Skip to content

Irinotecan Hydrochloride and Cetuximab With or Without Ramucirumab in Treating Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer With Progressive Disease After Treatment With Bevacizumab-Containing Chemotherapy

A Randomized Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab With or Without the Anti-Angiogenic Antibody, Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), in Advanced, K-ras Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer Following Progression on Bevacizumab-Containing Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01079780
Enrollment
136
Registered
2010-03-03
Start date
2011-01-18
Completion date
2021-08-17
Last updated
2023-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon, recurrent colon cancer, signet ring adenocarcinoma of the colon, stage III colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, mucinous adenocarcinoma of the rectum, recurrent rectal cancer, signet ring adenocarcinoma of the rectum, stage III rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab and ramucirumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Cetuximab and ramucirumab may also stop the growth of colorectal cancer by blocking blood flow to the tumor. It is not yet know whether giving cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride together is more effective with or without ramucirumab in treating colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride with or without ramucirumab work in treating patients with advanced colorectal cancer with progressive disease after treatment with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * To evaluate the progression-free survival of patients with advanced K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer, following progression on bevacizumab-contained chemotherapy, treated with irinotecan hydrochloride and cetuximab with versus without ramucirumab as second-line therapy. * To evaluate the response rate in patients treated with these regimens. * To evaluate the grade 3-4 toxicity rates of these regimens in these patients. * To evaluate the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized study. Patients are stratified according to performance status (0 vs 1), discontinuation of oxaliplatin before disease progression (yes vs no), and time to disease progression since last treatment (≤ 6 months vs \> 6 months). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm A: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 60-120 minutes and irinotecan hydrochloride over 60-90 minutes on day 1. * Arm B: Patients receive ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 and cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride as in arm A. Arm B was closed early due to excessive toxicities and Arm C was then added to the study with reduced dose of protocol drugs. * Arm C: Patients receive reduced dose of ramucirumab, cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride as in arm B. In all arms, courses repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up periodically for 5 years.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALcetuximab

Given IV

BIOLOGICALramucirumab

Given IV

DRUGirinotecan hydrochloride

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Measurable disease * Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum * K-ras wild type based on either primary or metastatic tumor * Must have received prior first-line therapy comprising oxaliplatin-based fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer * Registration within 42 days since confirmed disease progression * Performance status 0-1 * ANC ≥ 1,500/μL * Platelet count ≥ 75,000/μL * Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) OR creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min * Urine protein ≤ 1+ on dipstick or routine urinalysis (if ≥ 2+, a 24-hour urine collection must demonstrate \< 1,000 mg of protein) * Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL * AST and ALT ≤ 3.0 times ULN (5.0 times ULN for patients with liver metastases) * INR ≤ 1.6 (≤ 3.0 for patients on warfarin and no active bleeding \[i.e., no bleeding within the past 14 days\]) * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 3 months after completion of study therapy * At least 28 days and no more than 90 days since prior bevacizumab * Concurrent stable dose of oral anticoagulant or low-molecular weight heparin allowed

