Skip to content

Fractional Laser as Treatment Option for Various Pigment Disorders (Fractional-3)

Non-ablative 1,550 nm Fractional Laser Therapy Versus Triple Topical Therapy for the Treatment of Melasma: a Randomized Controlled Split-face Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01085279
Enrollment
29
Registered
2010-03-11
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2010-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pigmentation Disorder

Keywords

fractional laser, melasma, topical bleaching

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of non-ablative fractional laser is safe and effective in the treatment of melasma.

Interventions

DEVICEFraxel Restore, Solta Medical Inc. (Non-ablative fractional laser)

1,550 nm non-ablative fractional laser Irradiance: 15 mJ/microbeam. Coverage: 14-20%. Number of treatment sessions: 4-5

DRUGModified Kligman's formula (Triple topical therapy)

Hydroquinone 5%, tretinoin 0.05%, triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% once a day during 15 weeks

Sponsors

Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Melasma * Subjects attending the outpatient department of the Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders * Age at least 18 years * Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* use of bleaching creams during the past six weeks * history of keloid * active eczema * suspected hypersensitivity to lidocaine or triple therapy * use of isotretinoin in the past six months * high exposure of the lesion to sunlight or UV light (UVA or UVB).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physician's global assessmentT0, 3 weeks, and 3 and 6 months follow-upImprovement of hyperpigmentation was assessed by an independent blinded dermatologist. The results were scored on a scale from zero to six (0: total clearance (100% improvement), 1: almost total clearance (90-99% improvement), 2: distinct clearance (75-89% improvement) 3: moderate clearance (50-74% improvement) 4: mild clearance (25-49% improvement) 5: no change, 6: worsening of hyperpigmentation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
L-valueT0, 3 weeks and 3 and 6 months follow-upImprovement of hyperpigmentation was assessed by color measurement through reflectance spectroscopy (Microflash 200 d, Datacolor International, Lawrenceville, GA). This instrument, with an aperture of 4 mm, determines color by measuring the intensity of reflected light of particular wavelengths. In this study, the obtained L value, indicating the lightness of the measured area of skin, was used.
Melanin indexT0, 3 weeks and 3, and 6 months follow-upMelanin index was measured using a spectrometer (Derma-Spectrometer, Cortex Technology ApS, Hadsund, Denmark) in order to assess changes in the amount of dermal and epidermal melanin.
Patient's global assessment3 weeks, 3 and 6 months follow-upPatients were asked to score the improvement of hyperpigmentation on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (Patient's Global Assessment, PGA) at all follow-up moments.
Patient's satisfaction3 weeks, 3 and 6 months follow-upPatient's satisfaction was scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026