Skip to content

A Phase I/II, a Single Arm, Open-label Study of Ofatumumab (GSK1841157) in Patients With Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

A Phase I/II, a Single Arm, Open-label Study of Ofatumumab (GSK1841157) in Patients With Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01077622
Enrollment
10
Registered
2010-03-01
Start date
2009-09-01
Completion date
2011-04-01
Last updated
2017-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic

Brief summary

Ofatumumab is an IgG1κ fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically recognizes an epitope on the human differentiation antigen CD20 molecule. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that ofatumumab depletes CD20 positive (CD20+) B cells through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), which results in the antitumour effect. This is an open-label study to evaluate safety, tolerability, efficacy and PK profile of ofatumumab monotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Ofatumumab will be administered intravenously at the first dose of 300mg followed by 7 weekly infusions of 2000mg, followed by 4 infusions of 2000mg at every 4 weeks. Primary objective of the study (Part A) is to evaluate tolerability, and the study (Part B) is to assess overall response rate in CLL population. 10 subjects will be enrolled into this study. Subjects will be followed for 48 weeks.

Detailed description

Ofatumumab is an IgG1κ fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically recognizes an epitope on the human differentiation antigen CD20 molecule. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that ofatumumab depletes CD20 positive (CD20+) B cells through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), which results in the antitumour effect. This is an open-label study to evaluate safety, tolerability, efficacy and PK profile of ofatumumab monotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Ofatumumab will be administered intravenously at the first dose of 300mg followed by 7 weekly infusions of 2000mg, followed by 4 infusions of 2000mg at every 4 weeks. Primary objective of the study (Part A) is to evaluate tolerability, and the study (Part B) is to assess overall response rate in CLL population. 10 subjects will be enrolled into this study. Subjects will be followed for 48 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGofatumumab 100 mg, 1000 mg / vial

ofatumumab , 300mg followed by 7 weekly infusions 2000 mg, followed by 4 monthly infusions 2000mg

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects eligible for enrolment in the study must meet all of the following criteria at the time of screening: * Patients who gave consent to this study participation and signed into informed consent form. * Previously treated(Patients who received at least one prior CLL therapy and have either relapsed or have refractory disease, both requiring therapy.) CLL with at least 5 x 109 B lymphocytes/ L (5000/μL). The diagnosis of CLL requires CD5, CD19, CD20 and CD23 positivity, according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) guidelines \[Hallek, 2008\]. * Laboratory test values meet the following criteria which indicate that patients have sufficient physiological functions; Neutrophils:1≥ 500 /mm3 ALT ≤ 2.5 times upper local normal limit Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times upper local normal limit Total bilirubin≤ 1.5 times upper local normal limit 1:Patients should not receive any hematopoietic cytokine such as G-CSF preparations within 1 week before screening laboratory test for neutrophil counting. \- Patients who passed the following periods from the last anti-cancer treatments at the time of screening: At least 4 weeks after anti-cancer chemotherapy. At least 4 weeks after anti-cancer radiotherapy. At least 4 weeks after glucocorticoids treatment for CLL unless ≤ 10 mg of prednisolone /day. At least 12 weeks after radio-immunotherapy and/or antibody therapy. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 0, 1, or 2. * Life expectancy more than 24 weeks after screening test. * Aged ≥ 20 (at the time of signing informed consent). * Patients possible to stay at the trial site for at least two days (the day of the first infusion and a subsequent day).