Exclusion criteria

* Brain or CNS metastases * Pregnant or nursing * Prior therapy with drugs other than oxaliplatin and a fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer * Clinically significant (equivalent to NCI CTCAE grade 3-4) bleeding episodes within the past 3 months * Active infection * Symptomatic congestive heart failure * Unstable angina pectoris * Symptomatic or poorly controlled cardiac arrhythmia * Uncontrolled thrombotic or hemorrhagic disorder * Uncontrolled or poorly controlled hypertension despite standard medical management (e.g., consistently systolic BP \> 160 mm Hg and diastolic BP \> 90 mm Hg) * Acute arterial thrombotic events within the past 6 months, including cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina * Other cancer requiring therapy within the past 3 years except in situ carcinoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer * Acute or subacute intestinal obstruction * History of inflammatory bowel disease requiring pharmacological and/or surgical intervention within the past 12 months * Known allergy to any of the treatment components * Major surgery within the past 28 days * Subcutaneous venous access device placement within the past 7 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 yearsProgression-fee survival is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death without documentation of progression. Censoring occurred at the date of last disease assessment without progression for cases without documentation of progression, except for cases where death occurred within a short period of time (4 months) following the date last known progression-free, in which case the death was considered an event. Progression is defined as appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With an Objective Response Rate (CR or PR)Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 yearsObjective response is defined as either complete response or partial response. Complete response is defined as disappearance of all lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse EventsAssessed every 2 weeks while on treatment and for 30 days after the end of treatmentAdverse events were assessed using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Treatment-related adverse events are defined as those that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to protocol therapy.
Overall SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 yearsOverall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first patient was accrued on January 18, 2011.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (IC)
Patients receive cetuximab (500 mg/m\^2) intravenously (IV) over 60-120 minutes and irinotecan hydrochloride (180 mg/m\^2) over 60-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.
62
Arm B (ICR)
Patients receive ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) IV over 60 minutes on day 1 and cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride as in arm A. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.
16
Arm C (mICR)
Patients receive reduced dose of ramucirumab (6 mg/kg) IV over 60 minutes on day 1 and cetuximab (150 mg/m\^2) and irinotecan hydrochloride (400 mg/m\^2) as in arm B. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.
45
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event1357
Overall StudyAlternative therapy202
Overall StudyDeath202
Overall StudyDisease progression43731
Overall StudyError made in lesion measurement100
Overall StudyNever started treatment102
Overall StudyPatient had surgery100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision101
Overall StudyTreatment cycle delay001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject644

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A (IC)Arm B (ICR)Arm C (mICR)Total
Age, Continuous59.8 years60.0 years60.4 years60.3 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants2 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
54 Participants13 Participants38 Participants105 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants1 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants15 Participants37 Participants99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants7 Participants13 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants9 Participants32 Participants78 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
55 / 7015 / 1643 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
64 / 6816 / 1646 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 6813 / 1627 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-fee survival is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death without documentation of progression. Censoring occurred at the date of last disease assessment without progression for cases without documentation of progression, except for cases where death occurred within a short period of time (4 months) following the date last known progression-free, in which case the death was considered an event. Progression is defined as appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 years

Population: Only eligible patients are included in this analysis. For the comparison between arms A and C, only eligible patients that were concurrently randomized were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (IC)Progression-free Survival5.98 months
Arm B (ICR)Progression-free Survival7.03 months
Arm C (mICR)Progression-free Survival9.20 months
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive.

Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 years

Population: Only eligible patients are included in this analysis. For the comparison between arms A and C, only eligible patients that were concurrently randomized were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (IC)Overall Survival19.3 months
Arm B (ICR)Overall Survival15.0 months
Arm C (mICR)Overall Survival19.2 months
p-value: 0.55Log Rank
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With an Objective Response Rate (CR or PR)

Objective response is defined as either complete response or partial response. Complete response is defined as disappearance of all lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 years

Population: Only eligible patients are included in this analysis. For the comparison between arms A and C, only eligible patients that were concurrently randomized were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (IC)Proportion of Participants With an Objective Response Rate (CR or PR)0.23 proportion of participants
Arm B (ICR)Proportion of Participants With an Objective Response Rate (CR or PR)0.44 proportion of participants
Arm C (mICR)Proportion of Participants With an Objective Response Rate (CR or PR)0.36 proportion of participants
p-value: 0.27Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events

Adverse events were assessed using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Treatment-related adverse events are defined as those that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to protocol therapy.

Time frame: Assessed every 2 weeks while on treatment and for 30 days after the end of treatment

Population: All patients who received protocol therapy and had toxicity data were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A (IC)Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events0.49 proportion of participants
Arm B (ICR)Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events0.81 proportion of participants
Arm C (mICR)Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events0.56 proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026