Skip to content

Study of SPM 962 in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)

A Phase 3 Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled, Double Blind, 3-Armed Parallel Group, Comparative Study of SPM 962 4.5 and 6.75 mg/Day to Investigate Superiority to Placebo in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01084551
Enrollment
284
Registered
2010-03-10
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2014-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of SPM962 in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) with once-daily repeated doses of 4.5mg and 6.75mg during a 13-week dose-titration and maintenance period. This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3-armed parallel group comparison study. Efficacy will be determined by investigating the superiority of SPM962 to placebo in terms of the primary efficacy variable, change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) total score from baseline to the end of the dose-maintenance period.

Interventions

once a daily transdermal administration started at 2.25 mg/day to 4.5 mg/day for 13 weeks

DRUGPlacebo of SPM 962

once a daily transdermal administration for 13 weeks

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients whose condition has been diagnosed as RLS by meeting all 4 of the International Restless legs Syndrome Study Group/ National Institute of Health (IRLSSG/NIH) criteria * Patients who meet any of the following criteria relating to RLS treatment: * Patients who have never received treatment for RLS * Patients who have received treatment for RLS in the past and responded to L-dopa or dopamine agonists (Response to other RLS medicines is irrelevant.) * Patients who have an IRLS total score of \>=15 at baseline * Patients who experience symptoms in the evening or during the night on at least two days a week within 14 days prior to commencement of study treatment * Patients and their partners can practice contraception at the end of follow-up observation period or by 1 week after the end of treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have previously participated in a clinical trial of SPM962 and taken the investigational product (IP) * Patients with secondary RLS induced by renal impairment (uremia), iron deficiency anemia, drugs, pregnancy, etc. * Patients who currently suffer, are at risk of developing, or have a history of sleep disorder such as sleep apnea syndrome, narcolepsy, and sleep attacks/sudden onset of sleep * Patients who have concomitant diseases or symptoms which may affect the symptoms of RLS, such as polyneuropathy (including diabetic neuropathy), akathisia, claudication, varicoses, muscle fasciculation, painful legs and moving toes syndrome, radiculopathy and folate deficiency * Patients who have other CNS diseases such as Parkinson's disease, dementia, progressive supranuclear paresis, multisystem atrophy, Huntington's Chorea, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease * Patients who have psychiatric conditions such as confusion, hallucination, delusion, and excitation, or patients who have abnormal behavior such as delirium, obsessive compulsive disorder, and impulse control disorder at the time of the screening test or baseline examination * Patients whose SBP declines by at least 30 mmHg from supine to standing position based on the orthostatic hypotension assessment, or patients who develop orthostatic hypotension at baseline * Patients who have a history of epilepsy, convulsion, etc * Patients who have complications or a history of serious cardiac diseases or arrhythmia (eg, congestive heart failure of class 3 or 4 in the NYHA classification, second or third degree atrioventricular block, complete left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, ventricular fibrillation, myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to the screening test, or a complication of angina pectoris) * Patients with arrhythmia who have been taking Class 1a antiarrhythmic drugs (eg., quinidine, procainamide) or Class 3 antiarrhythmic drugs (eg., amiodarone, sotalol) * Patients who have a serious ECG abnormality at the screening test and at the baseline examination * Patients who show QTc intervals exceeding 450 ms in both ECGs in the screening test * Patients who have an average QTc interval from the two ECGs in the baseline assessment that exceeds 470 ms (for females) or 450 ms (for males) * Patients with congenital long QT syndrome * Patients whose serum potassium level is \< 3.5mEq/L at the screening test * Patients whose total bilirubin is \>= 3.0mg/dL, or whose AST(GOT) and ALT(GPT) are equal or more than 2.5 times the reference range of the clinical site (or \>= 100IU/L) at the screening test * Patients whose BUN level is \>= 30mg/dL, or whose serum creatinine level is \>= 2.0mg/dL at the screening test * Patients who have a history of allergy to topical agents such as transdermal patch * Patients who are pregnant or nursing or who wish to become pregnant during the study period * Patients who habitually drink alcohol or smoke excessively * Patients who engage in evening shift work or other such shift work, or whose work or circumstances makes it difficult to maintain a regular period of sleep * Patients who engage in hazardous work such as driving a vehicle, operating machinery, or working in a high location. * Patients with autoimmune disease, chronic active hepatitis, or immune deficiency disorder * Patients who have a complication or history of malignant neoplastic disease, or received treatment for the disease within 12 months prior to the screening test * Patients who are unable to properly record information in a patient diary * Patients who received other IPs within 12 weeks prior to commencement of study treatment * Patients who have been judged by the investigator or the sub-investigator to be inappropriate for inclusion in the study for any other reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Total ScoreBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)Change from the baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. IRLS is a scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms. IRLS consists of ten questions. Each question is scored from 4 for the first (top) answer (usually 'very severe') to 0 for the last answer (usually none). The sum of the score of each question serves as the scale score. The scale scoring criteria are: Mild (score 1-10); Moderate (score 11-20); Severe (score 21-30); Very severe (score 31-40). A decrease in the scores means improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ImprovementBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)CGI improvement is a clinician-reported scale for assessing how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened from baseline. The scale scoring criteria are 1: very much improved, 2: much improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: much worse, 7: very much worse.
Patient Global Impression (PGI) ImprovementBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)PGI improvement is a patient-reported scale for assessing how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened from baseline. The scale scoring criteria are 1: very much better, 2: much better, 3: a little better, 4: no change, 5: a little worse, 6: much worse, 7: very much worse.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)Change of PSQI from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. PSQI is a scale for assessing severity of sleep disorders. The score ranges from 0 to 21. 0 indicates no difficulty and 21 indicates severe difficulty. A decrease in the scores means improvement.
Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)IRLS is a scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms. IRLS consists of ten questions. Each question is scored from 4 for the first (top) answer (usually 'very severe') to 0 for the last answer (usually none). Numbers of subjects with -4 or -3 score change from baseline in each item of IRLS. A decrease in the scores means improvement.
Average Duration of RLS SymptomsBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (weeks 13)Change of average duration of RLS symptoms in a week from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. Only the days with RLS symptoms are used for calculation.
Incidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and NightBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)Incidence rate of RLS symptoms is calculated as the number of days with RLS symptoms / the number of days of evaluation \* 100%.
Average Duration of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and Night in a WeekBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (weeks 13)Change of average duration of RLS symptoms in a week from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. Only the days with RLS symptoms are used for calculation.
Nocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a WeekBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)Nocturnal awakening rate is calculated as the number of days with nocturnal awakenings / the number of days of evaluation \* 100%.
Average Sleep Time in a WeekBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (weeks 13)Change of average sleep time in a week from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period.
Incidence of RLS SymptomsBaseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)Incidence rate of RLS symptoms is calculated as the number of days with RLS symptoms in the week / the number of evaluation days in the week\* 100%

