Skip to content

Effect of Febuxostat on Joint Damage in Hyperuricemic Subjects With Early Gout

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Effect of Febuxostat Versus Placebo in Joint Damage in Hyperuricemic Subjects With Early Gout

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01078389
Enrollment
314
Registered
2010-03-02
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2014-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Joint Damage

Keywords

Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid, Drug Therapy

Brief summary

This purpose of this study is to assess the effect of febuxostat, once daily (QD), on joint damage in patients with elevated serum urate levels and gout.

Detailed description

Gout is caused by high levels of uric acid in the body, and is associated with a broad range of comorbidities including heart disease, chronic kidney disease and additional risk factors like obesity and high blood pressure. Hyperuricemia, which is defined as an elevation in serum urate levels, develops into gout when urate crystals form from supersaturated body fluids and settle in joints and other organs. Urate-lowering therapy is used to treat hyperuricemia in patients with gout. Current treatments focus on initiating urate-lowering therapy in hyperuricemic gout patients who have experienced multiple acute gout flares within the past year. However, joint damage caused by crystal deposition may occur much earlier than previously considered. Monosodium urate crystals have been found present in the joints of people with hyperuricemia who do not have any symptoms. The presence of monosodium urate crystals would indicate that after the crystals form, they stay within the joint if serum urate levels are not reduced. Lowering uric acid levels and maintaining them may reduce acute gout flare episodes and possibly halt or reduce joint damage in patients with gout. This study will evaluate the effect of febuxostat on joint damage in hyperuricemic patients with early gout. All patients will receive gout flare prophylaxis for the first 6 months of the study. Gout flares may also be treated throughout the study. A variety of imaging techniques are in use to evaluate gout. Plain radiographs (x-rays), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) will be utilized in this study. The modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde scoring method (named after Drs. Sharp and Van Der Heijde) for assessment of x-rays has been validated in patients with chronic gout and will be used in this study for evaluating erosion and joint space narrowing. Participants are expected to have 15 visits which will include plain radiographic examinations at 5 visits, 3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examinations and 3 DECT procedures at selected sites.

Interventions

DRUGFebuxostat

Febuxostat capsules

DRUGPlacebo for Febuxostat

Febuxostat placebo-matching capsules

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participant, or the participant's legally acceptable representative, signs a written informed consent form/Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) Authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures. * Must have a history or presence of gout defined as having one or more of the following conditions of the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) preliminary criteria for the diagnosis of gout * A tophus proven to contain urate crystals by chemical or polarized light microscopic means and/or * Characteristic urate crystals in the joint fluid and/or * History of at least 6 of the following clinical, laboratory and x-ray phenomena\*: \*More than one flare criteria will be excluded for the purpose of this study if the participant has a history of only a single acute gout flare. * More than one attack of acute arthritis\* * maximum inflammation developed within 1 day * monoarticular arthritis * redness observed over joints * first metatarsophalangeal joint painful or swollen * unilateral first metatarsophalangeal joint attack * unilateral tarsal joint attack * tophus (proven or suspected) * hyperuricemia * asymmetric swelling within a joint on x-ray * sub-cortical cysts without erosions on x-ray * joint fluid culture negative for organisms during attacks * \*More than one flare criteria will be excluded for the purpose of this study if the participant has a history of only a single acute gout flare. * Is male and at least 18 years of age OR; * Female ≥45 years of age and at least 2 years post-menopausal AND has a Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level ≥40 IU/L OR * Female receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT) must be ≥55 years of age (FSH level not required). * Has hyperuricemia defined as serum Uric Acid (sUA) level ≥7.0 mg/dL at Screening. * Has a history of ≤2 (1 or 2) flares. In participants with a history of 2 flares, must have had only one flare in any 12 month period. The primary affected joint will be based on the location of the first gout flare which must be located within right or left metatarsophalangeal (MTP), interphalangeal (IP), ankle, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), Proximal Inter-Phalangeal (PIP), or distal inter-phalangeal (DIP) joints prior to Screening. * Is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements, including scheduled clinic procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Previously on urate-lowering therapy (allopurinol, febuxostat or probenecid). * Has secondary hyperuricemia (eg due to myeloproliferative disorder or organ transplant). * Has a history of xanthinuria. * Has a known hypersensitivity to any component of the febuxostat formulation. * Has rheumatoid arthritis. * Has active peptic ulcer disease. * Has a history of cancer, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin, which has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study medication. * Has experienced either a myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke within 90 days prior to the Screening visit. * Has alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values greater than 2.0 the upper limit of normal during the Screening period. * Has a significant medical condition and/or conditions that would interfere with the treatment, safety or compliance with the protocol at the discretion of the Investigator. * Has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse with 5 years prior to the Screening visit. Participant consumes \>14 alcoholic beverages/week. * Has received any investigational medicinal product within 30 days prior to the Screening visit. In addition, the participant has been previously randomized into this study and received at least one dose of double blind study drug treatment. * Has an estimated Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula by the Central Laboratory. * Has a serum creatinine at Screening greater than 2.0 mg/dL. * Has a known history of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus. * Is a study site employee, or is an immediate family member (ie, spouse, parent, child, and sibling) of a study site employee involved in conduct of this study. * Is unable to understand verbal or written English or any other language for which a certified translation of the approved informed consent form is available. * Is required to take excluded medications. * Magnetic Resolution Imaging: * Has a known hypersensitivity to gadolinium * Has history of severe asthma * Has an electronically, magnetically or mechanically activated implanted device * Has any object that could present a potential hazard or interfere with MRI interpretation secondary to the artifact (i.e. metallic foreign bodies) * Has a significant medical condition considered by the Investigator (or radiologist) to interfere with the participant's ability to receive gadolinium (eg Sickle cell anemia).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Radiographs (X-rays) of this single joint in the hands or feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst). Individual erosion scores were summed to a maximum erosion score of 5 for joints in the hands and 10 for joints in the feet. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline and Month 24Radiographs (X-rays) of 40 joints in the hands and 12 joints in the feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) for a total erosion score range of 0 to 320. Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed using a 5-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 4=absence of joint space, presumptive evidence of ankyloses, or complete luxation (worst) for a total JSN score range of 0 to 208. The Erosion Score and the JSN Score were combined for a total possible score of 0 to 528. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline and Month 24Radiographs (X-rays) of 40 joints in the hands and 12 joints in the feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) for a total erosion score range of 0 to 320. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was evaluated using the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Score (RAMRIS). Bone erosion in the proximal and distal location were each assessed in the affected joint using an 11-point scale where 0=no erosion (best) to 10=91-100% bone eroded (worst) for a bone erosion score range of 0 to 20. Bone marrow edema in the proximal and distal location were each assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no edema (best) to 3=67-100% edema (worst) for a bone marrow edema (BME) score range of 0 to 6. Synovitis was assessed in the affected joint using a 4-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 3=severe (worst). Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Radiographs (X-rays) of the single affected joint in the hands or feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) and Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed using a 5-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 4=absence of joint space, presumptive evidence of ankyloses, or complete luxation (worst). The Erosion Score and the JSN Score were summed for the Total Score. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 65 investigative sites in the United States from 10 March 2010 to 3 September 2013.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of gout were enrolled equally in 1 of 2 treatment groups, once a day placebo or febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg based on serum urate levels.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg (based on serum urate levels at Day 14), capsules, orally, once daily for up to 24 Months.
157
Placebo
Febuxostat placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 24 Months.
157
Total314

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event106
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2323
Overall StudyMajor Protocol Deviation20
Overall StudyOther92
Overall StudyVoluntary Withdrawal2036

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous51.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04
Age, Customized
45 to <65 years
85 participants99 participants184 participants
Age, Customized
<45 years
49 participants42 participants91 participants
Age, Customized
≥65 years
23 participants16 participants39 participants
Alcohol History
Current Drinker
103 participants106 participants209 participants
Alcohol History
Ex-Drinker
17 participants16 participants33 participants
Alcohol History
Never Drank
37 participants35 participants72 participants
BMI Categories
<25 kg/m^2
11 participants11 participants22 participants
BMI Categories
25 to <30 kg/m^2
37 participants46 participants83 participants
BMI Categories
≥30 kg/m^2
109 participants100 participants209 participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)33.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
32.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.23
32.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.32
Height176.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.22
176.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.36
176.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.79
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
8 participants10 participants18 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
25 participants24 participants49 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
26 participants36 participants62 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
131 participants121 participants252 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
119 participants121 participants240 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
157 participants157 participants314 participants
Renal History (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD])
Mildly Impaired MDRD
105 participants115 participants220 participants
Renal History (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD])
Moderately Impaired MDRD
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Renal History (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD])
Normal MDRD
49 participants40 participants89 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
143 Participants145 Participants288 Participants
Smoking History
Current Smoker
32 participants25 participants57 participants
Smoking History
Ex-Smoker
41 participants38 participants79 participants
Smoking History
Never Smoked
84 participants94 participants178 participants
Weight102.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.88
100.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2
101.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.04