Exclusion criteria

A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria is met: * Active malignancy which needs therapy with anti-cancer drug, except for CLL. * Known Richter's transformation. * Previous autologous stem cell transplantation, within 24 weeks prior to screening. * Previous allogenic stem cell transplantation. * Known CNS involvement. * History of significant cerebrovascular disease. * Current cardiac disease requiring medical treatment (e.g. atrial flutter treated with acetylsalicylic acid and beta blocking agents). * Chronic or active infectious disease requiring systemic (intravenous or oral) treatment such as, but not limited to, chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis and tuberculosis. * Suspected/known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity to components of ofatumumab. * Patients previously treated with ofatumumab. * Positive serology test for any of HBsAg, anti-HBcAb or anti-HCVAb. If only anti-HBcAb results is positive, HBV-DNA test will be performed. If HBV-DNA results in negative, the patient is eligible. * HIV positivity. * Pregnant or lactating women. * Women of childbearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception during the study and one year after the last dose of ofatumumab, and male patients not willing to use adequate contraception during the study. Adequate contraception is defined as follows but not limited to; Abstinence. Oral Contraceptive (exclude oral progesterone alone). Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS). Male partner sterilization. Double barrier method: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical / vault caps) plus spermicidal agent (gel / film) etc. * Use of an investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to screening. * Current participation in any other clinical study. * Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to, renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral or psychiatric disease. * Patients who an investigator (or sub investigator) judges ineligible to this study. Note; Child-bearing potential: a woman with functioning ovaries and uterine, or no documented sterility (i.e., a woman with functioning ovaries who have a current documented tubal ligation, women who have had a hysterectomy, women who are post-menopausal, or women who have had both ovaries surgically removed).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants (Par.) With Objective Response (OR), Defined as Complete Remission (CR), CR Incomplete (CRi), Partial Remission (PR), and Nodular PR (nPR) as Assessed by a Safety and Evaluation Review Committee (SERC) and the InvestigatorUp to Week 48Par. were evaluated in accordance with the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group. CR: no lymphadenopathy (Ly)/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>=1.5\*10\^9/liter (L), platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, hemoglobin \>11.0 grams/deciliter, lymphocytes (LC) \<4.0\*10\^9/L, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to chronic lymphocytic leukemia but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen, etc. nPR: nodules in BM.
Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)Up to Week 8A DLT was defined as the following toxicological findings, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (AE) v3.0: any treatment-related Grade (G) \>=3 non-hematotoxic AE, occurrence of G3 infusion reaction (treatment-related AE) at the day of infusion in a participant who received pre-medication or appropriate management during infusion (glucocorticoid) (the severity of the AE must have remained as \>= G3 until the next day); and any of following: \>= G4 hematotoxic treatment-related AEs (neutropenia lasting 7 days or more, febrile neutropenia).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Response as Assessed by a SERCUp to Week 48Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of PR or better until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any reason in participants with PR or better.
Overall SurvivalUp to Week 48Overall survival is defined as the time from the first infusion of investigational drug to death due to any cause.
Time to Response as Assessed by a SERCUp to Week 48Time to response is defined as the time from the first infusion of investigational drug to the first response (PR or better).
Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy as Assessed by a SERCUp to Week 48Time to next CLL therapy is defined as the time from the first infusion of investigational drug to the first administration of the next CLL treatment. CLL therapy includes anti-cancer chemotherapy, anti-cancer radiotherapy, radio-immunotherapy, and antibody therapy.
Mean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of hemoglobin.
Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of lymphocytes.
Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48Bone marrow (BM) aspiration was performed, and the bone marrow smears were prepared for the assessment of lymphocytes in the BM.
Mean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of total neutrophils.
Mean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of platelets.
Percentage of Bone Marrow Infiltration at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48SERC assessed bone marrow infiltration with the bone marrow smears of participants provided by trial sites.
Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48SERC assessed lymphocytes based on the data provided by trial sites.
Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48SERC assessed lymphocytes in the bone marrow (BM) based on the data with BM smears provided by trial sites.
Mean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total ANC) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48SERC assessed total neutrophils based on the data provided by trial sites.
Number of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48CD19+ CD20+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.
Number of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48CD20+ CD23+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.
Number of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48CD19+ CD23+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.
Number of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48CD19+ CD5+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.
Number of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48CD20+ CD5+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.
Number of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48CD23+ CD5+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.
Ratio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaDay 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Peripheral blood Ig kappa and Ig lambda were measured using flow cytometry. Abnormality of a ratio of Ig kappa and Ig lambda indicates clonality of lymphocytes. A normal range of this parameter is between 1.0 and 3.2.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Night sweats are one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had night sweats at BL, and still had night sweats at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had night sweats at BL, but did not have night sweats at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Weight loss is one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had weight loss at BL, and still had weight loss at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had weight loss at BL, but did not have weight loss at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Fever is one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had fever at BL, and still had fever at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had fever at BL, but did not have fever at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48Extreme fatigue is one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had extreme fatigue at BL, and still had extreme fatigue at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had extreme fatigue at BL, but did not have extreme fatigue at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48Baseline and Weeks 8, 24, and 48Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured in the blood samples of the participants.
Number of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48Screening; Weeks 24 and 48HAHA are indicators of immunogenicity to ofatumumab.
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48ECOG PS is used to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and to determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The grades for the scale range from 0 (fully active) to 4 (completely disabled), with increasing severity.
Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of OfatumumabDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hour (hr) before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 minutes (min), 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of OfatumumabWeeks 7 and 24Blood sampling at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), 120 hr (5 days), 168 hr (7 days), and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) Following Ofatumumab AdministrationDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Half-life (t1/2) of OfatumumabDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24t1/2 of ofatumumab is the time required for the plasma concentration of ofatumumab to decrease by half. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time t (AUC[0-t]) for OfatumumabDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24AUC(0-t) was evaluated from the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last measurable time point (time t). Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 168 hr (AUC[0-168]) for Ofatumumab at Week 7Week 7Blood sampling at Week 7 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), 120 hr (5 days), 168 hr (7 days), and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 672 hr (AUC[0-672]) for Ofatumumab at Week 24Week 24Blood sampling at Week 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), 120 hr (5 days), 168 hr (7 days), and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) for OfatumumabDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Volume of Distribution (Vz) During the Terminal Phase for OfatumumabDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24Vz for ofatumumab was calculated as a ratio of the amount of ofatumumab in the body during the terminal phase to the plasma concentration during the terminal phase. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) for OfatumumabDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24Vss for ofatumumab was calculated as a ratio of the amount of ofatumumab in the body in equilibrium conditions to steady-state plasma concentrations. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Mean Residence Time (MRTinf) of OfatumumabDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24MRTinf is the average amount of time that ofatumumab spends in the body. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Clearance (CL) of Ofatumumab From PlasmaDay 1; Weeks 7 and 24CL of ofatumumab from plasma of participants was evaluated. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by a SERCUp to Week 48PFS is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the first documented sign of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause (whichever occurs earlier).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum Hemolytic Complement Titer at Weeks 36 and 48: CH50Weeks 36 and 48The CH50 is the serum complement to lyse 50% of sensitized red blood cells; it's is a marker of complement activation. A high CH50 level suggests evidence for complement activation, whereas a low CH50 level suggests lack of complement activation.

