Skip to content

Comparison of Patient Comfort After Two Anesthetic Protocols for Injections Into the Eye

Clinical Comparison of Two Anesthetic Preparations for Intravitreal Injection

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01087489
Enrollment
53
Registered
2010-03-16
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2012-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

pain, discomfort, anesthetic drugs, topical drug administration, injections, intraocular, lidocaine, intraocular pressure, keratopathy

Brief summary

Patient comfort during and after eye injections will be compared after two numbing (anesthetic) protocols, an eye preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine drops versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel.

Detailed description

The primary goal of this investigation is to determine the relative comfort of an intravitreal injection (same day and the next day) after a preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel. Based on the available data, the researchers contend that a preparation based on viscous 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel, which coats the surface and remains in contact with the eye longer, may provide greater anesthesia and result in greater patient comfort than the topical 4% lidocaine, which is part of the standard preparation routinely utilized in the ophthalmology department currently. Secondary outcome measure is the intraocular pressure rise after the injection, and the authors will generate prospective data to study whether softening the eye with cotton swabs prior to the injection lowers post-injection pressure spike.

Interventions

The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 4% lidocaine drops and a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface followed in three rounds by additional 5% povidone iodine and a sterile cotton swab soaked in sterile 4% lidocaine applied with gentle pressure to the area designated for injection in the infero-temporal quadrant.

DRUG3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel

The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 5% povidone iodine will be placed over the eye. Two drops of preservative-free 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel will be placed into inferior conjunctival sac. The patient will be asked to close the eye for 7 minutes. Next, a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface and allowed to remain in contact with the eye for at least 2 minutes. The eye will then be rinsed with antibiotic drops.

Sponsors

University of Miami
CollaboratorOTHER
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Miami VA Healthcare System
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has required repeat Ranibizumab injections and has had at least 3 injections prior to recruitment * Informed consent * Age ≥ 18 years * Clinical need for a therapeutic ranibizumab intravitreal injection regardless of the medical indication * Able to understand and read English

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) * Mental disability * Prisoners * Patients with fluctuating or impaired decision-making capacity * Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures * Previous reaction to the same drug class

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal Injectionimmediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next dayDiscomfort according to the Eye Sensation Scale: 1-none, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe, 5- extremely severe Patient satisfaction scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5= extremely satisfied

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHgimmediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutesintraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately after the injection, and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the injection (until it was 30 mmHg or below). Prior to injection IOP and post-injection IOP were compared to find the IOP change after injection.
Presence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival Hemorrhagewithin 10 minutes of the injectionPresence of corneal staining after the injection: * Quadrants of fluorescein staining: 0 1 2 3 4 * Density of staining: 0- None 1- Mild 2- Moderate 3- Severe 4- corneal abrasion Size of subconjunctival hemorrhage: in clock hours

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Miami VA Medical Center retina injection clinic; patients needing frequent intravitreal injections of ranibizumab were approached and recruited between April 2010 and March 2011

Pre-assignment details

Patients were randomized upon recruitment and received the first anesthetic method on the day of recruitment, no wash out or transitional periods were necessary

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Each participant was randomly assigned to receive either anesthetic preparation during one of two consecutive intravitreal injection (if unilateral disease) or in one eye if requiring bilateral injections given on the same day.
53
Total53

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall Studyenrolled in another VA study01
Overall Studyunable to survey by telephone01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
44 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants
Age Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Region of Enrollment
United States
53 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 530 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 531 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Discomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal Injection

Discomfort according to the Eye Sensation Scale: 1-none, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe, 5- extremely severe Patient satisfaction scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5= extremely satisfied

Time frame: immediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next day

Population: all 50 patients who completed the study were included in the analysis, each patient received both anesthetic preparations prior to two consecutive (if unilateral disease) intravitreal injections on consecutive visits or in fellow eyes (if bilaterla disease) on the same day

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort during anesthetic preparation2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort during needle penetration1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionSatisfaction with entire prep and injection4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort 1 h after injection2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort day after injection1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionNext day satisfaction with injection4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort day after injection1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort during anesthetic preparation2.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort 1 h after injection2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionDiscomfort during needle penetration2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionNext day satisfaction with injection4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelDiscomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal InjectionSatisfaction with entire prep and injection4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Intraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHg

intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately after the injection, and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the injection (until it was 30 mmHg or below). Prior to injection IOP and post-injection IOP were compared to find the IOP change after injection.

Time frame: immediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutes

Population: 48 participants were included in each arm, i.e. each participant received both methods, one eye twice if unilateral or both eyes if bilateral disease were randomily assigned to alternate prep on consecutive or same visit respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodIntraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHgbaseline IOP before injection15.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.3
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodIntraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHgIOP change after 0.05 cc injection25.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.2
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelIntraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHgbaseline IOP before injection15.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 3
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelIntraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHgIOP change after 0.05 cc injection30.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.9
Secondary

Presence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival Hemorrhage

Presence of corneal staining after the injection: * Quadrants of fluorescein staining: 0 1 2 3 4 * Density of staining: 0- None 1- Mild 2- Moderate 3- Severe 4- corneal abrasion Size of subconjunctival hemorrhage: in clock hours

Time frame: within 10 minutes of the injection

Population: all eyes for which data were available were included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodPresence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival HemorrhageCorneal fluorescein staining3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
4% Liquid Lidocaine MethodPresence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival HemorrhageDensity of corneal staining1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelPresence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival HemorrhageCorneal fluorescein staining2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine GelPresence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival HemorrhageDensity of corneal staining1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026