Skip to content

Study of Milnacipran in Patients With Inadequate Response to Duloxetine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Switch Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Milnacipran in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Duloxetine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01077375
Enrollment
107
Registered
2010-03-01
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2012-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Milnacipran, Duloxetine, Switch, Forest Research Institute

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of milnacipran in patients with an inadequate response to duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia.

Detailed description

* Two weeks Duloxetine 60 mg Open-Label Period * Randomization to Double-Blind Treatment Period: 10 weeks Milnacipran (direct switch) or 10 weeks placebo (one week blinded 30 mg duloxetine) * One week Double-Blind Down-Taper Period

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

* Placebo tablets, oral administration, twice daily for 10 weeks during randomized, double-blind treatment period. Duloxetine capsules, oral administration, 30 mg/day for 1 week after randomization to effect a duloxetine down-taper. * Placebo tablets, twice daily for 1 week during double-blind down-taper treatment period.

DRUGMilnacipran

* Milnacipran tablets, 100 to 200 mg/day, oral administration, twice daily in divided doses for 10 weeks during randomized, double-blind treatment period. Placebo capsules, 1 capsule/day administered for 1 week after randomization to maintain double-blind duloxetine down-taper. * Milnacipran tablets, 100 to 0 mg/day, oral administration, twice daily in divided doses for 1 week during double-blind down-taper treatment period.

Sponsors

Cypress Bioscience, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia * Have been treated with a stable dosage of duloxetine (60 mg/day) for ≥ 4 weeks immediately before Screening (Visit 1) * Duloxetine must have been prescribed for the treatment of Fibromyalgia * Have a VAS 1-week pain recall score ≥ 40 mm and ≤ 90 mm * At Visit 2, to be eligible to enter the randomized treatment period, must continue to have a VAS 1-week pain recall score ≥ 40 mm and be dissatisfied with current Duloxetine treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Suicidal risk * History of mania, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, or a current episode of major depressive disorder * Myocardial infarction and/or stroke within the prior 6 months * Systolic blood pressure \> 160 mm Hg or mean diastolic blood pressure \> 100 mm Hg at Screening (Visit 1) * Substance abuse * Pulmonary dysfunction * Severe renal impairment * Active cardiac disease * Liver disease * Uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma * Autoimmune disease * Cancer * Inflammatory bowel disease * Unstable endocrine disease * Prostatic enlargement * Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Responder Status Based on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Visit 5 (Week 13)Assessed at Visit 4 (Week 9) and Visit 5 (Week 13) or early termination. Presented results generated via LOCF approach.The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of improvement in pain sensation and quality of life scored on a scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). To meet the criteria for a responder in this study, patients must report a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the PGIC.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Visit 5 (Week 13) in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1-week Pain Recall ScoreChange from Baseline (Week 3) to Visit 5 (Week 13)The VAS assessment ranges from a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred over an 8 month period from February 2010 to September 2010 at 25 study centers in the United States. Last patient last visit occurred on December 22nd, 2010.

Pre-assignment details

All participants were given an open-label treatment of duloxetine 60 mg once daily for a two week period before randomization. Patients randomized to placebo received 1 week of duloxetine 30 mg to effect a duloxetine down-taper. Patients randomized to milnacipran received 1 week of placebo capsules to maintain the blind.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Double-blind Safety Population: Placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
21
Milnacipran
Double-blind Safety Population: milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 md/day, twice a day in divided doses, oral administration. One patient randomized to the milnacipran treatment group did not take at least one dose of double-blind study drug and was therefore not included in the Double-blind Safety Population.
85
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event215
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy68
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up25
Overall StudyOther Reason01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject06

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboMilnacipranTotal
Age Continuous48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Age, Customized
18 to 59
17 participants77 participants94 participants
Age, Customized
60 to 70
4 participants8 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants85 participants106 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants79 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 2163 / 85
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 212 / 85

Outcome results

Primary

Responder Status Based on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Visit 5 (Week 13)

The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of improvement in pain sensation and quality of life scored on a scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). To meet the criteria for a responder in this study, patients must report a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the PGIC.

Time frame: Assessed at Visit 4 (Week 9) and Visit 5 (Week 13) or early termination. Presented results generated via LOCF approach.

Population: ITT Population: patients in the Double-blind Safety Population with ≥ 1 PGIC post-baseline assessment. Double-blind Safety Population includes 6 patients who were not included in ITT population. Presented results generated via LOCF approach. No statistical comparisons between groups are presented; study was exploratory, not hypothesis-testing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboResponder Status Based on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Visit 5 (Week 13)5 participants
MilnacipranResponder Status Based on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Visit 5 (Week 13)26 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Visit 5 (Week 13) in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1-week Pain Recall Score

The VAS assessment ranges from a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).

Time frame: Change from Baseline (Week 3) to Visit 5 (Week 13)

Population: ITT Population: patients in the Double-blind Safety Population with ≥ 1 PGIC post-baseline assessment. Double-blind Safety Population includes 6 patients who were not included in ITT population. Presented results generated via LOCF approach. No statistical comparisons between groups are presented; study was exploratory, not hypothesis-testing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Visit 5 (Week 13) in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1-week Pain Recall Score-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
MilnacipranChange From Baseline to Visit 5 (Week 13) in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1-week Pain Recall Score-12.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026