Skip to content

Visionaire™ Versus Standard Instrumentation Safety and Efficacy in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Clinical Outcome of VISIONAIRE™ Patient Matched Technology vs. Standard Surgical Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01084772
Enrollment
134
Registered
2010-03-10
Start date
2012-06-21
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2020-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Arthritis of Knee

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess outcomes following TKA, utilizing two surgical techniques. Patients will be randomized to one of two arms: TKA with standard instrumentation and TKA with VISIONAIRE™ patient-matched cutting blocks. Data will be collected at preoperative, operative/discharge, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after TKA. The secondary objective of this study is to compare the safety, quality of life, and economic outcomes of TKA when these two techniques are utilized. This study does not involve treatment or investigational products, as all components are FDA cleared and are commercially available.

Detailed description

This is a prospective study comparing VISIONAIRE™ to standard TKA instrumentation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TKA using VISIONAIRE™ when compared with standard instrumentation, including device survival, improvement in function and implant alignment after TKA. This study will also document any device-related, surgical complications and/or adverse radiographic observations. In contrast with the control group clinical outcomes following TKA completed with VISIONAIRE™ have yet to be assessed. The current investigation will determine if there is any difference in TKA outcomes when VISIONAIRE™ patient matched technology is utilized versus standard instrumentation. All patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria specified in this protocol will be asked to participate in the study. If the patient consents to participate, they will be enrolled in the study and randomized to one of the two study arms. Patients requiring TKA will be implanted with Legion, Genesis II or Journey BCS (Smith & Nephew) total knee implant systems. Standard instrumentation will be used to assist the surgeon in placing the implant in the control group. In the VISIONAIRE™ group, standard instrumentation will not be used in the surgery. Patients randomized to the VISIONAIRE™ arm will have an MRI preoperatively that will be used to create the customized cutting blocks. All patients will have an x-ray at each postoperative interval.

Interventions

OTHERVISIONAIRE Total Knee Arthroplasty

TKA will be performed with VISIONAIRE instrumentation, depending on randomization assignment.

TKA will be performed with standard instrumentation, depending on randomization assignment.

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all of the inclusion criteria. 1. Patient diagnosed with degenerative arthritis of the knee requiring a unilateral primary TKA. 2. Patient is of legal age to consent and is skeletally mature. 3. Patient is willing to sign and date an ethics-approved consent form. 4. Patient is willing to be available for two-year follow-up postoperatively

Exclusion criteria

Patients must not meet any of the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Total Score2 years postoperativelyThe KSS was used to rate both the prosthesis function and the patient's functional abilities after TKA. The KSS Total Score (0-100 points) included a combined evaluation of joint motion (0-25 points), instability (0-25 points), alignment (0-25 points), and symptoms (0-25 points). A higher score indicated a better outcome for subjects.
Knee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire2 years postoperativelyThe KSS was used to rate both the prosthesis function and the patient's functional abilities after TKA. The KSS clinical evaluation included a questionnaire completed by the investigators to assess for pain, stability, flexion contracture, extension lag, and alignment and evaluated based on number of subjects experiencing any of these issues at the 2-year postoperative visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year Postoperatively1 year postoperativelyX-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by radiolucencies (\> 2 mm). Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface, for each component, was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system for each of the 3 components was determined by measuring the radiolucent lines (mm) for each of these zones.
Radiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year Postoperatively1 year postoperativelyX-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by lack of evidence of surface wear or particulate debris generation, indications of early osteolysis, implant migration, and/or other clinical or radiographic abnormalities. Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed.
Serial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years Postoperatively2 years postoperativelyX-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by radiolucencies (\> 2 mm), lack of evidence of surface wear or particulate debris generation, indications of early osteolysis, implant migration, and/or other clinical or radiographic abnormalities. Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface, for each component, was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system for each of the 3 components was determined by measuring the radiolucent lines (mm) for each of these zones.
Radiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years Postoperatively2 years postoperativelyX-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by lack of evidence of surface wear or particulate debris generation, indications of early osteolysis, implant migration, and/or other clinical or radiographic abnormalities. Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed.
Evaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-ray3 months postoperativeLong radiographic anterior-posterior (AP) (full-leg standing x-rays) of the entire limb are superior for measuring alignment of the knee as the limb mechanical axes may be more precisely computed. For full-leg x-rays, 2 lines were drawn on the radiograph. First, a line was drawn from the center of the femoral head to the center of the femoral intercondylar notch and the line was extended through to the ankle. Second, a line was drawn from the center of the tibial spine to the center of the ankle talus. The angle between the first and second line was measured to determine mechanical alignment and assessed as either neutral (0 degrees) or a number of degrees of varus or valgus.
Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Blood LossDuring and immediately following surgeryAnalysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.
Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Incision LengthDuring and immediately following surgeryAnalysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.
Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Instrument Tray UseDuring and immediately following surgeryAnalysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.
Evaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaDuring and immediately following surgeryAnalysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: surgical approach, cut order, final status of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and need for perioperative prophylaxis antibiotics.
Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsDuring and immediately following surgeryAnalysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyBaseline (preoperative), 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperativelyEvaluation of KOOS questionnaire total scores including categories for symptoms, pain, function of daily living, function of sports and recreational activities, and quality of life. KOOS total scores ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating worst (no function) and 100 indicating no symptoms at all.

