Skip to content

Incision and Drainage Versus Needle Aspiration in Soft Tissue Abscesses

Ultrasound Guided Needle Drainage Versus Formal Incision and Drainage of Superficial Soft Tissue Abscesses in the Emergency Department Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01085929
Enrollment
101
Registered
2010-03-12
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2010-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abscess, Cellulitis

Keywords

abscess, infection, ultrasound guidance, incision and drainage, needle aspiration, skin, ultrasound

Brief summary

The incidence of skin and soft tissue infections has increased dramatically over the last decade, in part due to increased prevalence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Incision and drainage (I&D) is considered the primary intervention, however some clinicians prefer ultrasound guided needle aspiration (US Asp). The investigators performed a randomized trial comparing US Asp to I&D for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue abscesses, with a subgroup analysis of patients with CA-MRSA.

Interventions

Surgical incision of the skin surface followed by expression of purulence with or without debridement or manual exploration of abscess cavity.

PROCEDUREUltrasound Guided Aspiration

Ultrasound is used to identify the abscess cavity. An 18 gauge needle is introduced into the abscess cavity and manual aspiration of the abscess contents is attempted.

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* presenting to emergency department with skin abscess * abscess required surgical drainage * healthy appearing

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant * unable to give consent * abscess located in oral cavity * abscess located on genitalia * abscess located intra-gluteal at coccyx

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful drainage of abscess7 daysClinical outcome at 7 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful drainage of abscess2 daysHealing of abscess following drainage procedure at day 2
Ability to evacuate purulence from abscessDay 1Amount of purulence produced by drainage procedure on day 1

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026