Skip to content

Canakinumab in the Treatment of Acute Gout Flares and Prevention of New Flares in Patients Unable to Use Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and/or Colchicines Including a 12 Week Extension and a 1 Year Open-label Extension Study.

A Randomized, Controlled Study of ACZ885 (Canakinumab) on the Treatment and Prevention of Gout Flares in Patients With Frequent Flares for Whom NSAIDs and/or Colchicine Are Contraindicated, Not Tolerated or Ineffective Including a 12 Weeks Extension Study and a 1 Year Open-label Extension Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01080131
Acronym
β-RELIEVED-II
Enrollment
226
Registered
2010-03-03
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2014-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Gout

Keywords

Frequent flares, Gout, Anti-interleukin-1β monoclonal antibody

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that canakinumab given upon acute gout flares relieves the signs and symptoms and prevents recurrence of gout flares in patients with frequent flares of gout for whom non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/ or colchicine are contraindicated, not tolerated, or ineffective. The efficacy of canakinumab was compared to the corticosteroid triamcinolone acetonide. The purpose of the first 12 week extension study was to collect additional safety, tolerability and efficacy data in patients who have completed the core study CACZ885H2357. The purpose of the second one year open-label extension study was to confirm the long-term safety and tolerability of canakinumab in patients who had completed the first extension study.

Interventions

Canakinumab 150 mg was supplied in 6 mL glass vials each containing nominally 150 mg canakinumab (plus 20% overfill).

Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg was supplied as a suspension.

Placebo to canakinumab was supplied in 6 mL glass vials containing placebo powder as a lyophilized cake.

Placebo triamcinolone acetonide was supplied as a lipid emulsion similar in appearance to triamcinolone acetonide.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Core Study: Inclusion criteria: * Meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1977 preliminary criteria for the classification of acute arthritis of primary gout * Onset of current acute gout flare within 5 days prior to study entry * Baseline pain intensity ≥ 50 mm on the 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) * History of ≥ 3 gout flares within the 12 months prior to study entry * Contraindication, or intolerance, or lack of efficacy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and/or colchicine