Countries

Australia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was planned to enroll 196 subjects; 134 subjects were recruited to the study prior to its termination due to insufficient total enrollment. Subjects were enrolled from 21 June 2012 to 15 April 2014. Early termination was approved May 2014 and sites were officially notified of study termination in September 2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VISIONAIRE Instrumentation
TKA with VISIONAIRE instrumentation Total Knee Arthroplasty: TKA was performed with VISIONAIRE instrumentation. Total knee arthroplasty was performed using customized surgical instruments created from preoperative imaging and specialized software, VISIONAIRE Patient-Matched Technology, which was used to match the patient's unique anatomy.
68
Standard Instrumentation
TKA with standard instrumentation Total Knee Arthroplasty was performed using conventional instrumentation.
65
Total133

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
1 YearLost to Follow-up30
1 YearStudy Termination07
1 YearWithdrawal by Subject01
2 YearsLost to Follow-up52
2 YearsStudy Termination32
2 YearsWithdrawal by Subject10
3 MonthsDeath10
3 MonthsStudy Termination22
BaselineWithdrawal by Subject76

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalVISIONAIRE InstrumentationStandard Instrumentation
Age, Continuous68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
69.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.71
67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Height168.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.94
168.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.84
168.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Aus-Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Aus-Caucasian
26 Participants12 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, Not Hispanic
5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Not Hispanic
98 Participants52 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
77 Participants40 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants28 Participants28 Participants
Weight86.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.86
88.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
83.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.77

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 680 / 66
other
Total, other adverse events
43 / 6838 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 680 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Knee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire

The KSS was used to rate both the prosthesis function and the patient's functional abilities after TKA. The KSS clinical evaluation included a questionnaire completed by the investigators to assess for pain, stability, flexion contracture, extension lag, and alignment and evaluated based on number of subjects experiencing any of these issues at the 2-year postoperative visit.