Countries

Japan, South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ofatumumab
Participants received intravenous ofatumumab at an initial dose of 300 milligrams (mg). One week after the initial dose, participants received 7 infusions of 2000 mg at weekly intervals. Five weeks after the last 2000 mg infusion, participants received 4 infusions of 2000 mg at 4-week intervals.
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOfatumumab
Age, Continuous66.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.87
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)

A DLT was defined as the following toxicological findings, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (AE) v3.0: any treatment-related Grade (G) \>=3 non-hematotoxic AE, occurrence of G3 infusion reaction (treatment-related AE) at the day of infusion in a participant who received pre-medication or appropriate management during infusion (glucocorticoid) (the severity of the AE must have remained as \>= G3 until the next day); and any of following: \>= G4 hematotoxic treatment-related AEs (neutropenia lasting 7 days or more, febrile neutropenia).

Time frame: Up to Week 8

Population: All Subjects Population: all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. The first 3 participants enrolled in the study were evaluated for DLT according to study design.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants (Par.) With Objective Response (OR), Defined as Complete Remission (CR), CR Incomplete (CRi), Partial Remission (PR), and Nodular PR (nPR) as Assessed by a Safety and Evaluation Review Committee (SERC) and the Investigator

Par. were evaluated in accordance with the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group. CR: no lymphadenopathy (Ly)/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>=1.5\*10\^9/liter (L), platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, hemoglobin \>11.0 grams/deciliter, lymphocytes (LC) \<4.0\*10\^9/L, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to chronic lymphocytic leukemia but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen, etc. nPR: nodules in BM.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: All Subjects Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabPercentage of Participants (Par.) With Objective Response (OR), Defined as Complete Remission (CR), CR Incomplete (CRi), Partial Remission (PR), and Nodular PR (nPR) as Assessed by a Safety and Evaluation Review Committee (SERC) and the InvestigatorSERC70 Percentage of participants
OfatumumabPercentage of Participants (Par.) With Objective Response (OR), Defined as Complete Remission (CR), CR Incomplete (CRi), Partial Remission (PR), and Nodular PR (nPR) as Assessed by a Safety and Evaluation Review Committee (SERC) and the InvestigatorInvestigator70 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [34.8, 93.3]
95% CI: [34.8, 93.3]
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 168 hr (AUC[0-168]) for Ofatumumab at Week 7

Blood sampling at Week 7 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), 120 hr (5 days), 168 hr (7 days), and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Week 7

Population: PK Parameter Population

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 168 hr (AUC[0-168]) for Ofatumumab at Week 7200181.8 hr*mcg/mL
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 672 hr (AUC[0-672]) for Ofatumumab at Week 24