Exclusion criteria

* Rheumatoid arthritis, evidence/suspicion of infectious/septic arthritis, or other acute inflammatory arthritis * Presence of severe renal function impairment * Use of specified pain relief medications or biologics (corticosteroids, narcotics, paracetamol/acetominophen, ibuprofen, colchicine, IL-blocker, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor within specified periods prior to study entry * Live vaccinations within 3 months prior to randomization * Requirement for administration of antibiotics against latent tuberculosis (TB) * Refractory heart failure (Stage D) * Unstable cardiac arrhythmias or unstable symptomatic coronary ischemia * Any active or recurrent bacterial, fungal, or viral infection Extension Study 1: Inclusion: \- Completion of the Core study. A patient was defined as completing the core study if they completed the study up to and including visit 7. Exclusion: \- Continuation in this extension study was considered inappropriate by the treating physician. Extension Study 2: Inclusion Criteria: * Completion of the first extension study CACZ885H2357E1. A patient was defined as completing the first extension study if they completed the study up to and including Visit 10).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis During the 12 Weeks of StudyBaseline to 12 weeksKaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: •Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) •Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.
Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 72 Hours Post-dose72 hours post-dose (randomization)Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), at 72 hours post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 WeeksDuring 24 weeks overallThis was primary endpoint of extension study 1. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)72 weeksThis was the primary endpoint of extension study 2. An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetic Concentrations12 weeks post-doseCanakinumab concentration was analyzed in serum by means of a competitive Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay with a lower limit of quantification (LOQ) at 100 ng/mL.
Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours; and 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose (randomization)Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), from 6 hours to 7 days post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.
Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours; and 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose for last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).Patient's assessment of gout pain intensity in the most affected joint (on a 0-100 mm VAS) for the last post-baseline flare, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), was summarized up to 7 days after receiving a re-dose of study drug by time point. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The covariance analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score at that flare, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.
Time to the First New Gout Flare During 24 WeeksFrom randomization to the end of the first extension period (24 weeks).Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of the time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. Participants met the definition of a new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.
Mean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During 24 Weeks24 weeksPatients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint(at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.
Time to First Intake of Rescue MedicationFor 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).Participants who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, participants were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare. Use of these treatments during the first 7 days of a gout flare was recorded as rescue medication. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to first intake of rescue medication, in hours, and the confidence interval were determined for the flare experienced at study entry (Baseline flare) and the last new flare (last post-baseline flare) that occurred up until the end of the first extension period (24 weeks).
Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue MedicationFor 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).Participants who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, participants were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare. Use of these treatments during the first 7 days of a gout flare was recorded as rescue medication.
Amount of Rescue Medication TakenFor 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).Patients who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, patients were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare.
Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours post-dose and 24-weeks post-dose.The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The physician completed the assessment without viewing any of the patient's own assessments (pain intensity and patient's global assessment of response to treatment).
Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-doseParticipants made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.
Physician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-doseThe study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Tenderness on a 0-3 point scale: No pain, patient states that there is pain, patient states there is pain and winces, and patient states there is pain, winces, and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint; Swelling on a 0-3 point scale: No swelling, palpable, visible, and bulging beyond the joint margins; and Erythema: Present or absent. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.
Physician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-doseThe study physician assessed the range of motion of the most affected joint for range of motion on a 5-point Likert scale: Normal, mildly restricted, moderately restricted, severely restricted, immobilized. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.
Time to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline to 7 days post-dose (randomization)Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to at least a 50% reduction in self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline and the confidence intervals were determined along with 95% confidence interval. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.
Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-doseParticipant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme).
Percentage of Patients With Maximum Severity of New Gout Flares as Severe or ExtremeFrom the onset of a new flare until re-dosing. First post-baseline new flare during 12 week core study and the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).For each new flare, participants scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of the new flare and the time they were re-dosed on a 5 point Likert scale as None, Mild, Moderate, Severe or Extreme. The percentage of participants with a maximum new flare severity of severe or extreme is reported for the first post-baseline flare that occurred during the 12-week core study and for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension period.
Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment Over 72 WeeksFrom randomization to the end of the second extension period (72 weeks).Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.
Flare Rate Per YearFrom randomization to the end of the second extension period (72 weeks).Flare rate was calculated as the number of new flares over the period of observation in years. Flare rate was calculated using only those new flares before switching to canakinumab. Participants met the definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely. Flare rates were estimated from a negative binomial model with body mass index at baseline as a covariate.
Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.Participants scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe or extreme). Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.Participants made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight or poor. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: very good, good, fair, poor or very poor. The physician completed the physician's global assessment of response to treatment without viewing any of the patient's assessments. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
Physician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.The study physician assessed the most affected joint for tenderness on the following 4-point scale: * no pain; * participant states that there is pain; * participant states there is pain and winces; * participant states there is pain, winces and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
Physician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.The study physician assessed the most affected joint for swelling on the following 4-point scale: * no swelling; * palpable; * visible; * bulging beyond the joint margins. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
Physician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.The study physician assessed the most affected joint for erythema (redness of the skin) as either present, absent or not assessable. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in blood serum were measured by a central laboratory in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) levels in blood serum were measured by a central laboratory in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels72 hours after the first dose for the baseline flare and 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analyses were measured by a central laboratory. The analysis included treatment group, log-transformed protein level at baseline, and body mass index (BMI) at baseline as covariates.
Time to Complete Resolution of Pain; Survival AnalysisBaseline to 7 days post-dose (randomization)Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to complete resolution of self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected and the confidence interval was determined. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). Pain was scored at Baseline; 6 and 12 hours; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.
SF 36 Physical Function Score at Week 12Week 12SF-36 measures impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). 36-item survey has 8 subscales that can be aggregated into physical and mental component summary scores. Scores are standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment group and baseline SF-36 physical function subscore as covariates.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks of the StudyBaseline to Week 12The percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 new gout flare during the 12 week study treatment period.