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
0 mg/day for 13 weeks
95
SPM 962 4.5
started at 2.25 mg/day to 4.5 mg/day for 13 weeks
95
SPM 962 6.75
started at 2.25 mg/day to 6.75 mg/day for 13 weeks
94
Total284

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event294
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy201
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up003
Overall StudyPhysician Decision100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation240
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject210

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboSPM 962 4.5SPM 962 6.75Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
30 Participants18 Participants17 Participants65 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
65 Participants77 Participants77 Participants219 Participants
Age, Continuous53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
Region of Enrollment
Japan
95 participants95 participants94 participants284 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
54 Participants54 Participants46 Participants154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants41 Participants48 Participants130 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 9572 / 9577 / 94
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 950 / 951 / 94

Outcome results

Primary

International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Total Score

Change from the baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. IRLS is a scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms. IRLS consists of ten questions. Each question is scored from 4 for the first (top) answer (usually 'very severe') to 0 for the last answer (usually none). The sum of the score of each question serves as the scale score. The scale scoring criteria are: Mild (score 1-10); Moderate (score 11-20); Severe (score 21-30); Very severe (score 31-40). A decrease in the scores means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: Full analysis set (FAS), last observation carried forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboInternational Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Total Score-11.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
SPM 962 4.5International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Total Score-14.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
SPM 962 6.75International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Total Score-14.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Average Duration of RLS Symptoms

