Skip to content

Impact of a Decision Aid on Patient Decision Making in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients

Impact of a Decision Aid on Patient Participation in Decision Making and Resource Use in Low Risk Chest Pain Patients: A Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01077037
Enrollment
204
Registered
2010-02-26
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2015-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Brief summary

We are doing a study to assess the impact of including patients in making decision regarding their own medical care in the emergency department. We will randomly assign them to either receive a decision aid or usual care. In doing this, we aim to increase patient satisfaction and safely decrease medical cost.

Interventions

OTHERDecision Aid

Chest pain choice decision aid

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults with a primary complaint of chest pain. * Treating clinician's next consideration is observation unit admission for cardiac stress testing.

Exclusion criteria

* Initial cardiac troponin T value \>99th percentile (\>0.01ng/mL) * History of coronary artery disease * coronary revascularization procedure within the previous 30 days * cocaine use within 72 hours by the clinician's initial history * pregnancy * patient cannot read English or have, in their clinician's judgment, major learning barriers, such as visual or hearing impairment or dementia that would compromise their ability to give written informed consent (or use the decision aid)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient knowledgeImmediately after patient visitPatient knowledge regarding their short-term risk for an ACS and the risks of radiation exposure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of decision making processImmediately after patient visitQuality of the decision making process for the patient and clinician
Satisfaction with decision aidImmediately after patient visitPatient and clinician acceptability and satisfaction with the decision aid
Proportion of patients who decided to undergo observation unit admission and urgent cardiac stress testingDuring the initial ED visitProportion of patients who decided to undergo observation unit admission and urgent cardiac stress testing
Delayed or missed ACS30 daysRate of delayed or missed ACS
Economic costs and healthcare utilization30 daysEconomic costs and healthcare utilization

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026