Countries

Canada, China, Netherlands, Russia, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Canakinumab 150 mg
Participants received 1 subcutaneous (sc) injection of canakinumab 150 mg and 1 intramuscular (im) injection of placebo to triamcinolone acetonide on Day 1. Participants could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. In the first extension study participants completing the 12 week core study could continue to be treated on demand with the same treatment for another 12 weeks for any new gout flare. In the second extension study participants were to receive open-label on demand treatment with canakinumab 150 mg sc for any new flare for an additional year, for a total duration of 18 months.
112
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg
Participants received 1 intramuscular injection of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg and 1 sc injection of placebo to canakinumab on Day 1. Participants could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. In the first extension study participants completing the 12 week core study could continue to be treated on demand with the same treatment for another 12 weeks for any new gout flare. In the second extension study participants were to switch to open-label on demand treatment with canakinumab 150 mg sc for any new flare for an additional year. Triamcinolone acetonide was not to be administered in the second extension study.
114
Total226

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Core Study (0- 12 Weeks)Abnormal laboratory value(s)11
Core Study (0- 12 Weeks)Administrative problems01
Core Study (0- 12 Weeks)Death10
Core Study (0- 12 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up53
Core Study (0- 12 Weeks)Patient withdrew consent64
Core Study (0- 12 Weeks)Protocol deviation02
Extension Study 1 (12 -24 Weeks)Adverse Event10
Extension Study 1 (12 -24 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up10
Extension Study 1 (12 -24 Weeks)Unsatisfactory Therapeutic Effect01
Extension Study 1 (12 -24 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject43
Extension Study 2 (25-72 Weeks)Adverse Event12
Extension Study 2 (25-72 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up45
Extension Study 2 (25-72 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCanakinumab 150 mgTriamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTotal
Age, Continuous50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.21
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
100 Participants105 Participants205 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
42 / 11215 / 6219 / 6236 / 11415 / 418 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 1121 / 625 / 624 / 1140 / 413 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)

This was the primary endpoint of extension study 2. An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: 72 weeks

Population: Safety population consisted of all patients who received study drug in the core study and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death1 participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Any adverse event85 participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious adverse event12 participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Any adverse event44 participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious adverse event1 participants
Canakinumab: After RetreatmentNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 participants
Canakinumab: After RetreatmentNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Any adverse event39 participants
Canakinumab: After RetreatmentNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious adverse event5 participants
All Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 participants
All Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Any adverse event70 participants
All Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious adverse event4 participants
Triam: Before Switch to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 participants
Triam: Before Switch to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Any adverse event29 participants
Triam: Before Switch to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious adverse event0 participants
Triam: After Switch to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Any adverse event27 participants
Triam: After Switch to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious adverse event3 participants
Triam: After Switch to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 Weeks

This was primary endpoint of extension study 1. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: During 24 weeks overall

Population: Safety population consisted of all patients who received study drug in the core study and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 WeeksAdverse event78 Participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 WeeksDeath1 Participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 WeeksSerious adverse event7 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 WeeksAdverse event65 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 WeeksDeath0 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 WeeksSerious adverse event2 Participants
Primary

Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 72 Hours Post-dose

Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), at 72 hours post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose (randomization)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute post dose measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 72 Hours Post-dose22.1 mmStandard Error 2.33
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 72 Hours Post-dose31.9 mmStandard Error 2.35
Primary

Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis During the 12 Weeks of Study

Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: •Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) •Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First New Flare: Survival Analysis During the 12 Weeks of StudyNA Days
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First New Flare: Survival Analysis During the 12 Weeks of StudyNA Days
Secondary

Amount of Rescue Medication Taken

Patients who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, patients were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare.

Time frame: For 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).

Population: For the Baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For the last post-baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of patients re-treated for at least one new flare.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenBaseline flare: Acetaminophen [N=112, 114]1375.0 mgStandard Deviation 2726.63
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenBaseline flare: Codeine [N=112, 114]27.2 mgStandard Deviation 100.4
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenBaseline flare: Prednisone/Predinisone [N=112,114]9.2 mgStandard Deviation 35.32
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenLast flare: Acetaminophen [N=25, 46]2292.0 mgStandard Deviation 3462.65
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenLast flare: Codeine [N= 25, 46]64.8 mgStandard Deviation 224.11
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenLast flare: Prednisolone/Predinisone [N= 25, 46]5.6 mgStandard Deviation 14.46
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenLast flare: Codeine [N= 25, 46]65.2 mgStandard Deviation 178.7
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenBaseline flare: Acetaminophen [N=112, 114]2526.5 mgStandard Deviation 3925.13
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenLast flare: Acetaminophen [N=25, 46]1541.3 mgStandard Deviation 3771.33
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenBaseline flare: Codeine [N=112, 114]60.6 mgStandard Deviation 144.38
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenLast flare: Prednisolone/Predinisone [N= 25, 46]18.3 mgStandard Deviation 48
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenBaseline flare: Prednisone/Predinisone [N=112,114]19.3 mgStandard Deviation 44.88
Secondary