Change of average duration of RLS symptoms in a week from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. Only the days with RLS symptoms are used for calculation.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (weeks 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAverage Duration of RLS Symptoms-3.1 HoursStandard Deviation 4.7
SPM 962 4.5Average Duration of RLS Symptoms-3.7 HoursStandard Deviation 4.6
SPM 962 6.75Average Duration of RLS Symptoms-4.3 HoursStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Average Duration of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and Night in a Week

Change of average duration of RLS symptoms in a week from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. Only the days with RLS symptoms are used for calculation.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (weeks 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAverage Duration of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and Night in a Week-1.3 HoursStandard Deviation 3.1
SPM 962 4.5Average Duration of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and Night in a Week-1.8 HoursStandard Deviation 2.5
SPM 962 6.75Average Duration of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and Night in a Week-1.5 HoursStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Average Sleep Time in a Week

Change of average sleep time in a week from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (weeks 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAverage Sleep Time in a Week0.4 HoursStandard Deviation 0.8
SPM 962 4.5Average Sleep Time in a Week0.5 HoursStandard Deviation 1.1
SPM 962 6.75Average Sleep Time in a Week0.4 HoursStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement

CGI improvement is a clinician-reported scale for assessing how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened from baseline. The scale scoring criteria are 1: very much improved, 2: much improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: much worse, 7: very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboClinical Global Impression (CGI) ImprovementSubjects with much improved24.2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression (CGI) ImprovementSubjects with very much improved33.7 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 4.5Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ImprovementSubjects with much improved25.8 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 4.5Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ImprovementSubjects with very much improved41.9 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 6.75Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ImprovementSubjects with much improved29.0 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 6.75Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ImprovementSubjects with very much improved45.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)

IRLS is a scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms. IRLS consists of ten questions. Each question is scored from 4 for the first (top) answer (usually 'very severe') to 0 for the last answer (usually none). Numbers of subjects with -4 or -3 score change from baseline in each item of IRLS. A decrease in the scores means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of sleep disturbance)16.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of RLS as a whole)6.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of mood disturbance)8.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of sleep disturbance)2.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (RLS symptoms frequency)12.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of the impact on daily affairs)8.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (average duration of RLS symptoms)6.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (RLS symptoms frequency)12.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (need to move around due to RLS symptoms)11.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (average duration of RLS symptoms)1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (RLS discomfort)11.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of the impact on daily affairs)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (discomfort relief by moving around)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (RLS discomfort)1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (tiredness or sleepiness during the day)8.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (discomfort relief by moving around)10.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of mood disturbance)1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (tiredness or sleepiness during the day)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of RLS as a whole)1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboEach Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (need to move around due to RLS symptoms)2.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of the impact on daily affairs)11.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (RLS discomfort)17.2 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (need to move around due to RLS symptoms)2.2 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (need to move around due to RLS symptoms)25.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (discomfort relief by moving around)1.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (discomfort relief by moving around)20.4 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of RLS as a whole)1.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of RLS as a whole)12.9 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (RLS symptoms frequency)24.7 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (RLS symptoms frequency)9.7 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (average duration of RLS symptoms)2.2 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (average duration of RLS symptoms)10.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of sleep disturbance)4.3 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of sleep disturbance)16.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (tiredness or sleepiness during the day)2.2 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (tiredness or sleepiness during the day)11.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of the impact on daily affairs)1.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (RLS discomfort)2.2 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of mood disturbance)4.3 percentage of participants
SPM 962 4.5Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of mood disturbance)10.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of the impact on daily affairs)4.3 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of sleep disturbance)21.3 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (discomfort relief by moving around)28.7 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (RLS discomfort)12.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (tiredness or sleepiness during the day)2.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (discomfort relief by moving around)2.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of mood disturbance)12.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (tiredness or sleepiness during the day)8.5 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (need to move around due to RLS symptoms)18.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of mood disturbance)1.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (RLS symptoms frequency)11.7 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of the impact on daily affairs)1.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (average duration of RLS symptoms)2.1 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (RLS symptoms frequency)26.6 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (need to move around due to RLS symptoms)7.4 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (average duration of RLS symptoms)9.6 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-3 (severity of RLS as a whole)12.8 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (RLS discomfort)6.4 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of sleep disturbance)6.4 percentage of participants
SPM 962 6.75Each Item of IRLS (10 Items)-4 (severity of RLS as a whole)4.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of RLS Symptoms