Blood sampling at Week 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), 120 hr (5 days), 168 hr (7 days), and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 672 hr (AUC[0-672]) for Ofatumumab at Week 24216678.1 hr*mcg/mL
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) for Ofatumumab

Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) for OfatumumabDay 1, n=81506.3 hr*mcg/mL
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) for OfatumumabWeek 7, n=8716924.6 hr*mcg/mL
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) for OfatumumabWeek 24, n=7302326.7 hr*mcg/mL
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time t (AUC[0-t]) for Ofatumumab

AUC(0-t) was evaluated from the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last measurable time point (time t). Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time t (AUC[0-t]) for OfatumumabDay 1, n=81345.1 hr*mcg/mL
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time t (AUC[0-t]) for OfatumumabWeek 7, n=8587711.3 hr*mcg/mL
OfatumumabArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time t (AUC[0-t]) for OfatumumabWeek 24, n=7283751.4 hr*mcg/mL
Secondary

Clearance (CL) of Ofatumumab From Plasma

CL of ofatumumab from plasma of participants was evaluated. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabClearance (CL) of Ofatumumab From PlasmaDay 1, n=8199.157 mL/hr
OfatumumabClearance (CL) of Ofatumumab From PlasmaWeek 7, n=89.991 mL/hr
OfatumumabClearance (CL) of Ofatumumab From PlasmaWeek 24, n=79.230 mL/hr
Secondary

Duration of Response as Assessed by a SERC

Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of PR or better until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any reason in participants with PR or better.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: All Subjects Population: only those participants classified as responders for the assessment of objective response were evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OfatumumabDuration of Response as Assessed by a SERCNA Weeks
Secondary

Half-life (t1/2) of Ofatumumab

t1/2 of ofatumumab is the time required for the plasma concentration of ofatumumab to decrease by half. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabHalf-life (t1/2) of OfatumumabWeek 7, n=8331.275 hr
OfatumumabHalf-life (t1/2) of OfatumumabDay 1, n=89.585 hr
OfatumumabHalf-life (t1/2) of OfatumumabWeek 24, n=7300.354 hr
Secondary

Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ofatumumab

Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hour (hr) before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 minutes (min), 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population: all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug, and in whom PK data were available and allowed parameter estimations. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabMaximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of OfatumumabDay 1, n=869.33 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
OfatumumabMaximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of OfatumumabWeek 7, n=81670.36 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
OfatumumabMaximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of OfatumumabWeek 24, n=7864.93 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48

Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured in the blood samples of the participants.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 24, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgA, Week 8, n=90.014 g/LStandard Deviation 0.1337
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgA, Week 24, n=9-0.023 g/LStandard Deviation 0.0865
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgA, Week 48, n=70.086 g/LStandard Deviation 0.2889
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgG, Week 8, n=90.647 g/LStandard Deviation 0.9004
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgG, Week 24, n=10-0.150 g/LStandard Deviation 0.8641
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgG, Week 48, n=7-0.587 g/LStandard Deviation 0.968
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgM, Week 8, n=7-0.063 g/LStandard Deviation 0.1482
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgM, Week 24, n=8-0.058 g/LStandard Deviation 0.1831
OfatumumabMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM at Weeks 8, 24, and 48IgM, Week 48, n=5-0.108 g/LStandard Deviation 0.1809
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the Investigator

Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of hemoglobin.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 8, n=10119.8 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 20.35
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 12, n=10122.6 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 20.55
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 16, n=10125.6 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 21.08
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1, n=10115.7 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 15.44
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 1, n=10116.0 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 15.46
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 2, n=10117.4 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 16.37
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 3, n=10117.0 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 18.68
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 4, n=10116.1 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 18.53
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 5, n=10116.4 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 17.83
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 6, n=10118.1 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 16.25
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 7, n=10118.4 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 20.06
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 20, n=10127.8 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 21.81
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 24, n=10127.8 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 22.31
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 28, n=9126.2 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 21.49
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 36, n=9128.1 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 20.91
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Hemoglobin at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 48, n=7137.1 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 11.01
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERC

SERC assessed lymphocytes in the bone marrow (BM) based on the data with BM smears provided by trial sites.

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 48, n=523.26 percentage of lymphocytes in BMStandard Deviation 9.651
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 8, n=857.90 percentage of lymphocytes in BMStandard Deviation 23.492
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 16, n=538.04 percentage of lymphocytes in BMStandard Deviation 14.647
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 24, n=736.96 percentage of lymphocytes in BMStandard Deviation 14.961
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 36, n=629.13 percentage of lymphocytes in BMStandard Deviation 17.379
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the Investigator

Bone marrow (BM) aspiration was performed, and the bone marrow smears were prepared for the assessment of lymphocytes in the BM.

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 36, n=630.00 Percentage of lymphocytes in the BMStandard Deviation 17.03
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 8, n=857.90 Percentage of lymphocytes in the BMStandard Deviation 23.492
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 16, n=538.04 Percentage of lymphocytes in the BMStandard Deviation 14.647
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 24, n=736.96 Percentage of lymphocytes in the BMStandard Deviation 14.961
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes as a Percentage in the Bone Marrow at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 48, n=523.26 Percentage of lymphocytes in the BMStandard Deviation 9.651
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERC

SERC assessed lymphocytes based on the data provided by trial sites.

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 8, n=82.0120 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.03095
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 16, n=61.7975 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.05163
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 24, n=71.8784 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.56286
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 36, n=62.1213 GI/LStandard Deviation 2.6556
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 48, n=51.6284 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.70741
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the Investigator

Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of lymphocytes.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 7, n=102.4792 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.20853
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 8, n=102.1515 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.94237
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 12, n=101.8058 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.95653
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1, n=1042.6038 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 41.66244
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 1, n=1029.6861 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 33.19072
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 2, n=108.2290 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 6.76264
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 3, n=106.9065 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 6.81649
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 4, n=104.0446 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 2.70652
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 5, n=102.9535 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.47227
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 6, n=102.8063 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.43681
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 16, n=101.9575 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.0988
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 20, n=101.8388 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.22494
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 24, n=101.8500 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.33979
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 28, n=91.6405 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 1.05653
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 36, n=93.5754 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 5.38456
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Lymphocytes at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 48, n=71.5099 Giga (10^9) per liter (GI/L)Standard Deviation 0.72285
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the Investigator

Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of platelets.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 36, n=9143.0 GI/LStandard Deviation 43.19
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 48, n=7130.7 GI/LStandard Deviation 53.7
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1, n=10106.5 GI/LStandard Deviation 31.69
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 1, n=10104.0 GI/LStandard Deviation 45.45
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 2, n=10100.1 GI/LStandard Deviation 37.21
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 3, n=10118.3 GI/LStandard Deviation 40.9
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 4, n=10114.9 GI/LStandard Deviation 46.26
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 5, n=10111.5 GI/LStandard Deviation 47.11
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 6, n=10115.7 GI/LStandard Deviation 49.86
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 7, n=10121.4 GI/LStandard Deviation 54.65
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 8, n=10127.7 GI/LStandard Deviation 64.44
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 12, n=10120.1 GI/LStandard Deviation 46.29
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 16, n=10124.3 GI/LStandard Deviation 46
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 20, n=10134.0 GI/LStandard Deviation 41.66
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 24, n=10136.6 GI/LStandard Deviation 44.14
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Platelet Count at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 28, n=9128.9 GI/LStandard Deviation 41.64
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the Investigator

Blood samples of the participants were collected for the assessment of total neutrophils.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1, n=104.3103 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.9188
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 1, n=103.9316 GI/LStandard Deviation 2.37732
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 2, n=103.2158 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.62185
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 3, n=102.7873 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.16531
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 4, n=102.4570 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.22611
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 5, n=102.3908 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.9925
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 6, n=102.1747 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.00743
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 7, n=102.1612 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.22393
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 8, n=102.2136 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.22993
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 12, n=101.9814 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.90783
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 16, n=101.9915 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.00746
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 20, n=102.2165 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.29881
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 24, n=102.3093 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.1884
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 28, n=92.2069 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.57995
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 36, n=92.3482 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.04228
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC]) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 48, n=73.0431 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.6758
Secondary

Mean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total ANC) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERC

SERC assessed total neutrophils based on the data provided by trial sites.

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total ANC) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 8, n=82.3159 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.35507
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total ANC) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 16, n=62.5803 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.04075
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total ANC) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 24, n=72.8706 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.39803
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total ANC) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 36, n=62.1957 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.89898
OfatumumabMean Laboratory Data for Total Neutrophils (Total ANC) at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 48, n=52.6242 GI/LStandard Deviation 1.05912
Secondary

Mean Residence Time (MRTinf) of Ofatumumab

MRTinf is the average amount of time that ofatumumab spends in the body. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabMean Residence Time (MRTinf) of OfatumumabDay 1, n=818.417 hr
OfatumumabMean Residence Time (MRTinf) of OfatumumabWeek 24, n=7463.945 hr
OfatumumabMean Residence Time (MRTinf) of OfatumumabWeek 7, n=8478.105 hr
Secondary

Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Ofatumumab

Blood sampling at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), 120 hr (5 days), 168 hr (7 days), and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabMinimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of OfatumumabWeek 7832.17 mcg/mL
OfatumumabMinimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of OfatumumabWeek 24122.08 mcg/mL
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48

HAHA are indicators of immunogenicity to ofatumumab.

Time frame: Screening; Weeks 24 and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabNumber of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48Positive at Screening, n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48Negative at Screening, n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48Positive at Week 24, n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48Negative at Week 24, n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48Negative at Week 48, n=77 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants Who Tested Positive/Negative for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Screening and at Weeks 24 and 48Positive at Week 48, n=70 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS is used to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and to determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The grades for the scale range from 0 (fully active) to 4 (completely disabled), with increasing severity.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 1, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 1, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 2, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 2, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 3, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 3, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 5, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 5, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 6, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 6, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 8, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 8, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 12, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 12, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 20, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 20, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 24, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 24, deteriorated; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28, improved; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28, deteriorated; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 36, improved; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 36, deteriorated; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 48, improved; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4, improved; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 48, deteriorated; n=70 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated Weeks

Extreme fatigue is one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had extreme fatigue at BL, and still had extreme fatigue at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had extreme fatigue at BL, but did not have extreme fatigue at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, no; n=99 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, no; n=99 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, no; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, no; n=77 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Extreme Fatigue at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, no; n=100 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated Weeks

Fever is one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had fever at BL, and still had fever at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had fever at BL, but did not have fever at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, no; n=99 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, no; n=99 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, no; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Fever at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, no; n=77 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated Weeks

Night sweats are one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had night sweats at BL, and still had night sweats at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had night sweats at BL, but did not have night sweats at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, yes; n=91 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, no; n=98 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, yes; n=91 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, no; n=98 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, no; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, no; n=77 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, no; n=109 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, yes; n=101 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Night Sweats at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, yes; n=100 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated Weeks

Weight loss is one of the clinical characteristics of CLL. B symptoms are systemic symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and extreme fatigue, which can be associated with CLL. Participants who had weight loss at BL, and still had weight loss at Week 1, for example, are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, yes category. Participants who had weight loss at BL, but did not have weight loss at Week 1 are represented in the BL, yes; Week 1, no category.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 5, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 6, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 6, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 7, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 7, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 8, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 8, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 12, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 12, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 16, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 16, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 20, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 2, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 3, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 20, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 3, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 4, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 4, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 5, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 24, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 36, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 36, no; n=99 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 1, no; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 48, no; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, no; n=77 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, no; n=1010 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 1, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 24, yes; n=100 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 28, no; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, yes; n=90 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 28, no; n=99 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, no; Week 48, yes; n=70 participants
OfatumumabNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline (BL) in Weight Loss at the Indicated WeeksBL, yes; Week 2, no; n=100 participants
Secondary

Number of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ Cells

CD19+ CD23+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsDay 1, n=1023.8046 GI/LStandard Deviation 28.66936
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 1, n=917.4769 GI/LStandard Deviation 22.30923
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 2, n=104.6972 GI/LStandard Deviation 6.14672
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 4, n=101.8230 GI/LStandard Deviation 2.49206
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 6, n=100.4858 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.55687
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 8, n=90.2252 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.25765
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 12, n=100.2122 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.26787
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 16, n=100.1961 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.34108
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 20, n=100.1464 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.33132
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 24, n=100.1330 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.23961
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 28, n=90.1123 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.2613
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 36, n=80.2687 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.71524
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD23+ CellsWeek 48, n=70.0886 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.11398
Secondary

Number of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ Cells

CD19+ CD5+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsDay 1, n=1036.0022 GI/LStandard Deviation 36.6491
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 1, n=927.9129 GI/LStandard Deviation 32.61649
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 2, n=105.4212 GI/LStandard Deviation 6.55286
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 4, n=102.2158 GI/LStandard Deviation 2.62609
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 6, n=100.5799 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.63484
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 8, n=90.2338 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.27058
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 12, n=100.2420 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.32493
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 16, n=100.2425 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.38048
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 20, n=100.1943 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.38386
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 24, n=100.1719 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.29401
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 28, n=90.1449 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.25617
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 36, n=80.2858 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.73543
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD19+ CD5+ CellsWeek 48, n=70.1200 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.14511
Secondary

