Skip to content

EValuation of HumIRA® in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis in EASTern European Countries

Evaluation of Clinical Outcome, Treatment Compliance and Tolerability of humIRA (Adalimumab) in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis in EASTern European Countries; EviraEAST - a Multi-country, Multi-Center Post Marketing Observational Study in Routine Clinical Use

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01078402
Acronym
EviraEAST
Enrollment
809
Registered
2010-03-02
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2013-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA

Keywords

Treatment compliance and tolerability of Humira in patients, Eastern European countries, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Adalimumab, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Evaluation of clinical outcome

Brief summary

This is a non-interventional, post-marketing, observational study (PMOS) in which Humira (adalimumab) is prescribed in the usual manner in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization with regards to dose, population and indication. No data currently exists to characterize patient populations being prescribed Humira in Eastern Europe. Further, it is important to establish the clinical outcome and tolerability of Humira in Eastern European patients, as well as their compliance with Humira treatment, in particular the acceptability of self-injection, which may influence all of the above in routine clinical practice.

Detailed description

This PMOS will be conducted in a prospective, single-arm, multicountry, multicenter format. The assignment of the patient to Humira is not decided in advance by this protocol but falls within the current practice. The prescription of Humira is clearly separated from the decision to include the patient in this study. No additional procedures (other than standard of care) shall be applied to the patients. As this study is observational in nature, its follow-up is not interventional and is left to the judgment of each physician within the 14-17 months period (including tuberculosis (TB) screening and prophylaxis, if indicated), which defines the survey for each patient. The TB screening period per patient will be 1-4 weeks and, if applicable, the TB prophylactic treatment period before Humira administration will be 1 month in accordance with local guidelines. For indicative purposes, follow-up of patients should entail approximately 7 patient visits during this period. These visits will take place at average intervals of 3 months, apart from the first visit following TB screening. The first visit following introduction of Humira and final visits are required because of intercurrent events. If treatment with Humira is discontinued, the standard practice is to review the patient after a period of 70 days or 5 half-lives following the intake of the last dose of physician-prescribed treatment. If the physician decides to permanently discontinue Humira before the end of the planned observational period of 13 months, the reason for discontinuation and the new treatment regimen prescribed, if applicable, will be documented. The next routine follow-up visit will be the termination visit for this patient in the PMOS.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Adult patients with active RA, PsA or AS for whom Humira therapy is indicated according to the local product label and who meet the following criteria: * Are newly prescribed Humira therapy (no prior history of treatment with Humira), including patients with infliximab or etanercept treatment history OR * Completed Abbott sponsored interventional clinical trials and are continuing treatment with commercial Humira thereafter.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are being treated or will be treated with drugs at risk of interactions with Humira (see Humira Summary of Product Characteristics) * Patients currently participating in another clinical trial * Patients with diagnosis of active tuberculosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Outcome (Disease Activity Score [DAS28] Decrease ≥1.2) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With RABaseline, 3 monthsDAS28 score was calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) level, and the participant's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07, with scores below 3.2 indicating low disease activity. A positive clinical outcome was defined as a DAS28 decrease by 1.2 or more after 3 months of Humira therapy relative to baseline.
Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and ASBaseline, 3 monthsBASDAI score was calculated using a questionnaire with 6 questions that the participant completes by marking answers on a 10-centimeter visual analog scale with responses that range from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) and measures severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. A positive clinical outcome was defined as a 50% or more decrease in BASDAI score after 3 months of Humira therapy relative to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)Month 13Compliance with the Humira therapy was assessed by the number of missed injections among participants. Documentation of injections missed or delayed by more than 7 days was made at each study visit.
Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyBaseline, 4, 7 and 13 monthsHAQ-DI score was calculated using the standard questionnaire covering 8 category scores: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. Each category score is calculated as the maximum of the scores for the questions within the category. The HAQ-DI is expressed on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do) representing an average score across the category. Scores for at least 6 categories are needed to compute the HAQ score. Changes to lower scores indicate improvement in physical function.
Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From the time participant gave authorization to use and disclose information (or gave informed consent) until 5 half-lives following the last dose of physician-prescribed therapy. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of therapy was 49.0 (16.0) weeks.Tolerability was measured by AEs and SAEs, collected during the course of the study. See the Reported Adverse Event section for details.
Tolerability: Duration of Humira Therapy in Participants Who Discontinued TherapyFrom first treatment until study discontinuation, up to 13 months.Tolerability was evaluated by assessing the mean duration (in weeks) of treatment with Humira until the development of an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation or until early discontinuation for any other reason.
Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)13 monthsParticipant acceptability of self-injection was assessed by the percentage of participants able to appropriately execute self-injection after initial training in the medical center, per investigator's opinion and documentation of necessity of re-training. Those participants able to self-inject also reported their experience of self-injection as convenient or inconvenient.

Countries

Croatia, Hungary, Israel, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Investigational sites in 7 countries participated in this study: Croatia, Hungary, Israel, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine.

Pre-assignment details

Out of 809 participants recruited, 789 were included in the statistical evaluation dataset (SES). 20 participants were not included due to no documented Humira therapy and/or missing primary diagnosis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis
431
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Participants with active psoriatic arthritis
124
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Participants with active ankylosing spondylitis
234
Total789

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Total
Age Continuous54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score
High Disease Activity (BASDAI score ≥4)
NA participants53 participants217 participants270 participants
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score
Low Disease Activity (BASDAI score <4)
NA participants7 participants10 participants17 participants
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score
Missing
NA participants64 participants7 participants71 participants
Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
High Disease Activity (score ≥5.1)
376 participantsNA participantsNA participants376 participants
Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
Low Disease Activity (score ≥2.6 and <3.2)
1 participantsNA participantsNA participants1 participants
Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
Missing
17 participantsNA participantsNA participants17 participants
Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
Moderate Disease Activity (score ≥3.2 and <5.1)
37 participantsNA participantsNA participants37 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
360 Participants61 Participants60 Participants481 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
71 Participants63 Participants174 Participants308 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4310 / 1240 / 2340 / 789
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 4314 / 1245 / 23427 / 789

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and AS

BASDAI score was calculated using a questionnaire with 6 questions that the participant completes by marking answers on a 10-centimeter visual analog scale with responses that range from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) and measures severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. A positive clinical outcome was defined as a 50% or more decrease in BASDAI score after 3 months of Humira therapy relative to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: Clinical Outcome Analysis Set (COS): all participants in the SES, who had a non-missing assessment of clinical outcome at baseline and not less than one follow-up visit with a non-missing assessment of clinical outcome. In addition, patients with unclear visit schedule were excluded from the COS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and ASMissing2 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and ASPositive (BASDAI Decrease ≥50%)24 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and ASNegative (BASDAI Decrease <50% or No Decrease)26 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and ASMissing12 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and ASPositive (BASDAI Decrease ≥50%)138 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Clinical Outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Decrease ≥50%) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With PsA and ASNegative (BASDAI Decrease <50% or No Decrease)66 participants
Primary

Clinical Outcome (Disease Activity Score [DAS28] Decrease ≥1.2) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With RA

DAS28 score was calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) level, and the participant's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07, with scores below 3.2 indicating low disease activity. A positive clinical outcome was defined as a DAS28 decrease by 1.2 or more after 3 months of Humira therapy relative to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: Clinical Outcome Analysis Set (COS): all participants in the SES, who had a non-missing assessment of clinical outcome at baseline and not less than one follow-up visit with a non-missing assessment of clinical outcome. In addition, patients with unclear visit schedule were excluded from the COS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Clinical Outcome (Disease Activity Score [DAS28] Decrease ≥1.2) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With RAMissing56 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Clinical Outcome (Disease Activity Score [DAS28] Decrease ≥1.2) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With RAPositive (DAS28 Decrease ≥1.2)251 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Clinical Outcome (Disease Activity Score [DAS28] Decrease ≥1.2) After 3 Months of Humira Therapy Relative to Baseline in Participants With RANegative (DAS28 Decrease <1.2 or No Decrease)78 participants
Secondary

Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)

Compliance with the Humira therapy was assessed by the number of missed injections among participants. Documentation of injections missed or delayed by more than 7 days was made at each study visit.

Time frame: Month 13

Population: Participants in the SES with evaluable values. SES=participants fulfilling both of the following criteria: a primary diagnosis of specified rheumatic disease (RA, PsA, AS); at least one recorded Humira treatment is documented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)None403 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)1 Injection Missed11 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)2 Injections Missed0 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)3 or More Injections Missed14 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)1 Injection Missed5 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)2 Injections Missed3 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)3 or More Injections Missed4 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)None109 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)2 Injections Missed8 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)1 Injection Missed7 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)3 or More Injections Missed8 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)None210 participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)3 or More Injections Missed26 participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)1 Injection Missed23 participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)None722 participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Compliance With the Humira Administration Schedule at Month 13 (End of Study)2 Injections Missed11 participants
Secondary

Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)

Participant acceptability of self-injection was assessed by the percentage of participants able to appropriately execute self-injection after initial training in the medical center, per investigator's opinion and documentation of necessity of re-training. Those participants able to self-inject also reported their experience of self-injection as convenient or inconvenient.