Incidence rate of RLS symptoms is calculated as the number of days with RLS symptoms in the week / the number of evaluation days in the week\* 100%

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboIncidence of RLS SymptomsBaseline85.7 percentage of days with RLS symptomStandard Deviation 20.8
PlaceboIncidence of RLS SymptomsWeek 1348.7 percentage of days with RLS symptomStandard Deviation 40.9
SPM 962 4.5Incidence of RLS SymptomsBaseline85.4 percentage of days with RLS symptomStandard Deviation 20.5
SPM 962 4.5Incidence of RLS SymptomsWeek 1335.8 percentage of days with RLS symptomStandard Deviation 38.6
SPM 962 6.75Incidence of RLS SymptomsBaseline83.2 percentage of days with RLS symptomStandard Deviation 22.2
SPM 962 6.75Incidence of RLS SymptomsWeek 1336.8 percentage of days with RLS symptomStandard Deviation 38.8
Secondary

Incidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and Night

Incidence rate of RLS symptoms is calculated as the number of days with RLS symptoms / the number of days of evaluation \* 100%.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboIncidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and NightBaseline80.6 percentage of days/week with symptomsStandard Deviation 24.2
PlaceboIncidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and NightWeek 1345.4 percentage of days/week with symptomsStandard Deviation 41
SPM 962 4.5Incidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and NightBaseline83.3 percentage of days/week with symptomsStandard Deviation 20.8
SPM 962 4.5Incidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and NightWeek 1334.6 percentage of days/week with symptomsStandard Deviation 38.2
SPM 962 6.75Incidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and NightBaseline79.5 percentage of days/week with symptomsStandard Deviation 24.2
SPM 962 6.75Incidence of RLS Symptoms in the Evening and NightWeek 1331.8 percentage of days/week with symptomsStandard Deviation 37.7
Secondary

Nocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a Week

Nocturnal awakening rate is calculated as the number of days with nocturnal awakenings / the number of days of evaluation \* 100%.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a WeekBaseline33.5 percentage of days/week with awakeningStandard Deviation 35.9
PlaceboNocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a WeekWeek 1315.6 percentage of days/week with awakeningStandard Deviation 31.7
SPM 962 4.5Nocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a WeekBaseline22.6 percentage of days/week with awakeningStandard Deviation 31.3
SPM 962 4.5Nocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a WeekWeek 137.7 percentage of days/week with awakeningStandard Deviation 20.5
SPM 962 6.75Nocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a WeekBaseline28.3 percentage of days/week with awakeningStandard Deviation 34.3
SPM 962 6.75Nocturnal Awakenings Due to RLS Symptoms in a WeekWeek 137.5 percentage of days/week with awakeningStandard Deviation 19.5
Secondary

Patient Global Impression (PGI) Improvement

PGI improvement is a patient-reported scale for assessing how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened from baseline. The scale scoring criteria are 1: very much better, 2: much better, 3: a little better, 4: no change, 5: a little worse, 6: much worse, 7: very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPatient Global Impression (PGI) ImprovementSubjects with much improved23.2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression (PGI) ImprovementSubjects with very much improved38.9 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 4.5Patient Global Impression (PGI) ImprovementSubjects with much improved24.7 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 4.5Patient Global Impression (PGI) ImprovementSubjects with very much improved48.4 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 6.75Patient Global Impression (PGI) ImprovementSubjects with much improved30.1 Percentage of Participants
SPM 962 6.75Patient Global Impression (PGI) ImprovementSubjects with very much improved50.5 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Change of PSQI from baseline to the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period. PSQI is a scale for assessing severity of sleep disorders. The score ranges from 0 to 21. 0 indicates no difficulty and 21 indicates severe difficulty. A decrease in the scores means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, the end of dose-titration/dose-maintenance period (week 13)

Population: FAS, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboThe Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)-2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
SPM 962 4.5The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)-3.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
SPM 962 6.75The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)-3.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026