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - none26 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - severe1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - <6 degrees44 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - 11-20 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - > 20 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 4 or 11 degrees valgus1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 2 or 13 degrees valgus0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 1 or 14 degrees valgus0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - varus or > 15 degrees valgus0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - mild or occasional12 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - stairs only1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - walking & stairs1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - moderate occasional2 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - moderate continuous3 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - missing response0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - <5 mm43 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - 5-10 mm1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - >10 mm0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - missing response2 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - 6-9 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - 10-14 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - >14 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - missing response2 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 0-4 degrees42 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 5-10 degrees2 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 11-15 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 16-20 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - > 20 degrees0 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - missing response2 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - 0 degrees43 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - < 10 degrees1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - missing response2 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 5 or 10 degrees valgus (normal)40 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 3 or 12 degrees valgus1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 0 or 15 degrees valgus1 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - missing response3 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - 6-9 degrees0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - none27 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - 0 degrees44 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - 10-14 degrees0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 1 or 14 degrees valgus1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - 11-20 degrees0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - >14 degrees1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - < 10 degrees0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 4 or 11 degrees valgus1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - missing response1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 2 or 13 degrees valgus0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - > 20 degrees1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 0-4 degrees42 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - missing response2 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - mild or occasional14 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 5-10 degrees2 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - stairs only1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireExtension Lag - missing response1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - walking & stairs1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 11-15 degrees0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - moderate occasional1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 0 or 15 degrees valgus0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - moderate continuous1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - severe0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - 16-20 degrees0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnairePain - missing response1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 5 or 10 degrees valgus (normal)41 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - <5 mm43 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - > 20 degrees0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - 5-10 mm1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - varus or > 15 degrees valgus0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - >10 mm1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireFlexion Contracture - missing response2 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAP Stability - missing response1 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireMedio-lateral Stability - <6 degrees44 Participants
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Clinical Evaluation QuestionnaireAlignment - 3 or 12 degrees valgus1 Participants
Primary

Knee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Total Score

The KSS was used to rate both the prosthesis function and the patient's functional abilities after TKA. The KSS Total Score (0-100 points) included a combined evaluation of joint motion (0-25 points), instability (0-25 points), alignment (0-25 points), and symptoms (0-25 points). A higher score indicated a better outcome for subjects.

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

Population: The Knee Society Clinical Score was not completed for all enrolled subjects. Data was only available for 83 subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Total Score91.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Standard InstrumentationKnee Society Clinical (KSS) Score at 2 Years Following Surgery - Total Score94.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Secondary

Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Blood Loss

Analysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.

Time frame: During and immediately following surgery

Population: Not all analysis values were available for all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Blood Loss105.2 mLStandard Deviation 85.1
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Blood Loss93.8 mLStandard Deviation 39
Secondary

Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Incision Length

Analysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.

Time frame: During and immediately following surgery

Population: Not all analysis values were available for all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Incision Length153.6 mmStandard Deviation 21.2
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Incision Length156.8 mmStandard Deviation 18.4
Secondary

Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Instrument Tray Use

Analysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.

Time frame: During and immediately following surgery

Population: Not all analysis values were available for all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Instrument Tray UseInstrument trays used in setup5.3 number of traysStandard Deviation 4.2
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Instrument Tray UseInstrument trays used5.1 number of traysStandard Deviation 3.8
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Instrument Tray UseInstrument trays used in setup8.2 number of traysStandard Deviation 2.6
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Instrument Tray UseInstrument trays used8.0 number of traysStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Evaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time Details

Analysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: anesthesia time, operative time (skin-to-skin), tray setup, duration of operation, blood loss, incision length, number of instrument trays setup, and number of instrument trays used.

Time frame: During and immediately following surgery

Population: Not all analysis values were available for all enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsAnesthesia time128.8 minutesStandard Deviation 37.2
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsSkin to skin time74.9 minutesStandard Deviation 23.5
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsTray setup time16.5 minutesStandard Deviation 13.9
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsDuration of operation110.6 minutesStandard Deviation 29.5
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsDuration of operation110.9 minutesStandard Deviation 26.8
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsAnesthesia time126.5 minutesStandard Deviation 32.8
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsTray setup time19.7 minutesStandard Deviation 11.7
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Criteria - Surgical Time DetailsSkin to skin time75.4 minutesStandard Deviation 23.6
Secondary

Evaluation of Health Economic Surgical Criteria

Analysis of health data captured during and immediately following surgery: surgical approach, cut order, final status of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and need for perioperative prophylaxis antibiotics.

