Thumb Joint Stiffness
Conditions
Keywords
thumb, Ulnar collateral ligament, superimposed electrical stimulation, stiffness, adhesions
Brief summary
Background One of the potentially debilitative complications of operative repair and subsequent immobilization is stiffness that appears secondary to inflammation and adhesions. To prevent such a physical impairment, active joint mobilization has shown to be efficient. However, adhesions sometimes remain despite the therapy. Due to the viscoelastic nature of the biological tissues, if a technique can enable to extend the muscle ability to impose a maximal steady stress on adhesions, adhesion deformation should be greater and range of motion deficit should be reduced. Within that context, the purpose of the present study was to assess the real-time effects of superimposed electrical stimulation (SES) on maximal voluntary muscular contraction (VOL) over time and to assess SES effects on range of motion recovery in thumb stiff joint. Methods and Findings The aim of the first experiment was to examine the real-time effects of tetanic SES on the maximal volitional level of force over repeated contractions of the triceps brachii muscle. To address this goal, seventeen subjects participated voluntarily in this study. Two features of the muscular force were assessed: The peak force (1) and the impulse (2). These two dependent variables were measured during 500 sec - including 50 maximal force productions of 4 sec each- in two randomized conditions of VOL and SES. When considering the 50 trials as a whole, exerted force was higher in the SES than in the VOL condition for both peak force and impulse (P\<.05). Over time, peak force and impulse decreased consistently in VOL starting between the 20th and 30th trials whereas they were maintained in SES condition (P\<.05). The aim of the second experiment was to compare the effects of VOL and SES on the range of flexion recovery of the stiff metacarpophalangeal joint following operative repair of the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb. To address this goal, eight patients participated voluntarily. Range of motion, oedema and pain were assessed before and after the two randomised conditions of VOL and SES.
Interventions
OTHERelectrically induced muscle activation
30 Hz frequency, 200 µs pulse duration, and 40% duty cycle (4 sec on, 6 sec off)
Sponsors
Université Joseph Fourier
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* loss of range of flexion in the involved metacarpophalangeal joint of at least ten degrees when compared to the opposite thumb * more than eight weeks post-surgery
Exclusion criteria
* do not meet the inclusion criteria
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| range of motion | 1sec after joint mobilization | Active range of motion was measured using a finger goniometer |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| muscle force | During the muscle contraction | The peak force and the impulse were measured during 500 sec in two randomized conditions of voluntary muscle contraction and electrically induced muscle contraction |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed