Skip to content

Identifying and Treating Arousal Related Deficits in Neglect and Dysphagia

Identifying and Treating Arousal Related Deficits in Neglect and Dysphagia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01085903
Enrollment
28
Registered
2010-03-12
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphagia, Spatial Neglect

Keywords

Spatial Neglect, Dysphagia, Arousal, Modafinil, Stroke

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine how stroke can alter arousal, alertness, neglect and dysphagia, and whether a medication, modafinil, can improve arousal.

Detailed description

Neglect and dysphagia are two of the most problematic behavioral disorders encountered in stroke rehabilitation with 300,000 patients affected annually in the US. Both disorders impede progress in therapy and both lead to costly medical complications, like falls which are associated with neglect and aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition which are associated with dysphagia. No widely accepted pharmacological treatment exists for either disorder. A new direction of this application is to view neglect and dysphagia as different disorders that share a common deficit in magnitude estimation (ME). ME refers to one's ability to perceive the intensity of sensory stimulation. Deficits in ME explain how much of a stimulus is neglected by stroke patients. Sensory deficits are also known to produce dysphagia. Perceptual deficits influence how patients response to stimuli like failing to act on all stimuli present (neglect) and failing to generate swallowing reflexes sufficient for normal bolus flow (dysphagia). We know from previous work that ME is altered by change in cortical arousal following stroke (decreased or hypoarousal). Hypoarousal is evidenced by objective and subjective post-stroke fatigue and daytime sleepiness which occurs in 50% of stroke patients and can persist chronically. Increasing arousal could potentially reverse the perceptual deficits associated with hypoarousal and improve neglect and dysphagia. This proposal manipulates arousal in two ways. Cold pressor stimulation (CPS), immersing the foot in cold water for 50 seconds, is used to increase arousal and reverse neglect and dysphagia temporarily. A brief, 3-day trial of modafinil (Provigil) versus placebo is then used in stroke patients to learn if a positive response to cold-pressor stimulation can predicts patients who respond positively to modafinil.

Interventions

DRUGModafinil

200 mg once daily with morning meal for three days administered only to stroke patients

DRUGPlacebo

Subjects will receive a placebo designed to look like 200 mg dose of modafinil. The dose will be taken once daily with the morning meal for three days and will only be administered to stroke patients

BEHAVIORALBaseline

Observations made at baseline before any intervention

BEHAVIORALCPS

Submerging each participant's foot into ice water (36-44 F) for 50 seconds.

BEHAVIORALPost CPS

20 minutes following the CPS condition.

BEHAVIORALFollow up

Follow up testing occurred at 3 months

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Arkansas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent * Willingness to complete study procedures * Ability to comprehend and sign informed consent * Evidence of unilateral, ischemic stroke based on: * Neuroimaging (clinically obtained imaging studies showing evidence of stroke) * Acceptable categories of stroke include: * Unilateral ischemic stroke * Atherothrombotic stroke * Cardioembolic stroke * Lacunar stroke \>1.5 cm * Chronic stable, unilateral hemorrhagic stroke * Or Behavioral evidence of stroke including: * Hemiplegia * Unilateral sensory impairment * Localized higher cortical dysfunction (e.g. neglect,dysphagia, apraxia)

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiac valvular disease * Left heart hypertrophy * Poorly controlled hypertension * Active variant angina * Pre-menopausal women capable of having children, including those using active contraception (precaution for study medication and not applicable to normal subjects) * Severe renal or hepatic disease * History of psychosis or substance abuse * Patients on other Central Nervous System (CNS) stimulants, dopamine agonists or antagonists (antipsychotics) * Severe speech comprehension deficit and/or inability to communicate responses * Allergies that could put the research subject at risk during the course of the study * Cannot speak English * Active cerebral neurologic disease other than stroke such as multiple sclerosis or Alzheimer's Disease * Active psychiatric illness except past history of treated depression or anxiety disorders * For persons needing an MRI - standard MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
P50 Percent Habituation Scorebaseline and after three days of interventionThis is an electrophysiological measure of arousal - a percent change in the P50 evoked response potential amplitudes with a 250 ms inter stimulus interval. The difference score is calculated as CPS - baseline and as modafinil - placebo (stroke subjects only).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PVT Fastest 10 Percent of Reaction Timesbaseline and after three days of interventionThis is a behavioral measure of arousal - the fastest 10 percent of all cued reaction time trials. The difference score is calculated as CPS - baseline and as modafinil - placebo (stroke subjects only).
Power Function Exponent for Oral Bolus Estimationbaseline and after three days of interventionThis is a behavioral measure of sensation in the oral cavity. The power function exponent is equal to the slope of a regression equation relating bolus size to a person's estimate of that size. An exponent below one implies an underestimate of bolus size. The difference score is calculated as CPS - baseline and as modafinil - placebo (stroke subjects only).
Time to Swallow Puree Foodbaseline and after three days of interventionThis is a behavioral measure of swallowing - the time it takes for pureed food to transition across a part of the throat. The difference score is calculated as CPS - placebo and as modafinil - placebo (for stroke subjects only).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Normal Subjects
Normal subjects are persons without stroke who receive baseline, CPS, Post CPS and Follow up interventions. Baseline: Observations made at baseline before any intervention CPS: Submerging each participant's foot into ice water (36-44 F) for 50 seconds. Post CPS: 20 minutes following the CPS condition.
21
Stroke Subjects
Stroke subjects are persons who have had a stroke affecting the right hemisphere and are subject to neglect or dysphagia who receive baseline, CPS, and Post CPS and then are randomized to modafinil or placebo. Baseline: Observations made at baseline before any intervention CPS: Submerging each participant's foot into ice water (36-44 F) for 50 seconds. Post CPS: 20 minutes following the CPS condition. Modafinil: 200 mg once daily with morning meal for three days administered only to stroke patients Placebo: Subjects will receive a placebo designed to look like 200 mg dose of modafinil. The dose will be taken once daily with the morning meal for three days and will only be administered to stroke patients
7
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStroke SubjectsTotalNormal Subjects
Age, Continuous71.429 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.914
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
51.286 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.462
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants24 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants11 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants17 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 216 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 212 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