Time frame: During and immediately following surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - missing0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - medial parapatellar58 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - anterior cut first5 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - missing0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - tibial cut first0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - excised29 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - subvastus0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - released2 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - distal cut first57 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - intact13 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - midvastus4 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - N/A (PS component used)18 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaPerioperative prophylaxis antibiotics - yes62 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - missing0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - lateral parapatellar0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaPerioperative prophylaxis antibiotics - no0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - other0 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaPerioperative prophylaxis antibiotics - no0 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - other1 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - missing0 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - anterior cut first13 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - tibial cut first1 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaPerioperative prophylaxis antibiotics - yes60 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - medial parapatellar56 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - subvastus0 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - midvastus2 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaSurgical approach - lateral parapatellar1 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - distal cut first46 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaCut order - missing0 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - excised27 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - released3 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - intact15 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - N/A (PS component used)15 participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Health Economic Surgical CriteriaFinal status of PCL - missing0 participants
Secondary

Evaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-ray

Long radiographic anterior-posterior (AP) (full-leg standing x-rays) of the entire limb are superior for measuring alignment of the knee as the limb mechanical axes may be more precisely computed. For full-leg x-rays, 2 lines were drawn on the radiograph. First, a line was drawn from the center of the femoral head to the center of the femoral intercondylar notch and the line was extended through to the ankle. Second, a line was drawn from the center of the tibial spine to the center of the ankle talus. The angle between the first and second line was measured to determine mechanical alignment and assessed as either neutral (0 degrees) or a number of degrees of varus or valgus.

Time frame: 3 months postoperative

Population: Evaluation of Mechanical Alignment 3 Months Postoperatively was not completed for all enrolled subjects. Only data for 88 participants was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayAlignment - Neutral19 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayVarus11 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayValgus14 Participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayMissing0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayMissing0 Participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayAlignment - Neutral10 Participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayValgus6 Participants
Standard InstrumentationEvaluation of Mechanical Alignment Assessed as Either Neutral or Varus/Valgus 3 Months Postoperatively Using a Full Leg X-rayVarus28 Participants
Secondary

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and Postoperatively

Evaluation of KOOS questionnaire total scores including categories for symptoms, pain, function of daily living, function of sports and recreational activities, and quality of life. KOOS total scores ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating worst (no function) and 100 indicating no symptoms at all.

Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively

Population: Not all enrolled subjects completed the KOOS questionnaire at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - 1 year postoperative81.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - 2 years postoperative85.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyActivities of Daily Living (ADLs) - preoperative46.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyADLs - 3 months postoperative78.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyADLs - 1 year postoperative86.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyADLs - 2 years postoperative89.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - 3 months postoperative42.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.6
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - 1 year postoperative62.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQuality of Life (QoL) - preoperative21.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - preoperative40.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - 3 months postoperative73.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - 1 year postoperative85.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - 2 years postoperative89.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - preoperative46.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - 3 months postoperative66.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - preoperative19.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - 2 years postoperative74.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQoL - 3 months postoperative58.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQoL - 1 year postoperative68.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.2
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQoL - 2 years postoperative75.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - preoperative49.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - 1 year postoperative82.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - preoperative43.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - 2 years postoperative88.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQoL - 3 months postoperative64.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyActivities of Daily Living (ADLs) - preoperative51.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - 3 months postoperative76.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyADLs - 3 months postoperative84.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySymptoms - 3 months postoperative73.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyADLs - 1 year postoperative89.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - 1 year postoperative88.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyADLs - 2 years postoperative92.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - preoperative23.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQoL - 2 years postoperative78.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - 3 months postoperative48.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.3
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyPain - 2 years postoperative92.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - 2 years postoperative74.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelySports/Rec - 1 year postoperative62.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.6
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQuality of Life (QoL) - preoperative22.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Standard InstrumentationKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Preoperatively and PostoperativelyQoL - 1 year postoperative72.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Secondary

Radiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year Postoperatively

X-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by lack of evidence of surface wear or particulate debris generation, indications of early osteolysis, implant migration, and/or other clinical or radiographic abnormalities. Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed.

