Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01080599

Enrollment

100

Registered

2010-03-04

Start date

2009-06-30

Completion date

2010-02-28

Last updated

2010-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nerve Block

Keywords

obturator nerve block in TURB

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach \[Labat technique\] and inguinal approach.

Interventions

PROCEDUREobturator nerve block

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

20 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled to undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor during combined spinal anesthesia and obturator nerve block were included in the clinical study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with advanced cardiac and respiratory insufficiency * Allergy to local anesthetics * Preexisting neurologic deficits * Prior operation involving the hip and the inguinal region and bleeding tendency were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Assessment of obturator sign during using nerve stimulator and operation	—

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026