Number of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ Cells

CD20+ CD23+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 4, n=100.0685 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.14483
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsDay 1, n=1019.9791 GI/LStandard Deviation 27.06441
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 1, n=98.9466 GI/LStandard Deviation 21.59662
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 2, n=100.0319 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.0401
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 6, n=100.0099 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.01869
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 8, n=90.0047 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.01131
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 12, n=100.0080 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.0227
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 16, n=100.0111 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.03162
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 20, n=100.0048 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.01277
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 24, n=100.0057 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.01553
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 28, n=90.0002 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.0004
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 36, n=80.2147 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.60466
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD23+ CellsWeek 48, n=70.0773 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.09355
Secondary

Number of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ Cells

CD20+ CD5+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsDay 1, n=1032.9606 GI/LStandard Deviation 39.50102
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 1, n=919.3999 GI/LStandard Deviation 35.56146
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 2, n=100.0134 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.01696
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 4, n=100.0493 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.13576
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 6, n=100.0024 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00185
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 8, n=90.0029 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00136
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 12, n=100.0020 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.0016
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 16, n=100.0062 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00907
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 20, n=100.0026 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00147
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 24, n=100.0036 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00258
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 28, n=90.0022 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00214
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 36, n=80.2597 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.72781
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD20+ CD5+ CellsWeek 48, n=70.0968 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.11682
Secondary

Number of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ Cells

CD23+ CD5+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsDay 1, n=1022.7190 GI/LStandard Deviation 25.17338
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 1, n=917.2018 GI/LStandard Deviation 21.23454
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 2, n=104.5264 GI/LStandard Deviation 6.03353
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 4, n=101.8255 GI/LStandard Deviation 2.49671
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 6, n=100.4714 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.50306
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 8, n=90.2095 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.23907
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 12, n=100.2114 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.27306
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 16, n=100.1866 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.34514
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 20, n=100.1478 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.32088
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 24, n=100.1327 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.23698
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 28, n=90.1035 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.23789
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 36, n=80.2570 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.68983
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood CD23+ CD5+ CellsWeek 48, n=70.1062 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.13388
Secondary

Number of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ Cells

CD19+ CD20+ cells in the peripheral blood were counted as measures of malignant B-cells and were measured by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 4, n=100.0565 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.16699
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 6, n=100.0022 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00258
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsDay 1, n=1033.1140 GI/LStandard Deviation 39.40966
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 1, n=919.6438 GI/LStandard Deviation 35.81756
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 2, n=100.0060 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.01151
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 8, n=90.0006 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00136
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 12, n=100.0006 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00116
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 16, n=100.0003 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00058
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 20, n=100.0005 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00087
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 24, n=100.0002 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00037
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 28, n=90.0003 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.00093
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 36, n=80.2525 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.71266
OfatumumabNumber of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD19+ CD20+ CellsWeek 48, n=70.0914 GI/LStandard Deviation 0.10259
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from the first infusion of investigational drug to death due to any cause.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: All Subjects Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OfatumumabOverall SurvivalNA Weeks
Secondary

Percentage of Bone Marrow Infiltration at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERC

SERC assessed bone marrow infiltration with the bone marrow smears of participants provided by trial sites.

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabPercentage of Bone Marrow Infiltration at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 8, n=857.90 Percentage of bone marrow infiltrationStandard Deviation 23.492
OfatumumabPercentage of Bone Marrow Infiltration at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 16, n=538.04 Percentage of bone marrow infiltrationStandard Deviation 14.647
OfatumumabPercentage of Bone Marrow Infiltration at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 24, n=736.96 Percentage of bone marrow infiltrationStandard Deviation 14.961
OfatumumabPercentage of Bone Marrow Infiltration at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 36, n=629.13 Percentage of bone marrow infiltrationStandard Deviation 17.379
OfatumumabPercentage of Bone Marrow Infiltration at the Indicated Weeks as Assessed by a SERCWeek 48, n=523.26 Percentage of bone marrow infiltrationStandard Deviation 9.651
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by a SERC

PFS is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the first documented sign of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause (whichever occurs earlier).