Time frame: 1 year postoperatively

Population: Not all subjects completed the serial radiographic evaluations at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - x-ray unclear0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - normal53 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - lateralized1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - subluxation0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - dislocation0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - Ingrowth35 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - indifferent, bone unchanged34 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - increased osseointegration1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - bone loss0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - implant at risk0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - implant loosening0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - revision indication0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - periosteal hypertrophy0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - osteolysis0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - subsidence0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - other0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - no54 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - yes0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - osteolysis0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - implant at risk0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - normal49 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - yes0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - lateralized0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - implant loosening0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - subluxation1 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - subsidence0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyPatella tracking - dislocation0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - revision indication0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - Ingrowth32 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - x-ray unclear1 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - no50 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - indifferent, bone unchanged29 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - periosteal hypertrophy0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - increased osseointegration2 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyObservations - other0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 1 Year PostoperativelyFixation - bone loss0 participants
Secondary

Radiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years Postoperatively

X-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by lack of evidence of surface wear or particulate debris generation, indications of early osteolysis, implant migration, and/or other clinical or radiographic abnormalities. Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed.

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

Population: Not all subjects completed the serial radiographic evaluations at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - dislocation0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - bone loss0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - increased osseointegration0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - implant at risk1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - subluxation0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - implant loosening0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - x-ray unclear0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - revision indication0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - periosteal hypertrophy0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - osteolysis0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - normal42 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - subsidence0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - lateralized2 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - other1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - missing1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - no45 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - indifferent, bone unchanged27 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - yes0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - fixation/ingrowth28 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - yes0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - subluxation0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - dislocation0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - x-ray unclear0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - indifferent, bone unchanged24 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - increased osseointegration0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - revision indication0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - lateralized0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - missing0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - fixation/ingrowth24 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - bone loss0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - implant at risk0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyFixation - implant loosening0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - periosteal hypertrophy0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - osteolysis0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - subsidence0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyObservations - other0 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyEvidence of deformity - no43 participants
Standard InstrumentationRadiographic Outcomes to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyPatella tracking - normal43 participants
Secondary

Serial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years Postoperatively

X-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by radiolucencies (\> 2 mm), lack of evidence of surface wear or particulate debris generation, indications of early osteolysis, implant migration, and/or other clinical or radiographic abnormalities. Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface, for each component, was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system for each of the 3 components was determined by measuring the radiolucent lines (mm) for each of these zones.

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

Population: Not all subjects completed the serial radiographic evaluations at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)2 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femor0al zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femor0al zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - patella zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (> 2 mm)1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening at 2 Years PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
Secondary

Serial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year Postoperatively

X-ray evaluations performed to assess for evidence of implant loosening by radiolucencies (\> 2 mm). Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral serial x-ray evaluations were performed. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface, for each component, was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system for each of the 3 components was determined by measuring the radiolucent lines (mm) for each of these zones.

Time frame: 1 year postoperatively

Population: Not all subjects completed the serial radiographic evaluations at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)3 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)2 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)1 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
VISIONAIRE InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (> 2 mm)1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 9 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone B (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 1 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone 5 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone A (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial ML zone B (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 2 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 3 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 4 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 5 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 6 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - femoral zone 7 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 2 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 3 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 4 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 5 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 6 (> 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (≤ 2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - patellar zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (≤ 2 mm and progressive1 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 1 (> 2 mm and progressive0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 2 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 3 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 4 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 5 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 6 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤ 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (≤2 mm and progressive)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 7 (> 2 mm)0 participants
Standard InstrumentationSerial Radiographic Evaluations to Assess Evidence of Loosening (Radiolucencies) by Measuring Lucent Zones at 1 Year PostoperativelyLucency - tibial AP zone 8 (>2 mm and progressive)0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026