Skip to content

Registry of AngioJet Use in the Peripheral Vascular System

PEARL II: PEripheral Use of AngioJet® Rheolytic Thrombectomy With a Variety of Catheter Lengths

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01086215
Acronym
PEARLII
Enrollment
500
Registered
2010-03-15
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2014-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Embolism and Thrombosis, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Venous Thrombosis

Brief summary

The Registry involves the collection of information for research and educational purposes only on the use of AngioJet in the peripheral vascular system.

Detailed description

The PEARL II Registry is a prospective, multi-center, observational registry including 500 patients who meet eligibility from up to 50 sites worldwide. Patient participation will be 12 months including post procedure follow-up contact at 3, 6 and 12 months. The study duration is estimated at 36 months. A patient's treatment is determined by the treating physician based on the clinical situation and local practices. In contrast to a randomized, controlled trial, there are no pre-defined experimental interventions.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has been treated in the peripheral vascular system with any of the AngioJet System catheters. * Patient has provided appropriate consent/authorization per the site's institutional policy and procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has previously been enrolled in either the PEARL Registry or the PEARL II Registry in the last 12months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Day 1From the Index Procedure's Baseline (pre-endovascular treatment) and Final (post-endovascular treatment) angiograms/venograms, each vessel was assigned a value by the treating physician. 1. complete occlusion (\>90% occlusion); 2. substantial occlusion (50-90% occlusion OR \<50% occlusion and \>3cm in length); 3. partial occlusion (\<50% occlusion AND \<3cm in length) 4. patent (without visable thrombus or occlusion) The levels of change (improvement) were calculated by subtracting the baseline assigned angiographic/venographic value from the final value.
Rethrombosis3 Month , 6 Month and 12 Month Follow UpThe number of patients affected by rethrombosis of the treated vessels (first episode) throughout a 12 Month Follow-Up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemDay 1The # of patients exposed to each treatment option at least once in the given thrombotic condition during the Index Procedure

Countries

Canada, Germany, Italy, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients presenting at a participating site who were clinically indicated for a peripheral interventional (arterial, venous or hemodialysis access) procedure with the AngioJet Thrombectomy System were offered the opportuntity to participate. Patients were recruited from January 2010 thru June 2013.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Limb Ischemia
Patients presenting with limb ischemia for treatment
212
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Patients presenting with deep vein thrombosis for treatment
201
Hemodialysis Access
Patients presenting with thrombosed hemodialysis access for treatment
73
Other Thrombotic Conditions
Patients presenting with a thrombotic condition other than limb ischemia, deep vein thrombosis or thrombosed hemodialysis access for treatment
14
Total500

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath14881
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2239182

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLimb IschemiaDeep Vein ThrombosisHemodialysis AccessOther Thrombotic ConditionsTotal
Age, Continuous63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.59
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.37
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.07
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.16
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
3 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
54 participants11 participants0 participants0 participants65 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
154 participants190 participants73 participants13 participants430 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
74 Participants93 Participants36 Participants5 Participants208 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
138 Participants108 Participants37 Participants9 Participants292 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2120 / 2010 / 730 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 2122 / 2010 / 730 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.

From the Index Procedure's Baseline (pre-endovascular treatment) and Final (post-endovascular treatment) angiograms/venograms, each vessel was assigned a value by the treating physician. 1. complete occlusion (\>90% occlusion); 2. substantial occlusion (50-90% occlusion OR \<50% occlusion and \>3cm in length); 3. partial occlusion (\<50% occlusion AND \<3cm in length) 4. patent (without visable thrombus or occlusion) The levels of change (improvement) were calculated by subtracting the baseline assigned angiographic/venographic value from the final value.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Limb IschemiaChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Levels of Change2.45 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.05
Limb IschemiaChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Final Value3.76 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.04
Limb IschemiaChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Baseline Value1.31 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.03
Deep Vein ThrombosisChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Final Value3.73 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.03
Deep Vein ThrombosisChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Baseline Value1.33 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.03
Deep Vein ThrombosisChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Levels of Change2.40 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.04
Hemodialysis AccessChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Baseline Value1.36 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.06
Hemodialysis AccessChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Final Value3.87 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.04
Hemodialysis AccessChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Levels of Change2.50 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.07
Other Thrombotic ConditionsChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Final Value3.75 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.12
Other Thrombotic ConditionsChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Levels of Change1.95 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.18
Other Thrombotic ConditionsChange in Degree of Occlusion From Baseline to Final Angiogram/Venogram.Baseline Value1.80 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.16
p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Rethrombosis

The number of patients affected by rethrombosis of the treated vessels (first episode) throughout a 12 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: 3 Month , 6 Month and 12 Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Limb IschemiaRethrombosis3 Month Follow Up21 participants
Limb IschemiaRethrombosis12 Month Follow Up9 participants
Limb IschemiaRethrombosis6 Month Follow Up9 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisRethrombosis3 Month Follow Up22 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisRethrombosis12 Month Follow Up3 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisRethrombosis6 Month Follow Up4 participants
Hemodialysis AccessRethrombosis6 Month Follow Up12 participants
Hemodialysis AccessRethrombosis3 Month Follow Up15 participants
Hemodialysis AccessRethrombosis12 Month Follow Up7 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsRethrombosis3 Month Follow Up0 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsRethrombosis12 Month Follow Up0 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsRethrombosis6 Month Follow Up0 participants
Secondary

Concomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® System

The # of patients exposed to each treatment option at least once in the given thrombotic condition during the Index Procedure

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy without Lytic102 participants
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy + Lytic Delivery146 participants
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemBalloon Angioplasty164 participants
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemStent Placement124 participants
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemCatheter Directed Thrombolysis106 participants
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAtherectomy9 participants
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemFilter Placement17 participants
Limb IschemiaConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemNon AngioJet Thrombectomy31 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAtherectomy0 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemCatheter Directed Thrombolysis143 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy + Lytic Delivery175 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemNon AngioJet Thrombectomy14 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemFilter Placement51 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemStent Placement71 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemBalloon Angioplasty157 participants
Deep Vein ThrombosisConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy without Lytic94 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemFilter Placement0 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemBalloon Angioplasty69 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemStent Placement29 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemCatheter Directed Thrombolysis0 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAtherectomy0 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemNon AngioJet Thrombectomy45 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy without Lytic67 participants
Hemodialysis AccessConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy + Lytic Delivery15 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemBalloon Angioplasty6 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemStent Placement2 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy + Lytic Delivery9 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAngioJet Thrombectomy without Lytic6 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemCatheter Directed Thrombolysis2 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemNon AngioJet Thrombectomy2 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemFilter Placement0 participants
Other Thrombotic ConditionsConcomitant Treatments Used With the AngioJet® SystemAtherectomy0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026