Time frame: 13 months

Population: Participants in the SES with evaluable values. SES=participants fulfilling both of the following criteria: a primary diagnosis of specified rheumatic disease (RA, PsA, AS); at least one recorded Humira treatment is documented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Convenient86.2 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Inconvenient7.2 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject With Need for Retraining0.5 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject Due to Disease Condition6.1 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Inconvenient0.8 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject With Need for Retraining0.0 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject Due to Disease Condition3.3 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Convenient95.9 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject With Need for Retraining0.4 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Inconvenient6.4 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject Due to Disease Condition0.9 percentage of participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Convenient92.3 percentage of participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject Due to Disease Condition4.1 percentage of participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Inconvenient6.0 percentage of participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Able to Self-inject, Assessed as Convenient89.5 percentage of participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Participant Acceptability of Self-injection at Month 13 (End of Study)Unable to Self-inject With Need for Retraining0.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira Therapy

HAQ-DI score was calculated using the standard questionnaire covering 8 category scores: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. Each category score is calculated as the maximum of the scores for the questions within the category. The HAQ-DI is expressed on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do) representing an average score across the category. Scores for at least 6 categories are needed to compute the HAQ score. Changes to lower scores indicate improvement in physical function.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 7 and 13 months

Population: SES=participants fulfilling both of the following criteria: a primary diagnosis of specified rheumatic disease (RA, PsA, AS); at least one recorded Humira treatment is documented. n=number of participants with evaluable records at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at Baseline (n=314, 81, 106, 501)1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 4 Months (n=232, 56, 76, 364)1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 7 Months (n=211, 49, 63, 323)1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 13 Months (n=174, 47, 31, 252)1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 4 Months (n=232, 56, 76, 364)0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 7 Months (n=211, 49, 63, 323)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 13 Months (n=174, 47, 31, 252)0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at Baseline (n=314, 81, 106, 501)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 7 Months (n=211, 49, 63, 323)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 4 Months (n=232, 56, 76, 364)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 13 Months (n=174, 47, 31, 252)0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at Baseline (n=314, 81, 106, 501)1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 13 Months (n=174, 47, 31, 252)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 4 Months (n=232, 56, 76, 364)1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at Baseline (n=314, 81, 106, 501)1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Physical Function: Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline, and After 4, 7 and 13 Months of Humira TherapyScore at 7 Months (n=211, 49, 63, 323)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Tolerability: Duration of Humira Therapy in Participants Who Discontinued Therapy

Tolerability was evaluated by assessing the mean duration (in weeks) of treatment with Humira until the development of an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation or until early discontinuation for any other reason.

Time frame: From first treatment until study discontinuation, up to 13 months.

Population: Participants in the SES who discontinued therapy and had evaluable records. SES=participants fulfilling both of the following criteria: a primary diagnosis of specified rheumatic disease (RA, PsA, AS); at least one recorded Humira treatment is documented.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Tolerability: Duration of Humira Therapy in Participants Who Discontinued Therapy28.6 weeksStandard Deviation 17.6
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Tolerability: Duration of Humira Therapy in Participants Who Discontinued Therapy29.7 weeksStandard Deviation 19
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Tolerability: Duration of Humira Therapy in Participants Who Discontinued Therapy29.9 weeksStandard Deviation 14.1
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Tolerability: Duration of Humira Therapy in Participants Who Discontinued Therapy29.2 weeksStandard Deviation 16.7
Secondary

Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Tolerability was measured by AEs and SAEs, collected during the course of the study. See the Reported Adverse Event section for details.

Time frame: From the time participant gave authorization to use and disclose information (or gave informed consent) until 5 half-lives following the last dose of physician-prescribed therapy. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of therapy was 49.0 (16.0) weeks.

Population: SES=participants fulfilling both of the following criteria: a primary diagnosis of specified rheumatic disease (RA, PsA, AS); at least one recorded Humira treatment is documented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any SAE18 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any AE78 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any SAE4 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any AE30 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any AE36 participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any SAE5 participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any SAE27 participants
All Participants (RA, PsA, AS)Tolerability: Overall Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Number of Participants with Any AE144 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026