P50 Percent Habituation Score

This is an electrophysiological measure of arousal - a percent change in the P50 evoked response potential amplitudes with a 250 ms inter stimulus interval. The difference score is calculated as CPS - baseline and as modafinil - placebo (stroke subjects only).

Time frame: baseline and after three days of intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Normal Subjects: Baseline vs CPSP50 Percent Habituation Score-44.12 percentage of change in amplitudeStandard Deviation 59.29
Stroke Subjects: Baseline vs CPSP50 Percent Habituation Score-45.84 percentage of change in amplitudeStandard Deviation 228.09
Stroke Subjects: ModafinilP50 Percent Habituation Score113.63 percentage of change in amplitudeStandard Deviation 154.5
Stroke Subjects: PlaceboP50 Percent Habituation Score61.41 percentage of change in amplitudeStandard Deviation 102.5
Stroke Subjects Placebo vs ModafinilP50 Percent Habituation Score52.223 percentage of change in amplitudeStandard Deviation 222.94
Secondary

Power Function Exponent for Oral Bolus Estimation

This is a behavioral measure of sensation in the oral cavity. The power function exponent is equal to the slope of a regression equation relating bolus size to a person's estimate of that size. An exponent below one implies an underestimate of bolus size. The difference score is calculated as CPS - baseline and as modafinil - placebo (stroke subjects only).

Time frame: baseline and after three days of intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Normal Subjects: Baseline vs CPSPower Function Exponent for Oral Bolus Estimation.014 exponentStandard Deviation 0.113
Stroke Subjects: Baseline vs CPSPower Function Exponent for Oral Bolus Estimation-.004 exponentStandard Deviation 0.196
Stroke Subjects: ModafinilPower Function Exponent for Oral Bolus Estimation.54 exponentStandard Deviation 0.17
Stroke Subjects: PlaceboPower Function Exponent for Oral Bolus Estimation.49 exponentStandard Deviation 0.19
Stroke Subjects Placebo vs ModafinilPower Function Exponent for Oral Bolus Estimation.04 exponentStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

PVT Fastest 10 Percent of Reaction Times

This is a behavioral measure of arousal - the fastest 10 percent of all cued reaction time trials. The difference score is calculated as CPS - baseline and as modafinil - placebo (stroke subjects only).

Time frame: baseline and after three days of intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Normal Subjects: Baseline vs CPSPVT Fastest 10 Percent of Reaction Times-10.57 millisecondsStandard Deviation 21.66
Stroke Subjects: Baseline vs CPSPVT Fastest 10 Percent of Reaction Times20.57 millisecondsStandard Deviation 29.2
Stroke Subjects: ModafinilPVT Fastest 10 Percent of Reaction Times244.71 millisecondsStandard Deviation 186.62
Stroke Subjects: PlaceboPVT Fastest 10 Percent of Reaction Times235.64 millisecondsStandard Deviation 150.62
Stroke Subjects Placebo vs ModafinilPVT Fastest 10 Percent of Reaction Times9.07 millisecondsStandard Deviation 38.73
Secondary

Time to Swallow Puree Food

This is a behavioral measure of swallowing - the time it takes for pureed food to transition across a part of the throat. The difference score is calculated as CPS - placebo and as modafinil - placebo (for stroke subjects only).

Time frame: baseline and after three days of intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Normal Subjects: Baseline vs CPSTime to Swallow Puree Food.029 secondsStandard Deviation 0.121
Stroke Subjects: Baseline vs CPSTime to Swallow Puree Food-.058 secondsStandard Deviation 0.512
Stroke Subjects: ModafinilTime to Swallow Puree Food.48 secondsStandard Deviation 1.05
Stroke Subjects: PlaceboTime to Swallow Puree Food.12 secondsStandard Deviation 0.11
Stroke Subjects Placebo vs ModafinilTime to Swallow Puree Food.36 secondsStandard Deviation 1.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026