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: All Subjects Population: only those participants who progressed or died during the study were evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OfatumumabProgression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by a SERCNA Weeks
Secondary

Ratio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig Lambda

Peripheral blood Ig kappa and Ig lambda were measured using flow cytometry. Abnormality of a ratio of Ig kappa and Ig lambda indicates clonality of lymphocytes. A normal range of this parameter is between 1.0 and 3.2.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 16, n=102.150 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 3.8972
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 20, n=102.017 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 3.8733
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 24, n=101.608 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 2.6223
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 28, n=91.647 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 2.3965
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 36, n=81.693 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 1.8636
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 48, n=73.368 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 5.2575
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 12, n=103.799 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 8.8774
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaDay 1, n=1034.710 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 38.2375
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 1, n=936.604 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 36.9383
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 2, n=1015.928 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 26.5203
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 4, n=109.451 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 25.1555
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 6, n=107.263 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 20.3014
OfatumumabRatio of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Kappa/Ig LambdaWeek 8, n=96.427 Ratio of Ig kappa/Ig lambdaStandard Deviation 16.7389
Secondary

Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy as Assessed by a SERC

Time to next CLL therapy is defined as the time from the first infusion of investigational drug to the first administration of the next CLL treatment. CLL therapy includes anti-cancer chemotherapy, anti-cancer radiotherapy, radio-immunotherapy, and antibody therapy.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: All Subjects Population: only those participants who received CLL therapy were evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OfatumumabTime to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy as Assessed by a SERCNA Weeks
Secondary

Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) Following Ofatumumab Administration

Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
OfatumumabTime to Reach Cmax (Tmax) Following Ofatumumab AdministrationDay 1, n=87.208 hr
OfatumumabTime to Reach Cmax (Tmax) Following Ofatumumab AdministrationWeek 24, n=75.250 hr
OfatumumabTime to Reach Cmax (Tmax) Following Ofatumumab AdministrationWeek 7, n=85.225 hr
Secondary

Time to Response as Assessed by a SERC

Time to response is defined as the time from the first infusion of investigational drug to the first response (PR or better).

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: All Subjects Population: only those participants classified as responders for the assessment of objective response were evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OfatumumabTime to Response as Assessed by a SERC8.1 Weeks
Secondary

Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) for Ofatumumab

Vss for ofatumumab was calculated as a ratio of the amount of ofatumumab in the body in equilibrium conditions to steady-state plasma concentrations. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) for OfatumumabWeek 7, n=81333.8 mL
OfatumumabVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) for OfatumumabWeek 24, n=73069.2 mL
OfatumumabVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) for OfatumumabDay 1, n=83667.9 mL
Secondary

Volume of Distribution (Vz) During the Terminal Phase for Ofatumumab

Vz for ofatumumab was calculated as a ratio of the amount of ofatumumab in the body during the terminal phase to the plasma concentration during the terminal phase. Blood sampling on Day 1 and at Weeks 7 and 24 for PK evaluation was performed at the following time points: 0.5 hr before infusion; end of infusion; and 10 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 24 hr (1 day), 72 hr (3 days), and 120 hr (5 days) after infusion of ofatumumab. At Weeks 7 and 24, blood sampling was also performed 168 hr (7 days) and 336 hr (14 days) after infusion of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Day 1; Weeks 7 and 24

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
OfatumumabVolume of Distribution (Vz) During the Terminal Phase for OfatumumabDay 1, n=82754.1 mL
OfatumumabVolume of Distribution (Vz) During the Terminal Phase for OfatumumabWeek 7, n=84774.9 mL
OfatumumabVolume of Distribution (Vz) During the Terminal Phase for OfatumumabWeek 24, n=73999.7 mL
Other Pre-specified

Serum Hemolytic Complement Titer at Weeks 36 and 48: CH50

The CH50 is the serum complement to lyse 50% of sensitized red blood cells; it's is a marker of complement activation. A high CH50 level suggests evidence for complement activation, whereas a low CH50 level suggests lack of complement activation.

Time frame: Weeks 36 and 48

Population: All Subjects Population. Only participants remaining in the study and contributing evaluable data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OfatumumabSerum Hemolytic Complement Titer at Weeks 36 and 48: CH50Week 36, n=845.14 Kilo units per liter (KU/L)Standard Deviation 13.643
OfatumumabSerum Hemolytic Complement Titer at Weeks 36 and 48: CH50Week 48, n=753.70 Kilo units per liter (KU/L)Standard Deviation 11.818

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026