Flare Rate Per Year

Flare rate was calculated as the number of new flares over the period of observation in years. Flare rate was calculated using only those new flares before switching to canakinumab. Participants met the definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely. Flare rates were estimated from a negative binomial model with body mass index at baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: From randomization to the end of the second extension period (72 weeks).

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgFlare Rate Per Year1.18 flares per patient per year
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgFlare Rate Per Year2.02 flares per patient per year
Secondary

High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analyses were measured by a central laboratory. The analysis included treatment group, log-transformed protein level at baseline, and body mass index (BMI) at baseline as covariates.

Time frame: 72 hours after the first dose for the baseline flare and 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).

Population: For the Baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For the last post-baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of patients re-treated for at least one new flare. N indicates the number of participants with available data in each analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsBaseline flare: hsCRP [N=107, 110]3.84 mg/L
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsBaseline flare: SAA [N=95, 104]6.31 mg/L
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsLast post-baseline flare: hsCRP [N= 22, 42]3.69 mg/L
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsLast post-baseline flare: SAA, [N= 19, 39]6.74 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsLast post-baseline flare: SAA, [N= 19, 39]11.04 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsBaseline flare: hsCRP [N=107, 110]6.38 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsLast post-baseline flare: hsCRP [N= 22, 42]4.32 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) LevelsBaseline flare: SAA [N=95, 104]15.85 mg/L
Secondary

High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in blood serum were measured by a central laboratory in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24-hours post-dose [N=48, 36]30.1 mg/LStandard Deviation 64.11
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72-hours post-dose [N=56, 38]10.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 31.11
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post-dose [N=55, 40]2.8 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.97
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post-dose [N=46, 37]1.6 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post-dose [N=37, 35]2.1 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.41
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post-dose [N=38, 31]1.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.79
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post-dose [N=37, 35]2.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.62
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24-hours post-dose [N=48, 36]39.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 41.1
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post-dose [N=46, 37]2.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.54
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72-hours post-dose [N=56, 38]12.6 mg/LStandard Deviation 15.8
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post-dose [N=38, 31]2.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.9
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post-dose [N=55, 40]3.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Mean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During 24 Weeks

Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint(at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgMean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During 24 Weeks0.35 new flares per patientStandard Deviation 0.694
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgMean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During 24 Weeks0.80 new flares per patientStandard Deviation 1.115
Secondary

Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

Participants scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe or extreme). Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - None [N=57, 37]64.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Moderate [N=59, 40]22.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Mild [N=57, 37]21.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Mild [N=59, 40]44.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Moderate [N=57, 37]10.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Severe [N=59, 40]3.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Severe [N=57, 37]3.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - None [N=59, 40]30.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Extreme [N=57, 37]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Extreme [N=59, 40]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Extreme [N=57, 37]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - None [N=59, 40]25.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Mild [N=59, 40]62.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Moderate [N=59, 40]12.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Severe [N=59, 40]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - None [N=57, 37]59.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Mild [N=57, 37]35.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Moderate [N=57, 37]5.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Severe [N=57, 37]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Extreme [N=59, 40]0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint

Participant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme).

