Skip to content

Effectiveness of Video System in Improving Learning of Tracheal Intubation Using Standard Laryngoscopy Among Novices

A Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of Video System in Improving Learning of Tracheal Intubation Using Standard Laryngoscopy Among Novices

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01080118
Enrollment
90
Registered
2010-03-03
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2013-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Intraesophageal

Keywords

Teaching, Video Scope, Intubation

Brief summary

The use of the video laryngoscope to teach laryngoscopy will improve the performance of tracheal intubation done by novices because it will allow a shared view of the airway leading to a better feedback from the trainer to the trainee.

Detailed description

A group of 30 fourth year medical students and interns rotating through the department of anesthesiology will be studied. Firstly, a standard lecture will be provided in which the description and importance of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation will be explained. This will include descriptions of anatomy, relevant equipment and technique of tracheal intubation. Following the lecture , the students will be randomly allocated using sealed envelopes into two groups : a control group ( taught with a standard Macintosh Laryngoscope ) and a study group ( taught with the Airtraq video laryngoscope).Each group will receive a demonstration and verbal instruction on how to perform laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation by their instructor.

Interventions

DEVICEAirtraq

Subjects were taught with the Airtraq video laryngoscope

OTHERControl group, taught with a standard Macintosh laryngoscope

Subjects were taught how to use the Mackintosh blade first

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Students: Inclusion criteria for the medical student: * Medical student or intern rotating through the anesthesiology department

Exclusion criteria

for the medical student: * Previous attempts of laryngoscopy in humans * Subject who refuses participation Patients: Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 -75 years of age * ASA PS I, II * Procedure that will require General anesthesia with tracheal intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful Endotracheal Intubation120 secondsA successful placement of the endotracheal tube as defined by the presence of bilateral breath sounds and positive recording of end tidal carbon dioxide.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Intubation120 secondsTime to intubation is the time interval of blade insertion until the removal of the laryngoscope.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Medical students and intern trainees with no prior experience in laryngoscopy on clinical rotation in the Department of Anesthesiology were recruited to participate. Written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants.

Pre-assignment details

Trainees received a structured lecture in airway management followed by training in laryngoscopy skills on a mannequin, and required to demonstrate proficiency. Trainees were then randomly assigned to attempt their first two intubations on different patients using either the optical or rigid laryngoscope with a MacIntosh size 3 blade.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rigid Laryngoscope Group
Medical students or interns attempting intubation with standard size 3 Macintosh laryngoscope
15
Video Laryngoscope Group
Medical students or interns attempting intubation with Airtraq video laryngoscope
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVideo Laryngoscope GroupRigid Laryngoscope GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Age Continuous27.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
27.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 151 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Successful Endotracheal Intubation

A successful placement of the endotracheal tube as defined by the presence of bilateral breath sounds and positive recording of end tidal carbon dioxide.

Time frame: 120 seconds

Population: The sample analysis was all of the medical students or interns who consented to participate in this study. All participants data was used for the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rigid Laryngoscope GroupSuccessful Endotracheal Intubation33.3 % successful
Video Laryngoscope GroupSuccessful Endotracheal Intubation83.3 % successful
p-value: 0.00199% CI: [0.05, 0.05]t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Time to Intubation

Time to intubation is the time interval of blade insertion until the removal of the laryngoscope.

Time frame: 120 seconds

Population: The sample analysis was all of the medical students or interns who consented to participate in this study. All participants data was used for the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Rigid Laryngoscope GroupTime to Intubation75 seconds
Video Laryngoscope GroupTime to Intubation35 seconds

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026