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
73 / 15767 / 157
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 15711 / 157

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected Joint

The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Radiographs (X-rays) of this single joint in the hands or feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst). Individual erosion scores were summed to a maximum erosion score of 5 for joints in the hands and 10 for joints in the feet. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available for analysis and missing values at Month 24 imputed using linear extrapolation are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline0.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.444
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointChange from Baseline at Month 240.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline0.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.438
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointChange from Baseline at Month 240.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.248
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 24p-value: 0.472Ranked Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet Radiographs

Radiographs (X-rays) of 40 joints in the hands and 12 joints in the feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) for a total erosion score range of 0 to 320. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline0.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsChange from Baseline at Month 24 (n=78,74)0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.709
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.473
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsChange from Baseline at Month 24 (n=78,74)0.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.969
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 24p-value: 0.389Ranked ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected Joint

The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Radiographs (X-rays) of the single affected joint in the hands or feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) and Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed using a 5-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 4=absence of joint space, presumptive evidence of ankyloses, or complete luxation (worst). The Erosion Score and the JSN Score were summed for the Total Score. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline0.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.057
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected JointChange from Baseline at Month 24(n=81,76)0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.602
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline0.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.022
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected JointChange from Baseline at Month 24(n=81,76)0.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.361
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 24p-value: 0.122Ranked ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet Radiographs

Radiographs (X-rays) of 40 joints in the hands and 12 joints in the feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) for a total erosion score range of 0 to 320. Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed using a 5-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 4=absence of joint space, presumptive evidence of ankyloses, or complete luxation (worst) for a total JSN score range of 0 to 208. The Erosion Score and the JSN Score were combined for a total possible score of 0 to 528. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline4.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.707
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsChange from Baseline at Month 24 (n=78,74)0.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.447
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline4.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.631
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsChange from Baseline at Month 24 (n=78,74)0.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.746
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 24p-value: 0.548Ranked ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected Joint

The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was evaluated using the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Score (RAMRIS). Bone erosion in the proximal and distal location were each assessed in the affected joint using an 11-point scale where 0=no erosion (best) to 10=91-100% bone eroded (worst) for a bone erosion score range of 0 to 20. Bone marrow edema in the proximal and distal location were each assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no edema (best) to 3=67-100% edema (worst) for a bone marrow edema (BME) score range of 0 to 6. Synovitis was assessed in the affected joint using a 4-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 3=severe (worst). Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointSynovitis:Baseline (BL)(n=82,76)1.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.782
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointSynovitis:Change from Baseline (n=75,67)-0.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.713
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointErosion (Distal+Proximal):Change from BL(n=79,69)-0.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.702
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointErosion (Distal+Proximal):Baseline (n=84,77)1.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.935
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointEdema (Distal+Proximal):Baseline (BL) (n=81,75)0.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.022
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointEdema (Distal+Proximal):Change from BL(n=77,66)-0.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.916
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointEdema (Distal+Proximal):Baseline (BL) (n=81,75)0.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.919
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointSynovitis:Baseline (BL)(n=82,76)1.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.687
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointErosion (Distal+Proximal):Baseline (n=84,77)1.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.916
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointEdema (Distal+Proximal):Change from BL(n=77,66)-0.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.962
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointErosion (Distal+Proximal):Change from BL(n=79,69)0.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.475
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointSynovitis:Change from Baseline (n=75,67)-0.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.531
Comparison: Synovitis: Change from Baseline at Month 24p-value: <0.001Ranked ANCOVA
Comparison: Erosion(Distal+Proximal): Change from Baseline at Month 24p-value: 0.634Ranked ANCOVA
Comparison: Edema(Distal+Proximal): Change from Baseline at Month 24p-value: 0.307Ranked ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026