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations available at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Extreme [N=108, 111]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - None [N=108, 111]30.6 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - None [N=79, 70]72.2 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Moderate [N=108, 111]20.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Mild [N=79, 70]19.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Severe [N=79, 70]2.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Moderate [N=79, 70]6.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Severe [N=108, 111]0.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Extreme [N=79, 70]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Mild [N=108, 111]48.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Extreme [N=79, 70]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - None [N=108, 111]18.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Mild [N=108, 111]45.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Moderate [N=108, 111]27.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Severe [N=108, 111]8.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Extreme [N=108, 111]1.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - None [N=79, 70]67.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Mild [N=79, 70]25.7 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Severe [N=79, 70]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Moderate [N=79, 70]7.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment

Participants made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations available at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Acceptable [N=108, 108]18.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Excellent [N=79, 72]59.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Good [N=108, 108]37.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Good [N=79, 72]26.6 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Slight [N=108, 108]4.6 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Acceptable [N=79, 72]6.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Excellent [N=108, 108]36.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Poor [N=108, 108]3.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Poor [N=79, 72]1.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Slight [N=79, 72]6.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Poor [N=79, 72]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Excellent [N=108, 108]19.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Good [N=108, 108]32.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Acceptable [N=108, 108]13.9 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Slight [N=108, 108]25.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Poor [N=108, 108]9.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Excellent [N=79, 72]40.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Good [N=79, 72]44.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Acceptable [N=79, 72]13.9 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Slight [N=79, 72]1.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

Participants made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight or poor. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Excellent [N=58, 38]41.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Poor [N=56, 39]3.6 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Good [N=58, 38]32.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Acceptable [N=58, 38]12.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Slight [N=58, 38]13.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Poor [N=58, 38]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Excellent [N=56, 39]51.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Good [N=56, 39]26.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Acceptable [N=56, 39]10.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Slight [N=56, 39]7.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Good [N=56, 39]33.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Poor [N=58, 38]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Poor [N=56, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Excellent [N=58, 38]36.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Slight [N=56, 39]7.7 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Good [N=58, 38]39.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Excellent [N=56, 39]51.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Acceptable [N=58, 38]21.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Acceptable [N=56, 39]7.7 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Slight [N=58, 38]2.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication

Participants who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, participants were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare. Use of these treatments during the first 7 days of a gout flare was recorded as rescue medication.

Time frame: For 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).

Population: For the Baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For the last post-baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of patients re-treated for at least one new flare.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue MedicationBaseline flare [N= 112, 114]43.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue MedicationLast post-baseline flare [N=25, 46]56.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue MedicationLast post-baseline flare [N=25, 46]41.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue MedicationBaseline flare [N= 112, 114]57.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks of the Study

The percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 new gout flare during the 12 week study treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks of the Study13.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks of the Study36.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Maximum Severity of New Gout Flares as Severe or Extreme

For each new flare, participants scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of the new flare and the time they were re-dosed on a 5 point Likert scale as None, Mild, Moderate, Severe or Extreme. The percentage of participants with a maximum new flare severity of severe or extreme is reported for the first post-baseline flare that occurred during the 12-week core study and for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension period.

Time frame: From the onset of a new flare until re-dosing. First post-baseline new flare during 12 week core study and the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).

Population: The number of participants analyzed (indicated by 'N') for the first new post-baseline flare includes patients who were re-treated for a new flare during the 12-week core study. For the last post-baseline flare the population analyzed includes patients re-treated for at least one new flare during the first 24 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Patients With Maximum Severity of New Gout Flares as Severe or ExtremeFirst post-baseline flare [N= 12, 37]66.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Patients With Maximum Severity of New Gout Flares as Severe or ExtremeLast post-baseline flare [N= 25, 46]64.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Patients With Maximum Severity of New Gout Flares as Severe or ExtremeFirst post-baseline flare [N= 12, 37]78.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Patients With Maximum Severity of New Gout Flares as Severe or ExtremeLast post-baseline flare [N= 25, 46]78.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Concentrations

Canakinumab concentration was analyzed in serum by means of a competitive Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay with a lower limit of quantification (LOQ) at 100 ng/mL.

