline

The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75 % improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. The PASI score is a measure of the average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale), weighted by the area of involvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat dataset was the Randomized Set (RS). RS with non-responder imputation: subjects who withdrew for any reason or placebo subjects who used escape medication are considered as nonresponders from drop out timepoint or when escape therapy was initiated. Subjects with missing data at a visit are non-responders for that visit, too.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Randomized Set)Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) Response at Week 24 in the Subgroup of Subjects With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3 % Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline15.1 percentage of participants
CZP 200 mg Q2W (Randomized Set)Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) Response at Week 24 in the Subgroup of Subjects With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3 % Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline62.2 percentage of participants
CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) Response at Week 24 in the Subgroup of Subjects With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3 % Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline60.5 percentage of participants
CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W (Randomized Set)Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) Response at Week 24 in the Subgroup of Subjects With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3 % Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline61.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: A hierarchical test procedure was applied to protect the overall significance level for the multiplicity of dose groups and endpoints. Conditional on the first test being significant, the second hypothesis was tested with the same alpha level of 5 %. Statistical testing for the following hypotheses was performed only if the previous null hypothesis in the hierarchy was rejected.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [35.7, 56.9]Wald-test, 2-sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026