Skip to content

Comparing Google With A Focused Diabetes Search Engine

Comparing Google With A Focused Diabetes Search Engine

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01080976
Enrollment
10
Registered
2010-03-05
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2018-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Brief summary

Abstract Diabetes behavior can be influenced by patients exploring diabetes topics that may lack scientific credibility. The question this study examines is whether a Google or Health on the Net (HON) internet search, presents websites that would incline a more or less likely recommendation to patients ? A preliminary trial suggests that referrers recommend websites based on rules that may prioritize website source over content. This study will qualitatively assess the rules that participants use in deciding which websites are more suitable than others. Method The investigators will inject a diabetes related search term into a HON and a Google search engine. The top 5 mutually exclusive websites from each search engine will be presented to 5 people from three groups stratified across endocrinologists, informaticians and PCPs. Participants will rank the websites and then identify the rules that they applied to reach their decision.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* physician, informatician, diabetologist

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Website RankingImmediatePrimary care and diabetes clinicians' preference in a set of webpage search results on a visual analog scale (1-100) with 1 being the lowest preference and 100 being the highest. Rankings based on qualitative measures, such as perceived clinical relevance, perceived accuracy of content, and perceived timeliness of content.
Search Engine PreferenceImmediateBased on the results of primary outcome 1 (Website Ranking), preference for search engine was measured qualitatively between Google and Health-on-the-Net.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Primary Care Physicians5
Diabetologists5
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPrimary Care PhysiciansDiabetologistsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Search Engine Preference

Based on the results of primary outcome 1 (Website Ranking), preference for search engine was measured qualitatively between Google and Health-on-the-Net.

Time frame: Immediate

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Primary Care PhysiciansSearch Engine PreferenceNA Participants
DiabetologistsSearch Engine PreferenceNA Participants
Primary

Website Ranking

Primary care and diabetes clinicians' preference in a set of webpage search results on a visual analog scale (1-100) with 1 being the lowest preference and 100 being the highest. Rankings based on qualitative measures, such as perceived clinical relevance, perceived accuracy of content, and perceived timeliness of content.

Time frame: Immediate

Population: Participants were asked to rank 10 pages of website search results from Google and HoN search engines based on clinician preference. Clinicians were further asked for feedback and opinions on how they determined their ranking. Rankings of individual websites were done by visual analog scale, from 1-100, with 100 indicated as highly preferred.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Primary Care PhysiciansWebsite RankingNA units on a scale
DiabetologistsWebsite RankingNA units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026