Time frame: 12 weeks post-dose

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgPharmacokinetic Concentrations2.16 µg/mLStandard Deviation 2.375
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for erythema (redness of the skin) as either present, absent or not assessable. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Present [N=56, 38]26.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Absent [N=56, 38]73.2 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Absent [N=58, 39]84.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Present [N=58, 39]15.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Present [N=58, 39]5.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Absent [N=58, 39]94.9 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Absent [N=56, 38]92.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Present [N=56, 38]7.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for swelling on the following 4-point scale: * no swelling; * palpable; * visible; * bulging beyond the joint margins. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - No swelling [N=56, 38]55.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Palpable [N=56, 38]26.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Visible [N=56, 38]12.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Bulging beyond joint margins [N=56, 38]5.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - No swelling [N=58, 39]70.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Palpable [N=58, 39]17.2 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Visible [N=58, 39]10.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Bulging beyond joint margins [N=58, 39]1.7 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Bulging beyond joint margins [N=58, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - No swelling [N=56, 38]47.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - No swelling [N=58, 39]79.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Palpable [N=56, 38]34.2 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Visible [N=58, 39]2.6 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Visible [N=56, 38]15.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Palpable [N=58, 39]17.9 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Bulging beyond joint margins [N=56, 38]2.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for tenderness on the following 4-point scale: * no pain; * participant states that there is pain; * participant states there is pain and winces; * participant states there is pain, winces and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - No pain [N=56, 38]51.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Pain [N=56, 38]37.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Pain and winces [N=56, 38]5.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Pain, winces and withdraws [N=56, 38]5.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - No pain [N=58, 39]74.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Pain [N=58, 39]22.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Pain and winces [N=58, 39]3.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Pain, winces and withdraws [N=58, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Pain, winces and withdraws [N=58, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - No pain [N=56, 38]42.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - No pain [N=58, 39]79.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Pain [N=56, 38]50.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Pain and winces [N=58, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Pain and winces [N=56, 38]5.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Pain [N=58, 39]20.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Pain, winces and withdraws [N=56, 38]2.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint

The study physician assessed the range of motion of the most affected joint for range of motion on a 5-point Likert scale: Normal, mildly restricted, moderately restricted, severely restricted, immobilized. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations available at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Normal [N=107,109]47.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Mildly restricted [N=107,109]37.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Moderately restricted [N=107,109]13.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Severely restricted [N=107,109]1.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Immobilized [N=107,109]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Normal [N=79, 71]86.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Mildly restricted [N=79, 71]10.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Moderately restricted [N=79, 71]2.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Severely restricted [N=79, 71]1.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Immobilized [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Moderately restricted [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Normal [N=107,109]28.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Normal [N=79, 71]97.2 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Mildly restricted [N=107,109]45.9 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Immobilized [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Moderately restricted [N=107,109]20.2 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Mildly restricted [N=79, 71]2.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Severely restricted [N=107,109]5.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Severely restricted [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Immobilized [N=107,109]0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Tenderness on a 0-3 point scale: No pain, patient states that there is pain, patient states there is pain and winces, and patient states there is pain, winces, and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint; Swelling on a 0-3 point scale: No swelling, palpable, visible, and bulging beyond the joint margins; and Erythema: Present or absent. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations available at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness: No pain [N=107, 109]47.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness: Pain [N=107, 109]43.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness: Pain & winces [N=107, 109]4.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness:Winces/withdraws [N=107,109]3.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: No pain [N=79, 71]88.6 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: Pain [N=79, 71]8.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: Pain and winces [N=79, 71]1.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: Winces/withdraws [N=79, 71]1.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: No swelling [N=107,109]47.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: Palpable [N=107,109]28.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: Visible [N=107,109]22.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: Bulging [N=107,109]1.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: No swelling [N=79, 71]93.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: Palpable [N=79, 71]5.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: Visible [N=79, 71]1.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: Bulging [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Erythema: Absent [N=107, 108]74.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Erythema: Present [N=107, 108]25.2 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Erythema: Absent [N=79, 71]97.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Erythema: Present [N=79, 71]2.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Erythema: Present [N=107, 108]33.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness: No pain [N=107, 109]30.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: Visible [N=107,109]28.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness: Pain [N=107, 109]46.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: Bulging [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness: Pain & winces [N=107, 109]14.7 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: Bulging [N=107,109]6.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Tenderness:Winces/withdraws [N=107,109]8.3 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Erythema: Present [N=79, 71]2.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: No pain [N=79, 71]91.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: No swelling [N=79, 71]94.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: Pain [N=79, 71]5.6 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Erythema: Absent [N=107, 108]66.7 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: Pain and winces [N=79, 71]1.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: Palpable [N=79, 71]4.2 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Tenderness: Winces/withdraws [N=79, 71]1.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Erythema: Absent [N=79, 71]97.2 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: No swelling [N=107,109]35.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint24 weeks - Swelling: Visible [N=79, 71]1.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours - Swelling: Palpable [N=107,109]29.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment

The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The physician completed the assessment without viewing any of the patient's own assessments (pain intensity and patient's global assessment of response to treatment).

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 24-weeks post-dose.

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations available for this endpoint at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Very good [N= 107, 109]43.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Good [N= 107, 109]43.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Fair [N= 107, 109]11.2 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Poor [N= 107, 109]2.8 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Very poor [N= 107, 109]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Very good [N=79, 71]77.2 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Good [N=79, 71]16.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Fair [N=79, 71]5.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Poor [N=79, 71]1.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Very poor [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Fair [N=79, 71]4.2 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Very good [N= 107, 109]25.7 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Very good [N=79, 71]66.2 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Good [N= 107, 109]35.8 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Very poor [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Fair [N= 107, 109]26.6 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Good [N=79, 71]29.6 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Poor [N= 107, 109]6.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment24 weeks - Poor [N=79, 71]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours - Very poor [N= 107, 109]5.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: very good, good, fair, poor or very poor. The physician completed the physician's global assessment of response to treatment without viewing any of the patient's assessments. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Very good [N=56, 38]39.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Good [N=56, 38]39.3 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Fair [N=56, 38]16.1 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Poor [N=56, 38]5.4 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Very poor [N=56, 38]0.0 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Very good [N=58, 39]56.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Good [N=58, 39]25.9 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Fair [N=58, 39]15.5 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Poor [N=58, 39]1.7 percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Very poor [N=58, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Fair [N=58, 39]2.6 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Very good [N=56, 38]42.1 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Very good [N=58, 39]59.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Good [N=56, 38]39.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Very poor [N=58, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Fair [N=56, 38]18.4 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Good [N=58, 39]38.5 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Poor [N=56, 38]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab7 days - Poor [N=58, 39]0.0 percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours - Very poor [N=56, 38]0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)

Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), from 6 hours to 7 days post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours; and 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose (randomization)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)12 hours post-dose50.8 mmStandard Error 2.16
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)4 days post-dose19.2 mmStandard Error 2.25
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)48 hours post-dose29.5 mmStandard Error 2.45
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)5 days post-dose16.4 mmStandard Error 2.23
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)24 hours post-dose39.1 mmStandard Error 2.39
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)6 days post-dose14.3 mmStandard Error 2.2
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)72 hours post-dose22.1 mmStandard Error 2.33
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)7 days post-dose14.0 mmStandard Error 2.18
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)6 hours post-dose58.7 mmStandard Error 1.94
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)7 days post-dose19.5 mmStandard Error 2.2
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)6 hours post-dose60.3 mmStandard Error 1.96
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)12 hours post-dose52.0 mmStandard Error 2.18
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)24 hours post-dose45.0 mmStandard Error 2.41
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)48 hours post-dose38.9 mmStandard Error 2.48
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)72 hours post-dose31.9 mmStandard Error 2.35
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)4 days post-dose27.7 mmStandard Error 2.27
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)5 days post-dose25.4 mmStandard Error 2.25
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)6 days post-dose22.3 mmStandard Error 2.22
Secondary

Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Patient's assessment of gout pain intensity in the most affected joint (on a 0-100 mm VAS) for the last post-baseline flare, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), was summarized up to 7 days after receiving a re-dose of study drug by time point. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The covariance analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score at that flare, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours; and 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose for last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. For assessments made up to 7 days after re-dosing, pain values were imputed using the Last- Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)12 hours post-dose50.7 mmStandard Error 4.24
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)4 days post-dose31.3 mmStandard Error 4.75
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)48 hours post-dose42.3 mmStandard Error 4.96
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)5 days post-dose29.0 mmStandard Error 5.11
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)24 hours post-dose46.2 mmStandard Error 4.74
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)6 days post-dose28.1 mmStandard Error 5.04
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)72 hours post-dose37.0 mmStandard Error 5.12
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)7 days post-dose24.1 mmStandard Error 5.03
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)6 hours post-dose57.4 mmStandard Error 3.07
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)7 days post-dose19.1 mmStandard Error 3.7
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)6 hours post-dose59.1 mmStandard Error 2.26
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)12 hours post-dose53.3 mmStandard Error 3.12
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)24 hours post-dose43.8 mmStandard Error 3.49
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)48 hours post-dose34.2 mmStandard Error 3.65
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)72 hours post-dose26.1 mmStandard Error 3.77
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)4 days post-dose23.4 mmStandard Error 3.49
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)5 days post-dose21.6 mmStandard Error 3.76
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)6 days post-dose20.5 mmStandard Error 3.71
Secondary

Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab

Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) levels in blood serum were measured by a central laboratory in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.

Time frame: 24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consisting of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during the 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post-dose [N=47, 37]3.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.67
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24-hours post-dose [N=47, 36]129.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 324.45
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72-hours post-dose [N=54, 37]45.6 mg/LStandard Deviation 163.45
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post-dose [N=56, 39]5.7 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.9
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post-dose [N=38, 35]3.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.24
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post-dose [N=38, 29]3.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.37
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post-dose [N=38, 35]5.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 13.41
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post-dose [N=47, 37]5.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 7.02
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post-dose [N=56, 39]5.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.34
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24-hours post-dose [N=47, 36]145.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 257.44
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post-dose [N=38, 29]4.8 mg/LStandard Deviation 5.94
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72-hours post-dose [N=54, 37]45.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 97
Secondary

SF 36 Physical Function Score at Week 12

SF-36 measures impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). 36-item survey has 8 subscales that can be aggregated into physical and mental component summary scores. Scores are standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment group and baseline SF-36 physical function subscore as covariates.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Participants with observations at Week 12 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSF 36 Physical Function Score at Week 1281.46 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.786
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSF 36 Physical Function Score at Week 1278.75 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.82
Secondary

Time to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to at least a 50% reduction in self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline and the confidence intervals were determined along with 95% confidence interval. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.

Time frame: Baseline to 7 days post-dose (randomization)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute post dose measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)25.0 hours
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)48.0 hours
Secondary

Time to Complete Resolution of Pain; Survival Analysis

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to complete resolution of self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected and the confidence interval was determined. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). Pain was scored at Baseline; 6 and 12 hours; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.

Time frame: Baseline to 7 days post-dose (randomization)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All patients that received study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to Complete Resolution of Pain; Survival Analysis144.0 hours
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to Complete Resolution of Pain; Survival AnalysisNA hours
Secondary

Time to First Intake of Rescue Medication

Participants who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, participants were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare. Use of these treatments during the first 7 days of a gout flare was recorded as rescue medication. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to first intake of rescue medication, in hours, and the confidence interval were determined for the flare experienced at study entry (Baseline flare) and the last new flare (last post-baseline flare) that occurred up until the end of the first extension period (24 weeks).

Time frame: For 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).

Population: For the Baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For the last post-baseline flare the population analyzed consisted of patients re-treated for at least one new flare. Patients who did not take rescue medication had the time-to-first rescue medication intake censored at 7 days post dosing and re-dosing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First Intake of Rescue MedicationBaseline flare [N= 112, 114]NA hours
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First Intake of Rescue MedicationLast post-baseline flare [N=25, 46]32 hours
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First Intake of Rescue MedicationBaseline flare [N= 112, 114]37.5 hours
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First Intake of Rescue MedicationLast post-baseline flare [N=25, 46]NA hours
Secondary

Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment Over 72 Weeks

Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: From randomization to the end of the second extension period (72 weeks).

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment Over 72 Weeks254.0 days
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment Over 72 Weeks146.0 days
Secondary

Time to the First New Gout Flare During 24 Weeks

Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of the time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. Participants met the definition of a new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.

Time frame: From randomization to the end of the first extension period (24 weeks).

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to the First New Gout Flare During 24 WeeksNA days
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to the First New Gout Flare During 24 Weeks146 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026